General Forum
My theory about chatters in iA
I know this has been posted about before, but I have a theory about these guys that go a category that features quick nude shows and goes there and just chats in open. The host is only doing what the viewer asked and anyone can spend their own money the way they see fit. But I have worked with guys in the real world that take simple jobs and make them complicated just to cause grief for everyone else. Get the picture? I have a suspicion that there are some viewers on site that go to IA knowing what kind of category it is and chat only to piss off other viewers who enter open video expecting to see a hardcore show in progress. And unlike the guy complaining about ~, this can really be frustrating to many viewers who go in open vid in IA and see a chat session going on instead of a hardcore show.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Or maybe they realize that even if that girl is in instant action, and she does perform sex shows for him when he feels like it, she s cool and interesting to chat with.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
I guess you mean hosts having something like the following in their profile "What you can expect from my show
Yuo can expect an interesting talk and many other things....."
That is copied and pasted from the profile of an IA host
Yuo can expect an interesting talk and many other things....."
That is copied and pasted from the profile of an IA host
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Or maybe she is a friend working in several categories and this viewer caught her wherever he found her on line...
Your theory seems to confirm me also that there are other people in society who suffer from a persecution complex, and of course they'll find reasons to feel such an attitude directed at them in case they face it.
Entering a room that is already occupied means taking a risk. There are so many free girls, why to wish being second in line by entering a busy chatroom?
Your theory seems to confirm me also that there are other people in society who suffer from a persecution complex, and of course they'll find reasons to feel such an attitude directed at them in case they face it.
Entering a room that is already occupied means taking a risk. There are so many free girls, why to wish being second in line by entering a busy chatroom?
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
"Entering a room that is already occupied means taking a risk. There are so many free girls, why to wish being second in line by entering a busy chatroom?"
Good question. One reason is for just a quick look before I go to another host. Its just what I and maybe some others members like to do. Its all about personal choice as so many in this forum like to say all the time. And it is the category that starts off by saying "Don't have time for small talk"
Good question. One reason is for just a quick look before I go to another host. Its just what I and maybe some others members like to do. Its all about personal choice as so many in this forum like to say all the time. And it is the category that starts off by saying "Don't have time for small talk"
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Or maybe you really don't understand how complex a human being is, even a man that comes on a porn site. Why does it have to go down to "he's doing it to piss off others". I don't think they care about others. They want something, they pay for it. It's so dumb to insult all those men that simply like a girl and would like to know a bit more about her.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
I also agree. People are complex and some want more of the girl then just her body! You have a friend who understands you and you can tell everything. And then maybe you can even meet in real if all is right!
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
"People are complex and some want more of the girl then just her body!"
Not in IA!
Not in IA!
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
"
I think that's called prejudice(s)."
No its called categories. You know something for every taste that is used by many softcore hosts in this forum.
I think that's called prejudice(s)."
No its called categories. You know something for every taste that is used by many softcore hosts in this forum.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
" why is an IA host obliged to do a show?"
Because it is a CC rule. If a member is chatting in IA with host and a new member enters and asks the host to strip, she must comply. You can ask CC if you need verification
Because it is a CC rule. If a member is chatting in IA with host and a new member enters and asks the host to strip, she must comply. You can ask CC if you need verification
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
She wasn't asking the question because she didn't know the answer. In fact, she answered it in the very next sentence:
"About categories... why is an IA host obliged to do a show? Because that's what the viewer usually wants and expects. But if the viewer wants something else, she's supposed to comply."
You basically only reiterated redundantly what she already said. "supposed to" = "CC rules"
Again, not all viewers coming to IA want hardcore nudity. Just because that's what you want, please quit classifying every one of the rest of us viewers in your perspective. And yes, I suppose you are correct also, in that even if another viewer comes in after and wants a harcore nudity show, in IA, she is supposed to comply, regardless of the first-come/first-serve understanding which seems to prevail elsewhere. Which, when you think about it, is a pissy rule for the one came first and has been paying the longest.
Even if in IA, in my opinion, it should be the first-come/first-serve rule.
But unfortunately, CC does not always see things my way.
"About categories... why is an IA host obliged to do a show? Because that's what the viewer usually wants and expects. But if the viewer wants something else, she's supposed to comply."
You basically only reiterated redundantly what she already said. "supposed to" = "CC rules"
Again, not all viewers coming to IA want hardcore nudity. Just because that's what you want, please quit classifying every one of the rest of us viewers in your perspective. And yes, I suppose you are correct also, in that even if another viewer comes in after and wants a harcore nudity show, in IA, she is supposed to comply, regardless of the first-come/first-serve understanding which seems to prevail elsewhere. Which, when you think about it, is a pissy rule for the one came first and has been paying the longest.
Even if in IA, in my opinion, it should be the first-come/first-serve rule.
But unfortunately, CC does not always see things my way.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
"Again, not all viewers coming to IA want hardcore nudity"
Oh really? Then why does CC have this in their guidelines?
Girls Home Alone - Instant Action
Don't have time for small talk? This is the category for you! This is an adult category, and nudity is not only allowed, it is a given!
For those wanting to talk, there is non adult, Glamour and Little Shy. For those wanting hardcore action there is IA!
Oh really? Then why does CC have this in their guidelines?
Girls Home Alone - Instant Action
Don't have time for small talk? This is the category for you! This is an adult category, and nudity is not only allowed, it is a given!
For those wanting to talk, there is non adult, Glamour and Little Shy. For those wanting hardcore action there is IA!
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Well, if you can't figure that one out, pity!
Obviously, the category is intended to cater to the hardcore enthusiast. But where does that mean ALL, are looking for hardcore?
Read my words, and understand.
Obviously, the category is intended to cater to the hardcore enthusiast. But where does that mean ALL, are looking for hardcore?
Read my words, and understand.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Since when did CC start dictating what choices viewers could make? The category is AVAILABLE for those wishing hardcore nudity. It is not required that those who go there must go there only for that reason.
Again, you are trying to fit everyone else into YOUR mold.
Again, you are trying to fit everyone else into YOUR mold.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
MyHeart4Yours is 100% correct.
I will always go where my cash allows me. As long as I can pay I can go where I wish. I am not here for nudity, I come here to have a great time talking and getting acquainted with beautiful women. Nobody can force me to do otherwise. Just do what you wish and leave the real gentlemen alone!
I will always go where my cash allows me. As long as I can pay I can go where I wish. I am not here for nudity, I come here to have a great time talking and getting acquainted with beautiful women. Nobody can force me to do otherwise. Just do what you wish and leave the real gentlemen alone!
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
You are entitled to go to any category you choose and not get a show of nudity if the host wants to chat but you are cheap and wrong to go to hardcore and go into open session and expect that the host should sit there and chat with you when others come into open and are expecting nudity. You have the option of leaving if that is not what you want to see. Don't be so cheap and take her to 121 if you don't want the interruptions and her entertaining others that come into open. You are actually costing the host $$ if you are expecting her to ignore other guests in open and you are wrong to do so.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
There is no wrong if the host agrees that I have priority in an open session, and I want to chat (for a little while, or for a longer time), in whatever category.
If she doesn't agree because she wants to entertain more members in an open session, I have no argument with that. Then I can choose to go 121, or not.
I really don't care what you think about it, regardless.
If she doesn't agree because she wants to entertain more members in an open session, I have no argument with that. Then I can choose to go 121, or not.
I really don't care what you think about it, regardless.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
OMG how many times do we have to have this conversation?
In my view you are absolutely correct. An IA host is certainly within her rights to tell me, if I am in open, that she will strip because another viewe wants that, and I will accept it, and either leave or stay. But if we agree to do whatever we are doing because I was the first to arrive, that should be our CHOICE. It's quite simple.
In my view you are absolutely correct. An IA host is certainly within her rights to tell me, if I am in open, that she will strip because another viewe wants that, and I will accept it, and either leave or stay. But if we agree to do whatever we are doing because I was the first to arrive, that should be our CHOICE. It's quite simple.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Because I keep entertaining the hope that one day the message will sink in to this one who will not let the matter lie.
But unfortunately, it is like talking to a brick wall.
But unfortunately, it is like talking to a brick wall.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
My theory is that these knuckle heads that go to IA just to chat have no idea what this site is for. They see a beautiful young chick in video and they use $$$ to seduce her. True the girls are here for the $$$, but in their fantasy the knuckle head thinks the girl will be thankful and greatful for his gentleness if does not ask her for a strip and she will of course fall in love easily. It ends up the 40 something seducer becomes seduced by a 19 year old that barely speaks english, but she is smarter and will of course let him play his game. He leaves with a smile and thinking everyday he is winning by his own rules. Pity most girls are here to work and make $$$ and the idiots that "love" to show off their easy earned $$$ with long hours in her vid will always end up with just a hefty credit card bill to pay.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Aaaaaaand your problem is? Why does it concern YOU what another viewer does with his money? His money, his time, his decision. Ok, it's host's time too and it becomes her money. If you enter and she doesn't want to strip because she'd offend the other guy, ok, that's a problem, but I doubt there are many situations like that one.
You're all big boys (from an age point of view, I don't wish to talk about size) and you are well aware of what you are doing with your money. None if responsible for what another does. So why does it matter to you? (besides the situation where it might interfere with your show, in which case you can go find another girl)
You're all big boys (from an age point of view, I don't wish to talk about size) and you are well aware of what you are doing with your money. None if responsible for what another does. So why does it matter to you? (besides the situation where it might interfere with your show, in which case you can go find another girl)
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Finally a sane reply by someone who gets it. Thank you brother.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
I highly doubt that there is some grand conspiracy by a bunch of rich viewers that like to go to IA and chat just to piss other viewers off. They may enjoy that they are having this effect, but I doubt that this is their primary motivation.
They are chatting with IA hosts because they happen to like chatting and don't care about the category. Maybe they have hopes of marrying a host some day so they don't ask for a show (except when they come back with another account and don't give their cam, lol). Or maybe they just find that particular host interesting and are willing to pay to talk to her. But to think that there is anything more than a very low percentage of viewers that would just chat simply to annoy others seems like an absurd notion and sells a lot of interesting women here short.
Categories are there so that a viewer knows what to expect IF he wants what that particular category offers. So, for example, if he wants a guaranteed, instant nude show, he can go to IA. If he wants a nude show but doesn't mind chatting a few minutes first, he can go to Not So Shy. But that isn't what everyone here wants.
I almost always go to a host's room for a show. I'm not here to make friends. But even if I get that show, that doesn't mean that I don't appreciate the woman as a person and might not pay just to chat latter and end up as friends. In my case, I won't keep going back just to chat most of the time, but what's wrong with other guys deciding to do so?
I personally pay to chat about 5% of the time. I don't believe in paying for friends and will chat for money when I want to see someone I consider a friend on cam, and I don't worry about the category. The other 95% of the time I am chatting on yahoo or in text chat and unless a host is busy, they don't seem to mind chatting with me.
I think you are letting your frustration with hosts that don't follow the rules get the best of your better judgment and now you want to blame the viewer. The viewer isn't out to get you or or is some idiot or is some loser or is a slave just because he might want to chat. Yes, there are slaves and delusional members, but some viewers are chatting in many cases just because they like chatting. Would I pay just to chat? Usually no. But that doesn't mean others don't enjoy doing so.
They are chatting with IA hosts because they happen to like chatting and don't care about the category. Maybe they have hopes of marrying a host some day so they don't ask for a show (except when they come back with another account and don't give their cam, lol). Or maybe they just find that particular host interesting and are willing to pay to talk to her. But to think that there is anything more than a very low percentage of viewers that would just chat simply to annoy others seems like an absurd notion and sells a lot of interesting women here short.
Categories are there so that a viewer knows what to expect IF he wants what that particular category offers. So, for example, if he wants a guaranteed, instant nude show, he can go to IA. If he wants a nude show but doesn't mind chatting a few minutes first, he can go to Not So Shy. But that isn't what everyone here wants.
I almost always go to a host's room for a show. I'm not here to make friends. But even if I get that show, that doesn't mean that I don't appreciate the woman as a person and might not pay just to chat latter and end up as friends. In my case, I won't keep going back just to chat most of the time, but what's wrong with other guys deciding to do so?
I personally pay to chat about 5% of the time. I don't believe in paying for friends and will chat for money when I want to see someone I consider a friend on cam, and I don't worry about the category. The other 95% of the time I am chatting on yahoo or in text chat and unless a host is busy, they don't seem to mind chatting with me.
I think you are letting your frustration with hosts that don't follow the rules get the best of your better judgment and now you want to blame the viewer. The viewer isn't out to get you or or is some idiot or is some loser or is a slave just because he might want to chat. Yes, there are slaves and delusional members, but some viewers are chatting in many cases just because they like chatting. Would I pay just to chat? Usually no. But that doesn't mean others don't enjoy doing so.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
By the way, that guy you think is just chatting might just like to talk for awhile and then have a show. And unless you see the text, how do you know they aren't chatting about sex and she is watching him on cam? People are turned on by different things and don't always need a show.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
"I highly doubt that there is some grand conspiracy by a bunch of rich viewers that like to go to IA and chat just to piss other viewers off"
Where in my post did I mention grand conspiracy? Stop twisting my words and and try to give an honest reply to my post which I represent as a theory based on real life asswipes I've encountered.
Where in my post did I mention grand conspiracy? Stop twisting my words and and try to give an honest reply to my post which I represent as a theory based on real life asswipes I've encountered.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
I understood your post. I chose the language that I used because I felt your theory had little, if any, merit.
I can understand that you have run into real life a-holes that just like causing others problems. But how often are they paying $2.00/min to accomplish their objectives? Only a wealthy person or a complete idiot, or both, could get away with wasting his money like that, be it in real life or on CC.
I stand by my post. You are letting your frustrations with chatters get the best of you in my opinion. I think it would be too expensive for a guy on CC to do what you are suggesting although I am open to the possibility that a few guys here don't care about money and are doing as you suggest. I just feel that 99.9% of the chatters have other motivations and that your real life experiences don't apply here. And if I am wrong, that would be a pretty sad commentary on the personality of some viewers here.
I can understand that you have run into real life a-holes that just like causing others problems. But how often are they paying $2.00/min to accomplish their objectives? Only a wealthy person or a complete idiot, or both, could get away with wasting his money like that, be it in real life or on CC.
I stand by my post. You are letting your frustrations with chatters get the best of you in my opinion. I think it would be too expensive for a guy on CC to do what you are suggesting although I am open to the possibility that a few guys here don't care about money and are doing as you suggest. I just feel that 99.9% of the chatters have other motivations and that your real life experiences don't apply here. And if I am wrong, that would be a pretty sad commentary on the personality of some viewers here.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
I think if some guy wants an exclusive chat with a host that is what 121 is for the IA or NSS. Guys are coming in there expecting her to perform for the category that she picked and open is for all viewers not an exclusive chat. Any host that supports chatting with him and ignores the others are not thinking about others and she's loosing $$$ by catering to just one guy who is trying to impress her for a relationship. Nothing in that category refers to chatting hosts and for her to play the game with the guy she should ask him to come to 121 so she can just focus on him without interruptions. Seems like from the forums this is becoming quite an trend lately. I think I agree with you on that one. Before now I've never seen it in forums.
Maybe the guy thinks he is sparing her from her evil acts and he will save her and she will be so thankful that she will marry him. How fricken naive if that is what they are thinking. Hosts are here doing what they like to make money. Most are not here to meet Mr. Right. They must not read forums if they think otherwise.
Maybe the guy thinks he is sparing her from her evil acts and he will save her and she will be so thankful that she will marry him. How fricken naive if that is what they are thinking. Hosts are here doing what they like to make money. Most are not here to meet Mr. Right. They must not read forums if they think otherwise.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
You're basing your theory on what you perceive motivates others to disturb your little entertainment. So I don't see how you can expect anyone to prove or disprove your pet theory. It only serves your own sense of paranoia, or victimhood, or whatever it is that fuels your anger and frames your view of CC. And obviously you have companions here.
On this site, I don't interact with other members except here in the forums, and so I could care less about you or anyone else when I visit a host. I'm here for my own entertainment, whatever form that takes, as you are also, I suppose.
Get the picture?
On this site, I don't interact with other members except here in the forums, and so I could care less about you or anyone else when I visit a host. I'm here for my own entertainment, whatever form that takes, as you are also, I suppose.
Get the picture?
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
"People are complex and some want more of the girl then just her body!"
On this point, I agree
On this point, I agree
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
"On this site, I don't interact with other members except here in the forums, and so I could care less about you or anyone else when I visit a host. I'm here for my own entertainment, whatever form that takes, as you are also, I suppose."
On this point I agree
On this point I agree
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
or maybe he doesn't care what category he ended up to be, and just likes the girl :)
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
Or he prefers to pay an open rate, and the host is fine with it and is wiling to chat. Problem solved.
RE: My theory about chatters in iA
maybe he is not used with the site's options :)) or preffers to spend more time than pvt time
When Profile Pics Tell a Story
I like looking at the profile pics of hosts that have been on CC for a long time. Some for several years. In many cases their profile pics go back years and years. For most you can see not only their transition as they age but how they change in terms of appearance....clothes, hairstyle, makeup...and their demeanor...sexier...more confident...and in many cases with a lot less clothes.
I get a kick out of the changes in hairstyles and hair color, how the tattoos can appear, how more of the profile pics are taken outside of the studio, how their use of makeup increases....and how their pictures are more provocative and enticing...they learn...from experience or from each other.
I just thought it was interesting...probably just me.
I get a kick out of the changes in hairstyles and hair color, how the tattoos can appear, how more of the profile pics are taken outside of the studio, how their use of makeup increases....and how their pictures are more provocative and enticing...they learn...from experience or from each other.
I just thought it was interesting...probably just me.
RE: When Profile Pics Tell a Story
i know there will be different points of view on this subject. but here is mine.
i am thinking of one particular chathost. she has been on here about 4 years i think. she showed me one time her very first pics. no heavy makeup, her real hair color with it growing normally. now if you look at her it is as if she has aged 10-15 years. makeup is very heavy, says she will NEVER go back to her normal hair color, and always adding extensions, ironing hair etc. has said she will get breast implants when she has the money.
to me, unfortunately, i would say she has lost confidence in her natural looks over several years. my opinion could be totally off also, as she is doing all of this to attract and keep more customers. in that case she is being very intelligent.
but generally speaking when i look at chathosts that have 3 or 4 years of pics to me it looks like they have aged 10 or 15 years, for the same reasons i have pointed out about the one host. on the other hand, i can think of at least one host who still looks great as she did in her first pics years ago. she has not fallen into the trap of heavy eye makeup or going crazy trying to make her hair be something it is not.
so go ahead and disagree with me, that is just how i see it.
i am thinking of one particular chathost. she has been on here about 4 years i think. she showed me one time her very first pics. no heavy makeup, her real hair color with it growing normally. now if you look at her it is as if she has aged 10-15 years. makeup is very heavy, says she will NEVER go back to her normal hair color, and always adding extensions, ironing hair etc. has said she will get breast implants when she has the money.
to me, unfortunately, i would say she has lost confidence in her natural looks over several years. my opinion could be totally off also, as she is doing all of this to attract and keep more customers. in that case she is being very intelligent.
but generally speaking when i look at chathosts that have 3 or 4 years of pics to me it looks like they have aged 10 or 15 years, for the same reasons i have pointed out about the one host. on the other hand, i can think of at least one host who still looks great as she did in her first pics years ago. she has not fallen into the trap of heavy eye makeup or going crazy trying to make her hair be something it is not.
so go ahead and disagree with me, that is just how i see it.
RE: When Profile Pics Tell a Story
Ahhh c'mon, give us the screennames so we can see too! Pleaseeeee. I'm all in suspense!
RE: When Profile Pics Tell a Story
you can also see another story here...while the very successful hosts live the good life and take care of themselves, there are plenty just getting by, and due to where they live and their lifestyle, you can see how they age. all the smoking, bad diet, late nights, and lack of regular exercise takes its toll. the host looks incredible at 23, at 33 - not so much. now, of course I will see a gang of 30+ hosts swarm in and pound me about how they still look 22, but whatever. and why they are 35 and still hosting after 8 years is another story...
RE: When Profile Pics Tell a Story
What exactly are you replying to? Who said anything about this being a career for hosts? Did I miss something?
RE: When Profile Pics Tell a Story
im same weight though that didnt change just my hair color and size:)
RE: When Profile Pics Tell a Story
I would tend to agree. The hosts seem to lose their natural good looks in favor of heavy makeup and other enhancements that were not necessary when they first started. Plus their shows become routine and practiced....not the semi-spontaneous and un-practiced routines they had when they first started.
I also note the post that many of the girls smoke, drink and keep lousy hours being a host and that certainly takes it toll. I often read criticism of the hosts here from members but you must realize for many of them their life is school, work at CC and then whatever sleep, dating, and family and friend time they can find. Most of us would not tolerate that kind of schedule while essentially working on commission. I give the girls here a lot of credit. Not just my credit card.
I also note the post that many of the girls smoke, drink and keep lousy hours being a host and that certainly takes it toll. I often read criticism of the hosts here from members but you must realize for many of them their life is school, work at CC and then whatever sleep, dating, and family and friend time they can find. Most of us would not tolerate that kind of schedule while essentially working on commission. I give the girls here a lot of credit. Not just my credit card.
RE: strip hi lo
I can't be bothered to check up on the official answer but i would say hell yes, otherwise what is the point of them being in that category?
RE: strip hi lo
She must get 100% naked and not stall. This applies to soft core hosts too. Once they give the viewer the option of hi-lo, they have waived their right to refuse to get naked. If any problems, and I am guessing that maybe you had some, contact CC. For me, I've had enough problems that I just avoid the category, but with the right host, it can be fun.
And by the way, if you give her your cam, there is no requirement that you must take off your clothes too if you lose, but this can make the game more fun.... again, with the right host.
And by the way, if you give her your cam, there is no requirement that you must take off your clothes too if you lose, but this can make the game more fun.... again, with the right host.
RE: strip hi lo
You claim to know the rules, yet you say you have so much trouble you avoid Strip Hi Lo? That sounds contradictory.
RE: strip hi lo
Why is that contradictory? Knowing the rules doesn't give me the ability to force a host to follow them. And I personally avoid hi-lo because there is too much stalling, which is not permitted. But I can't make the host stop stalling.
RE: strip hi lo
Obviously, but in the case of hi-lo, it isn't worth it. I don't find the game all that enjoyable anyway, and haven't played it for a few years. I have enough issues with things like not so shy hosts saying go 121 and writing CC about that. One needs to pick his battles, lol.
RE: Qoute for the day....
How can you know whether or not a person is worth loving without first judging them so?
RE: Qoute for the day....
you dont "have to judge" , its possible to accept a person as they are .
live and let live a little ;).
live and let live a little ;).
RE: Qoute for the day....
but at some point there is Judgment aka Awareness or Discernment as to the person's character.
However, the context of the original post it is clear that it is more about judging as condemnation rather than discernment.
So I agree both with "me" and with "Joe" -- so long as the terms are clearly distinguished.
However, the context of the original post it is clear that it is more about judging as condemnation rather than discernment.
So I agree both with "me" and with "Joe" -- so long as the terms are clearly distinguished.
I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
I think that Little shy category, is a bit confusing in what members expect, because of how some hosts advertise themselves and because they either do not know the rules or they know the rules and choose to not follow them....it is a category that allows a host to decide how far she will go according to the person doing the asking. The host is not obligated to show anything in an open session....
There are times that I will be with a member and I feel comfortable enough to be adventurous and want to do things that I do not normally do, the only problem is that if you do it once then it might be expected to happen every time after and if the member decides to tell others then others will say "well you did it for him so why not for me"?
According to the rules. Little shy category Soft-core is:
- Mild sexual activity and flirting. Topless is okay, sexy lingerie is good. A sexy dance perhaps. You can do what you feel comfortable doing. You may like the Viewer and want to show more, or maybe you are feeling a little shy today.
- Just like any other category, if a Chathost makes a commitment to do a certain thing, they must honour that commitment within a reasonable time.
- If a viewer wants to see something more than you have committed to, then they should ask. It's up to you to decide how far you want to go.
Activity of a mild sexual nature which MAY include full nudity and touching of breasts, but no legs up or apart while nude; no close-up of genital areas (even with underwear on); no actual or implied touching of genital areas (even with underwear on); no display or use of phallic objects; no animals may be visible in video at any time.
It is not a category for hosts to intentionally stall knowing that she will NOT do what is agreed upon..
So as you can see it will always depend on the host and the member in each situation....
There are times that I will be with a member and I feel comfortable enough to be adventurous and want to do things that I do not normally do, the only problem is that if you do it once then it might be expected to happen every time after and if the member decides to tell others then others will say "well you did it for him so why not for me"?
According to the rules. Little shy category Soft-core is:
- Mild sexual activity and flirting. Topless is okay, sexy lingerie is good. A sexy dance perhaps. You can do what you feel comfortable doing. You may like the Viewer and want to show more, or maybe you are feeling a little shy today.
- Just like any other category, if a Chathost makes a commitment to do a certain thing, they must honour that commitment within a reasonable time.
- If a viewer wants to see something more than you have committed to, then they should ask. It's up to you to decide how far you want to go.
Activity of a mild sexual nature which MAY include full nudity and touching of breasts, but no legs up or apart while nude; no close-up of genital areas (even with underwear on); no actual or implied touching of genital areas (even with underwear on); no display or use of phallic objects; no animals may be visible in video at any time.
It is not a category for hosts to intentionally stall knowing that she will NOT do what is agreed upon..
So as you can see it will always depend on the host and the member in each situation....
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
"Activity of a mild sexual nature which MAY include full nudity and touching of breasts, but no legs up or apart while nude; no close-up of genital areas (even with underwear on); no actual or implied touching of genital areas (even with underwear on); no display or use of phallic objects; no animals may be visible in video at any time."
That comes from the Mobile phone rules. A host in little shy can do as much as a host in IA does if she chooses. It is up to the host..
That comes from the Mobile phone rules. A host in little shy can do as much as a host in IA does if she chooses. It is up to the host..
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
I already said in my post that she can do as much or as little as she wants.
and when a member comes in using a mobile the screen will say by the viewer's name then if there are restrictions with that particular session.
That comes from the rules of cc for glamour and little shy...when logging picking categories....
here is the whole rules for soft core...
Adult Softcore
Activity of a mild sexual nature which may include full nudity and touching of breasts, but no legs up or apart while nude; no close-up of genital areas (even with clothes on); no actual or implied touching of genital areas (even with clothes on); no display or use of phallic objects; no animals visible in video at any time. More info...
Glamour Girls
By signing into this category the Chathost commits to:
* Mild sexual activity and sexy chat. Full nudity is allowed, and more (if you want to) as long as you do not have a restricted session message.
* Just like any other category, if a Chathost makes a commitment to do a certain thing, they must honour that commitment within a reasonable time.
* If a viewer wants to see something more than you have committed to, then they should ask. It's up to you to decide how far you want to go.
Girls Home Alone - A little shy
By signing into this category the Chathost commits to:
* Mild sexual activity and flirting. Topless is okay, sexy lingerie is good. A sexy dance perhaps. You can do what you feel comfortable doing. You may like the Viewer and want to show more, or maybe you are feeling a little shy today.
* Just like any other category, if a Chathost makes a commitment to do a certain thing, they must honour that commitment within a reasonable time.
* If a viewer wants to see something more than you have committed to, then they should ask. It's up to you to decide how far you want to go.
S - Adult Softcore
Activity of a mild sexual nature which may include full nudity and touching of breasts, but no legs up or apart while nude; no close-up of genital areas (even with underwear on); no actual or implied touching of genital areas (even with underwear on); no display or use of phallic objects; no animals may be visible in video at any time.
You may receive restricted Video Sessions with the following Adult Ratings:
SNL - Adult Softcore - NON Sexual Lingerie
SNT - Adult Softcore - NON Sexual Topless
SN - Adult Softcore - No Nudity
ST - Adult Softcore - Topless
SF - Adult Softcore - Full Nudity
SL - Adult Softcore - Lesbian Softcore
ST - Adult Softcore - Full Nudity
and when a member comes in using a mobile the screen will say by the viewer's name then if there are restrictions with that particular session.
That comes from the rules of cc for glamour and little shy...when logging picking categories....
here is the whole rules for soft core...
Adult Softcore
Activity of a mild sexual nature which may include full nudity and touching of breasts, but no legs up or apart while nude; no close-up of genital areas (even with clothes on); no actual or implied touching of genital areas (even with clothes on); no display or use of phallic objects; no animals visible in video at any time. More info...
Glamour Girls
By signing into this category the Chathost commits to:
* Mild sexual activity and sexy chat. Full nudity is allowed, and more (if you want to) as long as you do not have a restricted session message.
* Just like any other category, if a Chathost makes a commitment to do a certain thing, they must honour that commitment within a reasonable time.
* If a viewer wants to see something more than you have committed to, then they should ask. It's up to you to decide how far you want to go.
Girls Home Alone - A little shy
By signing into this category the Chathost commits to:
* Mild sexual activity and flirting. Topless is okay, sexy lingerie is good. A sexy dance perhaps. You can do what you feel comfortable doing. You may like the Viewer and want to show more, or maybe you are feeling a little shy today.
* Just like any other category, if a Chathost makes a commitment to do a certain thing, they must honour that commitment within a reasonable time.
* If a viewer wants to see something more than you have committed to, then they should ask. It's up to you to decide how far you want to go.
S - Adult Softcore
Activity of a mild sexual nature which may include full nudity and touching of breasts, but no legs up or apart while nude; no close-up of genital areas (even with underwear on); no actual or implied touching of genital areas (even with underwear on); no display or use of phallic objects; no animals may be visible in video at any time.
You may receive restricted Video Sessions with the following Adult Ratings:
SNL - Adult Softcore - NON Sexual Lingerie
SNT - Adult Softcore - NON Sexual Topless
SN - Adult Softcore - No Nudity
ST - Adult Softcore - Topless
SF - Adult Softcore - Full Nudity
SL - Adult Softcore - Lesbian Softcore
ST - Adult Softcore - Full Nudity
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
Ok I checked again and you are correct. But in the following quote you are partially correct " The host is not obligated to show anything in an open session...."
The host is not required to do a show in 121 either.
The host is not required to do a show in 121 either.
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
When I log on and start a session that is what it says (as she quoted) for the description of the category....period. Not sure where some get that is for mobile phone viewing since that is supposed to be a restricted session.
She wrote it exactly as it specifies for hosts in that category!!
She wrote it exactly as it specifies for hosts in that category!!
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
The message is clear that don't go into a hosts room in softcore and expect nudity, toys, anal, dp and whatever else they do in hardcore. Go to hardcore or instant action if that is what you want to expect to serve your tastes. Many softcore viewers appreciate shy hosts that like to tease, flirt. be seductive, play and possible nudity. They like the gentler shy girl that they can interactively seduce to some extent.
There is a category for all tastes!
There is a category for all tastes!
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
that is so wrong to say...a person can say the same about hardcore too...there are many hardcore hosts that stall...and dont so as they say they will....
You can not tell people to not go to softcore expecting such things without saying that the same can happen in hardcore too...
there are softcore hosts that do toys, dp and all the stuff u just said not to expect...it all depends on the host...
especially considering the posts that have been posted about hard core and softcore ....
there are hosts that are in both hard core and soft core ....and there are hosts that do everything in softcore too....
You can not tell people to not go to softcore expecting such things without saying that the same can happen in hardcore too...
there are softcore hosts that do toys, dp and all the stuff u just said not to expect...it all depends on the host...
especially considering the posts that have been posted about hard core and softcore ....
there are hosts that are in both hard core and soft core ....and there are hosts that do everything in softcore too....
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
From Adult Ratings;
For NON-RESTRICTED Video Sessions: The Adult Ratings do not define the maximum activity allowed but are ONLY GUIDELINES that are useful for selecting the right CamContacts category for you to join.
For NON-RESTRICTED Video Sessions: The Adult Ratings do not define the maximum activity allowed but are ONLY GUIDELINES that are useful for selecting the right CamContacts category for you to join.
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
The poster did not say that you must do these things, she said that it is up to the host how much she does or does not do. I got the same set of rules/guidelines when I selected the little shy category. and she is right there is a notice that comes up when a mobile user enters the video showing if there are restrictions and what the restrictions are.
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
You need to get your facts straight and shy should you know more than what it tells hosts only when we sign on?? Hhhmmm very interesting! At any rate she is correct!
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
I also a shy host...I don't do nude but....
Give it up my dear...I too saw that you said it's up to the host how far she goes......I have also seen all the posts regarding the confusion with the categories and I know you were only trying to be helpful.....but as you see you are only going to get stomped on....instead of taking from what cc shows us when we pick our category, maybe you should have just put the whole post in your own words.
Sorry to see you were stomped by those who do not see what we see when we choose our category ...
Good luck to you..
Give it up my dear...I too saw that you said it's up to the host how far she goes......I have also seen all the posts regarding the confusion with the categories and I know you were only trying to be helpful.....but as you see you are only going to get stomped on....instead of taking from what cc shows us when we pick our category, maybe you should have just put the whole post in your own words.
Sorry to see you were stomped by those who do not see what we see when we choose our category ...
Good luck to you..
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
Sometimes she is shy, but sometimes she's not! There are no adult restrictions in this category. You can expect something more than just chatting - a strip show, some soft core action, or more depending on how shy the Chathost is feeling! But, remember, these girls are a little shy, so be prepared for some extra sweet talk to warm them up. Please be respectful of the Chathost's preferences and double check her profile prior to entering video chat.
Key words:"There are no adult restrictions in this category. You can expect something more than just chatting - a strip show, some soft core action, or more "
"NO restrictions and you can expect more than just chat"
Yes I agree it is poorly written, but it is there for viewers to read. So if little shy is confusing, blame cc not viewers.
Key words:"There are no adult restrictions in this category. You can expect something more than just chatting - a strip show, some soft core action, or more "
"NO restrictions and you can expect more than just chat"
Yes I agree it is poorly written, but it is there for viewers to read. So if little shy is confusing, blame cc not viewers.
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
Glamour/Little Shy - hosts can do what they want unless they promise something
Not so shy - hosts must start stripping within a few minutes if requested to do so by a viewer
Instant Action - hosts must strip right away if requested to do so by a viewer
What's so confusing? It only can get confusing when the session is a restricted session but the limits are right on the host's screen when the member enters video. The only other limits are the limits which always apply such as no going to the bathroom and some other pretty sick stuff. Other than that, unless the session is restricted, any adult host can strip, use toys, et cetera.
Hosts, IF they pay attention when they sign up for their given category and read the rules carefully, know all this. The only times things become confusing is when they don't read carefully, if a studio boss does their profile for them and misinforms them of the rules, or if their English isn't good enough to understand. But most hosts here have pretty good English language skills. And of course some hosts know the rules and just choose to ignore them.
The rules are pretty basic. They might not be presented in the best way , and it would be nice if members could more easily see all the rules, but if people pay attention, it isn't very confusing.
Not so shy - hosts must start stripping within a few minutes if requested to do so by a viewer
Instant Action - hosts must strip right away if requested to do so by a viewer
What's so confusing? It only can get confusing when the session is a restricted session but the limits are right on the host's screen when the member enters video. The only other limits are the limits which always apply such as no going to the bathroom and some other pretty sick stuff. Other than that, unless the session is restricted, any adult host can strip, use toys, et cetera.
Hosts, IF they pay attention when they sign up for their given category and read the rules carefully, know all this. The only times things become confusing is when they don't read carefully, if a studio boss does their profile for them and misinforms them of the rules, or if their English isn't good enough to understand. But most hosts here have pretty good English language skills. And of course some hosts know the rules and just choose to ignore them.
The rules are pretty basic. They might not be presented in the best way , and it would be nice if members could more easily see all the rules, but if people pay attention, it isn't very confusing.
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
And 121 doesn't affect any of this. It can be used as a condition to do certain things in glamour/little shy, but beyond that, it means nothing. Not so shy and IA hosts must get naked in open and 121.
Again, pretty simple.
Again, pretty simple.
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
I think that if any viewer goes to a softcore hosts room and expects nudity or toys, etc will be disappointed unless she agrees in chat or writes it in her profile. That is the reason they gave hosts a choice of
softcore or hardcore. Adult obviously does not mean hardcore action.
Yes I think CC has made it more confusing where before it was pretty clear.
softcore or hardcore. Adult obviously does not mean hardcore action.
Yes I think CC has made it more confusing where before it was pretty clear.
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
Plenty of little shy hosts will strip although some will say go 121, and a good number of glamour hosts will do the same, again with the 121 thing usually. Just look at the number in soft core hi-lo, for example. And a lot use toys too.
Categories are chosen by hosts, not just based on the rules, but based on position on the list of hosts page and the price allowed. There are plenty of little shy hosts that will give instant action type shows in open, including toys, but would starve if they tried charging $1,70, for example. And many hosts go to glamour not because they won't strip but because they think that category gets more attention since it is at the top.
It isn't just about having control over the type of show. The ones that focus on having control and the ability to say no to stripping are very often long time hosts that used to strip quite a bit but now have decided to focus on chatting a lot more as well as those that truly are shy and really don't want to strip. Other than that, there are a lot of hosts picking soft core due to pricing and to get noticed.
The issue isn't finding hosts in soft core that strip. The issue is taking the time to ask them if they do and to find out if they will say go 121. Also, a lot of little shy hosts have not so shy rooms open at the same time so they definitely will strip (although a lot of times these are the same ones pulling the 121 garbage in not so shy).
Most hosts on CC strip. They didn't all start their host careers here, and they often come from sites that they strip all the time on, and some of them still work on those other sites, including soft core hosts. The difference is that CC has taught them that they can often make money when not stripping so it becomes more of a challenge to get a show, particularly with soft core hosts, but you can still get one.
Bad CC!!! Shame on you!!! Helping hosts not to strip. Bad CC!!!
Categories are chosen by hosts, not just based on the rules, but based on position on the list of hosts page and the price allowed. There are plenty of little shy hosts that will give instant action type shows in open, including toys, but would starve if they tried charging $1,70, for example. And many hosts go to glamour not because they won't strip but because they think that category gets more attention since it is at the top.
It isn't just about having control over the type of show. The ones that focus on having control and the ability to say no to stripping are very often long time hosts that used to strip quite a bit but now have decided to focus on chatting a lot more as well as those that truly are shy and really don't want to strip. Other than that, there are a lot of hosts picking soft core due to pricing and to get noticed.
The issue isn't finding hosts in soft core that strip. The issue is taking the time to ask them if they do and to find out if they will say go 121. Also, a lot of little shy hosts have not so shy rooms open at the same time so they definitely will strip (although a lot of times these are the same ones pulling the 121 garbage in not so shy).
Most hosts on CC strip. They didn't all start their host careers here, and they often come from sites that they strip all the time on, and some of them still work on those other sites, including soft core hosts. The difference is that CC has taught them that they can often make money when not stripping so it becomes more of a challenge to get a show, particularly with soft core hosts, but you can still get one.
Bad CC!!! Shame on you!!! Helping hosts not to strip. Bad CC!!!
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
Some of what you say is right but I don't believe the majority of your comments are a typical softcore host. I am softcore and I never intended to strip for day one when I came here. There have been exceptions but only after feeling very comfortable with them. That is what a shy host is....SHY. The ones that get lost and want more than one room open at the same time can be from hardcore but obviously when they do that it confuses the viewer for both rooms. Example would be when she says she only strips in 121 in Not so Shy. Or the host that chats in open in IA. Seems that host start making up their own rules when they cross over categories. I think that gets very confusing for the members when hosts start that.
I also think CC started encouraging hosts to have more than one room open on the site so that they would stay within the site rather than have another room from a different site at the same time as their CC room. I think their intentions were for the good of all it has just kinda ended up a mess when hosts start making their own rules to make more money.
I also think CC started encouraging hosts to have more than one room open on the site so that they would stay within the site rather than have another room from a different site at the same time as their CC room. I think their intentions were for the good of all it has just kinda ended up a mess when hosts start making their own rules to make more money.
RE: I think little shy category can be a bit confusing...
"Seems that host start making up their own rules when they cross over categories."
I agree 100%. You are spot on.
I agree 100%. You are spot on.
A question for not shy or IA hosts
If you are in open video chatting with a viewer and another viewer enters video and asks you to strip, what do you do?
1. Tell him to come back later
2. Strip for him
3. Tell him to go piss up a rainpipe
4. Ignore him
5. Other
1. Tell him to come back later
2. Strip for him
3. Tell him to go piss up a rainpipe
4. Ignore him
5. Other
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
I didn't say if you were in a show, what I said was if you were in open video talking with a member. Just talking.
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
As she is a IA host, she is obviously in a show from the beginning of the chat, don't you think so?
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
Yes most times that is the case, but have come across a few of late that had members only talking, with no show.
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
Being in video is being in a show, be it chatting or something else. Maybe to you chatting in video is not a show to that particular viewer.
It is what the viewer asked for, if during the chat it goes to something further, that is up to the first viewer in and myself.
The viewer first in video is the one that gets the attention, and I let others know I am already with someone and they can decide if they will stay, wait or come back....
It is what the viewer asked for, if during the chat it goes to something further, that is up to the first viewer in and myself.
The viewer first in video is the one that gets the attention, and I let others know I am already with someone and they can decide if they will stay, wait or come back....
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
Open session is just that where it is your responsibility to entertain a group in IA or Not So Shy. If the first one wanted exclusivity then he should have taken you to 121. Instant Action refers to stripping etc instantly regardless of who is in the room. All viewers are entitled to that who go into open session same with hardcore if it is in open.
121 is for the viewer to choose without interruption....
121 is for the viewer to choose without interruption....
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
If I already know him, I tell him to come back later (even he obviously knows that I'm chatting with someone ELSE), but oh well, let me be politely as long as I already know him.
If I don't know him I simply ignore him, maybe he likes to be a Voyeur or else why would he would be jumping into other guy's "action"?
If I don't know him I simply ignore him, maybe he likes to be a Voyeur or else why would he would be jumping into other guy's "action"?
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
Not so shy and Instant Action hosts must strip if ANY viewer in open session requests them to do so. There is no first come, first served rule. Just check with CC. The host can offer a password or switch categories, and the member can go 121, if they want to avoid problems.
I would even go so far as to say that it is rude for the host to ask the member to come back. You have spent money, although perhaps not all that much, just to be told "sorry, i'm too busy to follow the rules now". This is not allowed. And it would even be more rude to simply keep ignoring you.
Now, I personally would try to avoid this type of situation by not entering open unless I was the first member to do so. And if I liked the host and decided to just jump into open and hope for the best, I would probably just go without saying anything to CC. But there is nothing wrong with a member jumping into IA and asking for the host to strip regardless of whether she and another member want to chat. She must strip, and in fact, she must masturbate too. That is what she agreed to. If she doesn't like that, then she can switch categories. The not so shy host also agreed to these things but she can chat for a few minutes first.
Of course, she can give priority in terms of the kind of show she gives. If one guy says show ass and the other says show breasts, she can choose although continually ignoring someone might be considered rude and therefore against the rules. But the sorry I'm chatting thing only works if ALL the members in open agree to it when in Not So Shy and IA.
This is all theoretical of course. In practice, you will probably get a horrible show from many hosts if you basically force them to perform. It probably is better to come back.
I would even go so far as to say that it is rude for the host to ask the member to come back. You have spent money, although perhaps not all that much, just to be told "sorry, i'm too busy to follow the rules now". This is not allowed. And it would even be more rude to simply keep ignoring you.
Now, I personally would try to avoid this type of situation by not entering open unless I was the first member to do so. And if I liked the host and decided to just jump into open and hope for the best, I would probably just go without saying anything to CC. But there is nothing wrong with a member jumping into IA and asking for the host to strip regardless of whether she and another member want to chat. She must strip, and in fact, she must masturbate too. That is what she agreed to. If she doesn't like that, then she can switch categories. The not so shy host also agreed to these things but she can chat for a few minutes first.
Of course, she can give priority in terms of the kind of show she gives. If one guy says show ass and the other says show breasts, she can choose although continually ignoring someone might be considered rude and therefore against the rules. But the sorry I'm chatting thing only works if ALL the members in open agree to it when in Not So Shy and IA.
This is all theoretical of course. In practice, you will probably get a horrible show from many hosts if you basically force them to perform. It probably is better to come back.
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
Makes perfect sense to me ....now who is going to enforce it?
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
Emails to CC help, but most guys probably don't bother. I personally will ask for credits when problems, but not everyone does. From there, it is up to CC to handle it as they see fit. Once I get my credit, I avoid the host and move in. It is in CC's hands at that point. I have posted in the member forum at times too depending on the situation, but not usually.
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
It seems the IA and not shy hosts that responded to this thread disagree.
RE: A question for not shy or IA hosts
As I said, I try to avoid the situation being discussed here. But I have also received credits for when it arises. The hosts can disagree all they want.
For Lovers of Art - Van Gogh's Family Tree
Family Tree of Vincent Van Gogh:
His dizzy aunt ----------------------------------------------- Verti Gogh
The brother who ate prunes----------------------------- Gotta Gogh
The brother who worked at a convenience store --Stop N Gogh
The grandfather from Yugoslavia ----------------------U Gogh
His magician uncle ----------------------------------------Where-diddy Gogh
His Mexican cousin-----------------------------------------A Mee Gogh
The Mexican cousin's American half-brother -------Gring Gogh
The nephew who drove a stage coach ---------------Wells-far Gogh
The constipated uncle -------------------------------------Can't Gogh
The ballroom dancing aunt -------------------------------Tang Gogh
The bird lover uncle -----------------------------------------Flamin Gogh
The fruit-loving cousin --------------------------------------Man Gogh
An aunt who taught positive thinking -------------------Way-to-Gogh
The little bouncy nephew ----------------------------------Poe Gogh
A sister who loved disco -----------------------------------Go Gogh
And his niece who travels the country in an RV ------Winnie Bay Gogh
I saw you smiling . . . There ya Gogh!
His dizzy aunt ----------------------------------------------- Verti Gogh
The brother who ate prunes----------------------------- Gotta Gogh
The brother who worked at a convenience store --Stop N Gogh
The grandfather from Yugoslavia ----------------------U Gogh
His magician uncle ----------------------------------------Where-diddy Gogh
His Mexican cousin-----------------------------------------A Mee Gogh
The Mexican cousin's American half-brother -------Gring Gogh
The nephew who drove a stage coach ---------------Wells-far Gogh
The constipated uncle -------------------------------------Can't Gogh
The ballroom dancing aunt -------------------------------Tang Gogh
The bird lover uncle -----------------------------------------Flamin Gogh
The fruit-loving cousin --------------------------------------Man Gogh
An aunt who taught positive thinking -------------------Way-to-Gogh
The little bouncy nephew ----------------------------------Poe Gogh
A sister who loved disco -----------------------------------Go Gogh
And his niece who travels the country in an RV ------Winnie Bay Gogh
I saw you smiling . . . There ya Gogh!
Can we please stop using ~ ?
Since I left the forum and then came back the other day to it, people have started using this ad nauseum
1st, ~ does NOT mean "to"
2nd ~ as a mathetical symbol it means "approximately" and is also used in
3rd in some languages' usage it was originally used over a letter to indicate abbreviation, or in some other languages to denote pitch
It never means "to"
It is the mark of laziness, in my opinion. An old saying says that the Lazy person ends up working harder than the industrious person. and in this case it is true: To type the word "to" requires only one more keystroke, than to type "~" and actually is easier to type the full word since the keyboard characters are designed with the ~ out of the way and requiring the SHIFT key in addition to the ~ key
Also, with so many (I assume) different people using ~ and Previous Poster's name, we have no sense as to whom we are replying. Is ~host, the same person as ~So, or is it two different persons.
All you do with your usage is to create more confusion on the forums.
If you don't want to use your own name, at least use something consistently that is uniquely your own, so the rest of us at least have an idea whom we are talking to.
PLEASE!!!
1st, ~ does NOT mean "to"
2nd ~ as a mathetical symbol it means "approximately" and is also used in
3rd in some languages' usage it was originally used over a letter to indicate abbreviation, or in some other languages to denote pitch
It never means "to"
It is the mark of laziness, in my opinion. An old saying says that the Lazy person ends up working harder than the industrious person. and in this case it is true: To type the word "to" requires only one more keystroke, than to type "~" and actually is easier to type the full word since the keyboard characters are designed with the ~ out of the way and requiring the SHIFT key in addition to the ~ key
Also, with so many (I assume) different people using ~ and Previous Poster's name, we have no sense as to whom we are replying. Is ~host, the same person as ~So, or is it two different persons.
All you do with your usage is to create more confusion on the forums.
If you don't want to use your own name, at least use something consistently that is uniquely your own, so the rest of us at least have an idea whom we are talking to.
PLEASE!!!
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
I was serious. Thanks for your smart ass reply, though. The tilde usage is annoying, and prevents good communication and creates misunderstanding in that sometimes you think you are replying to one person when you may be replying to someone else. I use RomanHoliday when I post. Though you may not "know" me, you have a sense of who I am when I post something or when you reply to me. But who is ~____?
btw thank you for using SundaySmile. When I see posts with that name, I will know it is most likely the same person making those posts. (unless of course, people are unscrupulous enough to use someone else's name -- I suppose that happens)
btw thank you for using SundaySmile. When I see posts with that name, I will know it is most likely the same person making those posts. (unless of course, people are unscrupulous enough to use someone else's name -- I suppose that happens)
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
I am sorry that such a trivial thing is getting you so annoyed. Have you considered stress management? It obviously works well here and we all including you are aware of it's purpose.
You would go totally ape if you were in New England and when they go to order a "hamburger" they refer to it as "hamburg" Or how the word idea is mispronounced often and called and pronounced "idear".
Sorry Roman but I think to change the use of it hear would be very self centered since you are the only one that it annoys and yet it is effective. Also never go to New England, USA you will go crazy :))
You would go totally ape if you were in New England and when they go to order a "hamburger" they refer to it as "hamburg" Or how the word idea is mispronounced often and called and pronounced "idear".
Sorry Roman but I think to change the use of it hear would be very self centered since you are the only one that it annoys and yet it is effective. Also never go to New England, USA you will go crazy :))
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
It\'s silly to give out information likes this on the internet. Now we know what annoys you and we will use it against you until we have drive you away from these forums - be sure of that. That\'s the rule of modern communications.<br />
<br />
~TGJ
<br />
~TGJ
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
Who made you in charge of how we / others speak?
If "~" anoys you it is your problem and no one elzes, why do you expect everyone else to change to illeviate your annoyance??
Maybe you need some professional counsilingz. ~~~~~
If "~" anoys you it is your problem and no one elzes, why do you expect everyone else to change to illeviate your annoyance??
Maybe you need some professional counsilingz. ~~~~~
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
it is not mistreatment it is expansion, stretching to new limits. going where no verb has gone before......
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
Solution: why don't we all just start posting in the "From:" line "~ " to the previous poster, Then none of us will have any idea who is posting. (good post btw, I happen to agree with you, although it is useless to request such a thing and even more unrealistic to expect it to change)
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
" although it is useless to request such a thing and even more unrealistic to expect it to change)"
For once we agree.
For once we agree.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
So was it a crime that he express his annoyance with it and make his request?
And btw, I doubt you agree with all I say, only what you have picked and chosen. You'd make a great politician
And btw, I doubt you agree with all I say, only what you have picked and chosen. You'd make a great politician
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
I finally agree and you have to argue! You just love to argue.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
Well let's just put it this way: I'm wary of your "agreement." You tend to pull things out of context or twist them around to support your positions.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
we could replace it by ==> (too long) or @ (well, at is too static), so why not ¬ ? it looks like a poke sign in FB ;-)
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ RomanHoliday
I feel I have to confess that is it my use of the tilde that kicked off the rather poor imitations of it use. However I defend my use of it as a clarification of posts going back a long long time into the dim distant past of Usenet.
I think though it is fair to say that when I use the tilde to define a reply to a single person (as oppose to a group) in the subject, it is clear enough that is what I am doing because I don't try and confuse it with my member name when I do it. I suppose the "~" member thinks he/she/it is being clever. Personally I think it demonstrates completely the opposite.. Just another AC in a long line of AC's
I cannot of course speak for other posters but I find it slightly ignominious to see, what is supposed to be a simplification of thought, being used so fatuously. Tis a pity to be sure.
TNTHJBMTM
I think though it is fair to say that when I use the tilde to define a reply to a single person (as oppose to a group) in the subject, it is clear enough that is what I am doing because I don't try and confuse it with my member name when I do it. I suppose the "~" member thinks he/she/it is being clever. Personally I think it demonstrates completely the opposite.. Just another AC in a long line of AC's
I cannot of course speak for other posters but I find it slightly ignominious to see, what is supposed to be a simplification of thought, being used so fatuously. Tis a pity to be sure.
TNTHJBMTM
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ RomanHoliday
Speaking of things fatuous, what exactly is "TNTHJBMTM" supposed to mean?
Thanks for keeping it real, mate.
Thanks for keeping it real, mate.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ RomanHoliday
Since RH has grown silent (LOL) and I am championing the cause for him, let me say, your explanation is a good one. Thanks for showing another perspective to the issue. It makes sense.
However... (you knew that was coming, didn't you?) ... wouldn't it still be less confusing (as to who is replying) to post something like TNT ~ previous poster, or (as RH obviously would prefer) TNT to previous poster ?
My agreement with him is that no one knows who is posting what.
I, for one, would have appreciated knowing that TNT was one of the posters of many of the comments. Whether it was your particular posts with which I often took issue, I may never know.
Anyway, I'm tired of the issue. RH, you can have it back.
However... (you knew that was coming, didn't you?) ... wouldn't it still be less confusing (as to who is replying) to post something like TNT ~ previous poster, or (as RH obviously would prefer) TNT to previous poster ?
My agreement with him is that no one knows who is posting what.
I, for one, would have appreciated knowing that TNT was one of the posters of many of the comments. Whether it was your particular posts with which I often took issue, I may never know.
Anyway, I'm tired of the issue. RH, you can have it back.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
Well it might surprise you to know that I try to take time and effort to make my posting clear in that you will always see when I am posting because my posting name will always be a different colour from the subject.
That being said though, I think where the confusion stems from is because of 2 phenomena.
1) I post increasingly rarer these days than has been known in the past and hence I no longer provide any example ( good or bad) for anyone to follow.
2) People are inherently lazy in their writing. For me I find it logical to change a subject heading when I want to redirect a conversation to a particular point or just start a new thread. Most people will just click reply and be done.
It is not a recent phenomenon of course. Back in the day we had RFC 1855 - Netiquette Guidelines.
Perhaps it is confusing, I cannot really say. I know I prefer to see a members name nice, clear and easily identifiable as I rarely find time to search through posts to find any worthy gems .So instead I just look for familiar names of people who have shown to have wit, intelligence or original thought.
Can't say I have found too many of those lately but oh well.. sign of the times I guess...
TNTRTGODWETEL
That being said though, I think where the confusion stems from is because of 2 phenomena.
1) I post increasingly rarer these days than has been known in the past and hence I no longer provide any example ( good or bad) for anyone to follow.
2) People are inherently lazy in their writing. For me I find it logical to change a subject heading when I want to redirect a conversation to a particular point or just start a new thread. Most people will just click reply and be done.
It is not a recent phenomenon of course. Back in the day we had RFC 1855 - Netiquette Guidelines.
Perhaps it is confusing, I cannot really say. I know I prefer to see a members name nice, clear and easily identifiable as I rarely find time to search through posts to find any worthy gems .So instead I just look for familiar names of people who have shown to have wit, intelligence or original thought.
Can't say I have found too many of those lately but oh well.. sign of the times I guess...
TNTRTGODWETEL
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
From the Wikipedia entry for Netiquette:
"When someone makes a mistake – whether it's a spelling error or a spelling flame, a stupid question or an unnecessarily long answer – be kind about it. If it's a minor error, you may not need to say anything. Even if you feel strongly about it, think twice before reacting. Having good manners yourself doesn't give you license to correct everyone else. If you do decide to inform someone of a mistake, point it out politely, and preferably by private email rather than in public. Give people the benefit of the doubt; assume they just don't know any better. And never be arrogant or self-righteous about it. Just as it's a law of nature that spelling flames always contain spelling errors, notes pointing out Netiquette violations are often examples of poor Netiquette."
So does your constant whinging about how so many others here have no respect for netiquette in fact make you a violator of netiquette too? And if so, are you at all afraid that someone might very well call you out for being such a hypocrite?
"When someone makes a mistake – whether it's a spelling error or a spelling flame, a stupid question or an unnecessarily long answer – be kind about it. If it's a minor error, you may not need to say anything. Even if you feel strongly about it, think twice before reacting. Having good manners yourself doesn't give you license to correct everyone else. If you do decide to inform someone of a mistake, point it out politely, and preferably by private email rather than in public. Give people the benefit of the doubt; assume they just don't know any better. And never be arrogant or self-righteous about it. Just as it's a law of nature that spelling flames always contain spelling errors, notes pointing out Netiquette violations are often examples of poor Netiquette."
So does your constant whinging about how so many others here have no respect for netiquette in fact make you a violator of netiquette too? And if so, are you at all afraid that someone might very well call you out for being such a hypocrite?
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
Looking for smart or intelligent posts on a porn site forum? You've got to be kidding! LMAO!
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
Yeh, we're all stupid idiots who can't hope to have an IQ above 60. But hey, we can spend money. (Said sarcastically for OMG's benefit)
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
Who in their right mind would expect intelligence in a place like this?
As Spock said: "Beam me up Scotty. There is no intelligent life down here."
As Spock said: "Beam me up Scotty. There is no intelligent life down here."
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
Why not expect intelligence? Only unintelligent people can visit a porn site? or are you saying that when we enter the porn site, our reasoning capacity, our common sense, our wisdom, and smarts, are all checked at the door?
I've read some exceptionally brilliant, well-written posts in here (by me mostly hahaha) no, but seriously, you don't have to be an ignoramus to come to a site like this. If that's your opinion, then I feel sorry for you.
I've read some exceptionally brilliant, well-written posts in here (by me mostly hahaha) no, but seriously, you don't have to be an ignoramus to come to a site like this. If that's your opinion, then I feel sorry for you.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
Possibly they were referring to the bigger brain that tends to take the back seat when the smaller brain is being entertained....lol.
I agree with you that there are some very intelligent people that come to this porn site. When they post they must be using the larger brain :))
I agree with you that there are some very intelligent people that come to this porn site. When they post they must be using the larger brain :))
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
You mean the little head guides you in to this site and its wonder and the bigger head is "sometimes" used by "some" when posting :-P
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
The phrase is actually "Beam me up Mr Speaker" used by former US Congressman from Ohio James Califant., which he used to say in the well of the House of Representatives years ago before he went to jail.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
Actually OMG and ~OMG are both wrong.
OMG -- it was not Spock, but Captain Kirk, and "Beam me up, Scotty" is a misquote... that particular phrase never said. And "There's no intelligent life down here," was a marketing ploy by a clever T-shirt-maker.
~OMG -- it is James Traficant, not Califant. You can hear his usage in You Tube search "My favorite Democrat James Traficant - Farm Animals" But even so, it was based on the Star Trek misquote, which, btw, is the title of James "Scotty" Doonan's memoirs.
OMG -- it was not Spock, but Captain Kirk, and "Beam me up, Scotty" is a misquote... that particular phrase never said. And "There's no intelligent life down here," was a marketing ploy by a clever T-shirt-maker.
~OMG -- it is James Traficant, not Califant. You can hear his usage in You Tube search "My favorite Democrat James Traficant - Farm Animals" But even so, it was based on the Star Trek misquote, which, btw, is the title of James "Scotty" Doonan's memoirs.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
Me thinks you spend too much time Googling things in the internet :-P
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
methinks it only took 5 minutes of googling.
me_also_thinks, you shouldn't be so quick to judge
me_also_thinks, you shouldn't be so quick to judge
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
5 minutes less off ur human life you will never recup plus another min. reading this post :+)
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ? ~ MyHeart4Yours
About 2 seconds, actually, to read your post, but hey, I decided to linger on it awhile so that I took the full minute :)
you are right, I never will gain back the 5 minutes I took to google that bit of trivia, but hey, it was 5 minutes of trivializing worth spent. Better than 5 minutes lost from smoking, or some other bad habit ;)
you are right, I never will gain back the 5 minutes I took to google that bit of trivia, but hey, it was 5 minutes of trivializing worth spent. Better than 5 minutes lost from smoking, or some other bad habit ;)
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
We all know what we are referring to here and you obviously figured it out too so think you should just go with the flow....Just call it a CC thing!
I don't think all should stop because you think it is improper...that is a bit much to ask....lol
I don't think all should stop because you think it is improper...that is a bit much to ask....lol
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
I can't believe the childish, even hostile responses in this thread!
I wasn't being a "speach dictator" or requiring people to do anything, let alone trying to "force" my way on anyone.
I was simply making a request, a simple request, a request which, as far as I can see, is reasonable. Yes, of course people will continue doing it. But maybe some will stop and try for better communication.
If it is not allowed to make such requests, and hope for the best, then forgive me for breaking some unwritten law here at CC.
I'm enough of an optimist to actually believe some people will want to better themselves. But maybe I'm wrong there too. Obviously I was wrong for the majority of people who responsed to this thread.
I wasn't being a "speach dictator" or requiring people to do anything, let alone trying to "force" my way on anyone.
I was simply making a request, a simple request, a request which, as far as I can see, is reasonable. Yes, of course people will continue doing it. But maybe some will stop and try for better communication.
If it is not allowed to make such requests, and hope for the best, then forgive me for breaking some unwritten law here at CC.
I'm enough of an optimist to actually believe some people will want to better themselves. But maybe I'm wrong there too. Obviously I was wrong for the majority of people who responsed to this thread.
RE: Can we please stop using ~ ?
It is very typical here. A person can see all the way through the forums where a simple question is asked and is met with many hostile responses. Often the topic is thrown completely off track.
This forum is suppose to be for everyone to post thoughts, questions, suggestions or anything at all thinking that helpful, useful responses will be given, and even maybe with some humor. Unfortunately that is not always the case. As often a person has to go through hostile responses before the real responses regarding the topic are seen.
It is such a shame as this could be a very fun, informative, interesting place.
Alright now that I have said my five cents worth, I am sure I will get met with some heavy sticks. :)
This forum is suppose to be for everyone to post thoughts, questions, suggestions or anything at all thinking that helpful, useful responses will be given, and even maybe with some humor. Unfortunately that is not always the case. As often a person has to go through hostile responses before the real responses regarding the topic are seen.
It is such a shame as this could be a very fun, informative, interesting place.
Alright now that I have said my five cents worth, I am sure I will get met with some heavy sticks. :)
RE: Why Men Are Happier
Amusing. But got me thinking, do men really have one mood all the time?
RE: Why Men Are Happier
Here toilet paper pass to Tisme now, Because u kept saying "shit" So i thought u need one by right now? :P
RE: Why Men Are Happier
i stand corrected.2 moods with 3 shades of each.the above & horny,hornier & horniest.the shitty shades usually happen if these shades aren't satisfied! :--)
RE: Why Men Are Happier
And yet women live longer.
Of course most Darwin award winners are men.
Of course most Darwin award winners are men.
RE: Why Men Are Happier
You wrote: "Men can do their Christmas shopping for 25 relatives on Christmas Eve in 25 minutes"
Actually, it takes me 35 minutes. But that's only because the wife does most of the shopping. I just have to buy for her. She's already bought my parents, my kids, my aunts and uncles, my secretary, my friends. In fact, I don't think I've had the slightest idea what gifts we have given to all of them, and when they say, "Why thank you for such a thoughtful gift" I just look at them and smile, and say "you're welcome."
Ahhhh, to be a man!
Actually, it takes me 35 minutes. But that's only because the wife does most of the shopping. I just have to buy for her. She's already bought my parents, my kids, my aunts and uncles, my secretary, my friends. In fact, I don't think I've had the slightest idea what gifts we have given to all of them, and when they say, "Why thank you for such a thoughtful gift" I just look at them and smile, and say "you're welcome."
Ahhhh, to be a man!
RE: love hits u like a truck
are we talking about romance or the kind of love you need to clean up with a mop and bucket?
RE: love hits u like a truck
I always thought of it as being hit by a wave....first there are few smaller waves and then...you see the big one is coming and it washes over you and you are totally soaked and in love.
joke
An executive with a new young wife and a yen for golf decided about December one year that he couldn't take it any longer.
So he said to his wife one evening, "Honey, next Friday we're going to Hilton Head for the weekend. We'll get a condo on the golf course and I'm going to play golf all weekend."
"That sounds fine," she purred. And, sure enough, next Saturday morning at 6 a.m., found him on the golf course, all alone.
After playing two holes, he noticed a man carrying a golf bag walking toward him across a fairway.
The exec. waited, and the other man arrived, saying, "Mind if I play along?"
The exec. said, "Fine. Glad to have the company."
All went well for a couple of holes, until each approached the sixth green. When the new fellow laid down his clubs, the cover came off one club.
The exec. noticed, however, that it wasn't a club at all. It was a high powered rifle.
"Whoa," he said. "That's a high powered rifle!"
"Look," said the other man. "I'm not out to cause any trouble. If you want me to leave, I will. No hard feelings."
"No. No," said the exec. "I'm just curious as to why you have a high-powered rifle in your bag."
The other man pondered for a moment and then said, "Well, I'll tell you. It's my business. It's what I do for a living."
"Wow," said the other. "I've heard about guys like you, but I've never met one before."
"Still want me to play?" said the other.
"Sure," said the Erie exec. "As a matter of fact, you know, I do a little hunting. Would you mind if I look at it?"
The other man showed him the rifle. It was beautiful--an inlaid Weatherby with a huge powerful scope mounted on it.
The exec. picked it up, looked through the scope, and said, "Gee, I can see the window of my condo with this thing. Matter of fact, there's my wife." He lowered the gun for a moment and said, "she doesn't have any clothes on." He looked through the scope again. "Damn, there's a guy with her."
The Erie exec. lowered the rifle and looked at the other man. "How much do you charge?"
"$10,000 a bullet," said the man.
The Erie man thought for a moment, and said, "Do it."
"Which one?" said the hit man.
"Both," said the exec.
"That's $20,000, you know."
"I don't care, hit 'em both."
The hit man took two cartridges from his bag and loaded the rifle. "Where do you want me to get the man?" he asked.
"Blow his nuts off" said the exec.
"How about the woman?"
"In the mouth. She's always flapping her gums anyway."
"Ok," said the hit man as he raised the rifle. Taking careful aim, he clicked off the safety, but then he paused and chuckled. "Mister," he said, "I think I'm going to be able to save you ten thousand dollars."
So he said to his wife one evening, "Honey, next Friday we're going to Hilton Head for the weekend. We'll get a condo on the golf course and I'm going to play golf all weekend."
"That sounds fine," she purred. And, sure enough, next Saturday morning at 6 a.m., found him on the golf course, all alone.
After playing two holes, he noticed a man carrying a golf bag walking toward him across a fairway.
The exec. waited, and the other man arrived, saying, "Mind if I play along?"
The exec. said, "Fine. Glad to have the company."
All went well for a couple of holes, until each approached the sixth green. When the new fellow laid down his clubs, the cover came off one club.
The exec. noticed, however, that it wasn't a club at all. It was a high powered rifle.
"Whoa," he said. "That's a high powered rifle!"
"Look," said the other man. "I'm not out to cause any trouble. If you want me to leave, I will. No hard feelings."
"No. No," said the exec. "I'm just curious as to why you have a high-powered rifle in your bag."
The other man pondered for a moment and then said, "Well, I'll tell you. It's my business. It's what I do for a living."
"Wow," said the other. "I've heard about guys like you, but I've never met one before."
"Still want me to play?" said the other.
"Sure," said the Erie exec. "As a matter of fact, you know, I do a little hunting. Would you mind if I look at it?"
The other man showed him the rifle. It was beautiful--an inlaid Weatherby with a huge powerful scope mounted on it.
The exec. picked it up, looked through the scope, and said, "Gee, I can see the window of my condo with this thing. Matter of fact, there's my wife." He lowered the gun for a moment and said, "she doesn't have any clothes on." He looked through the scope again. "Damn, there's a guy with her."
The Erie exec. lowered the rifle and looked at the other man. "How much do you charge?"
"$10,000 a bullet," said the man.
The Erie man thought for a moment, and said, "Do it."
"Which one?" said the hit man.
"Both," said the exec.
"That's $20,000, you know."
"I don't care, hit 'em both."
The hit man took two cartridges from his bag and loaded the rifle. "Where do you want me to get the man?" he asked.
"Blow his nuts off" said the exec.
"How about the woman?"
"In the mouth. She's always flapping her gums anyway."
"Ok," said the hit man as he raised the rifle. Taking careful aim, he clicked off the safety, but then he paused and chuckled. "Mister," he said, "I think I'm going to be able to save you ten thousand dollars."
wondering...
Do members have a problem when a hosts asks what he is into and what he is wanting in a video.,..so that both are sure the member is not disappointed..?
RE: wondering...
While it may remove some of the mystique if one intends to fantasize the encounter as being "conquest' , it's a rather thoughtful gesture in my opinion.
RE: wondering...
I can understand that, and agree...but at the same time once u agree to do one thing they have asked and then the person changes their mind and their request...then starts telling you to do things other than agreed upon and you say well I am sorry I dont do that...bingo they get mad, disappointed and say "well why did you not tell me that before"...which I would have if he had told me what kind of show he wanted when he was asked. rather than "well we will start with you showing me your bush and go from there"...loool...it is not like I am in a hardcore category...
RE: wondering...
I have same problem......it very difficult when that happen...........I say ok to one thing they change mind and want different in show..........then I stuck with angry veiwer.
RE: wondering...
I think its a case of once they get you going, then they ask for what they really wanted in the first place hoping your now suddenly horny and in the mood to play.. and that you will loose your principles and say yessss BB Ill "insert what ever pervy request here" myself for you now that you asked so nicely...
RE: wondering...
You are right you can do that! And for the Alpha it also works good! But you must ask the camgirl slow and the camgirl must do all you ask or you leave again and can report her because you are the viewer! I am right?
RE: wondering...
Yes Alpha the host is obligated to do what you agreed to before the session started.
"But you must ask the camgirl slow"
If you mean while in the session she is moving too fast then you can ask her to slow down. or If you mean to talk to the host slow, then yes, with the language barriers it is good idea to speak slowly so that you understand what is being said.
Enjoy your time with the host of your choice....:)
"But you must ask the camgirl slow"
If you mean while in the session she is moving too fast then you can ask her to slow down. or If you mean to talk to the host slow, then yes, with the language barriers it is good idea to speak slowly so that you understand what is being said.
Enjoy your time with the host of your choice....:)
RE: wondering...
I have never had a shy host ask me what I was into. I usually get the 20 question routine, name, location, marital status, my job, my cam, my bank balance, my credit card limit etc.
RE: wondering...
Really? wow...I mean i usually ask how are you, location, not the other stuff unless I am asked that, but yes I always ask what a person is into and what they are wanting in a session. How else is one to know what to do in a session and what a viewer is wanting. Viewers have different requests, so one needs to know what to do and not just guess and hope to get it right....
Have a nice Sunday...
Have a nice Sunday...
RE: wondering...
" Viewers have different requests, so one needs to know what to do and not just guess and hope to get it right.... "
When I ask a shy host for show in pvt, a few do one, but most tell me to go to IA for show.
When I ask a shy host for show in pvt, a few do one, but most tell me to go to IA for show.
RE: wondering...
Well the answer will depend on what is it you are asking them to do in a show. That is why it is important to know and ask what the viewer is asking the host to do in a show. I would think that asking a viewer what he is into and what he wants her to do in a show would be one of the main questions asked...
RE: wondering...
Well the answer will depend on what is it you are asking them to do in a show" I agree, but in little shy I only ask for naked show and many times am told to go to IA or hell a few times. And it even happened a time or 2 with hosts that play Strip Hi Lo.
RE: wondering...
Well if all you are asking for is nude show, then that seems rather harmless. if the host you ask does not do nude then simply letting you know is all that is needed...and as for asking for it in strip hi lo, if the host does not want to be nude then she should not be playing that game.
RE: wondering...
Girls in softcore do not generally do a "show" but rather just flirt and tease with the member individually. That is what softcore viewers enjoy because it is more like they are seducing the host rather than her just doing a pre-designed show with little interaction as in hardcore.
RE: wondering...
After a few mintues of converstaion I think a good host is smart to ask the member what he is looking for in video. That gives the member the opportunity to specifically say what he wants in detail...and the host can say yes or come back with a counter offer.
Remember...repeat what you want and make sure the host says Yes I will do that...not...come and well' find out, or maybe, or depends on you, or depends on my mood, or depends if you turn me on.... get a yes or no. No...either renegotiate until a yes or leave. Avoid the scam.
Remember...repeat what you want and make sure the host says Yes I will do that...not...come and well' find out, or maybe, or depends on you, or depends on my mood, or depends if you turn me on.... get a yes or no. No...either renegotiate until a yes or leave. Avoid the scam.
RE: wondering...
Thank you "So" I could not have said it better, that is exactly the reason that I ask, some members get annoyed when I ask and come back with, "well surprise me" or "do what you do best" or "guess" or "you know what I want" or :well what do you like (as if there is one or two standard things that I like..) and many like that which really do not help me to be able to say yes or no thank you.
If the member is not going to tell us what he wants then how can he expect us to know, heck if I was able to read minds, not only would that be a miracle but I really do not think I would be here...loool
Be well everyone :)
If the member is not going to tell us what he wants then how can he expect us to know, heck if I was able to read minds, not only would that be a miracle but I really do not think I would be here...loool
Be well everyone :)
RE: wondering...
The only thing that ruins that is the fact we are men. And we think we are clever and charming and sexy. Most of us are not. Once we have a girl agree to something...it is in out nature to try and persuade her to give more....I am sure you have heard...Oh Baby...please show me more or I won't be able to cum...or...Show me I will come to your video every day for the rest of my life.....or the mean spiritied...come on baby or I will give you 1 star and trash you in the forums.... So...what did we learn...men are pigs...and despite that...it is always good for the member and host to understand what is expected in the show...and stick to it...we hold the host to it...she should be able to hold the member to the agreement too....
RE: wondering...
Actually, no I have not heard any of those statements....knock on wood...but I have heard that we are no more than "online prostitutes" and yes I have heard those exact two words a number of times..I don't think there are many hosts have not been trashed in the forums, even a compliment there is usually someone fast to turn it into an insult, even if they have not seen you...lol...I know very well about the mean men, which is why I its important to know what is wanted before agreeing to a video...as for holding the member to what was agreed upon...I agree but that is easier said then done, and often if they do not get what they want, they get angry and rate you low anyway, and some will post negative about you in forum.
I do not think men are pigs, some simply let their hormones take over and then instead of seeing us as a person we become objects. but then to be fair, some on here see members as money signs and not as people..I hope the day never comes that I stop seeing people as people no matter how they are... :)
I do not think men are pigs, some simply let their hormones take over and then instead of seeing us as a person we become objects. but then to be fair, some on here see members as money signs and not as people..I hope the day never comes that I stop seeing people as people no matter how they are... :)
RE: qoute for the day
Good evening Mr. Rockefuller,
pls allow me to remind u that only the coins have 2 faces, while people and diamonds have more.
Violence is most likely an effect of something and not a cause of it. Sometimes it's an effect of low glicemy or of a mental disease, simple as that.
Violence has minimum 3 major genres: the attack, the revenge and the self-defence. Not all of them are to be blamed.
Violence is also the ultimate reaction in front of extinction. Of LIFE.
U seem to be a bit bored this evening Sir, but pls be carefull because such minimal philosophy can be considered as superiour, arrogant or even violent by other human beens.
pls allow me to remind u that only the coins have 2 faces, while people and diamonds have more.
Violence is most likely an effect of something and not a cause of it. Sometimes it's an effect of low glicemy or of a mental disease, simple as that.
Violence has minimum 3 major genres: the attack, the revenge and the self-defence. Not all of them are to be blamed.
Violence is also the ultimate reaction in front of extinction. Of LIFE.
U seem to be a bit bored this evening Sir, but pls be carefull because such minimal philosophy can be considered as superiour, arrogant or even violent by other human beens.
RE: qoute for the day
While I think the response is rather heavy in dissecting the premise, it is indeed well stated. ........................
Men strike back..
If your dog is barking at the back door and your wife is yelling at the front door, who do you let in first?
The dog, of course. He'll shut up once you let him in.
The dog, of course. He'll shut up once you let him in.
RE: Men strike back..
Who are you striking back at, the host that said thank you for the tip, or the one that stated a fact that there are men who intentionally will read a profile and try to force the host to change her mind?
Profile Photo Tip
When you take photos for your profile pics...look at the camera...not your monitor. The photos where the host is looking at the camera are really more appealing and sexier in my opinion. Just look at the camera and take a bunch of pics...then you can delete the ones you don't like.
RE: Profile Photo Tip
Thank you for the tip "So"...... I will give that a try......
Have a nice weekend.. :)
Have a nice weekend.. :)
RE: Profile Photo Tip
might have been meant as helpful advice but comes across as an instruction, I'd suggest you don't apply for that job in the diplomatic service just yet.
Read profiles, pls!
Dear members, why don`t u read hosts` profiles? It`s not too hard to do it, it will take just 3 minutes of yr time! In my profile it`s written I DON`T STRIP!, so why hundreds of members come into My room and ask Meto take clothes off?! And when I refuse, they just go away and rate Me bad. Really annoying!
RE: Read profiles, pls!
that's because many girls just do it!and they are getting frustrated if someone doesn't do it!no matter what u will write in yr profile or the category u are in!i think it's a new "fetish".they might get turned on because they rate u bad:)))
RE: Read profiles, pls!
this happen bcs many Mistress accept to be also slaves, and do everything for some extra money, is not only the members mistake, everything start from the girls who choose the wrong category and if few do everything the members will think all of as are the same :-(, sad but happen
RE: Read profiles, pls!
I think most profiles are pretty generic and don't give you much insight into the host or her show...so members generally don't read them. I have no doubt you took time to write specifically what you do or don't in your profile but again...members are used to ignoring them. I wish CC added an Icon.....a no-nudity icon...that is easy to see that says...host does not provide nudity in her shows. Easy.
RE: Read profiles, pls!
reading Profiles will schock u discovering how some of us are working on them, giving u a sample of how we talk or how we are, trying to help u to avoid spending money in vane and funny but after all these good intentions all we get from some guys are ... bad ratings :))))))
RE: Read profiles, pls!
I read proflies, but I do not believe them until I meet the host. Some profiles are written by the studio, and the host doesn't know what it says! One new girl had "double penatration" on profile in little shy, and then said she did not strip at all!
RE: Read profiles, pls!
Some members do read the profiles, and then intentionally try to convince, pressure and force a host to do the things that she has said no to...
We are screwed no matter what we do ....lol...
We are screwed no matter what we do ....lol...
RE: Read profiles, pls!
The terms softcore and hardcore and the alignment of the categories is confusing. CC informed me the only nude required categories are Strip Hi Lo, Not So Shy and Instant Action. Period! That's it! In my opinion ,they should list Glamour and Little Shy in softcore and Not So Shy and Instant Action in hardcore. And list all other categories separately.
RE: Read profiles, pls!
And here I always thought
that hardcore was far more than baring one's all.
that softcore was oft for not doing it all
A matter of degrees, from sex act to tease
at least, that's how I was taught.
that hardcore was far more than baring one's all.
that softcore was oft for not doing it all
A matter of degrees, from sex act to tease
at least, that's how I was taught.
RE: Read profiles, pls!
Taught? They had to teach you the difference between Softcore and Hardcore? Geez! and I though I was a loser for not noticing the difference between glamour and Not so Shy!
RE: smarty2
Not sure I'll still visit your room after such a post...
And about its contents, knowing the job you perform, I didn't expect you to mention milking the cow free of charge. Don't you think chathosts are doing it at a given price per minute? Nice week-end Sarah ;-)!
And about its contents, knowing the job you perform, I didn't expect you to mention milking the cow free of charge. Don't you think chathosts are doing it at a given price per minute? Nice week-end Sarah ;-)!
RE: smarty2
But what if the pig has a fine mansion , a Rolls Royce , a full domestic staff, a second home at the water and loves to buy expensive jewelry for his girl? Is he still a "pig"?
joke
The Pope was cruising along the beach in the Pope-mobile when there was a frantic commotion just off-shore. A helpless man, wearing an English rugby jersey, was struggling frantically to free himself from the jaws of a 25 foot shark.
As the Pope watched in horror, a speedboat pulled up with three men wearing Welsh, Irish and Scottish rugby jerseys. One quickly fired a harpoon into the shark's side while the other two reached out and pulled the hapless English fan from the water. Then, using long clubs, the three beat the shark to death and hauled it into the boat.
Immediately the Pope shouted and summoned them to him. "I give you my blessing for your brave actions. I heard that there were some bitter hatred between the Celts and England rugby fans, but now I have seen with my own eyes that this is not true."
As the Pope drove off, the harpooner asked his buddies: "Who was that?"
"It was the Pope," one replied. "He is in direct contact with God and has access to all of God's wisdom."
"Well" the harpooner said, "he may have access to God and his wisdom, but he doesn't know anything about shark fishing. Is the bait holding up OK or do we need to get another one?"
As the Pope watched in horror, a speedboat pulled up with three men wearing Welsh, Irish and Scottish rugby jerseys. One quickly fired a harpoon into the shark's side while the other two reached out and pulled the hapless English fan from the water. Then, using long clubs, the three beat the shark to death and hauled it into the boat.
Immediately the Pope shouted and summoned them to him. "I give you my blessing for your brave actions. I heard that there were some bitter hatred between the Celts and England rugby fans, but now I have seen with my own eyes that this is not true."
As the Pope drove off, the harpooner asked his buddies: "Who was that?"
"It was the Pope," one replied. "He is in direct contact with God and has access to all of God's wisdom."
"Well" the harpooner said, "he may have access to God and his wisdom, but he doesn't know anything about shark fishing. Is the bait holding up OK or do we need to get another one?"
Mexico City considers fixed-term marriage licences
Interested in peoples views on this news today... Progressive or the begining of the end....
Mexico City politicians want to help newlyweds avoid the hassle of divorce by giving them an easy exit strategy: temporary marriage licences.
The minimum marriage contract would be for two years and could be renewed if the couple stays happy. The contracts would include provisions on how children and property would be handled if the couple splits.
"The proposal is, when the two-year period is up, if the relationship is not stable or harmonious, the contract simply ends," said Leonel Luna, the Mexico City assembly member who co-authored the bill.
"You wouldn't have to go through the tortuous process of divorce," said Luna, from the lefwing Party of the Democratic Revolution, which has the most seats in the 66-member chamber. Luna says the proposed law is gaining support and he expects a vote by the end of this year.
Mexico City politicians want to help newlyweds avoid the hassle of divorce by giving them an easy exit strategy: temporary marriage licences.
The minimum marriage contract would be for two years and could be renewed if the couple stays happy. The contracts would include provisions on how children and property would be handled if the couple splits.
"The proposal is, when the two-year period is up, if the relationship is not stable or harmonious, the contract simply ends," said Leonel Luna, the Mexico City assembly member who co-authored the bill.
"You wouldn't have to go through the tortuous process of divorce," said Luna, from the lefwing Party of the Democratic Revolution, which has the most seats in the 66-member chamber. Luna says the proposed law is gaining support and he expects a vote by the end of this year.
lol
Wikipedia:I know everything!!!
Google:I have everything!!!
Facebook:I know everyone!!!
Internet:Without me u r nothing
The electricity: Continue talking, idiots :))
Google:I have everything!!!
Facebook:I know everyone!!!
Internet:Without me u r nothing
The electricity: Continue talking, idiots :))
Euro 2012
Euro 2012 is next summer in Poland & Ukraine. Is there excitement? England may even qualify this time....