General Forum
Debate, no cars or gifts
Who's the more dominant?
host or guest.
Who calls the shots.?
And who wins???
Replies plz
host or guest.
Who calls the shots.?
And who wins???
Replies plz
RE: Debate, no cars or gifts
what host , what guest?? can depend from case to case.... question without certain answer....
RE: Debate, no cars or gifts
ok stryker , whats wrong with u darling??? didnt have a good f**k long time or what??? pffffffff what an answers .............
RE: Debate, no cars or gifts
dana don't ask about my sex life unless you're willing to help it.
RE: Debate, no cars or gifts
sry darling ... but u seem frustrated lately:)))) a good sex might help u :))) ( just a thought).....xoxo Dana
RE: Debate, no cars or gifts
The host. She always winds up with the money and what does the member have? A stain on his jeans.
RE: Debate, no cars or gifts
Woman always win:))Sure, if she have a relations with strong man..
strong--may be wrong word.I make mistakes sometimes:))
strong--may be wrong word.I make mistakes sometimes:))
RE: Debate, no cars or gifts
Strong is a good word,
And he has to be strong enough to let her win.
Its what relationships are all about.
And he has to be strong enough to let her win.
Its what relationships are all about.
RE: Debate, no cars or gifts
Wins?!? It's just a member visiting a host, not a contest to see who wins or loses.
R.I.P Mike Reid
Rest in peace bruv!
Pussy, Pussy, where's that fucking Pussy?! (Puss in boots pantomine)
Pussy, Pussy, where's that fucking Pussy?! (Puss in boots pantomine)
RE: R.I.P Mike Reid
whenever he left Pat or Peggy - he went to manchester.
"you hear the dogs barking but you never see 'em" Harry Hills TV Burps
"you hear the dogs barking but you never see 'em" Harry Hills TV Burps
top 5
smallest countries in the world
1) vatican city 0.2 sq miles
2) monaco 0.7 sq miles
3) naura 8 sq miles
4) tuvalu 10 sq miles
5) san marino 23 sq miles
(just passing the time again)
1) vatican city 0.2 sq miles
2) monaco 0.7 sq miles
3) naura 8 sq miles
4) tuvalu 10 sq miles
5) san marino 23 sq miles
(just passing the time again)
RE: top 5
List must be published in a country that doesn't recognize the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, population approximately 80, size -- one bulding, smaller then 2 US football fields (couldn't find exact measurements)
RE: top 5
Also doesn't recognise Sealand, even tho' the nutter that "owns" it has his own stamps and currency, http://www.sealandgov.org/About.html
RE: top 5
hows about Sark and Isle of Wight (they inbred so much there, it must be a separate country by now)?
A Hint for you Travelers
When I visit a host and like her I buy a nice used car for my use on my next visit and let her use it in the mean time. To say this produces a certain faithfulness and great time when I arrive again is to understate the investment. Then when I'm moving on I simply sell the car..................give it a try and see yourself :)
RE: A Hint for you Travelers
That was the most lame stuff I heard in a long time.. It says alot about you as a person eh..
RE: A Hint for you Travelers
Better to rent her car from her for $150 a week or so. She gives up her car for a short time for quick cash and you get a bargain on the rent.
RE: A Hint for you Travelers
good 4 u,i dont have 2 buy ppl tho. They r naturalley pleased 2 see me, without false material belongings, gifts etc. its a way of buying ppl 2 get wot u want., using them in effect. Sneaky & cheap.
RE: A Hint for you Travelers
Rent her car for $150 a week (after u have fucked her) then sell it for a profit....
RE: A Hint for you Travelers
sounds to me like someone saw this on tv last night and decided it would b fun to make it look like his idea...first off its rediculous..secondly..top gear rules :D
RE: A Hint for you Travelers
What's the ethical distinction between buying affection and selling affection?
RE: A Hint for you Travelers
Your analogy is false, as in your example one party is passive whereas in the question both parties are active.
RE: A Hint for you Travelers
if you really do that, you must reak of desperation, insecurity and insincerity...why not try a fake marriage offering next time?...same resuts and a lot cheaper
RE: Hello :)
i did.i missed you sooooooooooooo much that not a day went by that i didn't think of you.wait.who are you again?? do i know you?? anyway,sure,i missed you. :-P
RE: looking
Possible? Yes. Probable? No. I take it you are asking this question 'tongue in cheek.' I assume you didn't meet the first one here, right? Or have you come back to fish in the same pond? Good luck.
RE: looking
yeah, just buy her a car next time you visit, when you get the divorce finalized you can sell it.
RE: Those g strings must hurt
I only wear G srtings)))Most amazimg thing ever)) Ahhh sometimes lil lacy shorts low cut mmmmmmm))
RE: Those g strings must hurt
If they wore them backwards it would make more sense since it would make the clit bigger
RE: Those g strings must hurt
and it dosen't help when the "rhoids" are flaring up like Mt Pinatubo
CC is the Way life should be
I love this place. Where could get such hotties to show their stuff to you for so little money at at your time schedule?
Also as you get to know specific ones and you get tired of one you just pick another.
It just doesn't get any better than this in the real world :)
Also as you get to know specific ones and you get tired of one you just pick another.
It just doesn't get any better than this in the real world :)
RE: CC is the Way life should be
Ask the Creator to make his next Creation like CC... a Cool Creation with a lot of angels...
RE: CC is the Way life should be
Are you: a) a shill for CC, b) a satirist, c) both a & b, d) none of the above?
RE: some food for thought
with all due respect we are not here to seek your approval. fuck all that other bullshit we want to see some ass and titi's we can talk to our own females. you know you look good so show that shit off!
RE: some food for thought
omg stryker, i dont want u in my room ever....goshh......guys like u make me apreciate more sweet guys i meet here...pls stay awayyyy from LovelyDana yuck
RE: some food for thought
Are you the only lucky one? Actually just as most hosts her are great, normal girls, I think most members are pretty normal, polite guys, just sometimes a bit thoughtless.
As an average, the horror stories from both sides are overblown.
As an average, the horror stories from both sides are overblown.
RE: some food for thought
You said <<and treat them like men not pigs >>. Why do you want to be treated like a man?
RE: some food for thought
The phrase could be directed at the hosts with the "them" being the members.
RE: some food for thought
Or she COULD mean <<and treat them like [hu]man [beings] not pigs >>.
RE: some food for thought
So I go to the cc search engine and type in the work"slut" guess how many names popped up? 323, seems some host don't mind being called a slut and even encourage it..go figure.
PrettyAlex
I told you people she will be back online in yahoo... and what do you know? there she is!
I'll tell her hi from you wiseguys.
I'll tell her hi from you wiseguys.
RE: PrettyAlex
yes tell hi from me too--i missed her laughter too and calming me down from my drinking-cool,,, by the way how is her twins doing,, hope all is ok and cool
RE: PrettyAlex
tell her I said she has a bunch of no-life morons following her every move....lol
Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
I am happy to have found CC because some girls seem to be nice and attractive and this forum is also interesting. Therefore, I wonder why forums seem to be not equal. I explain, it seems that everybody can read Viewer forum because there is no requested login to get access except to write there; but the reciprocal does not exist for the access to the Chathost forum. I mean that we must have Chathost account even only to read... Then, do you think that this difference is logical?
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
We respect the girls privacy and allow them to have secrets.
But don't worry - it's not too exciting. Only "where are all the viewrs??!" and "let's raise our prices" and "how can I make more money?" It's rather boring.
But don't worry - it's not too exciting. Only "where are all the viewrs??!" and "let's raise our prices" and "how can I make more money?" It's rather boring.
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
if you respect their privacy how do u know what they talk about?
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
Viewers forum is open for respective guests to view. It's about business so they are not going to close it off completely.
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
and closing off the chathost forum is to not scare away prospective hosts, i guess :)
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
We respect the girls privacy and allow them to have secrets.
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
I don't get it,
on one hand you say "We respect the girls privacy and allow them to have secrets."
And on the other you say
" it's not too exciting. Only "where are all the viewrs??!" and "let's raise our prices" and "how can I make more money?"
I guess you don't repect their privacy that much to post what they are saying there eh?
on one hand you say "We respect the girls privacy and allow them to have secrets."
And on the other you say
" it's not too exciting. Only "where are all the viewrs??!" and "let's raise our prices" and "how can I make more money?"
I guess you don't repect their privacy that much to post what they are saying there eh?
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
welcome to cc land new member hope you have a great time here, i been here 3 years now and still enjoy it-cool,,,,and don't ask personal questions about host forums its cool,,, its the only way they know who to go after a private with--cool,,, also another way to find out who is really married or not,, I know I use to be a host here 2 years ago,, but of course it could had change over the last 2 years-cool--ok have fun and peace
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
I read a few of your posts in this forum. Are you only a scapegoat or also a paranoiac?
RE: Hi, i'm a new CC member and...
best learn the meaning of big words before you use them & my opinion still doesn't change.
RE: about pictures
alll of them,haha.honestly any you like i'm sure will be good.most girls are usually their own harshest critics
RE: about pictures
Heyyyy,you have never been in video with me,so don't start spreading lies!!
top 5
most populated cities in the world...
1) tokyo 33,750,000
2) mexico city 21,850,000
3) new york 21,750,000
4) seoul 21,700,000
5) sao paulo 20,200,000
1) tokyo 33,750,000
2) mexico city 21,850,000
3) new york 21,750,000
4) seoul 21,700,000
5) sao paulo 20,200,000
RE: top 5
I been in Sao Paulo too,, yay,,though it was warm, humidity n foggy-smokes,,"ill be back"
RE: top 5
I heard that tourists avoid visiting the city...too polluted,crowded and too noisy but hmmm... i dont mind...pssstt TK:P ,take me there,i wanna go there!hugzzz!!!
RE: top 5
Democracy cannot survive overpopulation. Human dignity cannot survive it. Convenience and decency cannot survive it. As you put more and more people into the world, the value of life not only declines, it disappears. It doesn't matter if someone dies. The more people there are, the less one individual matters.
RE: top 5
damn shy you forgot to mention Nashville,,, you know you had a good time here meeting the southern country girls......cool
RE: top 5
Isaac, Good to see you here! I read a couple of your many books. So this is where people go when they die, huh? Well, I suppose it could be worse.
I understand your argument about population and the significance of the individual, but I respectfully disagree. Your argument is Malthusian and as such a bit gloomy, even if it is altogether rational.
I have no quarrel with the argument as such. As I said, it is rational. My problem is that it is ONLY rational and upon closer examination is not supported by the evidence of human experience. A man is only diminished and of less significance if the only economic measure is a purely material one. What's more, such a view is reductive and by design fails to take into account other equally important--if not MORE important--elements of a qualitative nature.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to make a case for poverty. It has devastating effects and does, in fact, crush people and rob them of their dignity. However, human experience does not bear out your assumption that the greater the population, the less significant the individual. The cruel irony is that in a developed country like the US, which has taken the Western notion of "individualism" to its limit, the "individual"--who is supposedly enjoying the greatest degree of "freedom"---matters much less than an individual in a small village in India, poor though he may be. His material wealth is marginal, but a part of his wealth is the warmth of family ties and a sense of social connectedness from which Westerners have, in varying degrees, been alienated. So, in an alienated state, the "individual" seeks some sort of connectedness and may well come here, for example!
I understand your argument about population and the significance of the individual, but I respectfully disagree. Your argument is Malthusian and as such a bit gloomy, even if it is altogether rational.
I have no quarrel with the argument as such. As I said, it is rational. My problem is that it is ONLY rational and upon closer examination is not supported by the evidence of human experience. A man is only diminished and of less significance if the only economic measure is a purely material one. What's more, such a view is reductive and by design fails to take into account other equally important--if not MORE important--elements of a qualitative nature.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to make a case for poverty. It has devastating effects and does, in fact, crush people and rob them of their dignity. However, human experience does not bear out your assumption that the greater the population, the less significant the individual. The cruel irony is that in a developed country like the US, which has taken the Western notion of "individualism" to its limit, the "individual"--who is supposedly enjoying the greatest degree of "freedom"---matters much less than an individual in a small village in India, poor though he may be. His material wealth is marginal, but a part of his wealth is the warmth of family ties and a sense of social connectedness from which Westerners have, in varying degrees, been alienated. So, in an alienated state, the "individual" seeks some sort of connectedness and may well come here, for example!
RE: top 5
I've read a few nasty predicitions about the consequences of global human overpopulation, and they freak me out. If hostilities between countries today over energy is cause for concern, imagining what might come of shortages of resources as basic as potable water and arable land makes me cringe.
And as for that village in India, maybe it's just a matter of my ethnocentrism, but if I were born a woman into such a society, if I only had value as a human being in relation to a husband who bought me for a dowry, and if I were expected to jump on his funeral pyre if he were to die before me, I imagine I'd be praying for that sense of individualism and all the freedoms that that concept necessarily entails.
I know where you're coming from though. People banding together and forging strong social bonds is a good thing. But I just think it's a much better situation when they're formed voluntarily and not out of a very basic need to survive.
And as for that village in India, maybe it's just a matter of my ethnocentrism, but if I were born a woman into such a society, if I only had value as a human being in relation to a husband who bought me for a dowry, and if I were expected to jump on his funeral pyre if he were to die before me, I imagine I'd be praying for that sense of individualism and all the freedoms that that concept necessarily entails.
I know where you're coming from though. People banding together and forging strong social bonds is a good thing. But I just think it's a much better situation when they're formed voluntarily and not out of a very basic need to survive.
RE: top 5
Nat, If it is you again, I know you understand that an "argument" (or idiomatically in this case, "quarrel") does not = a fight. But whoever you might be, I suspect it is you who wants to fight, not me. If, on the other hand, you have anything you'd like to contribute to the discussion of the topic at hand, by all means share your ideas.
RE: top 5
Misanthrope,
Thanks for your thoughtful reply. (I started to reply earlier, but lost my internet connection, so composed my thoughts on Word, which is always a safer bet.) I don’t disagree with the points you make. I know where you are coming from as well. As we both know, it’s a complex and daunting problem. The consequences of overpopulation are frightening, and the leaders of the affluent nations better treat the matter with the seriousness that it deserves. About a half-dozen years ago I remember reading a cover story from the business weekly, Barrons. The headline was something like, “The Coming Water Wars.”* It was, quite naturally, published from a business perspective and did not broach the ethical questions inherent in this development.
The focus of the article was on companies that have developed new technologies that have made it possible to convert salt water—of which there is no short supply---to potable water in areas of the world in which there is little or none. Hitherto, only countries like Saudi Arabia would pay for such conversion by means of distillation, which was prohibitively expensive. (I can’t recall, but it made the price per gallon much more expensive than any existing traditional waterworks facility---up until recently, nearly all publicly run and regulated facilities). By comparison, there is a process known as “reverse osmosis” in which the salt water passes through some membrane or some such thing, thereby extracting the salt, and does so at a price that is still not as cheap as natural water supplies, but may cost only 2x as much as opposed to 10 or 20 times. Thus private water companies that buy and use these technologies are selling to various governments as well as hotel chains. The Caribbean area is the area with which I’m familiar in this regard, but it has made its way around the world.
Surely such technological developments cannot be counted as a bad thing, but it does bring into greater relief the global spectacle of the conflicts over precious resources and arguably creates a greater divide between the Haves and Have Nots. Long before this technology was available, the water wars had begun. In fact, we need not leave our continent to find examples. In the Southwest , securing water rights has been a heated political issue for decades , and invariably the rights go to the rich and powerful who buy the politicians to do their bidding. And, after the water is parceled out, the last on the list to get water are the Mexicans, for whom the Rio Grande---to take a prime example---was a principal source of water. Now, by the time it gets to them, it is a mere trickle. Another example is the way water has been diverted by Israel for its own benefit, at the expense of those to whom the water naturally flowed. Let’s face it, the more affluent nations have the capital to embark on the kinds of engineering projects that are simply impossible for poorer nations. So, as you say, imagining shortages of these basic resources in the areas with a growing population and without these natural resources, or from whom these natural resources have been taken as a result of developments by their more affluent neighbors upstream, makes me cringe too. My only hope is that these new technologies be used to some advantage for the ‘Have Nots’ as well. After all, in areas where there is no potable water to steal or divert, the prospect of providing it for ALL is not impossible if those in charge have both a vision and wisdom to see that decreasing the gap between the rich and the poor will make for greater social harmony, hence prosperity.
As to your points about the social injustices in that Indian village and the women simply being relegated to little more than chattel, I don’t disagree with you. Even more egregiously horrible are the clitorectomies that are routinely performed in parts of Africa, the abolishment of which has become—quite understandably ---a ‘cause celebre’ for women in the developed world.
There are those who believe---a la Jean-Jacque Rousseau---that for every step of progress mankind has made materially, there is a corresponding loss of spiritual progress. It’s a nice neat construct and no doubt there are elements of truth to the claim. But it’s not that simple. Nevertheless, our “Pizza for One” society, man alone at last---the never intended result of a society that overvalues “individualism,”---strikes me as a sort of poverty, and should give all of us pause and make us humbly concede that the bounty we enjoy is deficient in some very significant ways and that the lives of much of mankind who live at a subsistence level are infinitely richer than our own.
* Example: http://www.doublestandards.org/water.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/South_America/Bolivia_WaterWarVictory.html
P.S. Check out (google) the organizations devoted to the writings of the late E. F. Schumacher.
Thanks for your thoughtful reply. (I started to reply earlier, but lost my internet connection, so composed my thoughts on Word, which is always a safer bet.) I don’t disagree with the points you make. I know where you are coming from as well. As we both know, it’s a complex and daunting problem. The consequences of overpopulation are frightening, and the leaders of the affluent nations better treat the matter with the seriousness that it deserves. About a half-dozen years ago I remember reading a cover story from the business weekly, Barrons. The headline was something like, “The Coming Water Wars.”* It was, quite naturally, published from a business perspective and did not broach the ethical questions inherent in this development.
The focus of the article was on companies that have developed new technologies that have made it possible to convert salt water—of which there is no short supply---to potable water in areas of the world in which there is little or none. Hitherto, only countries like Saudi Arabia would pay for such conversion by means of distillation, which was prohibitively expensive. (I can’t recall, but it made the price per gallon much more expensive than any existing traditional waterworks facility---up until recently, nearly all publicly run and regulated facilities). By comparison, there is a process known as “reverse osmosis” in which the salt water passes through some membrane or some such thing, thereby extracting the salt, and does so at a price that is still not as cheap as natural water supplies, but may cost only 2x as much as opposed to 10 or 20 times. Thus private water companies that buy and use these technologies are selling to various governments as well as hotel chains. The Caribbean area is the area with which I’m familiar in this regard, but it has made its way around the world.
Surely such technological developments cannot be counted as a bad thing, but it does bring into greater relief the global spectacle of the conflicts over precious resources and arguably creates a greater divide between the Haves and Have Nots. Long before this technology was available, the water wars had begun. In fact, we need not leave our continent to find examples. In the Southwest , securing water rights has been a heated political issue for decades , and invariably the rights go to the rich and powerful who buy the politicians to do their bidding. And, after the water is parceled out, the last on the list to get water are the Mexicans, for whom the Rio Grande---to take a prime example---was a principal source of water. Now, by the time it gets to them, it is a mere trickle. Another example is the way water has been diverted by Israel for its own benefit, at the expense of those to whom the water naturally flowed. Let’s face it, the more affluent nations have the capital to embark on the kinds of engineering projects that are simply impossible for poorer nations. So, as you say, imagining shortages of these basic resources in the areas with a growing population and without these natural resources, or from whom these natural resources have been taken as a result of developments by their more affluent neighbors upstream, makes me cringe too. My only hope is that these new technologies be used to some advantage for the ‘Have Nots’ as well. After all, in areas where there is no potable water to steal or divert, the prospect of providing it for ALL is not impossible if those in charge have both a vision and wisdom to see that decreasing the gap between the rich and the poor will make for greater social harmony, hence prosperity.
As to your points about the social injustices in that Indian village and the women simply being relegated to little more than chattel, I don’t disagree with you. Even more egregiously horrible are the clitorectomies that are routinely performed in parts of Africa, the abolishment of which has become—quite understandably ---a ‘cause celebre’ for women in the developed world.
There are those who believe---a la Jean-Jacque Rousseau---that for every step of progress mankind has made materially, there is a corresponding loss of spiritual progress. It’s a nice neat construct and no doubt there are elements of truth to the claim. But it’s not that simple. Nevertheless, our “Pizza for One” society, man alone at last---the never intended result of a society that overvalues “individualism,”---strikes me as a sort of poverty, and should give all of us pause and make us humbly concede that the bounty we enjoy is deficient in some very significant ways and that the lives of much of mankind who live at a subsistence level are infinitely richer than our own.
* Example: http://www.doublestandards.org/water.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/South_America/Bolivia_WaterWarVictory.html
P.S. Check out (google) the organizations devoted to the writings of the late E. F. Schumacher.
RE: top 5
The representation of hosts and members here is not a function of population, but of global economic realities. The site is a microcosm of the global economy insofar as the hosts--with few exceptions--are from countries with depressed economies (Russia, former Soviet bloc countries in Eastern Europe [principally Romania], the Phillipines [from which most of the Asians here come], and Columbia, South America [from which most of the Latinos here come]). The guests, on the other hand are almost all---again with few exceptions---from Western countries with healthy economies: US; Western Europe [lots of Germans]; Australia, and some from the healthier Asian economies, such as Japan. Thus, you will find few, if any hosts from Tokyo, but some guests, just as you will find few hosts from New York, but lots of guests.
It is also a function of the owners of the site (and others like it, in which you will find similar demographics), who understand these economic realities and exploit them accordingly. My sense, although I have only indirect knowledge of this, is that the owners of many of these sites are Russian--many of whom have Russian/American connections.
It is also a function of the owners of the site (and others like it, in which you will find similar demographics), who understand these economic realities and exploit them accordingly. My sense, although I have only indirect knowledge of this, is that the owners of many of these sites are Russian--many of whom have Russian/American connections.
LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
LAST night i went out with a guy from cc :( well i dated him before for 2 months , and after 2 years I decided to see him again yesterday , he now have a gf , so i went there just to chat nothing else . we could watch a movie together , i was bored anyway .. i didnt have anything to lose ,
well , yesterday . when I MET sae him was nice , my heart was beeping fast :) and i was very excited , he took me to his house and cooked me a nice dinner ... so far so good . We were listening to nice songs together while we ate .
..........................................................
after we ate ... we sat down to watch a movie ,
we were holding each other together , and i kiss him and say thank you for the food . My MISTAKE STARTED on this point .
I do like his company , I wanted to kiss him and be close together but after my kiss .
he got horny and hard :( wasnt what i want really .wanted
he coouldnt control hiself started to take his clothes off ........
anyway . we had sex .
and after that i felt so empty .... more than i actually was.
why guys in cc just meet just for sex ?? do they actually have fellings?if they want sex , why dont try a escort :(
I guess i show my pussy and play around too much , and when you want to meet seriously , they just think you are a whole ,
I promised myself it is the last guy i met on cc :(
I met few guys now and they never understand what I do.
thanks for listening to me ............ muah x
well , yesterday . when I MET sae him was nice , my heart was beeping fast :) and i was very excited , he took me to his house and cooked me a nice dinner ... so far so good . We were listening to nice songs together while we ate .
..........................................................
after we ate ... we sat down to watch a movie ,
we were holding each other together , and i kiss him and say thank you for the food . My MISTAKE STARTED on this point .
I do like his company , I wanted to kiss him and be close together but after my kiss .
he got horny and hard :( wasnt what i want really .wanted
he coouldnt control hiself started to take his clothes off ........
anyway . we had sex .
and after that i felt so empty .... more than i actually was.
why guys in cc just meet just for sex ?? do they actually have fellings?if they want sex , why dont try a escort :(
I guess i show my pussy and play around too much , and when you want to meet seriously , they just think you are a whole ,
I promised myself it is the last guy i met on cc :(
I met few guys now and they never understand what I do.
thanks for listening to me ............ muah x
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
Why do you think it was only sex? Maybe he wants two girlfriends.
But these days many girls only want sex, too, so maybe he was confused.
But these days many girls only want sex, too, so maybe he was confused.
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
Cmon why just sex? Guys from here fall in love too, really deeply in love but sometimes feelings pass. I had a bf from here and we loved each other like crazy...But now its gone and this is life, all gud things come to an end)) So cheer up and wait for ur new love)) It will come for sure)
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
not all guys just wanna meet for sex...and u could have said no
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
yeah, you soulnd like you were excited to see him, you go to his home, holding, kissing, if you didn't want sex you could have said no, right?
Don't try to blame the guy when it takes 2 to tango.
Don't try to blame the guy when it takes 2 to tango.
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
You wanted to be close to him. You went to his house. you kissed him. You could have stopped AT ANY TIME.
And now you blame HIM!!!!!
WOMEN!
And now you blame HIM!!!!!
WOMEN!
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
It must be a joke. It doesn't sound too realistic. Why did she kiss him to start with? LOL!
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
Sorry to hear that,, But pls - we cannot judge by what you have said what the feelings were..
Seems u gave off the wrong signals, or he misread.
Its not easy to be a guy in these situations..
we are crap at reading minds..
many girls like affection, and sexy evenings ,
soem would be disaointed if you were not " the man" and take control, some of course, and sounds like your situation , just wanted affection..
(guys mix these 2 up a lot)
If you learn 1 thing, please comunicate - guys need that..
hope he was a good lover, but he obviously got it wrong , and I have done that before too, i did not feel so good after.. but was too late.
These things happen..Donttake it all the wrong way- just pls communicate , talk , be open..
guys need that - we dont see some of those signals so good ( some do and ignore of course) but really we do like to know..
I dated 6 girls from CC only slept with 2, and with only 1 had a relationship that lasted a while, I never treated any different to how I do any other girl, home or abroad.. - still friends with them all.
complicated for sure..
sorry u got hurt..
Seems u gave off the wrong signals, or he misread.
Its not easy to be a guy in these situations..
we are crap at reading minds..
many girls like affection, and sexy evenings ,
soem would be disaointed if you were not " the man" and take control, some of course, and sounds like your situation , just wanted affection..
(guys mix these 2 up a lot)
If you learn 1 thing, please comunicate - guys need that..
hope he was a good lover, but he obviously got it wrong , and I have done that before too, i did not feel so good after.. but was too late.
These things happen..Donttake it all the wrong way- just pls communicate , talk , be open..
guys need that - we dont see some of those signals so good ( some do and ignore of course) but really we do like to know..
I dated 6 girls from CC only slept with 2, and with only 1 had a relationship that lasted a while, I never treated any different to how I do any other girl, home or abroad.. - still friends with them all.
complicated for sure..
sorry u got hurt..
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
I seriously don't see why you pity yourself and blame him. First of all,you knew he is with someone else. Now,if I were in your shoes and I accepted to go out with him I'd probably have something in mind ...to make him mine again,or simply to fuck his brains out. You had all the time in the world to back off,or to simply explain to him from the beginning you're hanging out as friends only. I'm not trying to accuse you of anything,all I'm saying you should take some responsability of your own actions. He didn't force you,drugged you or put a gun to your head ...you knew exactly what's going on. Or at least this is how it looks from here. G'luck in the future ..
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
no suprises here 2 me, just enjoy the sex if u meet any1 from here, and thats it....ohh remember u have 2 kiss 100 pigs b4 u get ur prince ...
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
If your heart was beeping, I'd get someone to have a look at that pacemaker. Are you sure it wasn't your phone?
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
It wasn't her heart pounding it was her cash register adding up.
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
thank for the replies
well i m fucked up now :) i guess :( i was wrong to kiss him and the only reason we had sex , was cause i didnt want to disappoint him , i m wrong :( like sucks
but i learnt with my mistake .
well i m fucked up now :) i guess :( i was wrong to kiss him and the only reason we had sex , was cause i didnt want to disappoint him , i m wrong :( like sucks
but i learnt with my mistake .
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
a painful lesson for you dear but I'm glad that you have grown and can move on.
Some men are cool and will not cause you agony.
Good luck
Some men are cool and will not cause you agony.
Good luck
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
im sorry to hear about this secret host,,,, all I can say is life sucks sometimes,,, but hey cheer up, look at it this way,, better to find out now then later (you know what I mean) now you can see their are others out there that might appreciate you better--stay cool host and have fun---cool
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
if a guy brings you home alone to cook for you, sex is implied, dear.
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
Thats nothing I found out the hosts here are only interested in money. Can you believe it? They dont really love me and dont actually get horny and wet. Baby I'm amazed....
RE: LISTEN TO ME :( I M HURT :(((((((
no big deal you just had some recreational sex.............
ain't some of 'em....
Aren't some of the hosts a bit strange? I met one, flirted with her outrageously, and initiated into a couple short very tame videos with her and talked about her lovely country, which I intend the visit, independent of meeting her and her stated hope to visit my country.
Then later she saw me in comm chat and went off on me big time as if we were engaged and I betrayed her. I told her that we couldn't possibly have a relationship after one day and a little chat online. I told her that relationships didn't really grow until two people met in real life. She didn't seem to get it.
Then later she saw me in comm chat and went off on me big time as if we were engaged and I betrayed her. I told her that we couldn't possibly have a relationship after one day and a little chat online. I told her that relationships didn't really grow until two people met in real life. She didn't seem to get it.
RE: ain't some of 'em....
I've heard that women in the sex industry generally often aren't the most emotionally stable people in the world. Maybe there's something to that.
RE: ain't some of 'em....
and their custumers are more stabile???give me a break....we are such a psichos, bitchs and soo on.... and u? who pay us ? love us? workship us?? im sick when i see these kind of ideas xoxoxo 4 normal guys jezzzzzz
RE: ain't some of 'em....
Dana,
I'm not an apologist for Gremlin, but he didn't say the customers were, in fact, more stable---though I can see how you think it is implied.
I've spoken to a lot of girls---online and in the "real" world [whatever that may be] --- about your very same complaint. In general, all tell me the question they hate most is, "What's s nice girl like you doing working in a place like this?" A 'workin' girl I know put it this way: "I hate it when a guy pays me to engage in sexual activity, then after it's over, degrades me by telling me I ought to get out of this business."
It's a fair complaint and it is true that men---not all, but many---refuse to acknowledge how they fit into the equation. I remember seeing this attitude expressed by a male porn star who was being interviewed by a Canadian woman documentary film maker for her film, "Not a Love Story." (I recommend the film.) She asked the male porn star, "Do you ever feel degraded by this work?" His reaction was one of incredulity: "What, ME degraded?!!" He was quite serious. I guess he felt he was doing the degrading (which he was), but he himself was not degraded. But this is, of course, not true because anytime we degrade another human being, we ourselves are degraded. It's like Hegel's commentary on the Master/Slave relationship: "None is free, until all are free."
I'm not an apologist for Gremlin, but he didn't say the customers were, in fact, more stable---though I can see how you think it is implied.
I've spoken to a lot of girls---online and in the "real" world [whatever that may be] --- about your very same complaint. In general, all tell me the question they hate most is, "What's s nice girl like you doing working in a place like this?" A 'workin' girl I know put it this way: "I hate it when a guy pays me to engage in sexual activity, then after it's over, degrades me by telling me I ought to get out of this business."
It's a fair complaint and it is true that men---not all, but many---refuse to acknowledge how they fit into the equation. I remember seeing this attitude expressed by a male porn star who was being interviewed by a Canadian woman documentary film maker for her film, "Not a Love Story." (I recommend the film.) She asked the male porn star, "Do you ever feel degraded by this work?" His reaction was one of incredulity: "What, ME degraded?!!" He was quite serious. I guess he felt he was doing the degrading (which he was), but he himself was not degraded. But this is, of course, not true because anytime we degrade another human being, we ourselves are degraded. It's like Hegel's commentary on the Master/Slave relationship: "None is free, until all are free."
RE: ain't some of 'em....
she was just trying to make you feel bad so that you would spend mare time in HER vid and not some other young "lady's" vid.
Don't think for a second that she has any feelings for you just that when you open your wallet she wants her fingers in there and not one of her colleagues
Don't think for a second that she has any feelings for you just that when you open your wallet she wants her fingers in there and not one of her colleagues
RE: ain't some of 'em....
I had a similar experience. I had a nice video session with a host and I opened my cam on Yahoo for her. About an hour after our session I was chatting with my cousin cross country and had my cam on again. She sent me an IM demanding to know which host I was chatting with. She told me she's very jealous.
I explained to her that I had no obligation to be "hers exclusively" if she was going to continut to video chat with other men, and I was free to chat with whomever I want (never told her it was not a cam host)
I explained to her that I had no obligation to be "hers exclusively" if she was going to continut to video chat with other men, and I was free to chat with whomever I want (never told her it was not a cam host)
RE: ain't some of 'em....
show some women a little affection or have a moment of fun and suddenly they get all possesive on you or just waiting to blame their whole fooked up life on...too funny.
RE: ain't some of 'em....
They are mostly kids. Who get told they are god's gift to men by horny middle aged men. They make good money relatively speaking for being sexy or a close imitation of being sexy. A few are weird. They get to act just as screwed us as members.
RE: ain't some of 'em....
Maybe it is what it is,But what two different people think "it" is can be the complete opposite of each other.
Ahhh, yes, what is "it?"....or what it "is."
Does CC allow Metaphysics here?! lol! Good question, But2. Maybe the apparent contradiction could be subsumed under the concept of the "Unity of Opposites."
Who's rights are right??
Ok, hosts have rights as do customers also
And hosts reasons for being here are different to customers.
Why do we try to apply the same logic to all circumstances?
It creates friction between us, and if we all get with the program, life could be a lot easier on both sides.
Hosts are here to make money.
Customers are here to fulfill a need.
Sometimes we cross the line and get involved, with each other, and the name calling starts, and the heart ache.
I have done the same, but have come to realize that it started off as an infatuation that turns to something real.
So if I want to carry on this relationship here, I need to understand the host's reasons for being here, and I think I have finally got it.
So I can live with the results.
Just my thoughts.
And hosts reasons for being here are different to customers.
Why do we try to apply the same logic to all circumstances?
It creates friction between us, and if we all get with the program, life could be a lot easier on both sides.
Hosts are here to make money.
Customers are here to fulfill a need.
Sometimes we cross the line and get involved, with each other, and the name calling starts, and the heart ache.
I have done the same, but have come to realize that it started off as an infatuation that turns to something real.
So if I want to carry on this relationship here, I need to understand the host's reasons for being here, and I think I have finally got it.
So I can live with the results.
Just my thoughts.
RE: ok but
My question is, why do we apply double standards to hosts.
One minute adore them, and want to marry them.
And next call them prostitutes, and we hate them.
I don't get it.
But im open to ideas.
One minute adore them, and want to marry them.
And next call them prostitutes, and we hate them.
I don't get it.
But im open to ideas.
RE: ok but
the swings in emotions could be caused because on one hand you want the girl on the cam to be your special angel but deep down you realise that she's only spending time with you coz you pay her.
RE: Who's rights are right??
me too.....and sometimes " prostitutes" like u call us can have a bigger heart and soul , than a " virgin".I dont see the difference between us and girls who date guys only for their money.... ohhhh ... i do .... they suck dick 4 real:) we dont:)))) xoxox
RE: Who's rights are right??
I didn't call anyone a prostitute, it was a metaphor, and was talking in the third person, it was meant to stimulate conversation and debate not offend.
You ask...
...”Why do we try to apply the same logic to all circumstances?" You also say you "don't get it," and that you're confused as to why "One minute [we] adore them, and want to marry them. And next call them prostitutes, and we hate them."
You say you are "open to ideas," so I offer this idea for your consideration: I believe your confusion lies in your misconception of where this "friction" arises. You assume that these human interactions are all governed by "logic," and that if we'd all just "get with the program", use the proper logical constructs, and understand that hosts and guests are here for different "reasons," all this misunderstanding would vanish.
In my opinion---and it is original by no means---what you are looking at is merely the tip of the iceberg. The nominal "reasons" people are here, be it economic necessity on the part of the hosts or--as you covertly put it--to "fulfill a need" on the part of the guests, are no doubt true in most cases, but it begs a larger question, which cannot be understood on a purely rational level. The factors which motivate people to come here also occur on a more primitive psychological and emotional level---one that is largely unconscious, and as such they are pre-rational, i.e. they are not governed by the tidy dictates of logic that you and all human beings desire. As Thomas Aquinas said, a human being is a "rational animal," or an animal endowed with reason.
Again, you ask why, "One minute [we] adore them, and want to marry them. And next call them prostitutes, and we hate them." Freud introduced an excellent word---coined by one of his colleagues---into the modern vocabulary: "ambivalence," (or "ambivalenz" in his native German). This single word adequately describes the confused state of emotions that puzzles you. The word has a Latin root: ambi + valere, meaning to be strong in two [opposite] directions. Understandably, feeling strong contradictory emotions (such as Love & Hate) about someone or something is very unsettling. It is NOT a matter of logic, though logic does provide a way to understand it. Classic Psychoanalytic Theory basically says that if you can understand your psychic and emotional life (i.e. make what was hitherto unconscious, conscious) you can govern these thoughts and emotions, instead of them governing you. Freud did not make a claim that this constituted a "cure" in the traditional sense in which that term is understood in medicine, but it did provide relief from the trauma of unsettling emotions because the patient becomes conscious of them instead of repressing them.
Hope this helps. :)
You say you are "open to ideas," so I offer this idea for your consideration: I believe your confusion lies in your misconception of where this "friction" arises. You assume that these human interactions are all governed by "logic," and that if we'd all just "get with the program", use the proper logical constructs, and understand that hosts and guests are here for different "reasons," all this misunderstanding would vanish.
In my opinion---and it is original by no means---what you are looking at is merely the tip of the iceberg. The nominal "reasons" people are here, be it economic necessity on the part of the hosts or--as you covertly put it--to "fulfill a need" on the part of the guests, are no doubt true in most cases, but it begs a larger question, which cannot be understood on a purely rational level. The factors which motivate people to come here also occur on a more primitive psychological and emotional level---one that is largely unconscious, and as such they are pre-rational, i.e. they are not governed by the tidy dictates of logic that you and all human beings desire. As Thomas Aquinas said, a human being is a "rational animal," or an animal endowed with reason.
Again, you ask why, "One minute [we] adore them, and want to marry them. And next call them prostitutes, and we hate them." Freud introduced an excellent word---coined by one of his colleagues---into the modern vocabulary: "ambivalence," (or "ambivalenz" in his native German). This single word adequately describes the confused state of emotions that puzzles you. The word has a Latin root: ambi + valere, meaning to be strong in two [opposite] directions. Understandably, feeling strong contradictory emotions (such as Love & Hate) about someone or something is very unsettling. It is NOT a matter of logic, though logic does provide a way to understand it. Classic Psychoanalytic Theory basically says that if you can understand your psychic and emotional life (i.e. make what was hitherto unconscious, conscious) you can govern these thoughts and emotions, instead of them governing you. Freud did not make a claim that this constituted a "cure" in the traditional sense in which that term is understood in medicine, but it did provide relief from the trauma of unsettling emotions because the patient becomes conscious of them instead of repressing them.
Hope this helps. :)
RE: You ask...
You're welcome taff007. Wouldn't it be nice if it were that simple, like turning off a light switch, huh? Perhaps it was more simply expressed, hundreds of years before Freud, by Blaise Pascal: "The heart knows a reason that reason does not know." :)
RE: Who's rights are right??
The customer should always be right. Courtesy should be the norm but when you are getting paid for a service and you are dealing with the public you have to take a lot of crap. If you don't like it get into another line of work.
Chathost Forums
Why are the girls personal forums vitually ignored? I always check the personal forums before "engaging" a chathost. But for the most part they are empty. The few that do have comments from viewers, the hosts rarely respond.
Is it just me or wouldn't it be in the best interest of the host to respond to comments - both good and bad ones?
I read them with the hope of gaining some insight into the hosts personality - definitely a significant factor in the level of "enoyment".
Is it just me or wouldn't it be in the best interest of the host to respond to comments - both good and bad ones?
I read them with the hope of gaining some insight into the hosts personality - definitely a significant factor in the level of "enoyment".
maybe
maybe they ignore thier forum, or,
in the past when i have seen a host and made a comment in her forum she emails or talks to me live in comchat.
in the past when i have seen a host and made a comment in her forum she emails or talks to me live in comchat.
RE: maybe
I wonder the same thing--some gets ignore and some don't,, well I actually I do think I know why some get ignore and thats cool, it is a site for members to dream about and a site for the host to let us dream-cool
RE: Chathost Forums
I've seen more than a few delete the things said in their form (good or bad), maybe they don;t like being talked about
RE: Chathost Forums
They get to delete them and nobody really reads them in that case. They usually are pantings from some whipped member who is getting taken for all his money for a peak at a nipple.
is it so hard
The hosts are mostly here to fulfill a fantasy. Some don't realize that a customer has certain requirements and it is her job to meet them, not to try to tell you they are not important.
RE: is it so hard
The request was very normal and achieved by 99% or hosts here, It was just odd and I thought to write about it. If I was really pissed I'd mention her name.
maybe you can do it and maybe you can't
In my mind in video I like a context. I like to imagine the host's accent. Because I am fairly well-read on various cultures of the countries these hosts come from I like to have a context to what I feel her general background brings to the experience.
The attitude of "what do you want? here I am... shut up and fuck me" is thoroughly alien and unappealing to me.
The attitude of "what do you want? here I am... shut up and fuck me" is thoroughly alien and unappealing to me.
RE: is it so hard
yes move on if they cant do wot u want, or maybe u like fake shows where the hosts do wot u want, but dont get off on it at all ?surely its better if the host is honest and says no i dont do that, try some1 else.
RE: is it so hard
No, that's why i told her what I needed. It is she that thought I was psychic.
RE: is it so hard
the customer, the inquisitor, the investigator, the detective, the accountant,, the member, th wonderer, the fan, the counselor.....hhhmmmmm, anyone else notice a pattern?
fenechka
Another blazingly hot girl that doesn't tolerate textchat well.
I give them both moderate endorsement because their English is good, they are hot and don't charge much.
I give them both moderate endorsement because their English is good, they are hot and don't charge much.
ive seen Manil
and i wasnt rushed to her video, well i was in a rush but thats different. as always i take all comments and remarks with a grain of salt. i dont know the complete situaltion. one possible cause IF a host is in a rush could be thier shift ends, lets say at noon and you jump in text it 11;55 well they could just say i gotta go see me next time, which i have seen sour remarks from members about that. so she may want to please you. i was seeing a host some time ago and when her shift was ending soon her studio cut her off, but if she is in video then she could ' work ' late.
got the point?
sorry 4 babbling
i miss her:(
well i miss her boobs:D
got the point?
sorry 4 babbling
i miss her:(
well i miss her boobs:D
Gone Again
freeda disappears and comes back as Azurella22. Now she has gone. Who will she come back as this time? I hear she dumped Mondo for some slave who sweet talked the panties off her in Dungeon. Maybe she will come back in Dungeon. PLEASE!
RE: Gone Again
are you a copper or something ? if shes not here get over it, move on, plenty more fish 2 fry
RE: Gone Again
If you ever had text sex with her you'd know why she is missed. Or am I the only one so blessed?
Crazy in love
Is it possible that u like someone so much that you gone crazy for that person, in the way that you love someone but you cant be with that person?
Is it in human nature, i mean like normal thing, that someone lost his mind because unfortunately love someone?
I know there were many cases in which people are beign doing crazy things in the "name of love" but anyway...what do you think about all that
Is it in human nature, i mean like normal thing, that someone lost his mind because unfortunately love someone?
I know there were many cases in which people are beign doing crazy things in the "name of love" but anyway...what do you think about all that
RE: Crazy in love
im a host, a girl who was on this sites only for money.... never belived something like this can happend: not just to me, to anyone.... but... i met him... on a site like this.. and i just loved him... and he just loved me.... true love.... words cant express this... u need to feel it... anyway, we not together , even if we madly in love, but everything apart us... so... what crazy think u can do in this case?? to be with the person u love??? nothing is too crazy 4 that... and noone does nothing... stupid
RE: Crazy in love
Then I ask you this,
is it normal to bear all things? no
is it normal to believe all things? no
is it normal to hope all things? no
if u want normal practical and logical then u don't want love.
is it normal to bear all things? no
is it normal to believe all things? no
is it normal to hope all things? no
if u want normal practical and logical then u don't want love.
RE: Crazy in love
Most men want something or someone out of his reach,
the further it is away, the more he wants it.
But it doesn't mean it's bad or wrong.
Now thats human nature!!
the further it is away, the more he wants it.
But it doesn't mean it's bad or wrong.
Now thats human nature!!
St Trinians
New St Trinians action vid playing x
Jolly Hockeysticks... Im Looking 4ward 2 the new St Trinians film out Dec, I got horny looking at pics of Colin Firth who stars in it yesterday and filmed my take on it x ENJOY x No negative press pls x
Jolly Hockeysticks... Im Looking 4ward 2 the new St Trinians film out Dec, I got horny looking at pics of Colin Firth who stars in it yesterday and filmed my take on it x ENJOY x No negative press pls x