General Forum
dont make me laugh....
why do some guys on here insist they are some sort of studmuffin,ah? Like they can bed hosts here or have women falling at their feet LOL. Surely if that was the case they wouldnt need the use of sexcam site like cc. PURLEEEEEESE!
RE: dont make me laugh....
Because this is a website based on people's fantasy so one can pretend to be a gentleman when he is an a**hole or to be a player when he's actually never been close to a woman, just like you can pretend u are single and looking for love when u are married with 2 kids. Fair game i suppose ;)
RE: dont make me laugh....
Men like to brag and bullshit. The biggest losers are the biggest bullshitters. My excuse for being here, I'm old. Guys in their 20s, 30s and 40s are pure losers. They couldn't get laid in a women's prison with a handful of pardons. And there are NO gentlemen on any of these cam sites. Only perverts, wankers and stalkers.
My 2 cents
My 2 cents
RE: dont make me laugh....
I like the member, he is not old but very sexy and attractive, he has his lil freaks, that is why he comes here. But without that freaks life would be so boring, I love it, men like he make me smile and happy. :P
RE: dont make me laugh....
Since you don't see cams with the members I honestly don't think that you should talk about them. I have manny beautiful men that come into my room that are pure gentlemen!! They work hard and don't have time for relationships which require lots of time. They come here as they travel and can connect with a woman that is there when they can be and both enjoy....
RE: dont make me laugh....
For men it is all about the hunt...the seduction.... As was mentioned it is a fantasy...they just want you to submit...and for a smart host who knows how to play it right...that could mean more videos and more profit...
RE: dont make me laugh....
"and for a smart host who knows how to play it right...that could mean more videos and more profit..."
You just described most of the girls in Glamour/Little Shy.
You just described most of the girls in Glamour/Little Shy.
RE: dont make me laugh....
Because that's one of their fantasies - to be wanted and desired. They pay you to fulfill their fantasy, whatever that is, and your best bet is to be nice and play along, none of the guys enter a hot lady's room, to be told what losers they are. Unless they're visiting Dungeon.
RE: dont make me laugh....
"Unless they're visiting Dungeon." Not true. All hosts on this site are qualified Dominatrix, and they are in every category on this site with the possible exception of non adult
RE: dont make me laugh....
not true, not all hosts are dominos here, i play dom only if a guy asks me about it...go figure it out.
RE: dont make me laugh....
Read my post again, I said Dominatrix qualified and you just confirmed it by saying you can be Dom if viewer asks. And btw dominoes is a board game.
RE: dont make me laugh....
i dream of being a studmuffin,but suffer being a stuffnuddlin! :--)
RE: dont make me laugh....
The simple answer is they don't. it just seems to be an urban myth circulated by 'long time member' and a few other discontents. I challenge you to cite 3 such postings in these forums by so-called studmuffins.
RE: dont make me laugh....
Agree. Just try to suggest you've actually met a host or could possibly be friends with one. Studmuffin. My feelings are hurt.
RE: dont make me laugh....
At least such guys here are cognizant of the fact that they're actually paying to indulge in that particular fantasy. In that respect, it seems healthier and more honest than the genuine kind of egoism and narcissism that's rampant on social networks like facebook. Now that shit's laughable.
RE: dont make me laugh....
I agree. I do not belong to Phoneybook myself, but you could say the whole internet is complete bullshit.
RE: dont make me laugh....
What is the difference between a guy acting like he is the "Best" and a host that is okay and acting and putting in writing that she is the "Best". There is no difference!! I laugh when see these hosts comments about themselves like they are so hot and they are so not...LOL
RE: dont make me laugh....
There are many attractive guys on here...sorry Aubrey if they do not come to your room or maybe you are a trans....no clue what your point is...
RE: dont make me laugh....
and the point is to all these so called superstuds here lol.....get a life:)
RE: dont make me laugh....
Assuming then that you are a host, then if you have such a low opinion of the webcam sex site, why are you here? If is is so beneath you, maybe you should find something more suitable to your personality.... like maybe a judge at a hog calling contest.
RE: dont make me laugh....
"I don't remember saying I was a host." So? Where did I say you said so?
Assume: 1. to take for granted or without proof; suppose; postulate; posit
Often assumptions are conclusions drawn from the context of what someone said. You sound like a host. Are you?
Assume: 1. to take for granted or without proof; suppose; postulate; posit
Often assumptions are conclusions drawn from the context of what someone said. You sound like a host. Are you?
RE: dont make me laugh....
Ummm, could you please define "Pantomime" Because by the definition that I know for it, I sure don't get your point.
RE: dont make me laugh....
and who said it was beneath me? I was merely observing some of the viewers here getting delusions of grandeur....
RE: dont make me laugh....
the whole tenor of your post was demeaning. Your entire post, though not said in so many words, rings of snobbishness toward those who choose to come here for relaxation, fantasy, or whatever. It is quite clear from your post that you think those who come to a webcam sex site are losers.
RE: dont make me laugh....
Oh, to correct your typing....
PUHLEEZE, not PURLEEZE is the slang term.
And "Couldn't have"... not "couldnt of" is the correct grammatical construction.
PUHLEEZE, not PURLEEZE is the slang term.
And "Couldn't have"... not "couldnt of" is the correct grammatical construction.
RE: dont make me laugh....
Excuse me for intruding on your cat fight, but correcting Audrey's English language skills actually reflects very badly on you; especially in a forum where English is not the native tongue of many of those who post.
RE: dont make me laugh....
as for correcting my mistakes.... you really do have too much time on your hands...you need to get out more!:D
RE: dont make me laugh....
Funny remark for someone who has been posting here since early morning.
RE: dont make me laugh....
You just directed your last comment to your own post? Are you high?
RE: dont make me laugh....
So if you are not a host how would you even know what the members look like...LOL You must be so bored!!
RE: dont make me laugh....
Well it is true for the males part of it, the females are the ones benefiting from them.
RE: dont make me laugh....
sounds like you hold the same attitude as Aubrey. So what is worse? The "loser" who comes here to fantasize, or the one who makes their livelihood from them?
RE: dont make me laugh....
You know, I have to agree with OMT. Seems to me that someone who has to make his or her living off of losers, is an even bigger loser.
RE: dont make me laugh....
I agree. I mean, really, what kind of person has so low an opinion of those she depends upon for income? If a host thinks so badly of her paying viewers, then what kind of opinion can she have of herself? Certainly not a very good one, right?
RE: dont make me laugh....
It was just one hosts opnion. I dont agree with her. Here are so different members..old and young, goodlooking and not, wealthy and poor, single and married, rude and polite, unhappy and happy..and etc. I like and respect all them, not only because of money, because they are all so different and interesting humans,every with something special, that always make me entertained.
RE: dont make me laugh....
Everybody has different reasons for being here. I get a buzz of knowing men pay to see me and talk to me. And I want to get as much as I can, that's the thrill. I love the viewers on here but none of them has a remote chance to receive any sort of respect from me if it comes to real life. I guess feelings would be mutual on this one :)
RE: dont make me laugh....
Its really hilarious to watch these morons use different names and talk to themselves.
RE: dont make me laugh....
careful making assumptions there, Bonzo. Someone might think you are talking to yourself too
RE: dont make me laugh....
What the heck another contest of wills and ego´s. Oh please folks stops that, its very disheartening. Bless your cotton socks and enjoy. Peace out !!!!!
RE: dont make me laugh....
Well this thread has certainly ruffled a few feathers)))))....which was the intention:D
RE: dont make me laugh....
So... what about the numerous guys (large in absolute numbers, but very small relative to the total population of members) who DO sleep with multiple hosts they've met on various sites? How/Where do you classify them? Inquiring minds and all...
RE: dont make me laugh....
I'm from the US and have met and slept with, let's see... 7 hosts... and yet I don't think of myself as a "studmuffin." (In fact, I'll be visiting one of those seven in a few weeks.) I bet there are hundreds (at least) of guys like me with similar experiences... and every host I've slept with admitted to sleeping with at least one other member they'd met, so... there are plenty of "us" out there (whatever label you want to choose).
rating
dear chathosts and members,
i saw how somepeople think about rating and how they wish it to be changed, but i think that the current rating system is the right way because cc is a site which was created by people who didnt like other sites and wanted something better, so i think we have made a good job in creating cc.
alsoevry member can stay and rate the host from his opinion,its like voting, voting its not always fair for everyone but its the right way. some members are not comfortable to stay more than few minutes and some go away fast because they dont like something or for any other reason.
its life.
good luck to all
i saw how somepeople think about rating and how they wish it to be changed, but i think that the current rating system is the right way because cc is a site which was created by people who didnt like other sites and wanted something better, so i think we have made a good job in creating cc.
alsoevry member can stay and rate the host from his opinion,its like voting, voting its not always fair for everyone but its the right way. some members are not comfortable to stay more than few minutes and some go away fast because they dont like something or for any other reason.
its life.
good luck to all
RE: rating
"cc is a site which was created by people who didnt like other sites and wanted something better"
In 2000 there was really only one other cam girl site. And any tie there is a successful business you have many more get in on that business.
And that's the truth
In 2000 there was really only one other cam girl site. And any tie there is a successful business you have many more get in on that business.
And that's the truth
RE: rating
Your comment "i think we have made a good job in creating cc" What is this an answer from CC? Who the hell is WE....is this one of the staff speaking or what? What is your point if everyone disagrees with the current system?? That is a good thing?? I think not...who ever you are!!
RE: rating
if u disagree with current system, it dont mean everybody disagree...
but ok, now we talk about this, i have new idea, it would be really great if a viewer can rate a host only once in a week, that would eliminate hosts fans to give 5 star every day, and make rating result more real
but ok, now we talk about this, i have new idea, it would be really great if a viewer can rate a host only once in a week, that would eliminate hosts fans to give 5 star every day, and make rating result more real
RE: small price in hardore open and 100% for 121
Know the chathost rules!
1. What is One2One session?
It's our latest service giving your visitors the option to have an exclusive and private session with you. No interruptions from anyone else.
Exclusive privacy is the main difference between a One2One and open sessions so... please do NOT use One2One to elude from performing in open sessions, such as by asking your Viewers to choose One2One if they want a show.
1. What is One2One session?
It's our latest service giving your visitors the option to have an exclusive and private session with you. No interruptions from anyone else.
Exclusive privacy is the main difference between a One2One and open sessions so... please do NOT use One2One to elude from performing in open sessions, such as by asking your Viewers to choose One2One if they want a show.
RE: ok,and i want hbo and hbo comedy 4 free :))) as bonus
It is your problem if you are not interesting enough to get guys to take you 121 and especially if that is your thinking that to charge a 100% more....this is why you are not doing so good...I would think!
RE: :))) so people can be honest
don't be porud of yourself if you are wierd :| this is insane..
RE: :))) so people can be honest
Did someone read my original post? are you all crazy? I made a question, and i don`t understand why u girls tell me i have a problem? Coz ive asked members what opinion have about using toys ,anal etc in 121 in hardcore cat and have a smaller price in open? ....dumbbbbbb or u don`t understand english?
RE: :))) so people can be honest
We totally understood that you think for you to do any show in hardcore you want to charge with a 100% markup!! That is why we think you are out there. It is a stupid idea (since you are calling others names) and you are the one that doesn't realize how ridiculous your question is. You are being paid in hard core to do a show in Open whether you think so or not!! If you're not I doubt you will get repeat viewers and probably some complaints. This is not the rules for the site and I have seen your posts before that you improvise everything on here to meet your thoughts...the question is what is wrong with your thinking? Why don't you find a site that fits your needs instead of making new rules!! If you provide sound then you are supposed to use both open and 121. I think you just want to get as much money as possible and I think that it's not working for you.
Question your own thinking instead of attacking every comment here!!
Question your own thinking instead of attacking every comment here!!
Can pornography use become an actual brain addiction? (Research)
The human brain is programmed to incentivize behaviors that contribute to survival. The mesolimbic dopaminergic system rewards eating and sexuality with powerful pleasure incentives. Cocaine, opioids, alcohol, and other drugs subvert, or hijack, these pleasure systems, and cause the brain to think a drug high is necessary to survive. Evidence is now strong that natural rewards such as food and sex affect the reward systems in the same way drugs affect them, thus the current interest in ‘natural addiction.’ Addiction, whether to cocaine, food, or sex occurs when these activities cease to contribute to a state of homeostasis, and instead cause adverse consequences. For instance, when eating causes morbid obesity few will argue that the organism is in healthy balance. Similarly, pornography causes harm when it impairs or destroys a person’s ability to develop emotional intimacy.
Author: Donald L. Hilton, Jr. MD, FACS 20110330 Category: Research
Date Published: 2010
Author: Donald L. Hilton, Jr. MD, FACS 20110330 Category: Research
Date Published: 2010
RE: Can pornography use become an actual brain addiction? (Research)
Thanks but too much information!!
RE: Can pornography use become an actual brain addiction? (Research)
A significant number of members are addicted. I was for several years. It can be overcome but it manifests itself like any other addiction, it is a APA recognized addiction, you can be sent away for treatment of it..... moderation in all things....Confucious.
RE: Can pornography use become an actual brain addiction? (Research)
a question too profound for me to answer.pornography has too many syllables for me to comprehend & i definitely am lacking in the"B"word to understand.nest i can do is smut for butt :--)
RE: Can pornography use become an actual brain addiction? (Research)
Given that I've just learned the rather shocking fact that a tampon soaked in vodka (and then inserted where tampons are supposed to go) is a current trend ... I have a cunning plan.
If eating and sex stimulate us to produce that lovely dopamine stuff then I can think of a rather raunchy way to combine these 2 acts and have the added bonus of getting alcohol at the same time .... I better go coz looks like tonight I'm - umm - 'eating out'.
If eating and sex stimulate us to produce that lovely dopamine stuff then I can think of a rather raunchy way to combine these 2 acts and have the added bonus of getting alcohol at the same time .... I better go coz looks like tonight I'm - umm - 'eating out'.
Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
This may be more a question for my fellow viewers but there always seems to be a better response to posts in this forum.
What I mean by extra, it could be maybe an extra $1 per min, a monthly fee for a sort of VIP member, a monthly fee for a host's fan club or by just requiring 121 for c2c.
So what do you all think?
What I mean by extra, it could be maybe an extra $1 per min, a monthly fee for a sort of VIP member, a monthly fee for a host's fan club or by just requiring 121 for c2c.
So what do you all think?
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
I would pay more not to use my cam
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
Perhaps you should turn it around to your advantage ally and ask the hosts if they would be willing to charge less if you didn't use your cam :P
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
It's usually the host who asks for c2c so I fail to see why any member should be expected to pay a premium. Its only March but I think we can already grant the prize for the most inane post of 2011.
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
why should i pay my own cam for what? No way! If any hosts ask me to see my cam then, Choice either discount price or no c2c. Take it or leave it!
Do not beggar with any members about c2c because members pay to see u in video and u get money plus free cam by any members, also u got real information by members about their private live! But what about host? Will host tell us about their private life? I felt that host want more and more than members asked!!!
Do not beggar with any members about c2c because members pay to see u in video and u get money plus free cam by any members, also u got real information by members about their private live! But what about host? Will host tell us about their private life? I felt that host want more and more than members asked!!!
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
Why would a member ask to be charged more for anything on here?? I have my doubts this is a member. Pretty rediculous question!
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
I am a member since 2000. And I know the site that invented cam sites charges a monthly fee for VIP membership that is needed for c2c. And there are 2 others that require a higher priced one on one pvt to use c2c. And there are 3 new sites I belong to that have no c2c.
Again I was only asking if things would be different on cc is it costs the member extra to use c2c.
Again I was only asking if things would be different on cc is it costs the member extra to use c2c.
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
sure it would be different, no one would use c2c
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
does replying to a post dilute your authority as"thread starter"? :--)
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
Dont you think the host should pay for watching my show! !!
RE: Would things be different if viewer had to pay extra for c2c?
No ...not that idea either...LOL
RE: Who tried use of 'vodka tampon' ?
I'd never heard of this but apparently the guys stick them up their back passage. Pouring the vodka down my throat has always worked for me and I think I will stay with this method.
RE: Who tried use of 'vodka tampon' ?
Police in southern Germany warned this week of a dangerous new form of alchohol abuse among teens - using tampons soaked in vodka to get drunk quickly and hide the smell. The practice poses grave health risks, they said.
RE: Who tried use of 'vodka tampon' ?
And here I was thinking that getting drunk via "eyeball shots" was the current hip thing to do. Man, sometimes I feel just so uninformed.
RE: Who tried use of 'vodka tampon' ?
Kind of gives a whole new meaning to the term Bloody Mary, eh?
RE: another theme about raiting
If you're in open video then you need to treat all who enter equally. Can't say I blame the bloke who rated you low. If someone wants your personal singular attention, that's what 121 is for.
RE: another theme about raiting
I agree with "another viewer" in general except I wouldn't say she needs to treat all equally. I think that the first viewer should perhaps get some priority in terms of what type of show the host is giving, especially if the host is in the middle of a show when subsquent viewers enter. But if they are just chatting, she should probably distribute her time pretty evenly and all, including the first viewer, should understand that her response might be a little slow since it is open.
In terms of the host saying it isn't fair, the second member spent his money to come visit you. Even if it is $0.50, why should he be told "Get out! I'm busy!" Did you say that? No, but you might as well have. If anything, you should have told the first member (if couldn't hear the most annoying notification in the porn site world that you had INCOMING CONTACTS) that another guy had entered and that you might be a little slow in responding. The first viewer took the risk of this happening by not going 121 so that is too bad for him. The second viewer did nothing wrong by entering open so why tell him to get out?
If you want to avoid this problem in the future, if it is a regular, give a password ahead of time. If it is a new person and you've been talking awhile, ask if he wants a password since you're having a good chat and you don't want to get interrupted. I bet you will get a very favorable response, at least, I personally would like to hear that. There is a risk that he might want a password all the time thereafter, but since he wasn't going 121 and you don't want more than one guy anyway, this doesn't seem to be a problem. And you might end up having a long-term regular this way.
In terms of the host saying it isn't fair, the second member spent his money to come visit you. Even if it is $0.50, why should he be told "Get out! I'm busy!" Did you say that? No, but you might as well have. If anything, you should have told the first member (if couldn't hear the most annoying notification in the porn site world that you had INCOMING CONTACTS) that another guy had entered and that you might be a little slow in responding. The first viewer took the risk of this happening by not going 121 so that is too bad for him. The second viewer did nothing wrong by entering open so why tell him to get out?
If you want to avoid this problem in the future, if it is a regular, give a password ahead of time. If it is a new person and you've been talking awhile, ask if he wants a password since you're having a good chat and you don't want to get interrupted. I bet you will get a very favorable response, at least, I personally would like to hear that. There is a risk that he might want a password all the time thereafter, but since he wasn't going 121 and you don't want more than one guy anyway, this doesn't seem to be a problem. And you might end up having a long-term regular this way.
RE: another theme about raiting
I specifically said the first member should get priority if you were giving a show. I addressed your concerns.
RE: another theme about raiting
Totally agree!! You should welcome and acknowledge all! Explain to first member that others have joined the room.
RE: another theme about raiting
just try give attention to all the guests. i would be angry if host ignore me even if i come second. and answer 1 word a minute. i would rate one. thats why so important to give attention to all of them.
RE: another theme about raiting
I have gone in to open and always yielded to the first viewer. If we had a voyeur option on this site, it would eliminate a lot of this shit. And if a viewer wants privacy, that is why there is a 121 option. Just remember that 121 only assures privacy not a nude show in Glamour/little shy.
RE: another theme about raiting
Camcontacts should really introduce a minimum time viewers have to be in chat before they are allowed to rate and leave a comment. On another very good site I broadcast it's 4 minutes, viewers can leave comments to which host can respond and rating is not anonymous!
The whole system here is not host friendly at all!
The whole system here is not host friendly at all!
RE: another theme about raiting
I think I know the site you speak of. But it is 5 minutes not 4 and the rating is only for the purpose of contests
RE: another theme about raiting
I am 100% certain it's 4 minutes and the purpose of it is it's own purpose, no contests on there :)
RE: another theme about raiting
again this same false statement about rating in cc. i have read how cc explains the rating to hosts, and there was simply said that even viewer is able to rate after 1 second in video, this rate do not count unless viewer have spent atleast 2 minutes in video.
Would be great if cc could post about this and tell if this thruth or not, i am tired for all this whining about ratings.
Would be great if cc could post about this and tell if this thruth or not, i am tired for all this whining about ratings.
RE: another theme about raiting
Sorry but it has never been said that a rating does not count until after the viewer has been in room at least 2 min. You are thinking of another site!
This is one of the big problems with this rating system ...
This is one of the big problems with this rating system ...
RE: another theme about raiting
maybe bigger problem in ratings is this:
"Note: We employ various techniques to prevent abuse of the Viewer Ratings.
Please don't ask lots of Viewers for short 1 minute video chat sessions
in an attempt to increase your Viewer Ratings. This is not allowed and could have the opposite effect,
lowering your Viewer Ratings.
We will continue to monitor and modify the Viewer Ratings to ensure fairness."
monitor and modify? maybe thats why all hosts dont have 5 star even they ask their fan viewers to give 5 star?
"Note: We employ various techniques to prevent abuse of the Viewer Ratings.
Please don't ask lots of Viewers for short 1 minute video chat sessions
in an attempt to increase your Viewer Ratings. This is not allowed and could have the opposite effect,
lowering your Viewer Ratings.
We will continue to monitor and modify the Viewer Ratings to ensure fairness."
monitor and modify? maybe thats why all hosts dont have 5 star even they ask their fan viewers to give 5 star?
RE: another theme about raiting
While the other members may have a point I am happy to accept the risk that I may get a reply such as yours when I jump into someone else's video. When it happens I thank the host, say goodbye and rate her 5 stars and will probably visit her later (in 121).
Therefore, in my opinion, rating you low, for that, is rather unfair.
Therefore, in my opinion, rating you low, for that, is rather unfair.
RE: another theme about raiting
im a host and if im a show already or a role play with the first viewer, that maybe put a lot of time and effort into creating his fantasy for that session, i wont interupt it for a guy who jumps in to say play with ur ass hahaha i couldnt care less about his 1 star, just frustrated guy who knew i was busy from the mom he entered , cope with the show thats already on or feel free to leave , jmy attention and full service always go on to the first one to join
RE: another theme about raiting
The couple of times that I did ask a member to come back at the request of the first viewer in the room...have not been good so I look at it from the perspective of the guys coming into the room and I notify the first member that there are others in the room. He was taking a chance when he did not take you to 121 and OPEN means open to all viewers! Maybe you will learn too. You can't change how the viewers feel so you might as well try not to offend them...their only recourse if they took offense is to rate you low.
RE: another theme about raiting
" I notify the first member that there are others in the room"
Right, thats normal practice. When host has only "open session" option (button) it is obvious that she is with guest(s) already. If some guy does not realize, hosts tell him.
Right, thats normal practice. When host has only "open session" option (button) it is obvious that she is with guest(s) already. If some guy does not realize, hosts tell him.
RE: another theme about raiting
Other than the horn that honks in the hosts room the original member does not have any notice that new guests have joined and he should be told so that he can understand he is not the one and only any longer. He can then choose to stay and share her attention or come back later and in 121 :) He is perfectly aware that he is not in 121 when he came in.... so he should be prepared for that to happen. 121 was an option when he chose to visit her.
RE: another theme about raiting
I give 5 stars when she doesn't ask to see me on cam - so depressing when she says, oh you really are old! :(
RE: another theme about raiting
Replace the word old with ugly and I know exactly what you mean ally :P
Not that I am young it is just that my ugliness overshadows my age by some length.
Not that I am young it is just that my ugliness overshadows my age by some length.
RE: another theme about raiting
Russian saying: "men should be a bit prettier then monkeys.." so dear INYF you have nothing to worry about. ))
RE: another theme about raiting
Thank you for your kind words :) But are you sure the saying isn't "Men should be nearly as attractive as monkeys" :P
Maybe, just maybe, then I would have nothing to worry about.
Maybe, just maybe, then I would have nothing to worry about.
RE: another theme about raiting
Well if she has only the open option displayed I assume that there is someone in video otherwise both the open and 121 option would be displayed. However there have been posts that suggest a host can display only the open option.
So to answer your question yes I know someone else is in video. My main reasons for jumping in are
1. To hopefully catch the host naked (then I will stay silently).
2. To see if she is as attractive as her photos suggest and to give me an excuse to escape quickly if she is not.
I only go into open with hosts I have never had a video with. If it is a host I know I will wait until she is free and take her 121.
So to answer your question yes I know someone else is in video. My main reasons for jumping in are
1. To hopefully catch the host naked (then I will stay silently).
2. To see if she is as attractive as her photos suggest and to give me an excuse to escape quickly if she is not.
I only go into open with hosts I have never had a video with. If it is a host I know I will wait until she is free and take her 121.
RE: another theme about raiting
all sessions should be 121 (just one member in pvt) plus some external voyeur view for the ones who like to watch ... in silence... it.s almost impossible for a host to make 2-3-4 simultaneous conversations , click on pvt-texting for each(!) line AND do a show all in same time, obviously someone will leave unhappy .
an external voyeur would not bother the show , just watch, they can be 10 at once(no matter) but then the host will be able to focus on her show properly in this way to her only ONE member.
the voyeurs not to be allowed to give ratings.
this way would be fair for both members and hosts.
an external voyeur would not bother the show , just watch, they can be 10 at once(no matter) but then the host will be able to focus on her show properly in this way to her only ONE member.
the voyeurs not to be allowed to give ratings.
this way would be fair for both members and hosts.
RE: another theme about raiting
I go 121 because i don`t want to share :p
And if this will happen that there is only 121 and voyeur, i think no host will turn the option off. They will earn a lot more as they do now: Only higher-prized 121 available for session, plus voyeur`s money. Would be good for the girls but not so good for me ;)
And if this will happen that there is only 121 and voyeur, i think no host will turn the option off. They will earn a lot more as they do now: Only higher-prized 121 available for session, plus voyeur`s money. Would be good for the girls but not so good for me ;)
RE: another theme about raiting
A host can make a lot more money entertaining several at one time in open. The voyeur option is creepy!! I think it was well thought out and different when they set it up the way it is.
RE: another theme about raiting
So nostalgic when I remember davedave rounding up members in commchat for a wet T shirt show - we each paid 50 cents only but the host was happy cos she had up to 6 members at the same time. We guys took it in turns to chat to the host during her perfomance. Very friendly and fun.
RE: another theme about raiting
I never had a problem with this. I go into vid in open and another viewer there. She says to me, sorry ally, someone else here now. I reply, no probs love, I come back later. Seems like some members just invent problems. This is a wonderful place. When I was young, the only way I got see a pretty girl naked was to lay on the floor in the swim pool changing room and peek at the girl in the next cubicle. Sometimes it was a guy. :(
RE: another theme about raiting
only when you were young?isn't that court order still valid? :--)
an hello and a question
hello there everyone , some already know me with that name or soem other :p lol just to tell u some hello to all recognize me , i left cc for now 3 months and even its hard sometimes (cc can be addicted like drug as some knows :) ) just want to say thank u for all the girl that were able to accept my "temper" and my changing "mood" and "character " :) now all that said im getting married in mid may so coming soon and im wondering if its normal sometimes to have some panic , some nigthmare or stuff like that concering that wedding and future life . i mean i love her a lot (not a cc girl for all that migth wondering ) and i really want to spend my life with her and we have awesome moment together , so why si it like that? is it something "normal" ? psy can help?
thanks to any help about that
regards
syl
thanks to any help about that
regards
syl
RE: an hello and a question
I agree with you. I married only after a month of knowing him, but I never felt so sure about anything else in my life. We've been together 6 years so far and I love him to bits!
RE: an hello and a question
congratulation, i wish you to be happy, is strange for me to hear this, if you really love the woman you choose you should be very happy and don't feel any worry...for sure something is there, think twice where is the problem, maybe as it is first time and you have an age, you are a little bit scared to do this step and this make you feel bad
any estimate on fixing browser issues?
is there any time frame as to when cc plans of fixing issues with various browsers with their new system?
RE: any estimate on fixing browser issues?
I have a PC that is over 8 years old, uses I.E. 8, has low RAM, et cetera, and I have no problems. Let me put it another way: my PC sucks, and I still have no problems entering video, using cam to cam, viewing pics, et cetera. I sometimes have problems with sound, and get a static-like sound if the host is using sound, but that was happening way before CC updated anything.
I also tried Google Chrome, and everything was okay. I did notice that the graphics seemed a little less clear, but I could surf the site and see the pics okay. And perhaps the graphics were always like this since I never went to CC on Google Chrome before today.
I really don't understand what is going on with people. I do know that there was a recent Java update and a recent Flash update so if you haven't updated your software, perhaps that will help. If you have installed Sun's Java, then go to your control panel and choose the Java icon. Then just choose the update tab and update the software.
To update Flash, go to the following link:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
Make sure you uncheck the get Google toolbar box and then click the download button. You should first check to make sure if you already have the latest version (10.2.153.1) by going to the following link:
http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
Look for the box on the right. It will tell you your version.
If you are having problems updating Flash, you might need to uninstall it. That is a little more complicated, but not too difficult. Post if you need help doing this, but make it the subject so I or another member can see it easily and notice your post.
Also, try doing an extensive clean of all of your cookies, temporary internet files, et cetera. Right click on the Internet Explorer "e" on your desktop and choose "properties". You should be at the "General" tab. Choose the "Delete" button in the middle of the page. Put green check marks in all of the boxes and then press the new "Delete" button at the bottom of the window. Then click the "OK button on the original window. This will also wipe out any saved passwords so make sure you remember yours.
If you are using Google Chrome, click the wrench at the top right of the window. The words "Customize and Control Google Chrome" appear when you point to it. The wrench is just above "Other bookmarks" and next to the star. After clicking the wrench, go to "Tools" and select "Clear browsing data...". Fill all the boxes with green check marks and press the "Clear browsing data" button.
You should always take these steps just before you shut down your computer. Others may disagree and say that it slows things down, but that is only true the first time you go back to a site. And like I said, I have a very old PC and all is fine. In fact, because I'm going to porn sites, lol, I do this all the time during the day and also make sure to manually update my anti-virus software throughout the day as well rather than waiting for the automatic updates.
Finally, the last thing you should do is go to the following site:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html
That site will allow you to clear out all of your Adobe flash cookies. Click the "Delete all sites" button on the right. I do this every now and then, but it wouldn't hurt to do it each day. You can also access this link when you are clearing browsing data on Google Chrome. You will see a link for it just next to the "Clear browsing data" button.
I don't know anything about Firefox, Mozilla, or other browsers, but I'm sure they have ways to clean out old files as well. I would do it for every browswer installed on your computer.
If none of this helps, and if no browser work for you, I have no idea what is wrong. Like I said, with both I.E. 8 and Google Chrome, I don't have problems. I have a pretty good internet connection most of the time but my PC is old so I am surprised others are having so much trouble.
I also tried Google Chrome, and everything was okay. I did notice that the graphics seemed a little less clear, but I could surf the site and see the pics okay. And perhaps the graphics were always like this since I never went to CC on Google Chrome before today.
I really don't understand what is going on with people. I do know that there was a recent Java update and a recent Flash update so if you haven't updated your software, perhaps that will help. If you have installed Sun's Java, then go to your control panel and choose the Java icon. Then just choose the update tab and update the software.
To update Flash, go to the following link:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
Make sure you uncheck the get Google toolbar box and then click the download button. You should first check to make sure if you already have the latest version (10.2.153.1) by going to the following link:
http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
Look for the box on the right. It will tell you your version.
If you are having problems updating Flash, you might need to uninstall it. That is a little more complicated, but not too difficult. Post if you need help doing this, but make it the subject so I or another member can see it easily and notice your post.
Also, try doing an extensive clean of all of your cookies, temporary internet files, et cetera. Right click on the Internet Explorer "e" on your desktop and choose "properties". You should be at the "General" tab. Choose the "Delete" button in the middle of the page. Put green check marks in all of the boxes and then press the new "Delete" button at the bottom of the window. Then click the "OK button on the original window. This will also wipe out any saved passwords so make sure you remember yours.
If you are using Google Chrome, click the wrench at the top right of the window. The words "Customize and Control Google Chrome" appear when you point to it. The wrench is just above "Other bookmarks" and next to the star. After clicking the wrench, go to "Tools" and select "Clear browsing data...". Fill all the boxes with green check marks and press the "Clear browsing data" button.
You should always take these steps just before you shut down your computer. Others may disagree and say that it slows things down, but that is only true the first time you go back to a site. And like I said, I have a very old PC and all is fine. In fact, because I'm going to porn sites, lol, I do this all the time during the day and also make sure to manually update my anti-virus software throughout the day as well rather than waiting for the automatic updates.
Finally, the last thing you should do is go to the following site:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html
That site will allow you to clear out all of your Adobe flash cookies. Click the "Delete all sites" button on the right. I do this every now and then, but it wouldn't hurt to do it each day. You can also access this link when you are clearing browsing data on Google Chrome. You will see a link for it just next to the "Clear browsing data" button.
I don't know anything about Firefox, Mozilla, or other browsers, but I'm sure they have ways to clean out old files as well. I would do it for every browswer installed on your computer.
If none of this helps, and if no browser work for you, I have no idea what is wrong. Like I said, with both I.E. 8 and Google Chrome, I don't have problems. I have a pretty good internet connection most of the time but my PC is old so I am surprised others are having so much trouble.
RE: any estimate on fixing browser issues?
thanks cc, the problem is fixed now. so whatever you changed on your end technically in the last 8 hours or so has fixed the problem. i can see photos in the host archives again.
RE: about meeting
To me this and all cam sites are for adult entertainment.. And there are no doubt (from what I'm told by hosts) no shortage of asshole members on site (and other sites too). That having been said, the Long Term/Marriage category is very misleading. Also a number of hosts and members have posted on these boards about meeting and marrying. And then we have the clowns who post in viewer forum about being such stud muffins that even girls in non adult strip for them for free and then they get on planes to fly over and bang any host they choose. It is CC's fault that this shit gets posted in these forums.
And finally most viewers are losers that can't get a date in the real world. You must be a new host. Post your question in the Chathost Only forum and I'm sure your sisters will tell of members just like the one you just dealt with.
And finally most viewers are losers that can't get a date in the real world. You must be a new host. Post your question in the Chathost Only forum and I'm sure your sisters will tell of members just like the one you just dealt with.
RE: about meeting
You are assuming that is the person that gave you a low rating. The ratings are updated once a day, at 00:00 CC time.
Are you sure he was the person that gave you a low rating? Even if he left your video at 23:59 CC time and the ratings updated 1 minute later, it could have been someone that visited you earlier that day.
Also, in terms of being allowed to meet, CC doesn't care. You can give your email, your phone number, et cetera. Some other sites definitely care, but not CC.
If you told him you are not allowed to meet, he may have given you a low rating because he felt you were lying. Some studio bosses may have different rules and say no meetings, et cetera, but once again, CC does not., so if you are at a studio, you need to say your boss doesn't let you meet or give out personal information to protect the safety of the other girls at the studio. Do not say it is CC setting these rules because most of us know that is not true, and like I said, the guy might have given you a low rating since he felt you lied to him, sort of like all the Glamour hosts that say they can't strip, lol.
Of course, giving a low rating because of not being willing to meet, even if a host lied about the reason, is an asshole move. But like I said, you don't know if this guy was the person that rated you lower unless he was the only viewer that day.
Also remember, if you had, for example, 5 stars, he still could have given you 4 stars and that could have lowered you to 4,5 stars. It doesn't necessarilly mean he gave you a bad rating. It just means he might have given you a rating lower than what you had before so when it was recalculated, your rating went down.
Are you sure he was the person that gave you a low rating? Even if he left your video at 23:59 CC time and the ratings updated 1 minute later, it could have been someone that visited you earlier that day.
Also, in terms of being allowed to meet, CC doesn't care. You can give your email, your phone number, et cetera. Some other sites definitely care, but not CC.
If you told him you are not allowed to meet, he may have given you a low rating because he felt you were lying. Some studio bosses may have different rules and say no meetings, et cetera, but once again, CC does not., so if you are at a studio, you need to say your boss doesn't let you meet or give out personal information to protect the safety of the other girls at the studio. Do not say it is CC setting these rules because most of us know that is not true, and like I said, the guy might have given you a low rating since he felt you lied to him, sort of like all the Glamour hosts that say they can't strip, lol.
Of course, giving a low rating because of not being willing to meet, even if a host lied about the reason, is an asshole move. But like I said, you don't know if this guy was the person that rated you lower unless he was the only viewer that day.
Also remember, if you had, for example, 5 stars, he still could have given you 4 stars and that could have lowered you to 4,5 stars. It doesn't necessarilly mean he gave you a bad rating. It just means he might have given you a rating lower than what you had before so when it was recalculated, your rating went down.
RE: about meeting
maybe ratings shouldn't be given by the viewers but based on the amount of time the viewer spends in the actual vid, as if a viewer doesn't like the host for whatever reason they will leave pretty early on, and a viewer who likes a host will spend much longer in vid. Probably not the greatest idea ever, but there it is
RE: about meeting
Minutes in video is also affected by price so that gives a lower priced host an advantage. Also, sometimes a session starts off well and then turns ugly. A host shouldn't get credit for a longer video if she, for example, told a member that she would strip after 10 minutes, and then didn't deliver as promised. Or, for example, yesterday, a host I was with started talking to her boss or boyfriend (or both, lol) 10 minutes into the session. I stayed since she was hot and doing well enough but then I one starred her for not paying attention. Had she not done that, she would have had 5 from me, but she stopped reading what I was typing, et cetera, so she got 1 star.
Now if you meant that the member's rating is multiplied by the minutes in video, that could work a little better, but there is still the problem of lower priced hosts having an advantage. Also, I think it would make most hosts end up with very high ratings and that is already a problem in my view. I think too many average hosts have 4,5 and 5 stars since members tend to be generous despite the complaints from hosts.
I would increase the sample size of votes from the last 10 to the last 25, and make it so one vote per member of these 25 votes (and try to confirm not multiple accounts by looking at CC's records and IP address). That won't solve all the problems, but it would help.
Now if you meant that the member's rating is multiplied by the minutes in video, that could work a little better, but there is still the problem of lower priced hosts having an advantage. Also, I think it would make most hosts end up with very high ratings and that is already a problem in my view. I think too many average hosts have 4,5 and 5 stars since members tend to be generous despite the complaints from hosts.
I would increase the sample size of votes from the last 10 to the last 25, and make it so one vote per member of these 25 votes (and try to confirm not multiple accounts by looking at CC's records and IP address). That won't solve all the problems, but it would help.
RE: about meeting
"Minutes in video is also affected by price so that gives a lower priced host an advantage" Amen to that.
We need written comments that can not be deleted by the host like she can in her Forum
We need written comments that can not be deleted by the host like she can in her Forum
RE: about meeting
You better give me 1* too big man, as I also stopped reading what you'd typed half way through.
RE: about meeting
That wasn't really that long of a post. Okay, you get one star. And something tells me that Instant Action is your favorite category, lol.
RE: about meeting
What about the member the other week who admitted to rating a girl purely on whether or not he thought her photos in her profile were realistic or not....
Lol, he was a prat for doing that.
Lol, he was a prat for doing that.
RE: about meeting
That's the problem with democracy...so many of the voters deserve being disenfranchised!
RE: about meeting
Because members assume that the rating of a chathost is based upon the hosts performance in their chatroom.
Now we see the people vote purely because they do or don't like someone. How can a host control that??
That isn't fair on the host.
Now we see the people vote purely because they do or don't like someone. How can a host control that??
That isn't fair on the host.
RE: why do you say NO?
I've heard a few horror stories where the guy actually did rush to meet the host. Of course, I've heard even more stories of hosts playing games and making the guy think he wants her to visit.
Just be honest. It won't satisfy everyone, but most guys will be okay with it.
Just be honest. It won't satisfy everyone, but most guys will be okay with it.
RE: about meeting
I dont think the rating should be connected to if a host meets or not.*******
I Think there are many hosts to have met, and they hopefully choose carefully.
I have met several hosts, most keep in touch tho I dont do vid now and have not for several years, still get sms, and Christmas cards from a few ex CC, and a few still live.
Some now friends on FB, or twitter, and of course msn or YM.
We are friends outside CC, it just we met here..
Rating a host at her place of work because of something outside work is wrong IMHO.
M
I Think there are many hosts to have met, and they hopefully choose carefully.
I have met several hosts, most keep in touch tho I dont do vid now and have not for several years, still get sms, and Christmas cards from a few ex CC, and a few still live.
Some now friends on FB, or twitter, and of course msn or YM.
We are friends outside CC, it just we met here..
Rating a host at her place of work because of something outside work is wrong IMHO.
M
RE: what music does meet ur mood now?)
shake that ass, Bass slammers
In and out of love, Armin van Buuren
Milk inc
September
Porchia
Miami
Is a heavy one tonight :)
In and out of love, Armin van Buuren
Milk inc
September
Porchia
Miami
Is a heavy one tonight :)
I used a Meat Grinder to Masterbate with and now
I used a Meat Grinder to Masterbate with and now instead of a Weiner I have a Hamburger.
RE: I used a Meat Grinder to Masterbate with and now
This explains the high turnover rate of staff in McDonalds
As for Bugger King .... you don't want to know!
As for Bugger King .... you don't want to know!
Mobile cover girls
On the home page for the Mobile version of the site got a few girls there, who are they??
Anyone got any names, or where i can find out
Thanks :)
Anyone got any names, or where i can find out
Thanks :)
I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now I cannot get my hand off.
How can superglue get disolved?
How can superglue get disolved?
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
I'm afraid amputation is the only solution.
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
Question is what exactly you want amputat? Hand or cock?
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
I wasn't aware that super glue could masturbate.
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
Wait for 'it' to shrink back to its normal miniscule size and your hand should become free! Lol!
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
miniscule you must be talking about your members and not my member.
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
its some mistress made you doing this? poor you:(
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
Joke, right? haha
Or can anyone REALLY be so stupid?
Or maybe you thought it was the K-Y? That will teach you to look for things in the dark. Try acetone or nail polish remover, and then wash really good. Oh, and make sure you don't get the nail polish remover up your pee hole. Or you will have worse problems than your hand glued to your prick.
Better yet, go to the emergency room, and try explaining this to the doctors and nurses there. I'm sure they would enjoy the laugh!
Or can anyone REALLY be so stupid?
Or maybe you thought it was the K-Y? That will teach you to look for things in the dark. Try acetone or nail polish remover, and then wash really good. Oh, and make sure you don't get the nail polish remover up your pee hole. Or you will have worse problems than your hand glued to your prick.
Better yet, go to the emergency room, and try explaining this to the doctors and nurses there. I'm sure they would enjoy the laugh!
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
I'm reading the instructions right from the tube of superglue: "If skin bonding occurs, soak in acetone-based nail polish remover or warm soapy water and carefully peel or roll skin apart (do not pull). KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN." Maybe they should add: AND DO NOT USE FOR MASTURBATION.
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
should have trusted me!!! i've had my share of stupid stuff :P.
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
I posted the same information earlier. wasn't a matter of trusting you.
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
check an even earlier post. ur 8 hours later. yes, i want credit. yes im being childish about it :P.
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
Reminds me of the warning on the superman haloween costume, "not for actual flight use".
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
you fool, everyone knows it is "no more nails" your supposed to use to masturbate with
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
have a loooong bath, water is accelerating the skin renewal together with loosing the "old" skin, maybe 2-3 weeks of bathing will help.
RE: I used Super Glue to Masturbate with and now ...
just let it wear off and think about the memories
question for all viewers :)
hi guys... i was just wondering... when u enter a room how do u like to see the girl in front of the pc?! on a bed, a chair or a sofa?! does it really matter for u how she is presenting herself in front of the camera? is it better if all her body is visible at all times or do u prefer to see her up close ( from waist above with really pretty face ) and than she can zoom out and allow u to see all of her?! and does it matter if she is wearing makeup or she is more natural looking?! just a few questions i thought to ask cus i've allways wondered about that... thanks in advance for everyone who answers :)
RE: question for all viewers :)
i prefer bed or sofa, chair is bit difficult to make a good show.
i also like to see different poses, not just sit or lay at same position, and i really prefer to see face with body, it always makes the show feel more real than just a close-up... i have already seen close enough what pussy looks like lol
and anyway it is usually face that i first notice about a girl, and combination of face and body is what makes a girl special and differ from other girls.
thats my opinion as a viewer )
i also like to see different poses, not just sit or lay at same position, and i really prefer to see face with body, it always makes the show feel more real than just a close-up... i have already seen close enough what pussy looks like lol
and anyway it is usually face that i first notice about a girl, and combination of face and body is what makes a girl special and differ from other girls.
thats my opinion as a viewer )
RE: question for all viewers :)
You won`t find it. Lie is basic of sexbusiness.
But hey, so many sweet liars around :)
But hey, so many sweet liars around :)
RE: question for all viewers :)
So rude to put all girls in that category...now go to your room....
RE: question for all viewers :)
i'm guessing there are more options than cards in a deck,so perhaps it's best for you to feel comfortable & ready to adapt to each member's preferences when they enter vid :--)
RE: question for all viewers :)
This is primarily a visual experience. So all is important.
Good lighting.
Bed.
Face or face and all body.
Naked is always good, or
Quality lingerie, not cheap costume stuff, or
Stylish clothes for club or party.
Not a sweatshirt and bule jeans!
Either a fresh face or careful makeup.
Hair brushed, either down or up carefully.
Sound on and working without hand held or head set microphpone.
When I see this kind of appearance, I am always impressed. But it is rare. My favorites mat not be classic beauties, but they are always stylish, and usually have a smile.
Good lighting.
Bed.
Face or face and all body.
Naked is always good, or
Quality lingerie, not cheap costume stuff, or
Stylish clothes for club or party.
Not a sweatshirt and bule jeans!
Either a fresh face or careful makeup.
Hair brushed, either down or up carefully.
Sound on and working without hand held or head set microphpone.
When I see this kind of appearance, I am always impressed. But it is rare. My favorites mat not be classic beauties, but they are always stylish, and usually have a smile.
RE: question for all viewers :)
I prefer to see her unaware that I've entered the room and I hang around watching her do things she thinks noonce is seeing.
RE: question for all viewers :)
he doesn't,but he has 2 ugly stepsisters.that's why he has to be home before midnight or he'll turn into a pumpkin...no wait that's wrong,i mean he likes to be home before midnight so he can roger a pumpkin :--)
RE: question for all viewers :)
oh yes this topic was definitely too serious for intelligent regulars... better turn it to joke like every other topics
RE: question for all viewers :)
i just wanna say its a turn-off for me only to see a girls body. Her face and especially the eyes are very important for me to see. a girl pretending a blowjob, while looking into the cam is a big turn on for me. So girls. please look at me.
3DDT
When will CC have 3D? Where can I get CC 3d Glasses?
Is it true what they say about 3D Tits?
Is it true what they say about 3D Tits?
RE: 3DDT
"Is it true what they say about 3D Tits?"
Now that's the question of someone who spends way too much time watching computer porn...
Now that's the question of someone who spends way too much time watching computer porn...
RE: 3DDT
One site I used to frequent, tried 3D. It was a disaster. It's still shown as available, but seems few if any hosts offer it, and getting/using the glasses is a hassle. If you like it, more power to you tho
New photo archive viewer
The new photo archive viewer really sucks! No zoom, please go back to the old one
RE: New photo archive viewer
he needs zoom because he's blind but too cheap to buy glasses? L--)
RE: New photo archive viewer
He could get camcontact lenses?
... Oh come on .... get your titters out!
... Oh come on .... get your titters out!
RE: New photo archive viewer
We are still in the process of introducing the HD pictures on the site and some functions are not yet there. The zoom option will be available by the middle of next week at the latest! Thank you for your patience ;)
RE: New photo archive viewer
Listen up camcontacts. Test your schemes offline and stop bringing down our site!
RE: New photo archive viewer
Well i guess they cannot just remove all the pics at once and put them back in HD with a wave of the magic wand. I for one am very glad to see the site improving. Keep up the good work CC :)))
RE: New photo archive viewer
I mean they should test the process on an offline beta system and when they get it right, then apply it to the online system.
How many videos have hosts lost coz some guy cannot see how she looks???
How many videos have hosts lost coz some guy cannot see how she looks???
RE: New photo archive viewer
Your attitude sucks!!! It isn't "our" site... It is their site, and they are just trying to improve it to make our experience here a better one. Could they have gone about it a better way? Perhaps, but you sound like an ungrateful two-year old.
Personally, I don't like the idea of enhancing pics that are are not at higher resolutions because too many flaws show up. And I kind of like the old-fashioned basic layout. It is more representative of a what CC is... a site where two people can just have a nice chat or do more so I hope they don't change too much. But since it isn't my site, it is their right to do what they want.
Next time why not make your suggestions in a more mature manner instead of acting like some angry boss.
Personally, I don't like the idea of enhancing pics that are are not at higher resolutions because too many flaws show up. And I kind of like the old-fashioned basic layout. It is more representative of a what CC is... a site where two people can just have a nice chat or do more so I hope they don't change too much. But since it isn't my site, it is their right to do what they want.
Next time why not make your suggestions in a more mature manner instead of acting like some angry boss.
RE: New photo archive viewer
Get with it "viewer":
The CamContacts Network ...created by its members ...run by its members ...for its members.
The CamContacts Network ...created by its members ...run by its members ...for its members.
RE: New photo archive viewer
Sorry... Guess you were one of the founders over 10 years ago, lol.
Just one question then.... WTF did you let this happen? Seems you really fucked up. Guess you should only be angry at yourself.
Just one question then.... WTF did you let this happen? Seems you really fucked up. Guess you should only be angry at yourself.
RE: New photo archive viewer
Don't be so obtuse. We sing god save OUR queen.. we are not claiming ownership or possession of her!! Pristine's initial statement was eminently sensible and simply best practice. And I'd rather listen to the boss than the hat-check boy!
RE: New photo archive viewer
I wasn't being obtuse. The attitude in his posts clearly indicates he feels that he is owed something as if he was in charge.
I've heard enough people in various situations in life express themselves in the manner that he did. It was clear right from the beginning that he felt he was owed something, and his most recent post reinforced that conclusion.
I obviously do not think he literally feels like he is the boss here for real. So perhaps you might be the one being "obtuse". But his way of expressing his frustrations was completely inappropriate.
The same would go for those others who act like the sky was falling. Maybe it was for them since they it was not as easy to wank for free by looking at pics during the changes, but for most of us, none of this was that big of a deal.
I've heard enough people in various situations in life express themselves in the manner that he did. It was clear right from the beginning that he felt he was owed something, and his most recent post reinforced that conclusion.
I obviously do not think he literally feels like he is the boss here for real. So perhaps you might be the one being "obtuse". But his way of expressing his frustrations was completely inappropriate.
The same would go for those others who act like the sky was falling. Maybe it was for them since they it was not as easy to wank for free by looking at pics during the changes, but for most of us, none of this was that big of a deal.
RE: New photo archive viewer
and touche' !
"Viewer" said "they are just trying to improve it to make OUR experience here a better one."
Same gramatical construct.... - or (lol) - "viewer" is speaking as the boss of all members/hosts. (Doubly guilty of the same thing he condems others for!!!
"Viewer" said "they are just trying to improve it to make OUR experience here a better one."
Same gramatical construct.... - or (lol) - "viewer" is speaking as the boss of all members/hosts. (Doubly guilty of the same thing he condems others for!!!
RE: New photo archive viewer
i don't want to get involved but,ohh who the hell am i kidding,i've been dying to stick my nose in,the use of our is different.one(your's)it's used as possessive.the other(his)it's used as collective :--) besides that you're both wrong & both right,i just can't work out where,why & how.sadly,even with my pathetic life,i don't really care that i don't know those answers :--)
RE: New photo archive viewer
you're supposed to be monitoring the comedy forum so please stay out of our fight :p
RE: New photo archive viewer
What are you talking about? We are the customers so it is "our" experience they are trying to impove, but that doesn't makie it "our" site.
Had you not had such a negative, attacking, hostile attitude, I would have read "our" site as meaning you felt like CC was a part of your life and you were distrubed by the changes. But the overall attitude of your first few posts indicates that you meant much more than that. It is clear that you feel that you have some type of ownership interest in CC in the sense that they owe you something as if you were a stockholder.
Putting aside the debate over the use of "our", the underlying point is this: the hostility in your post was equilvalent to a two-year old child getting upset that he wasn't getting his way. There were much better ways to express the fact that you didn't like the changes or the technical glitches. And I don't like them either, but you didn't see me acting like CC had done something horrible to me personally.
Had you not had such a negative, attacking, hostile attitude, I would have read "our" site as meaning you felt like CC was a part of your life and you were distrubed by the changes. But the overall attitude of your first few posts indicates that you meant much more than that. It is clear that you feel that you have some type of ownership interest in CC in the sense that they owe you something as if you were a stockholder.
Putting aside the debate over the use of "our", the underlying point is this: the hostility in your post was equilvalent to a two-year old child getting upset that he wasn't getting his way. There were much better ways to express the fact that you didn't like the changes or the technical glitches. And I don't like them either, but you didn't see me acting like CC had done something horrible to me personally.
RE: New photo archive viewer
Get with it "viewer":
The CamContacts Network ...created by its members ...run by its members ...for its members.
The CamContacts Network ...created by its members ...run by its members ...for its members.
RE: New photo archive viewer
ok maybe I will come back to your site next week and see if its working , otherwise maybe next month....
RE: New photo archive viewer
agreed, two thumbs down. I've avoided the hd pics in the past for the way they freeze you window or tab, guess I'll be avoiding everything now.
RE: New photo archive viewer
It was fine before, one could zoom and see the pics and scroll through them in the corner of your screen while you were doing something else. Screw the jokes about glasses, one COULD zoom them larger. Now it will be tied to the page. So much for (lack of) progress.
RE: New photo archive viewer
My PC is 8 years old and the pic work for me. But I've only check out a few so far.
They do look fake though which I don't like.
They do look fake though which I don't like.
RE: New photo archive viewer
I've come to not hate the new viewer as much, but it could greatly be improved if clicking the background page closed the viewer
different browsers are a problem?
as far as i can tell, internet explorer is no longer working to view photos. mozilla works. i have always used internet explorer to browse cc, and i only keep mozilla on my pc for cases such as this. i am kind of suprised as i thought internet explorer is commonly used no?
RE: different browsers are a problem?
I have 2 PCs one with IE8 and one with IE9.
IE8 works but not IE9.
IE8 works but not IE9.
RE: different browsers are a problem?
cool, i know cc looks at all these posts to censor them, so i hope they will pass they information on to their tech guys about ie8 and ie9.
RE: New photo archive viewer
I'm not a frequent visitor to the forums, so please excuse my ignorance... but when were the viewers consulted about any proposed changes to the site?
I access CC via Windows and Linux and the 'old' popup photos worked most everywhere.. but I'm not sure about this new scheme, as I haven't tried it out yet. If it's some Java(script) thing, it will probably cause all sorts of problems and I expect the site will not fallback to the old scheme if the server detects non-IE8+ browsers.
On the other side of it, I would prefer to see some updates in how the video sessions are managed. Having detachable video displays, selectable bandwidths, and frame rate displays for viewers would all be useful features for enhanced browsers.
Thanks to CC for attempts to improving the site... but I'd appreciate a different mechanism for determining what features to include and how the rollout is to happen.
I access CC via Windows and Linux and the 'old' popup photos worked most everywhere.. but I'm not sure about this new scheme, as I haven't tried it out yet. If it's some Java(script) thing, it will probably cause all sorts of problems and I expect the site will not fallback to the old scheme if the server detects non-IE8+ browsers.
On the other side of it, I would prefer to see some updates in how the video sessions are managed. Having detachable video displays, selectable bandwidths, and frame rate displays for viewers would all be useful features for enhanced browsers.
Thanks to CC for attempts to improving the site... but I'd appreciate a different mechanism for determining what features to include and how the rollout is to happen.
RE: New photo archive viewer
It sounds like eventually these changes could be a positive improvement especially for the viewers.
It would certainly have been nice for some kind of announcement from CC prior to the changes that were implemented and asking for patience through the process with some kind of explanation of what the final results would be. Also stating what browser would work the best to eliminate this confusion and frustration.
Even though we are not the decision makers for this site we are all key elements to the success of it.
It would certainly have been nice for some kind of announcement from CC prior to the changes that were implemented and asking for patience through the process with some kind of explanation of what the final results would be. Also stating what browser would work the best to eliminate this confusion and frustration.
Even though we are not the decision makers for this site we are all key elements to the success of it.
RE: Long hair.How sexy?
I leave her if she get fatter or change color I hate artificial blond.
RE: Long hair.How sexy?
I would stop seeing a favorite host if she cut her hair short. In fact I have already.
RE: Long hair.How sexy?
I visit hosts based on how they are as a person, so it wouldn't stop me if they cut their hair. But I can say that I do love long hair, and it will get my attention very quickly, just takes some brains under that hair to keep my attention.
RE: Long hair.How sexy?
I had long hair and now bob till my shoulders....usually I hear that it suits me a lot :)
French Air Force Shot Down Libyan Jet
The really amazing thing was they were using blanks!
Dividing the spoils !
If it's not a state secret who gets what on pay-day? I guess that CC/the Studio/Chathost get about a third each - assuming a host is working from a studio. Is this about right? Would anyone care to comment?
RE: Dividing the spoils !
But from their half they expenses including ongoing payments to websites that refer people to CC. Think about how you first "found" CC. I click on a link in an ICQ profile. That link contained an ID that linked my account to the referrer and they got a piece of everything I spent....there are expenses in business and CC is not cheap to run or to attract new members.
RE: Dividing the spoils !
What CC gets depends on how the member joined. If he joned via a refeering site CC may get 60 pct or may get half. of course they have to make payments to referring sites and meet other operating expenses from this. The split between studio and host is decidedc by the studio. I do not know crrent trand but in the past it was often 50-50 or 60pc studio/40 pc host but sometimes the studio took more.
RE: Dividing the spoils !
Latvian studio girl I used to be quite enamored with told me she got 17% of the Studio's take. hardly seems worth it to work for that. Working for peanuts would be almost be better. Can you imagine. $2/minute, 50 minutes show, total take $100. so for 50 minute show the host would only make $17. Maybe in other countries that's a good wage, but in USA it would suck big time.
RE: Dividing the spoils !
I don't think you read the question clearly. He was inquiring what percentage studio girls get!! Read a bit slower next!
RE: Dividing the spoils !
I don't think you read the reply correctly. The orginal poster said he assumed "1/3 each". The replier was correcting the assumption that CC got half.
RE: Dividing the spoils !
a more interesting thread title would of been"soiling the divide" :--)
RE: Dividing the spoils !
the studio gets a half and from that half the host gets approx 1/3 to 1/2 depending on the studio. This is true in south africa dont know about other countries
RE: why they leave so fast?
They're tired of being mislead and lied to. The only times I've left in the first minute is when the photos do not match live, the host is live on at least one or more other sites and ignores me in video or when it is clear the host has lied about what she does in video. CC does advise viewers to leave video in less than 2 minutes if things are not going well in video.
RE: why they leave so fast?
So many reasons.... profile pics are often very well done with the host appearing at her best. Or they are staged to hide a host's imperfections. You can have a great profile pic and a not so great video presence.
Then there are girls who look awful in video even with great pics because it is the middile of the night...the girls are tired. The girls are dressed in t shirt and jeans...not the lingerie in the profile pic...they are not smiling...not into the performance. They can be eating, or more interested in chatting with the other hosts, or other members on free chat...just not into it. Or their english is bad. So many reasons...
Then there are girls who look awful in video even with great pics because it is the middile of the night...the girls are tired. The girls are dressed in t shirt and jeans...not the lingerie in the profile pic...they are not smiling...not into the performance. They can be eating, or more interested in chatting with the other hosts, or other members on free chat...just not into it. Or their english is bad. So many reasons...
RE: why they leave so fast?
because for some of us, it is one huge turn-off, and the idea of kissing someone with ashtray breath is repulsive, even if it is virtual. One host I know was puffing up, with one hand, while the other hand was stroking her pussy.. The Message: "i'm so not into this, just going through the motions to get you off." Sorry, but doesn't work for me
RE: why they leave so fast?
If I see her smoking for a few seconds it's already too late. She might not ever be able to turn me on again.
RE: why they leave so fast?
I think all those issues above are very valid reasons to leave. I am rather surprised to hear that those things happen. Thanks for speaking up guys!
RE: why they leave so fast?
"profile pics are often very well done with the host appearing at her best"
Really? Hahaha...no, we like to put the worst photo in our profile pic. )) You are men sooooooo strange, of course profile pic show off the host of her best, but we used to have archive pics too, you can check...i am really sure that about 5 pics of the face (took by webcam) can give you a quite realistik view of how she looks like in video.
Really? Hahaha...no, we like to put the worst photo in our profile pic. )) You are men sooooooo strange, of course profile pic show off the host of her best, but we used to have archive pics too, you can check...i am really sure that about 5 pics of the face (took by webcam) can give you a quite realistik view of how she looks like in video.
RE: why they leave so fast?
You would be surprised. When hosts pose for a picture for their profile they generally are smiling, hair is down, they are dressed provocatively and look sexy and interesting. But that is not the way it often is in video.... Pictures are a tiny moment in time...and smart girls can do wonders with their pictures...video is reality...and often not so good.
RE: why they leave so fast?
oh men, you can always to ask host on that outfit you liked from her pics, also change her hairstyle (comb hair or opposite)...clever hosts always will do it for you...and smile...sorry, but that is too stupid, just say something nice to host and she will smile to you....simple!
RE: why they leave so fast?
Let's be honest..its a business and host want the members money..so what?
RE: why they leave so fast?
so there is a simple answer if you are willing. take two or three photos each time you log on so we can see how you look that day. then we will not be surprised at all and it is great to know before you enter.
RE: why they leave so fast?
that is a good point. I often come in to see what the host looks like. But if I am just checking her out, I don't rate. isn't fair. Sometimes the pics look nice but once I get to video the host just does nothing for me (not in behavior, but just in appeal) so I cut out
RE: why they leave so fast?
post yr cc name, and I will come see you, and before I levae I will tell why
RE: why they leave so fast?
I have a suggestion. If cc had a voyeur window for a fee, viewers could use that and not be able to vote or even disturb the host and at the same time satisfy his curiosity
RE: why they leave so fast?
picking nose-hmm good grief that line could had been left out of the forum,, anyway maybe the credit card reach its limit for the month and automatic got kick off.
RE: why they leave so fast?
I saw a host actually pick her nose and eat what she pulled out. I left. I barfed. And logged off to recover.
RE: why they leave so fast?
No thank you...I would not enjoy being watched constantly!! That feels kind freaky!
RE: why they leave so fast?
Voyeur window could be disabled by host. But if cc had one, members could peek, cc would make $ and so would the host and it would completely anonymous. The member could not type in the pvt. All he could do is watch. Also he could not rate host.
RE: why they leave so fast?
for me, often because it is obvious we are not connecting, or the host is unexciting, or looks bored and disinterested
RE: why they leave so fast?
what...hosts act bored and disinterested during shows...no, never, couldn't be!
RE: why they leave so fast?
Sorry I disagree with your opinion because of fake photos and liar about their BIO!!! Case is closed!
General Forum
This is available to everyone, Viewers and Video Chathost alike. It is [a] designed to stimulate debates,(short of like sitting in the community chat room listening to each member and host debating over what to expect from a private video) [b] feelings, (like going into a private video listening to a host expressing her desires and fantasy with a member) [c]opinions (like coming into the general forum room and reading waht each host and member has to say) [d] etc.. (for all that other stuff between Video Chathosts and Viewers. Chathosts can leave messages for their fans,(not sure if we can be call fans or clients, but whatever it is thank cc for having a favorite section to save them. Viewers can let Chathosts know their preferences etc.... hmm, beginning to think this should be more of a private thing. Anyway over the next few days I'm going to keep quiet and just sit back and read and learn again what this place is all about.
Obsession
I am new here but it is clear that people on this forum are obsessed with categories. What is with that? So many threads about it, like the one about instant action below mine. Isn't there more to talk about? Hasn't enough been said? It's like listening to a broken record, same thing over and over and over again. It's time for someone to nudge the record so it moves beyond the broken spot.
Okay, i know a lot of you don't have slightest idea what I am talking about with broken record, as they haven't been around much in the last 15 years. But if there was a scratch on a record, ti would get stuck there and keep repeating the same thing. "Blue suede shoes..... blue suede shoes... blue suede shoes" and you would have to bump the record to move the playback needle past the scratch in the record.
Okay, i know a lot of you don't have slightest idea what I am talking about with broken record, as they haven't been around much in the last 15 years. But if there was a scratch on a record, ti would get stuck there and keep repeating the same thing. "Blue suede shoes..... blue suede shoes... blue suede shoes" and you would have to bump the record to move the playback needle past the scratch in the record.
RE: Obsession
How do u know about everything? Are u really new here? lol I think u been here like 10 years already!
RE: Obsession
she said: I am new here but later she mentioned defected discs of the second past millennium saying: 15 years ago ..my father told me that this defect was popular in the early seventy of the passed millennium comparing dates she is the first host on CC when categories were mixed together.
RE: Obsession
Well I understand each individual word, but haven't the faintest idea what they mean when put together in that order!
RE: Obsession
My post was to agree with the above post ending by: I think u been here like 10 years already! Read my sequential logic: She said I am new while bill claimed that she has been here like 10 years already, to ensure his claim I stated that she tells about defects dating to 40 years ago saying 15 years ago, So...
RE: Obsession
oh to follow up on your logic, I said "15 years" because it has been about 15 years since LP records were completely (or near completely) phased out due to the CD revolution. They happen to still be around, although I don't think anyone still produces them. Soon CD's will be a thing of the past as well, just like LP Records, Cassette Tapes, Reel-to-Reel tapes, 8-Track Tapes, BETA video, VHS video are now all practically non-existent. Oh you can still buy them in some nostalgic curio shop or flea market, along with the equipment to play them (if they still work, so you better make sure before you buy)
RE: Obsession
you call that logic? I am not a host, I am a viewer. I am 55. I was around during the era of LP records (33 1/3 rpm), 45 rpm records, and 78 rpms. I joined this site on March 10 2011. Does my knowledge of things 40-50 years ago make me a host or a long time member? There is no equation.
RE: Obsession
You said : "Does my knowledge of things 40-50 years ago make me a host or a long time member? There is no equation".. You say things of 40-50 not as she did ( things of 15 years) ..
RE: Obsession
Records were popular well past the 70's and into the 90's, though by then they were pretty well taken over by new technologies. Your father's dating is not exactly right.
From Wikipedia: "Gramophone records were the primary medium used for commercial music reproduction for most of the 20th century, replacing the phonograph cylinder, with which they had co-existed, by the 1920s. By the late 1980s, digital media had gained a larger market share, and the vinyl record left the mainstream in 1991.[1][2] However, they continue to be manufactured and sold in the 21st century. The vinyl record regained popularity by 2008, with nearly 2.9 million units shipped that year, the most in any year since 1998.[3] They are especially used by DJs and audiophiles for many types of music. As of 2011, vinyl records continue to be used for distribution of independent and alternative music artists. More mainstream pop releases tend to be mostly sold in compact disc or other digital formats, but have still been released in vinyl in certain instances."
From Wikipedia: "Gramophone records were the primary medium used for commercial music reproduction for most of the 20th century, replacing the phonograph cylinder, with which they had co-existed, by the 1920s. By the late 1980s, digital media had gained a larger market share, and the vinyl record left the mainstream in 1991.[1][2] However, they continue to be manufactured and sold in the 21st century. The vinyl record regained popularity by 2008, with nearly 2.9 million units shipped that year, the most in any year since 1998.[3] They are especially used by DJs and audiophiles for many types of music. As of 2011, vinyl records continue to be used for distribution of independent and alternative music artists. More mainstream pop releases tend to be mostly sold in compact disc or other digital formats, but have still been released in vinyl in certain instances."
RE: Obsession
How do i know about everything? What is there to know? I read the forums. I see about this category, about that category, again and again and again. How does that make me know everything? how does that make me 10 years here?
RE: Obsession
I have found everything I want and more in Glamour & Little Shy....I never had to spend the money for Instant Action...occasionally Not so Shy. It has nothing to do with the category and everything to do with the host....she can do anything she pleases in any adult category...and many do...and often for the right price. Categories other than the differentiation between non-adult and adult are meaningless....except for our expectations....but again..it is all about the host and her willingness.
RE: Obsession
I really have to disagree with that remark. Hardcore is the host doing a show for you. Softcore is interacting with the host and then trying to seduce her and the seduction is the exciting part for most that are attracted to those categories. It does not guarentee nudity... Hardcore does with just about anything you are looking for. If you are content with softcore....that's great but it does not mean that you're going to get what you would in hardcore by any means!!
RE: Obsession
To the original poster. If you have an issue with what is written in these boards, don't read them. On the subject of categories, I agree with So. It is more to do about each individual host. As far as price, there are both high and low priced hosts in every category. And if you are not getting what you came here for, price does not matter.
I would prefer making it very simple and have 2 categories, non nude and nude.
I would prefer making it very simple and have 2 categories, non nude and nude.
RE: Obsession
I despise that attitude "If you don't like it, don't read it" When I was growing up we had a saying in USA "America: Love It or Leave It" because there were people protesting everything, from the Viet Nam War, to Race Prejudice, to the "Establishment" (aka, Old Folks and their way of life and government) So some narrow minded bigots came up with a slogan "America Love It or Leave it" because they could not understand that just because you are protesting about things going on in the nation then that doesn't mean you don't love love the nation. Maybe they were protesting because they did love it, and hated to see what was happening to it. on the flip side (an old phrase related to audio records) if you LOVE something doesn't mean you can't point out its failings and complain about it.
Did it not ever occur to you that maybe I enjoy the forums and reading the threads, but think there is more than all this rot about categories ?
Did it not ever occur to you that maybe I enjoy the forums and reading the threads, but think there is more than all this rot about categories ?
RE: Obsession
As you many new members and hosts come to this site and write in the forums. Some things are discussed often because of that.
You are welcome to express what you think here but just don't expect all to change to satisfy your point of view.
You are welcome to express what you think here but just don't expect all to change to satisfy your point of view.