General Forum

7 out of 7, honestly. They have all been together for quite a number of years as well. Fyi, these are all good friends, people I indeed know very well. I know 3 other married couples who have been divorced...they are all quite happy as well.

Now to be completely honest, upfront and accurate as possible...Of the 7, 3 of those couples are out of town...Way out of town, in each case, so obviously I don't see them too often. Nevertheless...people talk, of course, and all indications are that they are doing fine. The other 4 I see frequently, and while they have their ups and downs, all in all, they seem quite happy.

Of course, we've all heard stories, about the nightmare behind the scenes, that we never knew about....however, I'm pretty darn perceptive, and all I can say, without being a fly on the wall, is that they all certainly seem happy, and I'm convinced that they are.

Do you happen to know the reasons why all those married couples you know got married?

guessing of course,but like most i assume.love,comfort,financial,
desperation,convenience,parental etc.any,all or none of these :--)

Hmm...yep, mostly.

Btw..remembered 2 more out of town couples, that fit. So 9 long term first time, evidently very happy couples. Still 3 happy couples that were formerly divorced.

So I thought about this at some length...wrote down the couples initials, stared at them and looked for common ground, etc. Here's what I came up with. Btw, if you want a more detailed answer, I can give those initials with a comment or two after each. This is in regards to the 9, not the 3 formerly divorced.

So what brought them together. Equally as important, I noticed, and I believe is what did Not bring them together.
Here's what did: Love...truly, they were all, and still are in love. Secondly..in 6 out of 9 casse Religion...didn't bring them together, in and of itself, but was a key factor.
Third: All of the guys, and most of the ladies are easy going people. You could also call that tolerance I guess...they Don't however, let themselves be walked over, but they do have good tact....good diplomacy, even tempers.

Here's what didn Not bring them together:
Money. Most are what I'd call upper middle class...good money, but certainly not rich. Two of the guys were definitely not well off at the time...actually struggling.
Looks. Beauty is all in the eye of the beholder as the saying very correctly goes...and this varies amonst these people naturally...however, I'd pretty safely say that none of the guys are knock-outs. Sure, some are considered fairly attractive, but not overwhelming so. The women: 1 very attractive, 1 fairly attractive, the other 7, definitely not.
Pregnant: Zero. None of them---for sure--100% on this--got married due to pregnancy. 8 of 9 ended up having various amounts of kids later on in marriage--(one couple just didn't want kids at all)--but none were married just because of this.

There you go :) It just so happens that I'm very perceptive, and analytical, so could give you hopefully, a good response. As I originally said, and as someone later restated...they could all just be happy on the surface, and hate each other in private...but I really doubt it. Again...2 things on that...I really am very keenly perceptive, so I would probably figure it out...also as I mentioned...these are very good, long time friends....meaning they are pretty darn open in front of me...they Do have their bad moments, but overall, they are all quite happy. Plus if there were serious problems, the guys would very likely just tell me.
Take care.

Interesting and detailed answer - thanks.
I'm all for love and people choosing to devote the rest of their lives to one another, I'm just curious about marriage in general though. Being a religious institution, and considering that a great many people aren't really very religious in our society today, I just wonder sometimes why couples bother to get married at all. I mean, if a man and woman truly love each other, they don't really need to prove it anyone else by going through that particular ritual, do they?

I wouldn't marry at all. Although I like the idea of wearing a fairy-tale white dress, sexy white lingerie, stockings etc. (once in a life-time would do, especially when you are young and look good )

Perhaps I could marry because of a mutual child. If not- I strictly prefer long-term relationships where partners are faithful to each other and are together because they like it and not because they cannot find someone else.

Other reasons I can think of- tax breaks for married couples and the pressure the society and relatives put on you from a certain age. Shamefully enough, I myself regard men who are 36 and older and have never been married as immature and somehow 'defect' *shame*.

n/a

n/a

n/a

speaking for myself, I have married out of feelings. And the guy is really a dream come true. I like his physical appearance and he is an easy-going person of approx. my age.
The only thing I can complain about- the lack or freedom. I mean, I sometimes cannot do what I like- going to places etc. He is not enthusiastic about some (normal) things I would like to do and this constant judgement is kinda oppressing.

n/a

-Not sure I know of any. My parents have been together for like 30 years- constant arguments with the rare moments of reconciliation.

-My friends got married because of the child; after birth (a couple of years ago) they hardly have sex and constantly argue. Both are well over 30.
- Another couple, well-off,- 30 years together- they hardly bear each other but stay addicted to their strange relationship.

Strangely, ppl who are kinda outsiders, for example a very plump girl and a very thin man- they seem to be happy. (I know 2 couples who seem to be in a relaxed, happy marriage).

n/a

8.2 hetero,4 lesbiam,2 gay & 1 mixed. :--)

emm...excuse me...but 1 mixed...it's gay+lesbian or what o.O ?

8.2 hetero tisme ? Does that mean you don't know the 9th couple very well or should they really be in the mixed category :P

And just to stop anyone pointing it out to me I know he really meant 8 couples and 2 were heterosexual.

n/a

I know some happily married, but all those people didn't have any complicated circumstances: immigrant background/ visa issues, a child from a pervious relationship, past as a camgirl:), financial difficulties.

n/a

For a open minded fair and whole person all those things are really not issues at all!

Let's strongly believe in that and respect ourselves.:)

Just for some people these issues may be the source of dependance on their partner at some points...
of course it all depends on the partner you are with:)

Marriage is first step for divorce... thats why i never agree to marry my wifey, we just happy to live together 14 years, why spoil all this with getting married

I know two couples, they been together for over 25 yrs and they still are happy, they are open honest and faithful to each other, the only time they do anything behind each others back is when they are buying each other something or planning a something special to surprise each other.

they have told each other of fantasies and have also fulfilled fantasies together. Usually when you ask couples individually if they happy or have complaints. these two couples have said when asked together or asked individually if they are truly happy and they always say yes and they say it is because they are so open honest and faithful to each other. They talk about everything and do not go to bed angry with each other. They admit they have had bumpy patches but have worked those bumps out and those bumps in the road have made their relationship stronger..

They still hold hands...they always kissing each other...they trust each other completely...they respect each other...they actually listen to each other and hear each other....and they do not take each other for granted. they did say that there was a time that one of them was not feeling satisfied sexually, so they talked about it and asked what could be done to help and it did help.

they are very much sexual with each other....have gone on trips and camping and I have even stayed with each couple for periods of times during their marriage, the last time being a few months ago, and to my surprise they are as happy together as when they first started out, in fact they seem happier because of what they have built together.

while I am happy for them, it sounds like boring, solid middle-class love life to me.... holding hands, kissing in public, showing understanding... *yawn*

Well maybe that is boring to you, but try sleeping in their home when they are doing more than kissing and holding hands, what you thought I would talk of them making out in public. Well they have done that too, if you read the whole response you would see that they do enjoy more than just the kissing and holding hands. Their sex life is very much alive and active.

Maybe their passion is triggered by the presence of other people.
There are people who like kissing at parties or when they have guests.
That's the question- are they still so much in love alone in their house?

I personally like to see happy couples but not when they constantly touch and kiss- vulgar.

There is nothing vulgar about seeing a couple who have gone thru hell and back, holding hands, giving each other a kisses, telling each other that they love each other, showing each other affection, putting little notes in the lunches that they made for each other for work, or writing little notes on a mirror when one wakes up and heads off to work before the other is awake, as well as other things they do to let the other know they are special. The one couple has suffered thru a great loss that many couples dont recover from and end up splitting up from, but this couple supported each other thru it are still very much together and not just pretending to be happy.
No their passion is not only triggered by the presence of other people. Many times I have come into the house and seen them sitting watcing tv holding hands, or cuddled together watching tv. They do not only do it when they have guests or at parties. You make it sound like they are making out infront of people and that is not so.
As one of the Husbands of the two couples said to someone when he was teased for giving his wife a kiss on the cheek, "if I want to give my wife a kiss on her cheek or even on her mouth and tell her that I love her then I will do so"
I am not sure why you would think that a couple who still hold hands or gives each other a kiss is so vulgar. You make it sound like they are making out and pawing each other in public, and that is not the case.
Maybe you are not the type who wants to have someone show you that they still love you and are happy to be with you, but to me seeing such displays of affection between a couple that have been together for well over 25 yrs. is very refreshing to see and is very rare to see.

Ok, I do not know them. Besides, you sound like a psychologist who analyses couples' behaviour:)

I believe there is a thin line that separates real feelings from showing off in public. I also like it when I am in the mood and my bf holds the door for me, kisses me in public or holds my hand but some ppl overdo it.

Example- a while ago I sat alone on a bench in a park (its spring after all and I like flowers and greenery) and a medium-young couple (around 30 y.o.) sat in front of me on the grass, although there was plenty of free benches or space around and started to kiss.
It is not that I am extremely offended but I have a romantic streak and I would prefer my private moments- sun, music in mp3-player and flowers than watching two intrusive kissing strangers.

No I am not a psychologist nor an analyst of couples. I just happen to know these two particular couples my whole life.

I agree that some couples over do it and some couples just put on a front and I really do not see the point in pretending to be happy, and as for those who over do it well that is their business.

But with these two couples I and those who know them can say they are still happily married. They are not one of those couples that over do it nor do it just because people are around.

It is very rare to find couples that have been married a long time that are truly happily married. I don't know why you are so determined to discredit that I know of two couples who are still happily married, or that it exists.

Just because you don't know any does not mean they don't exist. The thread was started and the question asked. I am simply answering.

If I did not know for sure then I would not have responded to the thread.

I do not know why are you determined to think I am attacking your point of view or question the happiness of the couples.

I am just sitting here and trying to imagine how their relationship functions.
I somehow do not belong to the people who hear something and start to right away exclaim Ohhhh how sweeeeeeeet...together ahhh!
Perhaps because I have been on CC for too long and know of people's sins too much lol:)

For example, if I saw one of the husbands in my chatroom with pants down, I would discredit their happyness. For me personally it would be a shitty deal if my husband came here in order to keep going the romantic happiness in the family.....whatever the circumstances.

I was simply responding to the original posters question... of "How many REALLY happily married (first marriage) couples do you know? I don't know many."

you are the one that started in writing giving the impression that you doubted and you directed it at me and all my responses. my response had nothing to do with anyone being on here, it was simply saying yes I know two couples and that is it wonderful and rare to see people that are Happily married and still in first marriage.

If you had not directed your comments to me and my responses then, I would not have said anything to your comments and just chalked it up to your opinion and what you have seen, simple as that. But then you come up with assuming i am a psychologist and/or an analyzer of relationships.

As far as I am concerned if a person is on here behind their partners back then obviously that person is not in a happy marriage.

ok thanks for that. :--)

n/a

I never said I don't like American hosts. I said I prefer Russian and other eastern European hosts, because I can interact with American women every day, but the only way I can interact with Russian girls is here on cc.

n/a

Yes, completely agree. I also live in USA, and being with these girls, is a nice change of pace from real life. I actually worked with russian girl here for about 6 months, and she was awesome, great girl. Very, very sharp; was going to a private college...very funny, nice person, great work ethic...and yes, also very cute.

Still whoever I have a session with, will be based on all the usual factors: looks, price, what they'll do, etc. So far it has not been a usa girl though; and indeed this is definitely due to availability...usually find about 10 usa girls on, spread across all categories, and roughly 120+ russian ladies. If there were 100+ usa girls, sure I could find someone, but that's just the way it is.

n/a

Great post, and dead on.
Yeah, price as always, matters alot.

English matters quite a bit as well...if I really enjoy a girl, I'll certainly return...and their english does not by any means, have to be perfect, but if they have a translator..and that's sooo obvious when they do..then I will probably not go back, unless everything else was incredibly good.

What else...oh, those two you pointed out..hadn't checked them out until now....neither one is on now, but oh my goodness those are lovely ladies...wow. :) Will have to visit them later if I can.

Anyway, great post...lots of long time members, but always interesting to hear from you long time hosts as well. Take care, have a great one.

n/a

Oh agreed! His original post was regarding Russian and Eastern European hosts vs american specifically...but yes a hot girl is a hot girl, regardless of where she's from.
Heck, if she's smoking hot...she could be a green-skinned girl from Orion, and I'd certainly be happy :)
Seriously though, I have many hot memories of lovely Asian, African American (black), Latin girls, etc. Each very different, but all very lovely.

Thanks for sharing.

Yup, that's what forums are for, otherwise would kinda defeat the purpose :)

Sounds like if you not Russian nor eastern European than you might as well not be here. Well it is good to know. No point in wasting my time here any longer.

Ohhh...I at least, for sure didn't say that, if fact quite the opposite :)

No A Member that was not directed at you that was to the whole post all together..:)

I know...it was just in case you hadn't had a chance to read mine. Well anyway, don't leave. I'm sure you won't, but I, of course, get your point. Hugs. :)

n/a

do you mean recorded video or live show?

live show

Hmmm, this takes a lot of thought. I think I'd have to say, I would like to see a host swinging from the chandelier, doing a double backward flip to the floor, then doing somersaults from one end of the room to the other, dressed in a pink flamingo costume, wearing a Derby Hat, and smoking a cigar.

n/a

How about a full nude show

n/a

And this from a domina, lol.

n/a

You are a dungeon host.

Dungeon is for both Dominas and subbies. What's your point?

Are you her spokesperson?

what's YOUR point? She made a comment, didn't try to answer for 1badbabe

n/a

Im amazed you haven't gotten a ton of genuine responses. You are very intelligently and sincerely asking...basically at it's core, why people are here. You pay money to see a show, so what would you like out of that show...I always respect hosts that ask these questions, and it's just plain smart to do so.

Anyway...my answer: Uniforms, costumes, sexy dresses. Those can all be sexy as hell, and are not ...common. So: seeing you in cheerleader outfit, schoolgirl, maid, etc all can be very, very sexy. Also, one of those real nice, short, low cut dresses, very hot.

One other thing: sexy talk can be great. Use your imagination...tell me what sexy things you'd do to me if I was there, or what you'd like me to do to you, etc. ...only if you have audio though; effect is mostly lost in text. But if you know how to talk sexy, that's great...I can give you things to say in session, but better of course, if you can come up with them on your own.

Great post, I think. Thanks for asking it. Take care.

n/a

n/a

Ahhh..be creative :)
Schoolgirl: Plaid skirt and solid white blouse...though any color would do.
Nice dress: Just 1 item. Dosen't even have to be all that nice, just short and sexy.
Sexy Secretary or Schooteacher: Skirt, nylons, blouse...maybe a blazer as well. Glasses if you have them.
You must have some of these things. Or not, but I'm guessing you do. So if you wish, have fun with it.
See ya. Have a good one, stay positive :)

most of us have items in our closet..to make a outfit..like a secretary, student, nice dress for an evening out...you don't have to wear it all the time online, just once in a while.. it is amazing what one can put together with every day clothes in our closet...just about every female has a short skirt...even school girl can be a pleated skirt doesn't have to plaid..

If you work at home & have a laptop and a balcony, or hidden spot in a garden, it would be nice to see you acting in daylight. That`s what i am looking for.

Along similar lines, I once saw an amazing show on another site where the host was performing using her laptop with built-in cam, in a hotel lobby. Wouldn't be allowed here, because of the rule about unregistered persons appearing on cam: it was a busy lobby, and a very daring show.

what did she do in lobby? strip? lol

lol...no, that would have drawn to much attention to herself. The only thing she wasn't wearing was knickers, and she'd positioned herself so the table and laptop monitor itself obsucred what she was doing from the people in the lobby; but the camera itself clearly showed her playing with herself, whilst the mic picked-up all the innocent conversations going on around her. And once or twice she had to just discreetly position a newspaper to further conceal things from public view, but not that of the viewers online. It was all very erotic.

n/a

other high rises? Hey, they'd probably enjoy the show too (with some binoculars maybe) :D

No offence, but this doesn't conform to my definition of "interesting" either.

Yeah. That kind of sucked.

Mr Dillon, Mr Dillon.

2004 so I guess I have no life and I'll probably stay until the day I die so no point in me getting a life. But I have to agree that your post wasn't really any more interesting than the other posts but at least you are trying.

n/a

Further off topic:
What is it with chicks and star tattoos these days?

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

the us girls are usually higher priced. And some "usa" girls are really in Europe! Look at the time on their profiles and also the electical outlets sometimes visible behind them in the wall

n/a

not sure about this ip address as a locator as lilstar lists USA as country of origin and she'sRussian. There is another I cannot recall did the same listing USA but when she returned to Russia changed over.

n/a

n/a

Yeah, plus supply and demand, there are so few of you girls, vs say Russian where there's like 130 or more at any given time. Good English..with of course, no translator, is certainly a big plus as well.

On other side of coin though, Romanian girls ...at least that I've encountered, speak great english. Last couple of sessions were with them in fact.
Anyway, take care.

n/a

n/a

Yeah, some of you russian girls do fine with english...I wish in many cases, that translators were not needed, but that's not everybody, and just the way it is.

It's true too, that many europeans speak several languages, while most of us usa people have a hard enough time just with english :)
Actually, I have several friends who speak multiple languages, but that's not common.

As far as what you see in your room though at times...all I know, is that sometimes in my case I hit a wrong key, because I'm trying to hurry and it's ..um...dark :) lol.

Anyway, I think you guys are great, and much respect.
Take care.

I'm not Russian :)

There are mistakes that cannot be blamed on the "it's dark" :P like the huge difference between "your" and "you're", "they're" and "their"...and so on, and so forth.
There are typos, clearly, but there are also real mistakes. I am not going to poke fun at anyone, I was just pointing that we're not far inferior to the English native speakers. That's all :)

You take care too, you sound like a nice guy :)

Yes I have to admit that I do sometimes make the your and you're mistake. I think it's because I pronounce them the same (and I'm to lazy to concentrate). The one that always jumps out at me is using loose for lose. Again probably because I pronounce them differently.

n/a

So you grade a member's English skills in your pvt. Would that be considered a fetish?

n/a

Do you mean you criticize members' spelling and grammar while they are in your paid videochat? And if so, would these members be considered money slaves we read so much about in profiles and in this forum?

n/a

Completely agree with Miss T :)
Seriously, she was polite, and not for a second did I see her as being cruel or attacking anybody.

I didn't assume anything. I only asked a question. Really I was just curious. I have some hosts I know tell me some real wild stories about some of the viewers they have had in pvt over the years. And I see you post all the time and you appear to be very well versed a handling your customers in your pvt. And if I don't ask, I'll never know the answer to any questions I may have.

n/a

"But no, I do not make fun of the guys that I have in chat or in private"

Ok, I understand now. I have read profiles where certain hosts advertise for viewers that like to be made fun of in pvt. It's their thing I guess. And hosts that perform these kinds of shows are only doing what the customer requests. And it's only good business acumen to be diversified to appeal to a wide customer base. And I'm sure you would agree with that premise.

n/a

"And I'm not into "I would do anything for money either". Which would explain why I have time to spend here :)"

Well yes of course. I was only saying that any business tries their best to appeal to the widest segment of buyers of whatever it is they sell. I am well aware of the workings of hosts in the Glamour category. And I'm only being honest when I say, it's not for everyone. But to some, you are the perfect choice.

When people confuse "to" and "too", that one really bothers me two.

Yeah, later It hit me...she didn't say Russian in there at all, I just assumed that. You can't edit afterwards either. I thought about quickly adding a correction reply, but it was 5am here , so I just fell asleep. :)

But chu know, now dat I be thinking mo straite, I don't c any indicatshun of problems with are enlish, so I shore ain't gonna do nuthin about it. :p

And yes, I do try to be nice, thanks. Wanna go out? Kidding...that be a whole nother topic right thar as I'm sure you know. he he. This messed up english thing can be kind of fun.

Have a good one, stay positive.

n/a

That's lolcat-english ;)

I agree. I remember being in comm chat and a member was belittling a host for using incorrect English. I gave the definition of what she had said to show that she was, in fact, correct. Unfortunately she thought I was also joining in belittling her and gave me an angry response :P

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

You've seriously been attacked Just for your nationality? Wow, that is Way beyond dumb...that's archaic and pathetic. Sorry about that.
Wasn't me, of course, but it sure goes to show how many real backwards thinking idiots are out there.
Later.

n/a

n/a

Agreed, though on flip side of the coin, having been on this site for several years, I have run across many, many european hosts clearly using translators, which definitely detracts from the show.

It's also true that most europeans speak multiple languages, while many americans struggle with just their own. Further evidence of our education system in decline. It's just a simple, unfortunate fact.

As far as poor english when visiting your rooms, in my case at least...as hot as some of you girls are, I have a hard time just remembering my name, let alone typing coherent sentences. :)

Anyway, I both like and respect you guys very much. Take care.

It is amazing the reasons one will invoke to see oneself worthier and superior to another. Ego at it’s best! Unfortunately, it is also an ego trap. It is living by comparison. From this perspective, there will always be that someone, seen by the ego, as a bit more superior, that will ultimately make one, feel inferior within its own superiority. We all have different talents :)
Just a thought...
:)

n/a

n/a

I choose not to engage in a confrontation with you along the lines of: “you said this”, I said that”. However, please do read your initial post, with a “fresh pair of eyes” and see what it implies.
:)

n/a

Another catfight, sweet! Hold that pose girls, gonna go get some popcorn. For goodness sakes just...kiss and makeup...or makeout...or something. Damn. It's getting hot in here.

Just kidding, having some fun :) Smile ladies....or I'll have to spank you.

n/a

"I am in Fetish. I'm willing to do traditional shows if it's wanted, though my "normal" shows are suited for Glamour Girls, not Instant Action or the like."

A non nude host. Just as in Glamour, nudity is NOT required in Fetish.

n/a

I just call them as I see them. What you do or don't do is your choice. I never said it was a flaw. But there are some of us more traditional pervs that enjoy seeing naked girls. I was only pointing out that he hosts in Fetish are not obligated to do a nude show, the same as it is for Glamour and little shy in softcore. That is a fact, not an opinion.

So why badger the girl by pointing out the obvious; something she already knows.

n/a

You're welcome. I never said it was a bad thing. Some things you think are obvious are not obvious to all who may read this forum. You stated very clearly your "show" when you said "But if you want an eloquently-speaking Mistress, then I'm your girl. Just because I'm not quite your "thing", that doesn't mean I'm any less popular with others. "

Some new viewers may think that Fetish, since it is in hardcore, that hosts are required to do nude show and they are not. They can if they choose just as the hosts in Glamour and little shy.

n/a

Yeah...was wondering if you were going to see and / or respond to that.

I almost did earlier. Would've been basically this:
Another Member
" Just looks at American Girl, smiles, laughs, and sadly shakes his head"

Meaning of course, some people just don't get it do they? :) Even though I thought you were very clear from word one. And certainly in the last one...very well stated.
Take care, AG.

n/a

"If all they care about is nudity, then they should even be in our category."

I think you meant to say not be in our category and I agree. I have seen postings over time where viewers complained of a host not getting naked in Fetish or requiring he take them to 121 for a nude show. And the hosts in Fetish as in softcore are NOT obligated to ever do a nude show. As you mentioned the slaves and their dominas, there are also hosts that do nail shows and many other non nude shows. Yes hosts can do the hardest hardcore show on earth if they choose, but are under no obligation to do so.

n/a

I know the answer. But I'm gonna have to open another thread later.

n/a

I love the way, in your scheme of things, hosts seem to have no minds of their own and are but merely respondents to stimuli -- "But if hosts get member chatters in their rooms on a regular basis, they tend to start thinking all or at least most members only want to talk in pvt."

"If I were a host, I'd do the same thing as having long talks in pvt mean much more money in their bi weekly check." -- But you aren't a host, and even if you were and this is how you would respond, how can you say other hosts would as well? Are you not an individual? Are they not individuals?

"So chatters do drive the price up and performance down site wide in my opinion." -- And can you show us the statistical evidence of this? Or is this just your own opinion?

"But like it or not, it appears to me that CC's formula has worked very well for the site . . . So if it ain't broke, don't fix it." -- I wasn't criticizing CC or suggesting CC change anything. My beef is with a certain member (or members) who insist on labeling us who like mostly to chat as "slaves/sissy boys."

"And viewers who like to see naked girls, get your Google on, there is no shortage of those sites on the net." That is true, but I fail to comprehend the need for this statement. There is enough here for everyone, so why send them anywhere else?

No I never said hosts have no mind of their own. They do indeed and for the most part are good business women. If a host in IA only talks with a viewer, if that is what he wants, she is only doing what her paying customer wants. I have seen first hand viewers simply taking with hosts in IA. The hosts are just trying to meet the market and satisfy the needs of their paying customers. There is no rule on cc that prohibits viewers and hosts simply just talking in pvt even in IA.

n/a

My beef is with a certain member (or members) who insist on labeling us who like mostly to chat as "slaves/sissy boys."

Hmm....ImUrMrNiceGuy, I have not seen this. Since you obviously have no problem showing context from previous posts, please show evidence of this. Any evidence. Apparently you ran across this several times, so it should not be a problem. I am merely a skeptic at this point, not saying anything against you...or anyone else. So please show evidence would be very much appreciated.

n/a

n/a

n/a

You Go girl! Yes, god forbid someone post not perfectly in place; happens all the time :)

I'm not "Uhh" but I hope you know that my criticism earlier was not addressing your use of the terms "slave and sissyboy." This is not what I was objecting to. The context in which you use the terms is appropriate.

n/a

I think that sissyboy slave should lose his money however he likes.
Who are we to judge the poor fool?

Fuck dude. That hurts my mind's eye.

n/a

I love finding women like you, who are usually Dom, and turning them into little slave girls for me pleasure! It is much more fun than start with a sub girl, no challenge there.

n/a

n/a

"p.s. not all dominas hang out in dungeon (hint, hint) :P"

You got that right. They are in every category. CC has become Domina Central.

Thing is I can't find no 'elle' in Glamour. So if you want to let me be the man showing you some tricks, little one then you should either hint hint more or CCMail me!
Maybe you have a slight chance that I will be generous enough to visit your little room, missy.
Apology accepted for your missdemeanor, but I will still have to punish you for that. And you will like it. I know that. All do.

n/a

Ok well done. You have my attention.

I don't understand this marketing trick getting us interested but not telling us your name. This doesn't work that way. You have a good idea but the execution is a little fucked up.
I am not jumping in and out Glamour profiles to get me blocked and voted 1min guy of the year or 'public enemy no1'. Remember that you were complaining about that!

And I cannot find any hints in your other posts. If there is even just only one 'elle'. So either write it in your profile or give us a hint here 'elle'. 
Or does any of the viewers know more and care enough to give me a hint? CCMail appreciated. Maybe we work together on this?

n/a

You'd better be careful. If you don't tell these guys who you are they just might tell you to go to elle :P

n/a

n/a

you just need a strong, slow hand. Elle, I bet when you do fing that man both of you will be cats in heat.

n/a

so Elle, and more hints? category? country? The car you drive?

n/a

You could also search in that category with the 7 for elle.

n/a

n/a

n/a

Hell yeah! I'm there :) You guys are great, wish I did know who you are, would love to visit your rooms someday, but I think you are indeed wise to keep id's secret. Maybe someday cc will allow you to mail us directly again without visiting you first.

That sounds like Heaven! Where can I get my ticket? :)

n/a

n/a

n/a

Ok. I take that challenge.

Your spelling of of wannabies brought me to the band ELLEgarden. So the hint is hidden in those lyrics?

SSGB the G was a joke? Or do you know each other?
So the other question remains. You have dark long straight hair?

So give us at least a chance to visit you and reward you for your little game!

n/a

n/a

Actually I dont play the game, as i didnt get any your hints. lol But I often see one host online, with elle in her nick, so i thought that's maybe you.

... yet you call yourself a "girl". that's not very, uhm, female supremacist of you. hahaha

Oh Gosh, this is going to be a fun thread lol

Come on, Monika, you can do better than that. Get off that cute little butt of yours and say something controversial. Stir things up a little, please. These forum posts of late are putting me to sleep.

n/a

at least was smart enough to use his real screen name ...imagine the emails

I'm confused. Are you a sissy, a slave, a man or a boy?

well no, not ALL men. every strong, powerful woman's hidden desire, is to find her male counterpart. unless she's a lesbian. or has other issues.

"or has other issues"

Yeah like Andrea Dworken, Margaret Sanger, Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg et al.

Dworkin was an extreme feminist, which makes sense given the abuse she's experienced from men. add her time as a prostitute to that, etc. of course she had issues.
anyway, why would you enumerate the names of FEMINISTS you happened to stumble across, when the discussion was about female superiority/female supremacy, which has nothing to do with feminism.

"why would you enumerate the names of FEMINISTS you happened to stumble across, when the discussion was about female superiority/female supremacy, which has nothing to do with feminism."

I didn't stumble across those names, they are very well known. And feminism is about female supremacy. Only a mangina or sissy boy would argue it is anything else.

n/a

Anyone can post on Wikipedia. And that stated objective of any movement is not always what it really wants to do. There are comparisons between feminism and Marxism. Do some more reading.

n/a

n/a

I may not always agree with every single word Adayla says, but she is clearly very sharp, and she is always polite as well. I always look forward to seeing what she has to say.

Yes. Sharp and a nice. Adayla is always smiling and enjoying herself. Makes you lose track of time if you explore all her different sides. Also the not so polite one. She is everybody darling just at the surface. A minx if you get to know her better and make her feel comfortable. Then you might wake her hidden dark kinky side! Especially if she switches her Adayla profile to Glamour for a private like last night. 
And then you get all what you ever dreamed of and more for a grande finale. 
Too sad that her exclusive profile is not so exclusive anymore. Always felt special and honored cumming to the regular bonus treatment.

n/a

n/a

I think she was being sarcastic referring to wikipedia. It appears he is only spouting biases, rather than bothering to state facts regarding feminism. While some feminists may in fact see themselves as being superior, the primary thrust of feminism is about equality of opportunity and respect. (Can I use the word "thrust" in a conversation about feminism?)

n/a

n/a

"I think she was being sarcastic referring to wikipedia."

And you know what she is thinking, how?

Okay, smart alec. READ MY LIPS: I said, "I THINK she was being sarcastic" Nothing about knowing what was in her mind.

n/a

Amen my brother!

"Amen my brother!"

And how do you know "critical person" is your brother?

Or do you have the ability to see who is actually posting, how?

See, I can be just as smart alecky as you :D

WOW, Feminism is about Female Supremacy...
No, buddy, that would be FemiNAZIsm. OK? Bad troll is bad.

n/a

He he, you bet it is, missy!
And you wanna know what else I find particularly interesting?
The way genuinely intelligent, educated hosts, bring out the inferiority complex in some people. Just one extra reason to enjoy being here=))

n/a

n/a

...HOW ABOUT 'NO'?!?!

grow up will you

Slaves: this is a refrence to members who enjoy being with Dominatrixes. Sissy-boys refers to members who enjoy humiliation. Doms will even use the term Slave in their teaser heading and in their profile. I have never seen either term in refrence to members who just enjoy chatting.
Members who enjoy sexual sessions with hosts...never having been on a date, kissed a girl, etc. To be fair, there are many, many people who would say it is beyond pathetic to actually pay money merely to talk to a girl.
Personally, I say there is nothing wrong with Either one :) To each their own. Just trying to show both sides. If you're not hurting anyone, do what you will is what I say.
Nobody likes to be attacked...but in this case, there dosen't seem to be one. I at least have never seen those terms used in a negative manner to describe members who enjoy chatting. Take care.

I disagree, and in fact think you are being disingenuous. The terms may have a precise definition, but they are used repeatedly in the forums in a more generic sense as a term of criticism rather than identification. The OP is bang on the money. Btw, why do so many people feel it necessary to draw attention to the length of their membership, as if that somehow bestows credibility on their postings!

Thank you, Plantagenet. You have hit the nail right on the head. Whether or not Member-long time was being disingenuous, or just plain naive, or even hasn't seen all the critical, name-calling posts in which members such as myself are blasted as "slaves" and "sissy-boys", he clearly missed the mark in his comments.

Member-long time, I clearly know the definitions which you have given. I wasn't born yesterday. In fact the thread a little ways below this one uses those terms as they are intended. I was not referring to her thread, but the ongoing barrage by a certain member (or members) which has filled these forums for quite some time now. Re-reading through the forums today, it just p-o'd me to no end, and so I spoke out.

Long time member, etc...generic, simple, and accurate. Credibility...who cares. A member is a member, all views are valid.

As stated previously...if those statements are out there...directed at members who merely chat..I haven't seen them. Dosent mean they are not there, just that I haven't seen them. I Have however seen Doms refering to their own Slaves in a negative way...ie "who cares what my slaves think"...but that's all but expected...just continuing to play the game. Harmless.

Ironically, what clearly Was negative, was the OP slam against goodness knows how many members...couldn't get a date if their life depended on it.

Oh well. No worries for me, I do fine in real life, and certainly have fun here as well...I guess I just know too many attorneys...enjoy arguing more than I should :)

Sure...but so long as you don't confuse validity with merit.

n/a

Accusations have definitely been made by implication. There were threads a while back complaining about members who did not request adult hosts to strrip so that when the posters jumped into the video session they did not already find the host naked.

Amen my brother

n/a

n/a

Hmm, since there are only about 10 USA hosts on at a time, after a comment like that, I think I'll just avoid all of them.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Nope never.

However, I wondered about why guys would do that...figured they just came real quick...then I had 4 different hosts in a row that practically put me to sleep, a couple that didn't look at all like their pictures...and what reminded me of this, a couple with instantly bad attitudes...so for those who complain about 1min men, such as yourself, perhaps look in the mirror...a little bit of self reflection might be in order.

What prompted my reprimanding response in the first place...while initially you were at least admiralbly attempting to defend someone, you then went on to say..."I think those guys are probably bitter and jealous that they don't have the money to do any more than visit a host at a low price who barely speaks English, quickly stroke their cock, cum, then get out of there."

Sounds...just possibly...derogatory towards...god forbid...members who come to a sex site to enjoy sex...possibly don't have have much money...by all means, let's put people down for that...and now just for good measure, lets belittle your fellow hosts, because some of them may not speak perfect english.

So in order to avoid a negative experience, it seemed wise to just avoid an individual who could be so easily negative in the first place...and worse, do it so easily that they were not even aware of it.

I come here to see naked girls but that certainly does not make me a minute man. Most of my videos are between 45 minutes and 2 hours.

My answer to your question "If you can afford chatting longer then why not do it?" is quite simply I can do that for free in the real world. What I can't get is those same sexy young girls to get naked for me.

Oh and most of the hosts have very good English skills.

So, you did a web search for "nice conversation" and it directed you to this sex site?

n/a

Agree completely, 100%

I'm sorry, but you completely missed the point of my post. Please re-read it.

n/a

The part about the anger, I understood. It was the rest of it that seemed like you didn't really understand what I was saying. Anyway.... your point is taken :)

"And I am sick and tired of coming to these forums and seeing guys like me referred to as "slaves" and "sissy boys" by narrow-minded, pig-headed jerks who probably couldn't get a date with a real girl if their life depended on it!"

Then stop coming to the forums!

Excuse me? Is that your response to everyone who doesn't like something? Stop doing it? Stop coming to the forums? Did it ever occur to you that I may enjoy the forums in general, but this one particular aspect of it I despise?

"Excuse me? Is that your response to everyone who doesn't like something?"

No, I was only saying it to you.

Well my previous answer still stands. It's not the forum I dislike. It's what certain members have said. Why should I stop enjoying something I enjoy, just because of a few jerks? Rather speak my mind -- or is that not allowed?

Ok I understand. You think only posts you approve of should be in this forum. At the top of this forum it does say FREE SPEECH. I may disagree with you and others but would never want to censor your right to free speech. But it seems you would like to censor me.

Excuse me? I never once said anything about anyone not being able to post anything. I said it made me angry. Angry enough to post a reaction to it. You are most certainly entitled to say whatever crap you want to say, of course, but I am equally entitled to be pissed when it is directly (or indirectly) directed at me, and others who share my approach.

No one is calling for censorship here. You are putting words in my mouth that I never said, nor implied.

No, I do not want to censor you. However, I would like to punch you in the mouth! haha (just joking)

The sad thing is that you, like so many in our day, claim "freedom of speech" as the license to do or say what they want, without regard or respect for others. You want your "right" to say whatever you want, but don't give a crap about others' "rights" not to be abused or misrepresented.

But the truth is, there is no absolute freedom -- ever. There are always limitations. Even CC limits the "freedom of speech" they promote -- no SPAM, no posting in the wrong forum, and of course, as we all know, no anything they decide is not conducive to a good forum.

Obviously, from your comments, you are the "certain member" to whom my anger was directed. I suggest you might want to practice some self-limitation of your "right" to free speech.

So, is this the kind of scintillating conversation you pay for when you vid with hot chicks online?

first of all, I don't chat with chicks. I chat with women.
second of all, what I chat about is none of your business.
third of all, why should you care?

While it is completely up to you how you spend your money I have always wondered why someone whose "sexual desires are met in more wholesome ways than whacking off in a videochat session. " cannot also chat to the people who are fulfilling those desires.

As I said above, I can chat to young sexy women all day at work or on nights out, but I cannot get any of them to strip naked for me.

No disrespect to you, INYF, because I have always enjoyed your posts, but in this case you are mincing words.

I'm not restricting anybody from anything. Personally, I enjoy the chatting. If someone else wants to see gals naked and/or stroke in the process, that is their prerogative.

Amen my brother. You are the man INYF!

n/a

n/a

n/a

"All the new added features u enumerated dont take anything from a host"

I disagree. 2 way cam and voice added to what a host has to do. For some talking is harder than typing in a 2nd language and then they have to look at member cam and can not focus on what they do as much. But again, as I stated, I am not suggesting cc ad free video or anything else. CC can go back to its origins with no full screen, mail or c2c and I will not complain. I have never asked nor suggested they change anything back in 2000 and not doing so now.

n/a

"and by the way, in my humble opinion, cam2cam only made communication/interaction easier :)"

Maybe for you and some other hosts, but I know hosts that have had issues with it. But again, I have never suggested any changes or upgrades. But all business has to modernize to keep up with it competitors. Back in the early 20th Century many businesses sold carriages for horses, but then we got the horseless carriages and we all know how that turned out.

n/a

Good, interesting point. Would be kinda like you against the world, huh? Having been in a ton of rooms, it IS like that sometimes..host and a bunch of guys, several of which are beggars...must get sooo old. Don't know how many times I've seen something like: "show tits baby, and I take you private." Yeah right.

I just like to see the girl real quick, and if I like what I see, I always ask the same one or two questions: "...do you have sound, could you just say hello or something?" (having been lied to about this before) 2. "...so where you from?" (particularly if they Do have sound, I can now get an idea how good their english is). For me, that's it...if everything's good, then it's off to private :) Oh...if they're not showing their face, I'll ask to see that.

Anyway, I can certainly see getting nervous knowing, that all eyes are on you, and there are 20-25 of em. Heck, I've seen rooms, where there's 100-300 people watching the host. I've also been in rooms where it simply dosent say how many people are in the room at all, so you have no idea...only indication is by visible chat.

I think it all boils down to this: Most members..not all perhaps, but certainly most would like this feature, and conversely most hosts would not; so I doubt it will ever happen.

That comparison is not valid.
The one's on those sites who don't see more money are the ones sitting on their ass doing nothing or have a bitchy attitude towards the viewers. There's usually only a handful of people in their room. There are few hosts from here who are in that category on those sites.
They aren't doing more work for less money; they're just making their worth.

The ones who put a little effort into it (ie, not acting like a statue, not ignoring the viewers, not acting like an entitled bitch) can easily draw people into paid privates and keep a flow of tips going to them in public, and actually make some money for their time.
They are also making their worth... for the most part. There are, of course, always exceptions.

Plus, if those hosts sitting alone in their room would..or were able to...lower their price..they very likely would not be sitting there alone.

n/a

$4 a minute , try $6 a minute for the free site.

Yes it is $6 for pvt but only $1 for Group show of 3 and I've countless free shows in public video and sometimes tipped and others times did not tip.

n/a

Nope, none!
:)

n/a

n/a

Almost never. Like maybe once or twice a year on some random site, because something caught my eye; otherwise no, not at all.

Never thought about it, but here's the reason: on this site I actually interact directly with people...obviously video chat sessions with hosts...and topics, and discussions in these forums, might ultimately affect the quality of those sessions. Though mostly not I guess, because god forbid we change Anything about cc :)

n/a

There are various reasons why hosts do not want free publice video but I am sure the main one is that this would require them to be chatting and active as a host in front of cam the whole time. With the present system a host can do her personal stuff either on the computer or off it when there is no one in video as long as she is close enough to the computer to get to it within a couple of seconds of someone entering video.

I am a huge fan of public video...because as a viewer you get to see exactly what you'll be getting, and also get a very good idea of personality, and therefore performance quality.

Also, it is possible with some systems I've seen, for the host to take a break, and the screen says exactly that...words to the effect: "Taking a short break be right back."

Hosts don't like...probably even Hate dealing with all the beggars, and I don't blame them. That would get sooo old, in about 5 min let alone, for several hours. That's why you also need a good system for kicking, and banning...an easy way to take out the trash, so to speak.

Other systems I've seen have a nice option: It lets the host record a quick teaser at the start of her shift, which she can shift between that, and live view whenever she wants. You see whichever view the host has selected, live or teaser, just by puting your cursor over the hosts picture. When she goes in private, the teaser automatically goes on. Often the teaser will be what gets me in the room if done well.

So yeah, I'm all for it, big time. I'd say this site definitely has the best prices...it's the only one I'm aware of with both a forum and community chat. The one major element it's missing is public video..if it had that, it would be the best site Period in my opinion..but the lack of it, is definitely a strike against from a viewers perspective.
So cmon, cc update and be Number One. :)

n/a

Yesterday a host called Butterflly had open price $7 and 121 $11.98

n/a

n/a

So does that mean members come here looking for same show for less money?

n/a

IF....and if it Dosen't raise the price? If this feature was added, why go to any other site...this feature would put cc on a level playing field with the other sites...however, they would stand alone on the issue of price, having the lowest by far. It's therefore very likely, that cc would see quite the increase in memberships, and so have no reason to raise prices...especially since having the lowest prices around, is primarily what drew most members here in the first place.

n/a

Ahhh, I see, so let's be crystal clear...we're not saying cc would raise it's prices, but rather, that You would raise Your prices.
Well, fortunately not all hosts are you. I'm quite sure that given the change discussed, many hosts would leave their prices the same, and just enjoy the increase in clients.

n/a

Just wondering; how do we know that single feature would have anything to do with raising the price? I mean, I'm not a software engineer, but would there be any cost to maintain a feature like that? Wouldn't all the cost be just in the development and implementation? Of a program which has already been developed? How expensive could it be? I've worked at plenty of places where the computer guys changed part of our programs...sometimes very significantly, and there wasn't any major expense, they just did it.

n/a

Why should CC change to be like the MANY other sites out there? The way it is works, if it aint broke don't fix it.
I see so many people complaining over the years, it makes me laugh, simple answer is this, if you are not happy with the way this site is, and as many have stated, they go to numerous other sites,why not just stay on the other sites?

n/a

n/a

So actually they are deathly afraid it will raise the price, and tire them out. :)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

why didn't you post it below, why start a new tread about it, we all get the picture whom your favorites are

Why isn't this in the Viewer Forum. Looks like advertising by hosts themselves or studio boss.

n/a

n/a

n/a

I personally prefer long hair. Been with and enjoyed plenty of sexy, cute, short haired girls though as well.
Not much for girls with buzz head, mohawk, etc though. However, hair is very important, but still just one part of the whole package..so even if I hate the hair, if the face is beautiful, and you have a hot bod, then I still might be interested. Odds are I won't visit that person though, because I can probably just find someone else who has all 3 of those things that fit my tastes.
Btw...I'm not one of the slaves...have no problems with bad ass girls though...but just don't find some of the extreme hairstyles sexually appealing...to me. Take care. :)

I like normal hair colors,and normal styles, not anything wild or outlandish

I am not a member, but given I've been trolling cam sites for a long time, I can say that as long as the hairstyle really suits you and your personality, nothing can go wrong, traffic-wise. I change hairstyles and colours quite often, too. I had the sort of dark base with red/purple highlights you are talking about, and most of My guys loved it, both regulars and new visitors.

n/a

Do members notice hair? I'm a bit bald on top of my head and show myself from mid forehead down. Ironically I've had a few people say nice hair only seeing the end of my locks lol and no one ever asked to see anything hair related.

lol I doubt it comes from host ))

half bald woman? it's happen to men often after 30, to women very seldom. by the way u can use wigs or lengthen hair in salon if u r a woman u should know it. ;)

I didn't think a domina worried about how she appeared to her slaves. She owns them. Why worry about hairstyles?. Why worry about anything?

n/a

n/a

Wow you know how to pump up members' egos.

n/a

wow, you wont hear this often from a host.. unless they're trying to milk your wallet

This host at least has some nice memories she can share with us. Have you ever had a successful vid (unless youre into humiliation ofc) where the hist DIDNT like your nice age, your eyes, your witty sweet banter and your elegant way of getting around to the business of depriving her of her pants which are already wet from your delicious teasing

LOL, so true if a member is not a complete asshole.

yeh sure but tickle anything else?

(he kiss french)??

n/a

Soooo busted

Great question, and this is sooo easy for me, and I think a good message to all hosts....
My all time favorite cam girl...By Far..Every session was Awesome...of course is long gone...and I won't give her name, even though it's all good..I very much respect privacy...sure she wouldn't mind, but anyway...
Was simple..Every time, she had a Very passionate performance..was just simple masturbation with her toy..but god did she get into it..she really, really enjoyed herself all the way through, and just exploded..it was amazing, and awesome. Now the thing is..currently..the last 4 host in a row I've had...nice girls, etc...but sorry to say, their "hot performances" were just dead, practically put me to sleep...no worries, I was nice to them, and maybe they just don't have ...passion...and no I haven't set my standards too high, based on this other girl..I mean, I practically wanted to ask these people if they were even alive...that would be cruel, so of course I didn't, obviously, but you get the point.
I'm not trying to be mean..I just want the point to be clear...so if you don't have that within you, so be it...but if you do..or even if you're a good actress...maybe this girl in the past was acting..I seriously doubt it..if so, she was a Great actress :) but even if she was acting, I could care less, because damn it was hot..far better than masturbating, yet at the same time showing zero excitement in your actions...appearing like you're wondering about when you can get your nails done again or whatever.
So just give me a hot, hot performance...which of course, most of you claim you will do...but if you really can do that, then any of you who does will be in my list of best all time sessions.
Btw, to be fair, and positive, not all have been horrible..just the last 4....but some have been pretty darn good..say 4 stars...so good job..still looking for that 5 star performance out there though. :) Take care all. Be nice to each other out there.

n/a

well the site can do that but then just like the other categories there will be hosts that will not follow the rules anyway...lol

amen

I'm always polite to you guys...sorry again for the creeps you have to deal with...but in answer to your question...plenty of hosts in those softcore categorys, indicate in their profiles that they will indeed strip and put on a show. Usually it's not stated that specifically...ie I will strip, and give you hot show...buy it's clear enough. So therefore guys will ask...including me....though evidently I'm a bit more polite...if you say no, then that's it. But that's why...because plenty of hosts in softcore hint that they will strip, etc...so if it's not crystal clear one way or another in the profile, the only way to find out is to ask.
Stay positive we appreciate you :)

She was talking about non-Adult not softcore. To answer the question - some members like the idea of tasting "forbidden fruit". Getting a non-adult girl to strip counts as this.
Also there are certainly non-adult hosts who are prepared to switch categories. Regular members notice these hosts in other categories from time time time. To me it is legitimate to ask a host if she is ever in other categories but there is no excuse for being rude or pushy about this.

Whoops, my bad. I'm normally so perceptive :) Non adult. In any case, agree completely. Isn't there a saying..forbidden fruit is the sweetest? Certainly no harm in asking if host does other categories..but again, no is no.

n/a

Unfortunately neither I nor other members who are polite and can read category guidelines have no control over the morons who are morons and can't nor choose not to read category guidelines.

I think the saying is: Forbidden fruit dies a slow, simmering death, rotting alone on its diseased, stinking vine... something like that. I can't remember the exact phrasing.

n/a

n/a

I don't care about your grapes. I can buy wine.

n/a

n/a

My question is why waste your time as a member in non-adult, I say keep it instant action that's where the excitement and fun is. Thank you cc for a great site

My question is, why waste money to rub one off in IA, when there's free porn all over the internet? See, every member has a different view on what's fun and exciting.

n/a

I do not read the hosts forum but I have chatted with both dommes and subs and I think your analysi is completely wrong. There is a BDSM community and in general those that belong are genuinely supportive of each other. That does not mean that they do not argue or debate from time to time.
What annoys dommes is when hosts from other categories are suffering from low traffic and think they will try dungeon. ANd what makes them really angry is when those hosts assume that being a domme is "easy work" because all it involves is being mean to members. This shows a lack of respect which is the ultimate no-no. If someone has a genuine interest in BDSM and has the character to be successful most dommes are happy to talk about it.
The true dominas are also not worried that their slaves will rush off to another domina host. Slaves are among the most loyal of members.

Only one response other than mine so far, too bad...though it was a good one. I'm not a Slave, but was looking forward to reading more, sounded interesting.
Here's a thought or question to hopefully keep the ball rolling:
Other side of coin...looking at both Dungeon and Fetish cat just to be thorough..I see a number of Doms but Very Few submissives...If I could find the right one of those for my tastes...looks, price, etc etc...and could catch at the righ time for both of us...I'd certainly try one of Those...sounds fun. :)
Anyway, hope you get more responses, take care.

For me it is important that a dominatrix looks either amazing or different and certainly not average or plain. It's hard to explain as it's not classical beauty but a certain attractive but nasty look that i go for. Then of course she has to have a good inventive mind because she will do most of the talking and not simply barking arrogant orders. Profiles that are very sparse or mention only about money do not get me interested.
So it's looks, profile and price that get me into video and then the personality and skills that keep me there.

....... or photos cut and pasted from internet. I've even seen the same 'fake' photo on 2 different hosts profiles and they were not the same host using 2 names! hahaha.

n/a

So help us all out and not report them to CC so they can take care of it.

Looking at your photos, you are fine just as you are! And with reference to your fantasy/reality thread below, keep it real and be proud of your white skin and freckles :-)

n/a

Yes it happens all the time here.

n/a

Interesting I tried to post about hosts using photos that are not of themselves several years ago and cc admin would never post my comments. I tried many times.

I confronted some hosts and they admitted it, and told the site where they got the photos.

Be smart girls -0- don't use photos with tattoos when you don't have a tattoo!

Report all obvious fakes to CC Help.
The reason you may see different girls photos in archives might be because the names are owned by a studio and the manager didn't clean the archives when he hired a new girl.

n/a

There is no "or"... it is definitely a way to suck a few more dollars out of a member lol. There are of course other ways. I think some of us do want to hear the "yes, I'll meet" and delude themselves that it's the real thing when all indications are to the contrary.

But sometimes both the host and the member are deluded, enough so that they do in fact meet, and sometimes they are so deluded the ending is a happy one.

n/a

Irony doesn't translate well.

n/a

Ironically you caught the irony but the sense escaped you

n/a

It was a sarcastic remark, sweety. Basically it's an attempt at humor, and to make one's point, by saying the opposite of what is believed or felt. Helps if you can hear the person, it's normally clearly evident in the voice as well. Take care :)

n/a

I didn't mean to make light of your question. For me, early on, if you were to say you were interested in meeting I couldn't take you seriously. There just wouldn't be enough to go on. I might just have fun with the notion, but I honestly wouldn't expect it.

If we both felt a connection (and it needn't be a "love" connection lol), then I could see it actually happening. And it would be a more complicated matter at that point, involving consideration for the other person.

I have a host friend who has been saying for a couple years we ought to meet. And it would be possible, logistically, but It's not going to happen. I don't think she is serious. It's fun to talk about though.

n/a

It depends. By revealing you are married or have a boyfriend you shatter the illusions of some. The same thing for refusing to meet in reality. The best thing to do is to simply state that you are not here for meetings or to discuss personal stuff. You'll lose some, but you probably don't need them anyway.

n/a

n/a

n/a

I would have said the exact same thing as he did.

hahahaha brilliant story well done

Hey Lillie, interesting post.
For me, I'd say just be totally honest with me. Generally speaking...I'm not going to bring it up...so I'd just as soon the host not bring it up, unless they are totally sincere. If it is seriously discussed, it's...again generally speaking...usually...going to involve significant amount of money...flight, hotel room, etc So I'd just as soon not be deceived.
Another point totally apart from the money. I'm generally a bit skeptical, and not naive...so I'm probably not going to believe it at all..and if indeed I come to the conclusion that the host is just trying to play me, then it will negatively reflect on her in my mind...so hypothetically speaking, if I'm a regular of that person, and suddenly believe she's lying to me, trying to play me, then those regular visits will likely stop.
So bottom line hosts, just be honest with me. If you want return visits, just be nice, and give me a good show. :)

n/a

I've had many hosts in the softcore categories play that in person meeting and talk about their friends who married members. Its only done to prolong the paid video and mislead members.

..it's too bad it's come to this. Even if you don't ask for it, you get it. Even if you don't want it, you get it (sort of). I guess this isn't the place for honesty. And in the end it will just ruin the day for those few who are honest, as they won't be believed in any case.

n/a

n/a

In the example you gave I definitely want to hear the truth. Although, to be honest, I never ask to meet a host as I look like Quasimodo's ugly brother and I am probably older than most host's dads.

But for most other things I want fantasy :D

Much uglier brother D

I would think a member would prefer reality if the one they are with in reality is willing to fulfill their fantasies...

If we think of the sexiest times in our lives i expect all of them had in common a bit of a fantsasy element. I doubt if even men and women differ in this - though you might speculate otherwise.
It's quite common for a fantasy build-up to the physical bit to stick out (so to speak) and even a new encounter to be disappointing relative to the fantasy of anticipation.
Of course there's an old english (IRONIC) saying about sex - when it's good it s REALLY REALLY good and when it's bad it's still pretty good.
What i'm saying is - it wouldnt be surprising if your guests were just as keen on the fantasy as the enjoyment they get from your undoubtedly sexy physical charms and sure, that keeps them coming (!) back

the saying as i know it is......when its good its good, and when its bad its really really good

! ~~ !

n/a

n/a

For some the talk is all fantasy. The bad part is when one or the other party thinks it's for real. Mind you, in the 12 years I've been a member I have known of a fairly substantial number of marriages that have come from meetings on CC and countless satisfying real-life friendships.
The rule CC has about not exchanging info is to guard against off-CC paid video or the possibility of a girl soliciting for prostitution here.
There are many "connections" made via adult chat sites that are about neither cheating CC nor making prostitution. Both sides should be smart and careful.

If this site isn't "reality" then why do all these charges keep showing up on my credit card?

n/a

Whenever possible and state a time in GMT that you are on most times. For example evenings most week days , mornings on weekends or whatever. I've also read profiles where the host suggests sending a CC Mail to arrange a meeting.

No I just log on and see if any of my favourites are online. If not i search for a new girl to add into my favourites.

If a member is really interested to know when his fav host is on, he/she can set an alert and then will get an e-mail from cc when that host comes on line. Simple.

Yeah, I don't pay attention at all to what is listed in schedule. For one, I'm gonna cut the host alot of slack when it comes to this...I'm sure, one of the positive features of being a host, is the freedom that comes with it..so if you don't stick to your schedule, I'm not going to blame you, and therefore not really pay attention to it.
Like the others said basically, I just look at my favorites, and pick one.

when i am horny she needs to be there.

got it?

Some guys couldn't care less as long as one of his favorites is online. But it is a courtesy to those to whome you are indeed special to give them a fair idea when you are online.

They can play and pay with their own money not the US taxpayers' money!

n/a

n/a

They have several functions, but best known for being the USA Presidential bodyguards.
The reason this story is so big over here...USA...The Secret Service is very much known for their integrity, their ethical behaviour, good character, etc. From what I remember and have heard, there has Never been an incident in their Enitre history where their character was questioned...until now...so it's a huge story over here.
Thanks for asking Russian Host, I respect that. Not everyone knows everything; plenty I don't know about Russia :) Take care.

Known by whom for their integrity, their ethical behavior, and good character? Good God, you sound like a recruiter.
Government thugs abusing their positions of authority - wow, color me shocked.

Point is, specifically regarding Known incidents...just centering on character and ethics, not performance...there have been very few if any, made public at least til now. Which is not to say that they Are perfect, or that I think they are...but the General Public Perception of them til now....has indeed been pretty close to perfect, as this is a group with very few, if Any, widely Known character blemishes...til now.

n/a

Like the KGB without the ..... no, like the KGB

We have no kgb alreay more than 20 years ))

Yeah, he probably knew that :) was just making a joke I think. and KGB is..was.. more like CIA in any case. Which we definitely still have.

It's called FSB now ;)

Shhh...no one's supposed to know...it's a secret, the name was changed to protect the um innocent.. lol :) Yeah...certainly every world power is going to have some form of intelligence agency.

n/a

No, USA.
Seldom that there are Russian members? Hmmm...not surprising I guess. It Seems to be...that while there are members from all over the world, of course...generally speaking, Most members...seem to be from USA. Don't know, of course, just an observation.

n/a

Not necessarily. Just that US members tend to state where they are from more often than others. And possibly also hang around more on the forums than many others.

n/a

American KGB

Nope... American KGB is CIA. Secret Service protects the president and has a few other duties like pursuing counterfeiters.

I would pick Trent Richardson, but I'm not a Colts fan, so I'm glad their passing him up, maybe the Browns will get him and I would agree if I was picking a quarterback I would take Griffin

Andrew Luck is going to need some luck, will be throw onto the playing field the first year, look out

What does Andrew Luck, the Colts and the NFL have to do with this site? We don't watch the NFL on this site. In fact this is largely a European site. The vast majority of hosts and members have no interest at all in what you just posted about.

My guess is viewers are mostly usa, and hosts are mostly europe...but who knows. And good point. But on the other hand, its harmless.

I am a Colt fan and a NFL fan and it's a open forum for any type of discussion just like posting your opinion here and if you didn't like reading it, why did you open it.

"If you didn't like reading it, why did you open it?"

Are you for real?

at least it was about real football and not soccer, go Patroits

you got em thur, goober!

hey I love football not soccer