General Forum
Help me find her
Im looking for a special lady she works here at site, has long arms and short legs and very big ass, forgot her name but remember it starts with fuck... or maybe was just the nickname she gave me. Met her at an animal park she was there visiting her cousins
RE: Mith or reality?
my breath is bad in the morning. So I just have my girl suck my cock while I lick her pussy.
RE: Mith or reality?
u just haven't had any hot morning sex. there's something very primal about it - the solid morning hard on, the raw natural scents and pheromones flooding ur senses, and more. mmmmmmm yeah. so raw, so right. and u dont stop that affair in the middle to go brush ur teeth. ur on ur way to great sex. bad breath doesn't mean anything in that situation.
RE: Mith or reality?
The only problem then is when you have to pee really bad first thing in the morning :)
RE: Mith or reality?
it's ok if you don't breath on each other.....lol
morning sex is great...but sometimes bad breath can be a very big turn off...so your lucky if the one your with has a breath that you can handle...loool
morning sex is great...but sometimes bad breath can be a very big turn off...so your lucky if the one your with has a breath that you can handle...loool
RE: Mith or reality?
What does it matter? Your neck can't smell bad breath anyway - at least mine can't.
RE: Mith or reality?
i'm assuming if you wake up together in the morning,there would of been sex prior to sleep.so of course both would have bad breath.a mouth that's been full of cock & pussy eating mouths are unlikely to smell like breath mints :--)
RE: Mith or reality?
In order to get nice breath in the morning you shouldnt drink alcohol, smoke and clean your teeth very hard before go to bed. :)
RE: Mith or reality?
This problem was solved by one of my old girlfriends. When she woke in the morning or sometimes in the middle of the night she would just turn away from me then back into me (spoon position) and pull down whatever bottoms she was wearing.
hmmm what the heck was her name?... I should give her a call.
hmmm what the heck was her name?... I should give her a call.
Hosts; Do you ever change your mind about a show after going to 121?
After agreeing in free chat to get naked in 121, do you ever change your mind? For example if the viewer is barking orders or just rude in general, would this cause you to change your mind about doing a naked show?
RE: Can I host here using MAC?
Unfortunately there is often little 'quality of image' here; most times a host's video stream is divided up into hundreds of square pixels like a very simple jigsaw, or somebody on a filmed news broadcast whose identity needs to be protected!. As the picture quality of the some hosts but on other sites is just fine, and they will be using the same camera etc, and I will be viewing with the same equipment, presumably is a site server issue ( i am not that tech savvy). I also believe is a natural consequence of using split cam etc. It does mean that full screen is not really an enhancement, as it just magnifies the poor reception. I fail to understand how on a particular site I cannot name a host can have a 1000+ simultaneous viewers and the image is sharp as a button, but here more than one at a time and the image goes into meltdown.
RE: Can I host here using MAC?
A lot depends on age of computer and quality of internet connection more than if Mac or Windows. Honestly my old computer was better when it was running Win2K instead of XP because XP needs more power. When I use Linux on it I get much smoother video because it works better with older machines also, but I can have problems using my webcam with it.
RE: Can I host here using MAC?
I use my MAC to view and its awesome. But I have no idea how it works for a host.
RE: Can I host here using MAC?
if by mac you mean old macdonald,i'm sure it's allowed in couples,but cc won't allow any of the animals from his farm to be used. ee i ee i oh :--)
Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
There are a few that state in profile they do not strip in pvt and I respect them for their honesty. But so many others never tell me and I go in pvt hoping for naked show and it never happens. And so now all who reply will tell me to go to instant action.
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
Why do so many members use a post's title to ask a question and then answer it in their own post's comments?
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
I have no reason to speak for myself, I strip.
Check the forum and see how many hosts told members they'll strip in 121 and in fact they're only buying time. Check how many guys ask if a girl will strip and some answers will say that a guy needs to spend lots of money in order to see some flesh.
Hosts are here for money, why making it look like what it's not?
Check the forum and see how many hosts told members they'll strip in 121 and in fact they're only buying time. Check how many guys ask if a girl will strip and some answers will say that a guy needs to spend lots of money in order to see some flesh.
Hosts are here for money, why making it look like what it's not?
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
That is obviously a few out of many many hosts here. Being a softcore host I tease and am very sensual and sexy without having to go totally naked and I never claim to do a naked show. I do not have any complaints and I do not just try to ring up the bill. If asked in chat I say exactly that and I would only remove down to panties in 121 and I don't do that in open often. The viewers that come to my room are very pleased and I have a very high rating. Erotic, sexy and sensual do not mean complete nudity for all. Yes I have been nude on occasion and yet I don't advertise it and would not agree to that in chat. I am a honest host and have never been accused of wasting time to get as much money as possible.
So when you make that statement it does not speak for all hosts. I am well within my right to be offended by your broad statements that certainly do not represent the intentions of all hosts. My focus when I get online is pleasing my regulars and new viewers that come to my room. I make it clear what I do and it's always different with every person that enters. The reward is seeing what I earned after I get off line. I am not consciously thinking how to stall or get every penny I can from a member. My first concern is being as attentive to them for as long as they are in my room. There is no strategy as you claim but to only entertain the best I can.
Obviously we think differently.
So when you make that statement it does not speak for all hosts. I am well within my right to be offended by your broad statements that certainly do not represent the intentions of all hosts. My focus when I get online is pleasing my regulars and new viewers that come to my room. I make it clear what I do and it's always different with every person that enters. The reward is seeing what I earned after I get off line. I am not consciously thinking how to stall or get every penny I can from a member. My first concern is being as attentive to them for as long as they are in my room. There is no strategy as you claim but to only entertain the best I can.
Obviously we think differently.
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
But you also like to reply to each and everyone, despite the fact they post "for the sake of arguement" which kinda includes you in the same category. Let go and they won't find any more reasons to attack
Peace
Peace
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
They are non nude hosts.. makes perfect sense they wont strip.. just saying...
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
that is not really true...there are softcore hosts who do get nude and who do venture and do more...without ringing up the bill...
but if a member goes to a softcore category and is not going to read the profile or ask the host then he can not complain...
because it has been said often even in hardcore category not all hosts race to get nude and stall and ring up the bill...
just because some ring up the bill or some say one thing and do another...or some say they wont do nude does not mean that all are that way...no matter what category you go to it will always depend on the host your talking to...
but if a member goes to a softcore category and is not going to read the profile or ask the host then he can not complain...
because it has been said often even in hardcore category not all hosts race to get nude and stall and ring up the bill...
just because some ring up the bill or some say one thing and do another...or some say they wont do nude does not mean that all are that way...no matter what category you go to it will always depend on the host your talking to...
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
Your logic says: Nudity = Hardcore
Well, in my logic, you can act softcore being naked
Well, in my logic, you can act softcore being naked
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
obviously you get it is an visual expression(the member cares too less about your face ,all he wants is just you to zoom your pu--y and stuck something in.Could be your pu--y or anyone's else too.) .
Oh wait you didn't get it....Well maybe next time!
Oh wait you didn't get it....Well maybe next time!
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
Many softcore hosts choose that category because they do not have to strip fro everyone who enters their room. They can decide once the member has entered depending on their mood if they like the member etc. They therefore do not say definitely in their profile if they will or will not strip, and may not even say if asked in text chat.. Having said that I really do not understand your comment "so many others never tell me and I go in pvt hoping for naked show and it never happens". In my experience less than 10 pct of softcore hosts do not strip in 121. As has been said before if you want guaranteed nudity go to not shy or IA. I know there have been posts saying some hosts in these categories refuse to strip but if this happens you can complain to CC and you will normally receive a credit. However if you stay in video for a long time waiting for her to strip or do not actually ask her to strip you will not get a full credit.
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
I don't have any idea of how many hosts you have seen in private but in Softcore I do not believe that it is only 10% that do not do nudity in 121!!
To make such a statement I think it would be much more appropriate to say I have visited approx 100 softcore hosts in private and out of those hosts only 10 did not strip in 121. Even with that perhaps you choose the ones that their profile indicates they strip or they agreed to in chat first. Your statement is very misleading since I am sure you have not visited all hosts in softcore...or even a majority....too funny!
To make such a statement I think it would be much more appropriate to say I have visited approx 100 softcore hosts in private and out of those hosts only 10 did not strip in 121. Even with that perhaps you choose the ones that their profile indicates they strip or they agreed to in chat first. Your statement is very misleading since I am sure you have not visited all hosts in softcore...or even a majority....too funny!
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
Since January 2010 I have had over 4000 video sessions with approx 750 hists. At least 500 of these were from the softcore categories. I consider this a reasonable sample on which to base my statements.
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
"Many softcore hosts choose that category because they do not have to strip fro everyone who enters their room."
They actually do not have to strip for anyone. The 10% figure of non nude models would be the one sin my experience that say in their profile they do not strip. I don't keep records, but the percentage that do not strip is far greater than 10%. And many viewers choose softcore because of lower prices in some cases and also many may think softcore models on balance look better than hardcore models.
They actually do not have to strip for anyone. The 10% figure of non nude models would be the one sin my experience that say in their profile they do not strip. I don't keep records, but the percentage that do not strip is far greater than 10%. And many viewers choose softcore because of lower prices in some cases and also many may think softcore models on balance look better than hardcore models.
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
everyone knows its not about the money ;)
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
"everyone knows its not about the money ;)"
Oh yes it is
Oh yes it is
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
I'll see a girl one time who will say "I don't strip". Then the next time she'll say which dildo do you prefer. I have given up trying to figure it out.
RE: Why do so many non nude hosts keep it a secret that they do not strip in pvt?
Once i stumbled into a video and the host was already fully nude with her legs spread and masturbating. A few days later I went back into her video and she called me a pervert that God was going to punish for asking for such things.....lol
Happy Thanksgiving
On this Thanksgiving, be grateful for what you have. So many out there have so much less than you do. So many out there are sick but cannot afford to go to a doctor and get treatment. So many out there barely have enough to get by. Try to do what you can for them. No one person can do it alone.
Try as I might.
I can't save the world.
I see my friends' plight.
I can't save the world.
I give and give.
I can't save the world.
So that they can have a good life to live.
I can't save the world.
But it never is enough.
I can't save the world.
There is so much bad stuff.
I can't save the world.
Why God, why?
I can't save the world.
Must my friends and I cry?
I can't save the world.
My heart is broken.
I can't save the world.
My help seems but a token.
I can't save the world.
Should I do more?
I can't save the world.
Before I meet death's door?
I can't save the world.
To God, I pray.
I can't save the world.
That when I am gone, my friends will be okay.
I can't save the world.
:((((
Try as I might.
I can't save the world.
I see my friends' plight.
I can't save the world.
I give and give.
I can't save the world.
So that they can have a good life to live.
I can't save the world.
But it never is enough.
I can't save the world.
There is so much bad stuff.
I can't save the world.
Why God, why?
I can't save the world.
Must my friends and I cry?
I can't save the world.
My heart is broken.
I can't save the world.
My help seems but a token.
I can't save the world.
Should I do more?
I can't save the world.
Before I meet death's door?
I can't save the world.
To God, I pray.
I can't save the world.
That when I am gone, my friends will be okay.
I can't save the world.
:((((
RE: Happy Thanksgiving
Happy Thanksgiving to everyone in the USA...
A very nice post and well said, I am very thankful for all that I have, family, friends, health, love, safety...and sooo very much more.
I hope everyone has a wonderful Thanksgiving, rest of week and weekend......huggggggggggggg
A very nice post and well said, I am very thankful for all that I have, family, friends, health, love, safety...and sooo very much more.
I hope everyone has a wonderful Thanksgiving, rest of week and weekend......huggggggggggggg
On being rude
“New York's such a wonderful city. Although I was at the library today. The guys are very rude. I said, "I'd like a card." He says, "You have to prove you're a citizen of New York." So I stabbed him.”
“Most young people think they are natural when they are only boorish and rude.”
“It's a rather rude gesture, but at least it's clear what you mean.”
“A person who is nice to you, but rude to the waiter, is not a nice person”
“A true gentleman is one who is never unintentionally rude”
“Most young people think they are natural when they are only boorish and rude.”
“It's a rather rude gesture, but at least it's clear what you mean.”
“A person who is nice to you, but rude to the waiter, is not a nice person”
“A true gentleman is one who is never unintentionally rude”
RE: On being rude
"they have to pay for that while they could be loved for free."
No way Jose. There is nothing free in this world.
No way Jose. There is nothing free in this world.
What some people think of cc
Copied and pasted off site
The homepage is slightly misleading and manages to convince you that you have arrived at a cam network community site.
To sum up, CamContacts.com is a great cams site, receommended for both for the general viewer and particularly those who want something a bit different to push their buttons. Whether you are looking for romance, marriage or, most likely, a bit of hot XXX action, your money goes a long way and is well-spent here.
The homepage is slightly misleading and manages to convince you that you have arrived at a cam network community site.
To sum up, CamContacts.com is a great cams site, receommended for both for the general viewer and particularly those who want something a bit different to push their buttons. Whether you are looking for romance, marriage or, most likely, a bit of hot XXX action, your money goes a long way and is well-spent here.
RE: What some people think of cc
" or, most likely, a bit of hot XXX action".... not sure that is what most guys are "most likely" looking for here any more, but we've already had this discussion, lol
RE: What some people think of cc
I just copied a pasted a bit from a review of this site and others from a site that does such things. You're well informed, I'm sure you get around the internet and read quite a bit as I do.
Hosts; Which is worse?
A rude member in either open or 121 video or a free loading beggar in free chat? Yes I know they are both bad, but if you had to choose one for the worse, which would it be?
RE: Hosts; Which is worse?
no one has the right to be rude to another person...does not matter if they are paying or not...it does not take much and costs nothing to be polite...
RE: Hosts; Which is worse?
We here agree a Greedy Host is much worse than a rude member in either open/121 video or a free loading beggar in free chat.
Changes I've seen since I joined.
OK forgive me if I forget one, its been awhile since I joined. The most recent is the addition of 4 screen sizes including full screen. The enabling of sound in host's room if they choose. The cam 2 cam feature. The addition of Glamour Girls and Instant Action. The addition of one to one. Well I can't think of anything else.
And all came at no additional cost to the consumer. Well at least no obvious cost anyway. So ok have I missed any?
And all came at no additional cost to the consumer. Well at least no obvious cost anyway. So ok have I missed any?
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
You forgot at least two. I supposed that I can forgive you, however, since you were focused on additions, not subtractions, to CC:
1. Elimination of Friends and Family (no more parents visiting their children on CC, lol)
2. Elimination of Escort/Massage (I guess all hosts are allowed to meet us and give us massages now, lol)
I think I have been around for all except the creation of Instant Action. I believe I first came to CC after that. I don't recall the use of sound being an option either, but I do recall that cam to cam almost never worked in the beginning so maybe sound was always here and just didn't work well either. And hosts would always want to use cam on yahoo anyway back then... something about the cost of bandwidth I think. I definitely was here pre-Glamour and pre-121, and therefore, pre-problems in getting hosts in Adult to get naked, lol.
1. Elimination of Friends and Family (no more parents visiting their children on CC, lol)
2. Elimination of Escort/Massage (I guess all hosts are allowed to meet us and give us massages now, lol)
I think I have been around for all except the creation of Instant Action. I believe I first came to CC after that. I don't recall the use of sound being an option either, but I do recall that cam to cam almost never worked in the beginning so maybe sound was always here and just didn't work well either. And hosts would always want to use cam on yahoo anyway back then... something about the cost of bandwidth I think. I definitely was here pre-Glamour and pre-121, and therefore, pre-problems in getting hosts in Adult to get naked, lol.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
Yes you are correct. They were deleted but still it represents change. And at one time the non adult girls could do a password protected private and get naked. Oh well those were the days.
But the good news is that there is much more competition across the internet. So with one mouse click we can go from site to site with ease. What's really funny is that some of the same girls who say no here have to say yes on other sites you see them do to different rules or customs of that other place.
But the good news is that there is much more competition across the internet. So with one mouse click we can go from site to site with ease. What's really funny is that some of the same girls who say no here have to say yes on other sites you see them do to different rules or customs of that other place.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
There was the Java - Flash change.
Also addition of Mobile platforms.
Another change too but I suppose they won't let this post fly if I mention it.
Also addition of Mobile platforms.
Another change too but I suppose they won't let this post fly if I mention it.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
Thanks for your reply. I didn't know there was a change from Java to Flash. And I guess there have been changes going on behind the scenes with hosts. I was just focused on what viewers would notice.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
Another change I forgot all about was CC Mail. I just recently got mail from a host I had seen in pvt and she attached a photo. I never knew that was possible. It may also be that hosts simply hate my guts. What little mail I get is usually from hosts telling me I'm a rude perverted scumbag. Well it is true I am a perverted scumbag, but who on here isn't, lol? But I do try hard to never be rude.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
The reasons why it became more difficult to get hosts in the soft adult categories to get naked include; the tighetening up of the non-adult rules at that time, so hosts in non-adult who were ok with some sexy chat and teasing but didn't want to strip for everyone had to move to glamour or little shy; The restriction on hosts to have only two sessions open concurrently, which had to be in different categories, and the requirement to close one session when a member entered video in the other. Both of these were introduced at the same time as Glamour was added.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
I can understand why non adult hosts moving to soft core might not change their desire to strip, but I don't understand the connection to how many sessions can be open and the fact that they must close the other session when they have video in one of their sessions.
When did "restricted" sessions become part of everything? I know some hosts look at the "guidelines" as "rules" at all times instead of just for restricted sessions so perhaps this is a factor too.
When did "restricted" sessions become part of everything? I know some hosts look at the "guidelines" as "rules" at all times instead of just for restricted sessions so perhaps this is a factor too.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
Well closing the other session makes sense to those of us who prefer to go 121. I certainly do not want to pay 121 prices for exclusivity only to find that there are 4526 guys in her other room.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
I am assuming that your comment about problems getting hosts in adult to strip was mainly a reference to having to go to 121 for this. Having several sessions open at the same time gave hosts more oportunities to maximise revenue.They could be chatting or doing shows with a different member in each or 3 or 4 host sessions at the same time. Now that hosts are limited to just two sessions and must close the other when a member enters video they are more inclined to maximise the income from the member in video so want him to go 121 for a show.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
I actually wasn't thinking that deeply about things in my original post. It was more of an offhanded remark, and I was referring to more of the general attitude that hosts had that made it easier to see them get naked back before glamour and 121 than anything else.
But the change goes beyond 121. That just determines when and where they will get naked as opposed to whether they will get naked. I think that the whole glamour and 121 thing encourages a lack of nudity as opposed to serving as a means to make up for any lost revenue. It makes nudity more of a special type of thing that has become the exception instead of the rule regardless of price as evidenced by that attitude creeping into hard core categories more and more.
But the change goes beyond 121. That just determines when and where they will get naked as opposed to whether they will get naked. I think that the whole glamour and 121 thing encourages a lack of nudity as opposed to serving as a means to make up for any lost revenue. It makes nudity more of a special type of thing that has become the exception instead of the rule regardless of price as evidenced by that attitude creeping into hard core categories more and more.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
I overstated it... It is becoming more and more of an exception than the rule that you can see nudity.... We haven't crossed the line yet where most of the time you can't see nudity, and I doubt we will. But it certainly is a growing trend.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
little more stalling in pvt, talk-talk-talk- one of the best changes that I have seen is the 121 video cam, better picture quality and sound and now able to zoom in full screen and keep the same quality
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
There have always a few hosts in littleshy who would not get naked. The "does she strip?" question in forum has been asked since long before the start of Glamour. You can consider the fact that most Glamour hosts do strip a bonus and triumph for member power. Glamour was not intended to be an adult category, and when it started it was not. When CC tightened the rules for non-adult Glamour was introduced partly for those hosts in non-adult who wanted sexy chat and some teasing but did not want to strip for everyone. It was originally not classified as an adult category and hosts were allowed to have a session in non-adult and one in Glamour open at the same time. However there was so much adult activity in Glamour that it became a de facto adult category and CC decided to re-classify it.
RE: Changes I've seen since I joined.
"I think that the whole glamour and 121 thing encourages a lack of nudity as opposed to serving as a means to make up for any lost revenue. It makes nudity more of a special type of thing that has become the exception instead of the rule regardless of price as evidenced by that attitude creeping into hard core categories more and more. "
I could not agree more. You are spot on.
I could not agree more. You are spot on.
Hosts: Do you think viewers have everything they want on cc?
Do you think the status quo is all that viewers either want or need? Are there any changes or improvements you would make to the site? Changes can mean changes in rules, categories, hi tech upgrades or anything else you can think of?
RE: Hosts: Do you think viewers have everything they want on cc?
is perfect how it is, the best is CC
RE: Hosts: Do you think viewers have everything they want on cc?
How did you sign your name using an icon?
RE: Hosts: Do you think viewers have everything they want on cc?
simply copy it ( ive seen it in at least 1 profile)
RE: Hosts: Do you think viewers have everything they want on cc?
press in the same time Alt + 3
Happy Thanksgiving.
Realize that all do not celebrate thanksgiving, but would wish to all a happy thanksgiving. Let us remember as we go about our week, what we can be thankful for, and sometimes take for granted. I for one, am thankful for, family and friends who accept me as I am. Thankful for the oppurtunity to hopefully make a difference in this world.. Thankful for having a special friend enter my life, and has shown me how to be a better person. Take a minute and list some things you are thankful for.
RE: Happy Thanksgiving.
Happy Thanksgiving to you too tenderheart1982...
I am thankful for my health, that my family is healthy, the love I have and receive when it comes to my family and friends... the laughter that fills my heart from those I come into contact with, the laughter and smiles that I am able to bring to others faces, my beautiful yard, with many fruit trees, different types of berry bushes, flowers, the mountains and beauty that surrounds me, the deer, bear and other wild life that enters my yard, having a job when many don't, being able to put food on the table, being able to walk out my front or back door safely without having to worry about anything other than if I will step in the gifts that the bear and deer leave in my yard after raiding the fruit trees and berry bushes, lool, the beautiful colours of fall, for the good and the bad that happens in life.....because with out both there is no balance and we might not appreciate the good/positive that we encounter. For all this and more I am thankful for...
Happy Thanksgiving to all....huggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
I am thankful for my health, that my family is healthy, the love I have and receive when it comes to my family and friends... the laughter that fills my heart from those I come into contact with, the laughter and smiles that I am able to bring to others faces, my beautiful yard, with many fruit trees, different types of berry bushes, flowers, the mountains and beauty that surrounds me, the deer, bear and other wild life that enters my yard, having a job when many don't, being able to put food on the table, being able to walk out my front or back door safely without having to worry about anything other than if I will step in the gifts that the bear and deer leave in my yard after raiding the fruit trees and berry bushes, lool, the beautiful colours of fall, for the good and the bad that happens in life.....because with out both there is no balance and we might not appreciate the good/positive that we encounter. For all this and more I am thankful for...
Happy Thanksgiving to all....huggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
RE: suggestion to CC
I think its ironic, most members will say this is a horrible option to give hosts, about hosts stalking members and such. But Ive met many a host who has been stalked site to site by obsessed fans. Kind of fair play if you ask me.
I think theirs a couple things hosts should have, a 60 second delay option to be ready for a members arrival.
And the ability to end a pvt at their choice.
I think theirs a couple things hosts should have, a 60 second delay option to be ready for a members arrival.
And the ability to end a pvt at their choice.
RE: suggestion to CC
Sure, fair play is great......Let the hosts search for members and close a private, but let the member set the price per minute.....Kind of fair play if you ask me :)
RE: suggestion to CC
Although it sounded to me that she was talking about a database of ALL CC members, if she only meant viewer notes, then just go to that page, select "show all" and click on the "Screenname" button in the blue header, then you'll have them all listed alphabetically, just Ctrl+F+Nickname to find a particular one quicker.
RE: another suggestion to CC
I'm used to it at other sites. And I thinks its only fair. It helps the viewer too when the host is ready to greet them in pvt.
RE: For guys:what perfume you like on women?
Chanel No.5 nothing beats it.. its like heaven in a bottle.
RE: For guys:what perfume you like on women?
I with u on "The One") Perfect for winter:) One of my favs for like 4 years now :)
Hostess Turn-Offs
Hate greedy hosts in free chat, also Lack of brains is a huge turn-off.
RE: Hostess Turn-Offs
Presumably a greedy host in text chat would be one that asks you to talk more?! ;-)
RE: Hostess Turn-Offs
"also Lack of brains is a huge turn-off"
I presume you know this because that is what the host told you :P
I presume you know this because that is what the host told you :P
RE: Hostess Turn-Offs
Interesting comments all! since this post was copied from hosts profile! lol
Turn-Offs
Lack of brains is a huge turn-off, also hate beggars in free chat and unrespectful behavior
Turn-Offs
Lack of brains is a huge turn-off, also hate beggars in free chat and unrespectful behavior
RE: Hostess Turn-Offs
another example of taking something out of context and putting it ones own words...completely changes the whole meaning...
as has been said before...hosts get criticized for what ever is in their profile..many members complain when the host does not make things clear in her profile and they complain when she does make things clear......no matter what we do it is never good enough....so why bother lool
as has been said before...hosts get criticized for what ever is in their profile..many members complain when the host does not make things clear in her profile and they complain when she does make things clear......no matter what we do it is never good enough....so why bother lool
RE: Hostess Turn-Offs
It IS detesful when a hosts comments are looked at in a mirror and seen for what they really are.
WHATS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER.
WHATS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER.
dos anyone remember sensusveris ?
i regret her very much. Maybeis she on an other site ?
Some hosts think this site is real world
I see posts from saying they need to be warmed up, turned on to have a great time in pvt. The members sign up and agree to pay money to see naked girls. Its that simple. This is a pay for play site, not some singles bar. The money you make is all the warmth you need. Be happy you get paid to do this. Not everyone is so lucky.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
You are 100% wrong in my opinion. I'm a member and want to be turned on by a great show from the hosts. They give a better show when they are themselves aroused, which in consequence means a better experience for me. So it is in everybody's best interests.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
its just an excuse to make more money not to allow the model to be turned on.Its counterproductive in the long run.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
It's not counter-productive because a good host's bread and butter income is from her regular's who return time and again for what both parties know is going to be a great interactive experience: the 2 minute wank-and-go members who want to treat them like robots leave little mark: emotionally or financially.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Yes but for that to happen you do not need to turn the host on first. Then again I'm more into the girls posing in certain positions rather than a toys or fingers inserted. As long as they do the poses with a smile on their face there is a good chance they will get me as a regular.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Your fooling yourself if you think these girls get much in terms of sexual gratification on here,only real rewards open to them are financial.Whats free-chat for if its not to get to know model and chat alittle before entering into a video session which lets be honest is solely for the sexual needs of the visitor not the model.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
never make the mistake of assuming your thoughts,opinions & feelings are universal.everyone,every situation,every video is unique & preconceptions will always affect interaction & outcomes :--
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
I happen to agree with pt viewer. He is not assuming, he is only calling a spade a spade.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
one man's spade is another man's shovel,but they will both dig you into a hole :--)
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Seems to me that you haven't yet realised (I'll whisper it quietly, prepare yourself for a shock) that women like sex too
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Yes true, women do like sex but not with you or any of the viewers that pay to watch them on cam sites.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
You can only talk from your own experience (or rather perhaps lack of it). In my case (and I am sure many other's) what you say is demonstrably untrue, but I have no desire to convince you of it.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
"but I have no desire to convince you of it."
Because you can't!
Because you can't!
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Everything done on the internet is known as virtual reality. This is NOT real sex. Real sex occurs only in person. The only thing that is real is the money the hosts and cc make and the credit card bills members get.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
I met quite a few guys from here and had very real sex with some of them :) LOL
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
The only reason he can't convince you is because your mind is made up. And there is no possibility to provide proof. I know from my own experiences with hosts outside of videos on CC that what part-time viewer said applies to some hosts but not all..
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
No, he can't convince because I'm not an idiot. And if you are saying that you have "hooked up" with a host in real and had real sex you just proved my point. The only real sex is done in person. That was my whole point. Talking about guys like you hooking up with hosts in real is another post. According to Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, what we all do on the internet is called virtual reality, NOT real world. But maybe you and pt viewer want to say Gates and Jobs were wrong.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
I understand that hooking up with hosts in real is a different subject. I am talking about talking with hosts who I was not longer visiting in video, including hostts who stopped hosting some time ago. My point is that some hosts do sometimes, in some cases quite often, get sexual gratification on here.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
" in some cases quite often, get sexual gratification on here."
Yes meaning both the host and viewer masturbated and get their rocks off. Yes of course. My point was that the sex between 2 people on line is simulated rather than actual as it is in the real world. Yes wanking is an actual form of sex, but I was referring to actual physical intercourse as opposed to on line simulation.
So I think we just had a misunderstanding and that we actually agree.
Yes meaning both the host and viewer masturbated and get their rocks off. Yes of course. My point was that the sex between 2 people on line is simulated rather than actual as it is in the real world. Yes wanking is an actual form of sex, but I was referring to actual physical intercourse as opposed to on line simulation.
So I think we just had a misunderstanding and that we actually agree.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
The part of the thread in which i posted related to part-time viewers post that started "Your fooling yourself if you think these girls get much in terms of sexual gratification on here..."
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
OK if we are splitting hairs you may be correct. But most would agree physical sex between 2 people is much more real and gratifying than wanking. And when it comes to wanking I know best. But when I pay for a pvt my only concern is that I get off. Yes if the host gets off as well great, but I'm paying for me to get off not the host. And no getting her off does not make me feel any different.
We can agree to disagree.
We can agree to disagree.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
guess you are very selfish partner in real life too
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
What your talking about is gratification from the knowledge that someone is paying them for their sexuality,that can be a turn on and an ego boost.Nothing to do with you tho its still only the money that is driving force behind it.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Nothing to do with being female,more to do with this being a form of income or for some models a way to travel or improve their lives.I don't class anything that happens here or anywhere online as sex.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
when member warm me up and turn me on then i will be wet and give a great show ,but probably with your behave you will get just a robot show ALL THE TIME ! :)
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
if u like when women behave as robots with you- no problem
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
"if u like when women behave as robots with you- no problem"
No not like robots, like professionals
No not like robots, like professionals
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
well it will all depend on what your desire is.....if you are a member that just wants to see a host automatically put a toy in her or start masterbating as soon as you say hello then you know very well there is a category for that called instant action....
a professional to me means....... trying to make the member feel comfortable and at ease so the member enjoys himself more...in order to do that the host must also feel comfortable and at ease with the member...if a member does not feel comfortable and at ease with the host then he will not enjoy himself much now will he?
a professional to me means....... trying to make the member feel comfortable and at ease so the member enjoys himself more...in order to do that the host must also feel comfortable and at ease with the member...if a member does not feel comfortable and at ease with the host then he will not enjoy himself much now will he?
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Its up the member to make himself comfortable. Its up to the PAID host to entertain him.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
I'd like to know what categories that you are going to where you get these comments. If you go to hardcore there should be no discussion or small chat so why don't you stick there to get what you want? Softcore is definitely not your style or hers. So why go there?
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Follow the money. All of those requests from hosts translate into one thing and one thing only....video minutes. They know the longer they can delay the nudity the more they will make. Once a member is turned on and ejaculates the meter stops running. If a host can get a member to waste 5, 10 or even 15 minutes "turning her on" is money in the bank. And the host is actually getting turned on by the delay...not sexually but financially.... Can't blame them. This is a business...and in any business you do whatever it takes for your customers to buy more of your product.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
I think that maybe it is not right for you to make such a general statement as it sounds like you are accusing all hosts of doing this....not all hosts are that way...there are hosts who take the time to talk in free chat without asking nor pressuring nor tricking a member into video
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
What's wrong with a host working her craft in such a way as to make as much money as possible for both herself and this site?
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
I am. All hosts are here to make money. Nothing else. And we were talking about hosts saying that once in paying video a member would have to spend time getting the host in the mood before the sex part of the show was started. Two things to learn...they could care less what you say or do...it is all about the video minutes..the longer you take the better...and as for turning them on...a member never really turns on a member...her bf, husband, lover in real life does that...not an image or words on a screen...but they will pretend to be slowly stimulated as long as the money is rolling in. Nothing wrong with that hosts. But ...dont suggest that hosts really mean getting turned on for real before a video...its is all about extending the video as most of us CC oldtimers know only too well.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
I have to admit no member has ever turned me on :P
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
LOL...sorry that was a typo....I meant to say a member never really turns on a host...sure on occasion...but in general the time hosts ask members to spend to turn them on is based solely on a desire to extend the video....
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
I saw you typo but understood u right, dont worry. INYF havent got you right. ))
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
"I am. All hosts are here to make money. Nothing else."
You are spot on So.
You are spot on So.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Some just will never get it! A softcore host is shy and does require the interaction if she is going to remove her clothes. Has nothing to do with ringing up minutes as you say. If you want an instant show then go to IA or NSS because it says minimal chat and they are definitely not shy!
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
You are very correct hosts are here to make money.....however...
I am sorry to disagree with you...but you are sooo insulting and very wrong....there are hosts on here that do get turned on and do enjoy the sex with some of the members....and there are hosts that do not make you spend a lot of money to do it...I happen to be one of them...I will not waste a persons time nor money saying I am turned on if I am not...I do not get turned on by all members that would be a lie to say I do..i do not get turned on by the same veiwer every time either...but I sure as hell do get turned on by some viewers at times ....and yes words can be arousing...
So until you have been with every single host on here and can prove your statements true.....I would ask that you do not speak for all hosts when it comes to whether they really get turned on or not...just because you have encountered hosts that pretend to be that does not give you the right to clump all hosts in the same general statements...
I am sorry to disagree with you...but you are sooo insulting and very wrong....there are hosts on here that do get turned on and do enjoy the sex with some of the members....and there are hosts that do not make you spend a lot of money to do it...I happen to be one of them...I will not waste a persons time nor money saying I am turned on if I am not...I do not get turned on by all members that would be a lie to say I do..i do not get turned on by the same veiwer every time either...but I sure as hell do get turned on by some viewers at times ....and yes words can be arousing...
So until you have been with every single host on here and can prove your statements true.....I would ask that you do not speak for all hosts when it comes to whether they really get turned on or not...just because you have encountered hosts that pretend to be that does not give you the right to clump all hosts in the same general statements...
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
i may be wrong, but i think i remember hearing once that there's actually an entire category here devoted to providing members instantaneous nudity and play.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
There are many rule violators in both hardcore categories
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Off site ads for cc read NAKED GIRLS. Viewers sign up to see naked girls not your time.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
other sites do advertise naked girls...however....it is up to the member to also read the site they are signing up to and find out what it is about...this site clearly says about the different categories...
would you rather have all hosts just put false in their profiles and try to trick and screw you out of your money? we hosts are criticized for not being upfront and we are criticized for being upfront..
I have gone to some of the places that advertise this site....and the profile they are showing I have not had for well over a year....you dont sign to buy a car or get a loan without reading..so why would you not check the site you are joining?
when registering with this site it clearly tells the categories.....any site be it a sex site or not.....anyone knows when joining a place that is advertised somewhere else to make sure you read what the place is about...
would you rather have all hosts just put false in their profiles and try to trick and screw you out of your money? we hosts are criticized for not being upfront and we are criticized for being upfront..
I have gone to some of the places that advertise this site....and the profile they are showing I have not had for well over a year....you dont sign to buy a car or get a loan without reading..so why would you not check the site you are joining?
when registering with this site it clearly tells the categories.....any site be it a sex site or not.....anyone knows when joining a place that is advertised somewhere else to make sure you read what the place is about...
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
This site Camcontacts advertises in CAPS NAKED GIRLS. That is factually correct because there are naked girls on site. The category guidelines are vague references to what you may expect in pvt. They are not host rules. And to expect is no guarantee. But when you have a new member that just saw that ad, it is firmly imprinted on his mind, that being the part about NAKED GIRLS. If you want to get a straight man's attention, just mention NAKED GIRLS, and you'll have it.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
nellgwynn is good for oranges, her plums are nice too
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
That's apples and oranges, not apples and apples.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
wow the more i read that the more i realize how lucky i been with members since this 4 years :)))
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
your post seems to affirm"some hosts"thinking.seems very real world to me except here the hosts have the bonus of not actually having to touch us :--)
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
"except here the hosts have the bonus of not actually having to touch us :--)"
Well here we agree. They never have to touch us (or smell us) and yet they can touch our wallets in major ways.
Well here we agree. They never have to touch us (or smell us) and yet they can touch our wallets in major ways.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
My suggestion is that you stick with the hardcore section and not venture to softcore shy hosts!
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
If this si the attitude you have to all spects of your life I am sure you often get only average service in restaurants and shops and if you are a manager you certainly do not always get the best perormance out of the people who work for you. Money may be the main motivator but for many people it is not the only one.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
As the opening poster said nothing to indicate that you shouldn't be polite and respectful to hosts only that he expected them to do their jobs I will continue your analogy.
I would certainly avoid any restaurant or shop where I was expected to get the waiter / waitress or shop assistant "in the mood" and at the same time pay them before they would serve me my food or groceries.
Good evening sir I'm not really in the mood to serve you your food tonight. How about if I go and sit in the corner and you make me a cup of tea and serve me first. Oh and because I am sitting doing nothing my boss won't pay me (obviously one of these bosses that does not get the best from their staff) so can you also make up the money I will lose. Once you have done that I might then be in the mood to serve you your dinner.
I would also be looking to get rid of any employees who wouldn't start work before I had "got them in the mood".
I would certainly avoid any restaurant or shop where I was expected to get the waiter / waitress or shop assistant "in the mood" and at the same time pay them before they would serve me my food or groceries.
Good evening sir I'm not really in the mood to serve you your food tonight. How about if I go and sit in the corner and you make me a cup of tea and serve me first. Oh and because I am sitting doing nothing my boss won't pay me (obviously one of these bosses that does not get the best from their staff) so can you also make up the money I will lose. Once you have done that I might then be in the mood to serve you your dinner.
I would also be looking to get rid of any employees who wouldn't start work before I had "got them in the mood".
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
To me this is not about hosts requiring members to turn them on to get any sort of show. It is the difference between a good show and a really great one.
The original poster was complaining about hosts who say they need to be "warmed up or turned on" to have a great time in private. These hosts do not say they will not do their best to ensure that the member has a good time in private. Just that if the host is enjoying herself he will get a better time.
The original poster was complaining about hosts who say they need to be "warmed up or turned on" to have a great time in private. These hosts do not say they will not do their best to ensure that the member has a good time in private. Just that if the host is enjoying herself he will get a better time.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
"These hosts do not say they will not do their best to ensure that the member has a good time in private"
I conclude that is what they are saying by their comments. We simply have a different opinion. I firmly believe the only reason a host would say anything like that is to greatly increase the length of her pvt. I know the girls are here to make as much money as possible. And I support that. But let's just call it what it is.
I conclude that is what they are saying by their comments. We simply have a different opinion. I firmly believe the only reason a host would say anything like that is to greatly increase the length of her pvt. I know the girls are here to make as much money as possible. And I support that. But let's just call it what it is.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
The other side of the coin is that some members whether as part of their fantasy or becuase they are deluding themselves actually like some sort of "courtship" and to feel the host is getting some pleasure (besides watching her revenues) from what she does here. Hosts who put these comments in their profiles may be wanting to attract these members.
RE: Some hosts think this site is real world
Yes I completely agree. There are no shortage of delusional viewers on site. And yes hosts know this. I never said hosts weren't smart. In fact they are much smarter than most viewers. All I was doing is calling this spin hosts put in their profile what it is. The longer a host can keep a member in pvt the more she makes and in most cases much much more than if she did a quick show ala IA.
There is no argument, just tell it like it really is.
There is no argument, just tell it like it really is.
We need a new category
Oh man I can hear the outrage now for suggesting any changes to the site. But here goes anyway. How about a non nude category? All other categories would stay the way they are. The hosts could do bikini, lingerie shows and that sort of thing, which is not allowed in non adult. But they would be protected by the rules from ever having to get naked or even semi naked (topless). So instead of getting viewers pissed off for not stripping when they can if they want in Glamour/little shy, they can point to the rules that do not allow even semi nude. And just like now hosts can have rooms in softcore or hardcore and switch back and forth anytime.
So instead of softcore hosts having to explain to viewers they don't get naked even though it is written in her profile, the rules would completely protect her as she has no nude or semi nude option in a non nude category. We would not be a clone of any other site, cc would become even more unique.
So instead of softcore hosts having to explain to viewers they don't get naked even though it is written in her profile, the rules would completely protect her as she has no nude or semi nude option in a non nude category. We would not be a clone of any other site, cc would become even more unique.
RE: We need a new category
Why not install a "Chat only" category too, where hot girls in breathtaking lingerie sit on their beautyful asses and play the keyboard for hours? :D
RE: We need a new category
Give it up. That's what I've done in terms of category changes even if I would like to see some. And after people paying $10 and $12 in the last contest, CC isn't about to change anything. Enough members are obviously happy just as things are.
RE: We need a new category
lmao spot on but maybe you should forgive the error a little,he could of been drunk :--)
RE: We need a new category
I think you'd get a lot of objection from the current Glamour hosts that do strip now, which is why I suggested an entirely new category. But it will never happen anyway, I'm just mouthing off.
what is 'Make New Friends' category then?
why dont all the hosts who would like to chat only not move to the 'Make New Friends' category. wouldn't this solve the problem?
RE: We need a new category
While the idea has merit you have forgotten that members think with their dicks. After seeing a girl prance around in a bikini and lingerie for a few minutes members are going to want to see more. So the glamour hosts, as many do now, will have more adult IDs for that type of show. We already have a non-nude category...non-adult. If a host wants to chat and not strip at all...go there. Otherwise...off with the top.
RE: We need a new category
Just because you want to pick a host and demand her to take off her clothes doesn't mean she is available for that so why don't you stay in limited categories where you won't be disappointed rather than tell us what we should or shouldn't be doing? It is our business and you have a choice of shopping somewhere else. Apparently you can't be content in somewhere else. Why don't you block yourself from Glam and Little Shy Categories if you can't get the results that you want.....makes much more sense!
RE: We need a new category
why new category look around the women will not abide by the rules anyway make new friends is non nude but half the girls are telling members no nudity while jumping back and forth to glamour thats if they do not have a screen name open there already.
and the glamour girls are in this category and saying they dont strip or do nothing but chat
you have some glamour girls doing full adult shows in 121 and some hardcore hosts who don't do hard core but for a select few
so why add more confusion when no matter how easy cc tries to make it the host mess it up to benefit their mood
the truth is until cc decides to make categories and hold the host responsible to sticking to the rules on them IE penalties and deducting their money when breaking the rules and monitoring the sessions to see nothing is being broken. then the models will make their own rules and mess up any system cc puts in place here.
models make money yes but we as members bring the money and cc needs to start seeing our opinions instead of covering the hosts all the time sorry i am venting but i hope you get my point
and the glamour girls are in this category and saying they dont strip or do nothing but chat
you have some glamour girls doing full adult shows in 121 and some hardcore hosts who don't do hard core but for a select few
so why add more confusion when no matter how easy cc tries to make it the host mess it up to benefit their mood
the truth is until cc decides to make categories and hold the host responsible to sticking to the rules on them IE penalties and deducting their money when breaking the rules and monitoring the sessions to see nothing is being broken. then the models will make their own rules and mess up any system cc puts in place here.
models make money yes but we as members bring the money and cc needs to start seeing our opinions instead of covering the hosts all the time sorry i am venting but i hope you get my point
RE: We need a new category
cc does fine and they do penalize for breaking the rules ....any time I have broken a rule (and I did not break the rule intentionally) cc has been very fast to fine and or penalize me...heck they even did it when they thought I broke rules..and I had to prove to them that I did not before they would take the fine back and they apologized....so I really do not know how these hosts get away with breaking rules...
you are very right...hosts that break the rules should be fined and or penalized...and either prove that they did not break the rule or do what I had to do in order to be able to host again....
I wish members would stop generalizing....Not all hosts break the rules...but to hear members on here talking....they make it like all hosts screw things up...
you are very right...hosts that break the rules should be fined and or penalized...and either prove that they did not break the rule or do what I had to do in order to be able to host again....
I wish members would stop generalizing....Not all hosts break the rules...but to hear members on here talking....they make it like all hosts screw things up...
RE: We need a new category
Or the number of violations are greatly exaggerated. Over the last few years I have videoed with quite a few girls on here and not one of them ever refused to strip once she had agreed in free chat.
Now maybe it's because I am very good at only being attracted to the "bad" girls or perhaps it's because I am quite happy to chat for a few minutes first rather than the first words I grunt being tits pussy ass etc
But I suspect it is because the problem is greatly exaggerated.
Now maybe it's because I am very good at only being attracted to the "bad" girls or perhaps it's because I am quite happy to chat for a few minutes first rather than the first words I grunt being tits pussy ass etc
But I suspect it is because the problem is greatly exaggerated.
RE: We need a new category
"But I suspect it is because the problem is greatly exaggerated."
With all due respect I disagree. It may be that large numbers of viewers get ripped off and simply leave the site and never post or even email cc to complain. Trust me, the industry norm is to ignore viewers. I think most viewers are unaware of this forum, since except for 1 other, there are none on other sites.
So I have to say violations are under reported. This is only my opinion based on many years of going to cam sites.
With all due respect I disagree. It may be that large numbers of viewers get ripped off and simply leave the site and never post or even email cc to complain. Trust me, the industry norm is to ignore viewers. I think most viewers are unaware of this forum, since except for 1 other, there are none on other sites.
So I have to say violations are under reported. This is only my opinion based on many years of going to cam sites.
RE: We need a new category
that mean you can talk with women, some men are not, even in real world. thats why you always get what you want, some others seem never get what they want...sorry for them :)
RE: We need a new category
"Not all hosts break the rules...but to hear members on here talking....they make it like all hosts screw things up..."
I've never posted that all hosts screw things up and can't recall every seeing a post by anyone that said that.
I've never posted that all hosts screw things up and can't recall every seeing a post by anyone that said that.
RE: We need a new category
The point is why come on here and complain about girls not following the rules when it is a small majority and instead complain to CC when it happens and get results? Why do guys come on here with all these additions when for most it works.
It frustrates hosts too when girls end up in the wrong category for what they do and it effects all the others in that category.
It frustrates hosts too when girls end up in the wrong category for what they do and it effects all the others in that category.
RE: We need a new category
i agree not all are in the wrong category and breaking rules but allot are.
glamour hosts how many of them are doing full adult or not doing anything at all?
not doing anything while not in the rules they have to but if a host is here for chat what are you in glamour or little shy? why not move to non-adult
Truth is when i see a non-adult performer in make new friends or so on i never ask any show but if i see in glamour i expect some kind of show even if not nude.
when i say these hosts are ruining the categories i mean this.
not all hosts but allot of the reason men go and want a full adult show from glamour maybe because he is getting them from other girls
or if we go to non adult to ask show maybe because of the hosts who are working both sections or jumping categories.
we never know who they are unless we ask.
i have been on cc since 2002 and before 121 was issues with non-adult and models doing shows in password protected sessions
that's why cc changed to glamour for these hosts but it had a reverse effect and allot of hosts bend the rules to benefit them and ruined what cc was trying to do
glamour hosts how many of them are doing full adult or not doing anything at all?
not doing anything while not in the rules they have to but if a host is here for chat what are you in glamour or little shy? why not move to non-adult
Truth is when i see a non-adult performer in make new friends or so on i never ask any show but if i see in glamour i expect some kind of show even if not nude.
when i say these hosts are ruining the categories i mean this.
not all hosts but allot of the reason men go and want a full adult show from glamour maybe because he is getting them from other girls
or if we go to non adult to ask show maybe because of the hosts who are working both sections or jumping categories.
we never know who they are unless we ask.
i have been on cc since 2002 and before 121 was issues with non-adult and models doing shows in password protected sessions
that's why cc changed to glamour for these hosts but it had a reverse effect and allot of hosts bend the rules to benefit them and ruined what cc was trying to do
Choices
All members and hosts choose to be a part of this site. All hosts choose their category/categories. All members choose what categories they visit. The hosts in the softcore categories choose to strip or not to strip. The hosts in the hardcore categories give up that choice when they choose those 2 categories (NSS & IA).
Members in a softcore open or 121 still yield to the choice of the host to strip or not strip, but they can also choose to leave the pvt. They can then choose to visit a hardcore host or even an entirely different site. There are countless choices on the net.
So we all have choices.
Members in a softcore open or 121 still yield to the choice of the host to strip or not strip, but they can also choose to leave the pvt. They can then choose to visit a hardcore host or even an entirely different site. There are countless choices on the net.
So we all have choices.
RE: Choices
You can vastly reduce having to yield to the choice of the softcore hosts by simply asking in free chat if she strips. Every host that has agreed to strip did so. It's only once they have agreed to strip that I then go to video and actually ask them to put clothes on :P
RE: Choices
I agree...a couple of simple questions before the video would eliminate all the problems members seem to have with hosts and their videos. CC will back you if a host does not deliver what she promises. But be specific and define precisely what you want. If the host is vague about agreeing or gives some other evasive answer...save yourself the grief...move on to another host...she has no intention of stripping. Easy.
RE: Choices
I have no choice - mistress told me i must read this forum, and report to her the contents.
SweetChrisy & hotroxy
Does anyone remember these girls? They were two of my favorites when I first joined 9 years ago and I'd really like to know how they are doing
He has seen enough porn, should be better at this
He has seen enough porn daily, he should be better at this
Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
As we all know nudity nor even partial nudity (topless) is require in Glamour and little shy. So for those who strip, why do it if its not required?
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
bcs some members really deserve
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
If it's not required, a host not in a category that does not require it can use the distant promise of nudity as a lure to extend video sessions and thus earn more, right? or she can use the nudity as a reward to certain members who not only earn it by spending a lot on her, but who behave especially well and especially to her liking.....that makes sense too, right? if you were a host and you could amass a clientele of money slaves and virtual sugar daddies in certain categories, wouldn't you?
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
Because some girls want to and others probably figure that they will make more money....lol
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
1. categories have different minimum prices so some might want to charge a lower price than other categories allow
2. some don't mind stripping but like the idea that they can say no if they don't like the guy
3. some probably are willing to strip all the time but don't like toys and hard core and they look at soft core as this type of category
4. money... they make more money stripping than not stripping in some cases
5. INYF deserves it
6. I deserve it too.
2. some don't mind stripping but like the idea that they can say no if they don't like the guy
3. some probably are willing to strip all the time but don't like toys and hard core and they look at soft core as this type of category
4. money... they make more money stripping than not stripping in some cases
5. INYF deserves it
6. I deserve it too.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
Some of them actually enjoy it, when its with someone they like. They don't want to strip for just any stranger who barks at them to, so they don't work in categories that require it.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
And someday, I hope you will be able to move beyond this issue and discover that there is so much more in life besides this one thing that consumes your thinking and enjoying of this site.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
I bet someone has a big credit card bil, lol. But true. Some hosts are worth getting to know better.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
I get horny too...but in the hardcore category...it is not only expected but often demanded....I do not use toy and I am do not always masterbate.....but I do remove clothing as well as other requests (and there are many different types of requests that do not involve shoving a dildo or fist inside)....and there are times that a simple conversation can lead into more...or even someone will come along and the way they are can be enticing......so in little shy category....I am able to express my wilder side naturally...when I was in not so shy....it was a constant demand of get naked now...finger yourself now...cum now...and that was what they thought was foreplay....lol....I am not one that can pretend nor automatically be aroused just because someone says hi, I am hard and horny so get to it...after a while of hearing that constantly, it became a big turn off and rather than disappoint I chose to change categories to little shy....
for many hosts (mostly those in not so shy, instant action or those that have rooms in hard and soft core) they seem to have no trouble with doing such things and many of them are good at faking it too....and as I have read many posts saying "we don't if she fakes it as long as she is good at it" or "I am paying so the host will do what I say and when" or "I am paying so why should I bother to arouse a host, she should be arousing me" or "if a host is not going to do these things then they do not belong in the hard core categories"...
When I do show the wilder side of myself in such a way then I like to enjoy it....I do not stall in my videos and I do not say I will do something then say no once in video....but the wilder side is often a surprise and can be much more enjoyable when it is not expected.
for many hosts (mostly those in not so shy, instant action or those that have rooms in hard and soft core) they seem to have no trouble with doing such things and many of them are good at faking it too....and as I have read many posts saying "we don't if she fakes it as long as she is good at it" or "I am paying so the host will do what I say and when" or "I am paying so why should I bother to arouse a host, she should be arousing me" or "if a host is not going to do these things then they do not belong in the hard core categories"...
When I do show the wilder side of myself in such a way then I like to enjoy it....I do not stall in my videos and I do not say I will do something then say no once in video....but the wilder side is often a surprise and can be much more enjoyable when it is not expected.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
The same here....I dont mind to get naked and play, I even like it myself if I am in mood. But what I really hate to do it in rush. I need to take my time for hot show. I was in other sites out of categories and find myself its' not for me when a viewer enters my room and starts with commands: get naked, spread legs, get doggy, cum..so 5-10 mins and he got his cum and off from the chat with no even bye and thanks. I cant stand the rule I must get naked for everybody who are in in my chat (even if I am not in playful mood) thats why I awoid hardcore category and choose softcore. Toys and anal are not my thing too. I like to be naturally aroused and really horny for hot show, hate to pretend for it. My opinion for the show I need minimum 30 mins, but better 1 hr, with my price its from 50 $ to 100 $ for viewer thats not so much and if a guy cant afford it he shouldnt expect a show from me.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
Ladies, thank you... this is precisely the reason I might spend some time "chatting" up a host, and I'm some kind of sissy boy I guess? It's like members here don't understand female anatomy, or how women get aroused...
Which explains a lot, actually.
Which explains a lot, actually.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
"I'm some kind of sissy boy"
Your words, not mine.
Your words, not mine.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
Did I call you a sissy boy? Sorry if that offended you.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
sorry, but you have no idea what is it "sissy boys" or "money slave" and what they need in video. SeemsReal is a gentleman who cares about woman more than about himself...hmm maybe I would think to meet in real with such kind of men. :)
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
Ah, well... princess. Thank you. :)))))
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
"but you have no idea what is it "sissy boys" or "money slave"
I most certainly do. And no I'm not one.
I most certainly do. And no I'm not one.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
While I would happily spend an hour in video with a host at the prices you quote I have to admit that the host being turned on is not something I really care about (probably because I imagine that no host is really turned on when she is videoing with me). As I'm paying the only one I care about getting turned on is me.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
My sentiments exactly my friend
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
Well, thats you, your rights are all here. I only hope that aroused host not turn off for you at least? If yes, that maybe something not right with you, because normally for most men (as I know) pretending, cold woman is turn off, except sissy boys and money slaves (they adore arrogant goddess who merely ignoring them in video chat). By the way you never been in my video (if you use the same name for videochatting).
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
I would prefer a host to be turned on but if she isn't and is good at pretending she is enjoying herself with me (or pretending to be turned on) then I am happy.
It's the same with the friendship. I would love it to be real but I am wise enough to know that hosts are only pretending because I am paying. And I see nothing wrong with that. For a few minutes I can pretend that these beautiful, young sexy girls really do find me funny, sweet and generous.
I do video with this name and others. So if a member has ever asked you to wear jeans in your video then it could very well have been me.
But I think you are right and that we have probably never had a video.
It's the same with the friendship. I would love it to be real but I am wise enough to know that hosts are only pretending because I am paying. And I see nothing wrong with that. For a few minutes I can pretend that these beautiful, young sexy girls really do find me funny, sweet and generous.
I do video with this name and others. So if a member has ever asked you to wear jeans in your video then it could very well have been me.
But I think you are right and that we have probably never had a video.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
I never ask hosts to put on clothes. If you were wearing jeans or anything else, I would ask you to take it off. But often when I do that in softcore, I am told to go to IA or sometimes just to go to hell.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
I ask politely sometimes in free chat, but most times in open vid after 5 or 10 minutes and ask if they ever undress or make a comment I would like to see what is under whatever they are wearing. I can't help it if I am a perverted wanker.
RE: Softcore hosts; Why strip when you are not required to do so?
I do not call anyone sissy nor money slave, to me we are all people with different desires and requests...
I do not expect anyone to turn me on, but there are men on here that do like to try to do that and there are times when it just simply happens...
A person does not have to spend an hour in video turning me on, most often the talking it is in free chat, and they will then ask if I will be willing to remove my clothes, so I do not make people stay in my video for long periods of time, it is their choice how long they are in video for.
Most members will come to my free chat and ask me about their request and I prefer that so that no one wastes their money, I am upfront of what I will and will not do as soon as I know the request. Many member have many different requests, including asking a host to put on certain clothes, ie secretary clothes, lingery, leather, and many other types of clothing, sometimes the clothing stays on sometimes they come off, it all depends on the person who has the request.
As I said in my response not all members care if a host is pretending or not as long as she is good at it and that is fine, I am just not one that will pretend to enjoy when it comes to being in an intimate way. That is my preference, and honesty with a member from the begining gives the member the option to take the chance or to find a host that will say definately yes to all that is asked of them...so for myself shy category is the best place for me.
I think it is sad and unreasonable for a host to get mad or be rude to a member simply because he asks her if she will remove her clothes, we are on a sex site for heavens sake, and that is one of the things that is to be expected as a request no matter what category a host is in. The only time a softcore host should suggest a member go to IA is when he says he is wanting instant use of a toy or masterbation, and this should be said in a polite suggestive way. Otherwise a host can simply say in a polite way that she does not get nude. There is no need for a host to be rude just because a member asks for something.
A person can not always say when or what or who will turn them on. I can be doing a simple dance with strip and it can turn into more and can be a nice surprise for both. But this can happen as long as the host is honest and does not make false promises and agreements.
I do not expect anyone to turn me on, but there are men on here that do like to try to do that and there are times when it just simply happens...
A person does not have to spend an hour in video turning me on, most often the talking it is in free chat, and they will then ask if I will be willing to remove my clothes, so I do not make people stay in my video for long periods of time, it is their choice how long they are in video for.
Most members will come to my free chat and ask me about their request and I prefer that so that no one wastes their money, I am upfront of what I will and will not do as soon as I know the request. Many member have many different requests, including asking a host to put on certain clothes, ie secretary clothes, lingery, leather, and many other types of clothing, sometimes the clothing stays on sometimes they come off, it all depends on the person who has the request.
As I said in my response not all members care if a host is pretending or not as long as she is good at it and that is fine, I am just not one that will pretend to enjoy when it comes to being in an intimate way. That is my preference, and honesty with a member from the begining gives the member the option to take the chance or to find a host that will say definately yes to all that is asked of them...so for myself shy category is the best place for me.
I think it is sad and unreasonable for a host to get mad or be rude to a member simply because he asks her if she will remove her clothes, we are on a sex site for heavens sake, and that is one of the things that is to be expected as a request no matter what category a host is in. The only time a softcore host should suggest a member go to IA is when he says he is wanting instant use of a toy or masterbation, and this should be said in a polite suggestive way. Otherwise a host can simply say in a polite way that she does not get nude. There is no need for a host to be rude just because a member asks for something.
A person can not always say when or what or who will turn them on. I can be doing a simple dance with strip and it can turn into more and can be a nice surprise for both. But this can happen as long as the host is honest and does not make false promises and agreements.
Does anyone remember Gortensia?
She used to post in here all the time. She was in non adult but I do recall her saying she tried little shy and it didn't work out. She told me cc ban her from adult categories and she could only be in non adult. She never explained why, only that it happened.
But she was famous or imfamous for posting here and was curious as to what happened to her.
But she was famous or imfamous for posting here and was curious as to what happened to her.
RE: Does anyone remember Gortensia?
I remember her well but what she got up to once she left here I have no idea.
RE: Does anyone remember Gortensia?
great tits on her ;) . never belived the banned from adult categories story.
RE: Does anyone remember Gortensia?
She left for a long time and eventually returned as I recall...not sure it was this length of time however. She was getting a little older and bigger and maybe decided it was time to move on though she was not competing with the younger girls solely on her looks. You never know...once in a while an oldie but goodie pops up again but for the most part...like the McRib sandwich...when they are gone..they are gone.
RE: Does anyone remember Gortensia?
but you can always count on the McRib coming back this year, next year, or at some time in the future.
RE: Does anyone remember Gortensia?
Once i took her prv and told her to cut the crap and get nude. She got really mad and didnt show anything muahahahhaa
Latest contest appears to have been a sucess
It appears to me the hosts' ratings have improved site wide. There seems to be many more 5 and 4.5 star hosts in all categories. To me that would mean many happy customers . And if hosts are busy and making more money their attitude is much better and it shows to viewers as they enter her video. So it seems that happy hosts make for happy customers.
RE: Latest contest appears to have been a sucess
Or it could be because they were all pretending to "be nice" during the competition :P
RE: Latest contest appears to have been a sucess
Members go to their favorites during contests. A bunch of fans visited hosts, rated them 5 stars and ratings went up. I don't think it means anything one way or another, but it would be nice if you were correct.
RE: Latest contest appears to have been a sucess
Well, yes, CC contest time is a happy one. Reality doesn't set in until the credit card statements are due... let's see, that should be just before Xmas?