General Forum

no no and no :P

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

but not stupid to be hard :--)

n/a

Tiny Weiners

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Best ever name: Ridgid Tools. they make the best pipe wrenches. and they know the name has 2 meanings. they used to give out the hottest calendars that you would see in plumbing and mechanical shops with bikini babes holding long wrenches!

n/a

This morning a friend from yaroslavl told me about the accident so I felt a bit of a connection, plus I am a hockey fan. About an hour later, on the radio, I learned that one of the victims played hockey for my favorite NHL team in the USA and that he was the coach of the team on the plane. And reading a little more, it looks like there were players from several countries on the plane.

It is a tragedy that touched a lot of people all over the world. R.I.P. and may their families and friends find a way to deal with such a great loss.

:( its sad..

It's horrible!! I was shocked to know about!!!:(((

No idea whether there was an attempt to make an emergency landing on the river, but what a contrast between those remains on the shore of the Volga, where life of so many young sportsmen ended brutally, and remembrances of walks in nice company along the same river on a sunny day. My sympathy goes to those who lost a family member or a friend in this tragedy

n/a

n/a

untrue there was a few famous on the plane including Pavol Demitra great player great guy... RIP

n/a

n/a

n/a

1) rating sistem. guy can rate only after 10 minute of video. 2)contests only 4 times a year.. 3)would like to have preview video for maybe 10 seconds..

n/a

n/a

Disagree I like to surprise hosts and see what there really doing - especially the hosts who claim they never undress on videos.

n/a

n/a

sure, they do. u never noticed it?

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Gem, I'm sure that many members and hosts would love you ,if u invite all of us to your house for party :P

n/a

good thing hosts dont run this site. or do they?

n/a

Even a dude like me ? One that is old and ugly and that the thought of having him in your video room makes you feel physically sick ?

See I knew you loved me really Gems :P

n/a

Gem you don't know how much it turns me on to know I arouse such strong emotions in you :P

n/a

Yeah, I hate that alarm when a member come in ... its annoying ... no alarm please lol

n/a

(1) Video teaser sessions for long time members (2) alarm button that doesn't go off (3) No fake photos from host-must be their photos always (4) drop some of the categories- to many (5) community chat room after 30 minutes of in-activity for both host and members-should be disconnected (6) twelve month contest-not enough here (7) only allowed one member and host names (8) hired me to approved all the new host (women only) to make sure they do get in the right category, since we have to many as is (9) cc yearly party in Alaska (10) Members Profiles or Members Page with brief information. {Thanks CC for the good years-Thanks CC Models for the fun}

a better search engine, where we could check multiple characteristics rather than having to choose just one each time.

for example, I don't want to have to choose "straight" OR "bi," and limit my options. Both are okay with me.

Hair can be long OR shoulder length, not one or the other.

And "Big Bust" should be included among the body type options. "Cuddly" sounds like a euphemism for "fat" but there's already "BBW" which fulfills that function.

I also think that we should be able to sort LIVE hostesses more ways than just by the degrees of shyness.

We should be able to sort by body type!

I'd like to see a brief window of opportunity to cancel a session, maybe 30 seconds. If I enter a session and this girl is not the girl from the pics, or maybe was the girl in the pics 30 pounds ago I'd like to be able to back out and not have to be billed for the worthless minute that I was in there. And that session should not be rateable. That way it keeps both sides honest. I can't keep going in there to sabotage the host, and the host doesn't win a dollar for fooling me.

n/a

I agree. She could only win these contests with the help of members, and she's obviously extremely attractive. As far as I know, she didn't cheat to win these contests.

Why don't you rewrite the contest rules so that IA hosts can't participate? That would go over real well, I'm sure... Otherwise I don't understand why you have a beef.

oooops, I was replying to bewildered, not you, T.

n/a

n/a

n/a

"If it was JUST a question, there would have been no name of the host, there wouldn't have been any judgemental remark adressed to her."

That's not the case. If there was no name someone would have asked which host has won 13 times. I will add that another IA host has won 5 times, that being Wilone. These are facts , not opinions and not judgmental. These facts can be easily verified unlike the claims made by the "white knights" responding to this post.

There you go with your twisted rhetoric again. The fact one IA host has won 5 contests and another has won 13 demonstrates nothing except the fact that you can count.

"So how the hell does a host who is supposed to do instant nude shows winning all these contests? There is something very wrong with this picture."

How is that statement not judgmental?

"... how the hell does a host who is supposed to do instant nude shows winning all these contests? There is something very wrong with this picture."

You really don't consider that the least bit judgmental?

Captain Obvious, thanks for stating what everyone can know but no one really needs to know! You amaze me with your "expert" knowledge on all things.

Honestly I don't think it was right for you to attack the original poster. It actually was advertising for her anyway. I am so surprised at why some need to come forth and fight someone elses battles when it might not be a battle at all for them.
Chill out T!!

n/a

I don't play the competitions much but, when I do, I have played with several Instant Action hosts. As most of them allow you one go after each $5 you spend then what you do is have your show and then play the game at the end. Some of the competitions do not even need any participation at all such as the valentines puzzle where you get awarded pieces of the puzzle when you leave the video.

In my opinion, MYBEAUTY4U deserves every one of her 13 wins.

"I don't play the competitions much"

Well I do and with the newer contests, not the puzzles, you are busy playing to game. And even if you say you play the game at the end of the show, it costs you that much extra to play the game. And if you chat in IA like you do in softcore, it defeats the whole purpose of the category which says if you don't have time for small talk, this is the category for you.

Yes it cost me more to play the game at the end of the show but I would rather do it that way than continually interrupt the show every time I had spent $5. But that doesn't bother me as I realise that, even although the hosts in IA agree to an immediate show, at the other end is a person with feelings. It's also a thank you to the host for giving me a show rather than wasting my time which seems to happen a lot to certain members. So in the end I am quids in :P

"I realise that, even although the hosts in IA agree to an immediate show, at the other end is a person with feelings."

I've not seen anyone ever post otherwise. But to read the cc guidelines and choose IA for chit chat is analogous to reading about buying new VW, then going to a Toyota dealer to buy it. And it makes me wonder if guys like you with maybe more money than we average viewers, go to chat in IA just to be disruptive to the rest of us. I'm not accusing you of doing this, but it is certainly a possibility with at least some other viewers.

yea i'm sure ppl go to IA to chitchat just to piss ppl like u off, not becos they happen to like that host and it is comp time and she is good at comp or some more plausible reason.

I posted below, in the other Instant Action thread, by mistake. There I made the point about the puzzles, but yes, there are contests you need to be more active and it costs more money to play if you wait until the end. Of course, then you can take a few extra turns too.

I also noted that maybe CC should suspend category rules during contests so that viewer expectations are different. And since I believe a host can only play with one member at a time for things like word contests, that also eliminates the problem of the first viewer wanting to play the contest and the second viewer in open wanting a show in not so shy and instant action. Just suspend the category rules so we're all on the same page and treat everything like soft core. I guess all the hard hosts that want to play could switch categories but that could make things too confusing. Then again, newer viewers that don't know about contests and the suspension of the rules might get confused instead.

Hmmm. Maybe we should have mandatory nudity and masturbation during contests for all categories, even non adult, to make things easier, lol.

"Just suspend the category rules so we're all on the same page and treat everything like soft core."

There are already a number of hardcore hosts that do that on a regular basis.

You are like some softcore hosts seem obsessed with the rules. The main unwritten rule in adult site should be "getting pleasure in the way you like". So if a memeber want chat in IA...why not? Many members ask hardcore in softcore...so who gives a shit about?

n/a

There seems to be a trend lately in the forums to imply that members should be obliged to follow the limits of adult categories: According to these posters if a member enters an IA host's vid he must tell her to get naked immediately. If he goes to not shy he must require her to get naked without too much delay. I go to video to have fun with girls I find attractive and I want to have that fun in the way I choose. Depending on my mood and the language skills of the host I may want a quick show or I may chat for a while. If I am in open video and someone else enters I have no problem if they request the host to do something but I strongly object to this idea that I am somehow "breaking the rules" if i do not demand an adult host to do an adult show.

To be fair, I'm not picking on any particular host. Another IA host named Wilone has won 5 contests. So its more about the category not any particular host.

n/a

Well how many hosts hast won 13 times? Or even 5? By the way 5 is outstanding, 13 is incredible. I have several favs in softcore who may have won 2 and stay on line for hours and hours. And even more who have not won at all. I have seen members post they stay away from the site during contest time. I know hosts that stay away as well for their own reasons. There is at least the perception by myself and others that things aren't just right. Yes I did say perception, not fact. I never represent opinion or perception as fact as so many other posters like to do.

n/a

In order to win a contest host should find a good rich admire who ready to make true all her desires, because other guys used to chose to play with hosts who got some score already.....so then her score getting bigger and bigger and host wins. That is all the secret. But without good help from rich admire that do almost impossible even for popular host, most regulars stay away from all contests, also because they not ready to spend more than usual they spend.

Thank you for your very honest and straight forward post. It would appear she has many rich money slaves. Good for her.

There obviously is luck involved, but yes, a host has the best chance of winning when she has guys spending a lot of money in video.

And look at the contests she has won. Five are puzzles so that is just getting lots of video and being lucky. Now we're down to 8. One was top 20 easter which says it was based on viewers voting so again it just means she made guys happy. There were also some word challenges and all those take is some luck and a good word list that is loaded into excel, and while I didn't play with her, I am guessing her members were the ones driving things based on my impression that her english is okay but not great. And a couple were games that may have had some level of skill that you developed as you played them which she may or may not have been helpful with.

It is very possible that all that is happening here is exactly what you have said and most of us already know. Hosts with the most video win more than others. I would think that would be obvious. She may be a bit luckier than others (five puzzles is a lot) but ultimately it is her members driving things in all liklihood. And for all we know, it is just one or two guys spending lots of money and coming armed with good word lists, et cetera helping her each time.

She is just a popular host which, until now, has not been talked about all that much in forums. There isn't really a big mystery here but she would seem to be a bit more lucky than some. I don't think the category matters since at contest time cc stops being a porn site and becomes contest central, lol. And maybe she is getting a lot of 121 during contests too and the member isn't asking for a show.

Again, there really is no mystery here. I can understand why someone that is new to cc might think IA hosts do nothing but get naked, but they do chat and interact with members too. And at $2,00 open and $2,80 121, her price is pretty reasonable compared to a lot of glamour and little shy hosts. In fact, $2,80 121 is a bargain compared to hosts that I consider to be of the same quality that are in soft core.

The real mystery is why she doesn't raise her price. Perhaps people should be posting about others being greedy and having brainless money slaves instead of attacking a good host.

n/a

"And at $2,00 open and $2,80 121, her price is pretty reasonable compared to a lot of glamour and little shy hosts. In fact, $2,80 121 is a bargain compared to hosts that I consider to be of the same quality that are in soft core."

I don't disagree, but there are many members on site that would. I've seen dozens of posts saying anything over $1 is too high. And suggesting any host charge more is risking putting you in the money slave category.

I jump from host to host to host. I am only a slave to my own desires, lol. And I try to focus on lower priced hosts. But some of the more expensive hosts are worth it too.

Money slaves are guys that visit the same host, or perhaps a couple of them, and just go into the room and chat for hours and send presents. They love a particular host and want to spoil her because she is so beautiful and therefore feel she deserves to be spoiled. I never do that. I've helped people such as paid for their school because I care about them, but I never just send a bunch of money for presents or send a lot of gifts just to spoil someone.

You paid for a girl's school? Wow! You must be rich. I'm in awe of your financial prowess. I have my hands full paying for my own kid's school. The term money slave is new to and I am not qualified to say who is and who isn't one. But I think some members may put you in that category.

I wasn't paying for Oxford or Harvard, lol. School costs about 500 euro a semester in some countries, and I have helped a number of people try to have better lives that way. It isn't all that much, at least not to me. I've spent double that in a contest, lol, but at least I won a few times.

Well I'm sure you got much satisfaction in helping someone. It is better to give than receive.

n/a

Isn't that the same thing?

n/a

Actually I did Google and Wikipedia it. Wiki has nothing and Google has Dom sites for money slaves. But my post about love and money slave was done in a kidding manner.

lol, you even bother to count it...

and what? 13 or 113 why u bother.she is nice person and beauty.peoples like her, she is veteran host,,she earn money for site .she deserve to win.she is not the only one from IA who always win.its what important. go ask her urself.

When I go to IA, it is not to play a contest. It is to see an erotic nude show, nothing else.

n/a

She worked hard and kept her members happy and that in turn had them willing to play the contests with them.

Good for them. IA hosts deal with alot in that category, I know I could not handle being in IA category.

Actually it is not terribly complex to work out as the defacto format for most competitions is member spends X * Y$=P(Success). Ie. Hosts who can charge more increase the probability per member to complete the puzzle, picture, word game, battleships. This particular host has well established PR. Hence sufficient regulars to complete the tasks. Did anyone really think the competitions were ever about randomness?

"Did anyone really think the competitions were ever about randomness? "

You nailed it!

i am a businessman in dubai and meet with camgirls and escorts here. your girl needs a visa. hotel, airlines and so on can do this and they also can look into the needed insurance. it is illegal if they 'work' here with a tourist visa, so be careful! other possibilities also exist but it is complicated so you should go to amer page or call their hotline.

but do it because you will have your fun for sure if it works out and you behave well! just avoid to give her your true identity or permanent phone number and keep her services professional!
jarle

thanks for the information

just get her a guest visa it's the easiest way

tell blondya i said hi

blondya? who is that?

I am from Russia, and travelled to Dubai some years ago. I hadnt problem to get tiurists visa. I was alone and stayed there for 1 week at the seashore hotel. I was only like a tourist. What else do you want to know?

You say "I was alone and stayed there for 1 week at the seashore hotel"? Sure that right hahahaha Why not you come to USA? :P

n/a

thanks for your information

n/a

I don't know if I have some magic powers or maybe I just manage to pick all the "bad" girls from their profile pics but I have never had any issues with either NSS or IA girls.

Also when a LS or G girl has agreed to strip for me in text chat I have never been disappointed (in the sense that she did not fulfil her part of the agreement).

As for complaining it's not really my style as it seems rather pointless. So if it did happen to me I would just move on.

Awhile back, you posted that you usually or always go 121, at least I think you have. And perhaps you also are willing to chat for awhile even in instant action while in 121. If I am correct, that may be why you don't run into the stallers and scammers, but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen, that a member should be forced to go 121 for a show when a category doesn't require it or that he shouldn't complain to get a credit if his complaint is reasonable such as an instant action host not providing instant action.

As for the original question, depending on the nature of the contest, you can get a show and play the contest afterwards especially if it is something like a puzzle contest where you don't even do anything to play except spend money. And there is nothing wrong with chatting with an instant action host. I've done it many times. The issue is when you do it in open and then another member comes along, although this usually doesn't happen even with more popular hosts.

By the way, I think CC should perhaps suspend the category rules requiring shows during contests and say that soft core rules apply to all categories to avoid problems because there are hard core hosts that don't like to perform at contest time and it can cause problems.

Sorry, I responded to two different threads at once. Lots of complaints about IA lately.... It's getting confusing, lol.

I was about to point that out to you :P

Yes you're right I always go 121 and while I do not really chat much (unless it's nasty sex chat) I always ask the host to get fully dressed before the show starts and it can take 15 - 20 mins before I see anything. So maybe by that point they think I deserve it :P

n/a

A lot of what INYF says is tongue-in-cheek, but what's wrong with having he host dress up? Some guys enjoy watching a woman dressing... some guys enjoy the full strip, as erotic preparation for what is to follow, as opposed to the host already being in starting position. For some guys, it's not about "slam bam, thank you ma'am" but about mystique and suspense and the build up of erotic desire. There is nothing unbelievable in what INYF said (even if he was speaking tongue-in-cheek).

"For some guys, it's not about "slam bam, thank you ma'am" but about mystique and suspense and the build up of erotic desire."

I agree completely. And that is why there are several categories. And IA is set up for the "slam bam" guys. Read the category descriptions. Everyone talks about cc has something for everyone with all the categories. But now there are guys that want to redefine categories to their liking pushing aside an cc guidelines. Well if you're going to do that, why have categories?

Some time back I suggested just one category and just girls, no gays or trannys etc. And I was shouted down by scores of both hosts and members for suggesting any changes to the site. And you and INYF were most likely in that chorus calling for me to banned from the site for even suggesting such changes. And now you essentially agreeing with that suggestion as you advocate ignoring the site category guidelines and having the hosts and members do as they choose in their pvt rooms.

As SeemsReal (I think) said earlier... there you go twisting words, putting words in people's mouths. You were evidently shouted down because your suggestion was ridiculous, ignoring the many facets of people's preferences and styles, and the fact that the beauty of this site is that it allows those preferences and provides multiple opportunities for people to have their needs met. Your problem is that you are inflexible, wanting the "letter of the law rather than the spirit of the law", a fine-print legalist. It states the general purpose in the description because that is its primary purpose, but you allow no latitude for different approaches. You focus on rules rather than on people. You are more concerned for yourself, and fitting everyone else into your mold, than for letting people be people. And frankly, I'm tired of your incessant bullying of everyone else, calling them "slaves" "sissy boys" etc. I'm tired of your constant whining and complaining. You are on nearly every thread, practically taking up residence in here yet you have accused others of having no life for the time they spend here on CC. You are easy with the words, the name calling, the labeling of people, the accusations and twisting what people say, yet you are too much of a coward to come out in the open and say it without hiding behind ~ or some other non-identifyer.. Why don't you own up to what you have to say and use your actual username?

+100000000000000000000000000000
My ehnlish not so perfect, but you said it all I have in my mind when I have read posts from this person (and I am sure its the same person) already recognise his style in the posts.

In my opinion you are a Hall of Fame word twister. And you have me confused with others who do the ~ thing. In your rambling diatribe you actually agreed with my older post about doing away with categories or trimming to maybe 2. If cc did that, you and I would be in complete agreement. But we both know that's not going to happen. As far as money slaves, I only heard that term on this site and only fairly recently. And I'm not sure what it means. As far as rules and category guidelines, I think they apply to all. If not they should. I expect to get what I pay for from any business on line or off line. I've never known anyone that likes being ripped off. But who knows maybe there are some that get off on being ripped off. There are all kinds of fetishes.

As far as using one's screen name, since many members and hosts have many, would not really settle anything. The only way to make sure everyone posts with the same name every time would require members and hosts to sign up separately to post in the forums. And I really don't expect cc to do anything like that anytime soon. So the forum is what it is. And that's the way its always been. And as I'm sure you know cc determines what posts get posted.

And as far as my being a coward, the combat decorations hanging on my wall would suggest otherwise.

>"In my opinion you are a Hall of Fame word twister."

You are welcome to your opinion.

>"And you have me confused with others who do the ~ thing."

Maybe -- but I seriously doubt it. But if so, all the more reason why folks should use their username/screenname or a more appropriate identifier.

>"In your rambling diatribe you actually agreed with my older post about doing away with categories or trimming to maybe 2."

There you go again, twisting my words to agree with your views.

>"As far as money slaves, I only heard that term on this site and only fairly recently. And I'm not sure what it means."

Yeah right. I believe you. NOT

>"As far as rules and category guidelines, I think they apply to all. If not they should. I expect to get what I pay for from any business on line or off line."

The rules are in place to ensure that hosts fulfill member expectations. They are not there to restrict varieties of expectations or to limit what kind of viewers can enter into a particular category. You criticize constantly members who go into IA and want more than IA. It's their money, their desire, and the host who recognizes their individual needs and caters to them is a winning host. I am not referring to the host who refuses to IA when a member desires IA, of course. My argument is against your implying that IA hosts can only do IA activities, and your criticism and name-calling of those members who enter IA for more than just the sexual IA.

>"As far as using one's screen name, since many members and hosts have many, would not really settle anything.

So what? Your argument is moot.

>"The only way to make sure everyone posts with the same name every time would require members and hosts to sign up separately to post in the forums."

I'm not arguing for required log-ins and usernames in the forums. I'm arguing for voluntary integrity behind what one posts. I'm arguing that you are hiding behind anonymity hurling your barbs. I'm saying that folks should use their usernames OR at least some readily identifiable moniker so folks have a sense of who is posting, and can distinguish them from other posters. There is nothing required in my using my username -- I choose to use it to own up to what i have to say, whether you agree with me or not.

>"And as far as my being a coward, the combat decorations hanging on my wall would suggest otherwise."

Thanks for demeaning every soldier and every veteran who has ever fought in combat. As if you are the only one in this forum to have been decorated or to have served i combat. If you are so brave then stop hiding behind your tilde

n/a

Yes I like girls to wear specific items of clothing and so I do go to IA and ask them to dress up in them and then eventually to not be dressed in them.

To pick up on "BC's" post. If the girl offers to get dressed while I am in text chat then I will wait until she has changed. If she doesn't I go in and she changes while I am in video.

To ~MyHeart4Yours. I visit girls ( or women if they prefer) not a category so as long as I am not breaking any of cc's rules I will go to whatever category I want and have whatever type of show I want.

I also agree with the reply that MyHeart4Yours gave you.

"Lots of complaints about IA lately" Yes but over the years IA has flown under the radar and softcore hosts and specific softcore hosts have been savaged in these forums. Its all about fair play for everyone. Instead of burying our heads in the sand, let's talk about hosts that raise questions. No category should be above suspicion.

n/a

I don't know if its true as I got it in my email from a friend. If you read my post it gives the country.

Unfortunately it is not true :(

You would think that a ticket machine in a parking lot in England charging fees in dollars would raise some eyebrows.

LOL great observation!

huh?

Last I heard the currency of England was in Pounds, not Dollars.

And it's starting to wear thin with the (very real) Bristol Zoo parking attendant.

Was Google broken when you posted this?

Did he post it as a "true" story, or as a humorous but not necessarily true one? God help us the day we can no longer create fiction for entertainment purposes. I think probably half the "urban myths" out there were started for a laugh, not for fact. But we take it too seriously and believe every word we read as if it were true.

n/a

Lenin? LMFAO!

I don't remember paying parking when I've been to the zoo. And you can always park somewhere in clifton.

Was an April Fool story from Bristol evening Post a few years ago. I know, I live there

Funny thing is though, this is about the best journalism you can get from that rag. Worst paper ever

Wait, I'm hopping down the bunny trail now. Hippity Hoppity, yes, I'm on my way.

And when I arrive I will be glad to shake it like a bunny.

In fact, there is a great song just for that very purpose:

You put your left foot in, you put your left foot out, you put your left foot in and you shake it all about. You do the Hokey Pokey and you turn yourself around. That's what it's all about .....

:D

n/a

No, she wouldn't be answering her sms. I know she is telling the truth cuz i know her too ;-)

n/a

When i said i know her is because i already met her in real life. What more can i know her? Do you want i also tell you her blood type? Duh!

maybe you need that info, i dont care about her blood test or disease, wont f her haha maybe u should know

i bet here is around 300 hosts from yaroslavl :)) just a most popular yaro boss have 200 girls ,and same maybe work at home :)

but not all work from home and not all communicate using sms. and she hasnt been only since Sept 2 ;-)

n/a

n/a

n/a

She sent me an sms and asked me to post so relax. I hadn't tried to communicate with her for a few days. I figured she went to a relative that lives nearby like she does every now and then until I got the sms since she has been on yahoo mobile for a few days but not regular yahoo or cc.

By the way, I didn't actually ask, but I hope it is obvious that I wanted to know if others that use the same internet provider have the same problem. Of course, if they do, I guess maybe they can't answer, lol.

there are many peoples complain about zentr -telekom now days,but thx god there are many providers today ;)

if a host is doing this , she should be kicked off cc for good ,if shes in 121 , she should close all her other screen names.

If cc kicked off every host doing this, there would very hosts left lol.

not true , after the first few got kicked off , the rest would learn not to do it .

The rules are very clear to any host that cares to pay attention that anytime she is in video in another room she is to close or pause the other rooms. Especially in 121!!!
Sounds a bit greedy!!

And do not speak in Commchat while she is in 121!

n/a

n/a

n/a

Will you wear wooden shoes? :-))

n/a

Can I sniff them after? :-))

n/a

n/a

I think that's a great idea. It's also a way for guys to decide if they want a personal pvt with the host themselves, as well as create another cash stream for the model.

n/a

the one nice thing about your idea is it might finally force hosts to have a description of the video, and maybe even a photo of what they look like in the video - inconceivable!

I'd also like the ability to fast forward. Some of the recorded shows i've seen on here are filled with sooooo much filler. This particular model was charging 5$ too. Needless to say i wasn't THAT curious to stick with it for long.

I think it is a good idea. Sometimes it is just not the right mood to have to go live chat. The problem with many videos is poor quality. Also some start you in the middle of the clip. And it is a great way to check out a particular host. I just don't see the downside to this as long as hosts make an effort to do a good job. It does not even always have to be a sex tape. It could even just be "Introduction" tape so you get a sense of the host. Just as long as the content is clear before you start paying. I would pay a few bucks for a promo tape.

" it might finally force hosts to have a description of the video"

Never see that on this site.

As long as there are lots of naked bottoms in them then I am in :D

n/a

Not to be argumentative, but just being on here opens you up to something like that. Nothing really stops a member from taking pics or recording your pvt session and posting all over the internet.

I had that happen and it is not fun when you have someone trying to create problems with what they have recorded, it sure stopped me from doing things in video with those I do not know, and it really caused me to not trust and to be too scared to do much so I ended up changing categories to non adult and I will not do nude at all, let alone anything else I use to do and enjoy.

I got too scared to let myself go and really enjoy myself as it did not only happen once but a few times. It is no longer enjoyable to let myself go and enjoy more than just stripping to sexy underwear. In fact because of this I have also found another job that is away from online. Really sucks tho because I really did enjoy myself, but I will not let myself be in a situation that only causes stress and worry.

Even the pictures in our archives was allowed to be copied till cc changed that and even now it is still possible to take a picture from archives, and yes i have seen the handy work of such a thing being done.

I wish everyone a good time on here....

They do that on other sites. You mean you want to make cc a clone of other sites?

n/a

Oh now I know a fun game we can play. I can jump in and out of all of your different rooms and see how long it takes you to catch me (obviously if I am not in the room that you maximised you have to minimise it again). Want to play ? :P

Who are you? Where are you from? I like your brain and speech. Where are such smart boys? :P

I'm a sad loser who spends way too much time on here and other internet sites.
I am from the UK.
Thank you :).
It's been a long time since I was a boy and I do not know if I was ever smart :(

I should have also said

Who are you? Where are you from? I like your brain and speech. Where are such smart girls? :P

n/a

n/a

n/a

Do you have to use Split cam?

n/a

Do both of your names have a "T" in them ? :P

n/a

Moscow, Idaho, USA ??

That is like hearing american tourists visiting Schloss Neuschwanstein and exclaiming 'wow they built a copy of the Disney castle!'

n/a

n/a

I go by the idea that you should be friends first, get to know each other. Many times a person can become attractive after you learn things that you like about them. It's those kind of things that are more important anyway. I'd rather have an ugly girl i can talk to and relate to, than a supermodel i have nothing in common with. And then the 'ugly' girl would likely become attractive to me. That's how it's always worked for me anyway. I have hardly ever dated someone without knowing how i felt about them.

Makes it very hard to meet someone new being single now.
thx for ur reply :)

There is no ugly women- thats first, as the beauty in the eyes of the beholder so even famous supermodel can be not attractive for some men, as she is not their type. If one man gets crazy about tall and slim girls only, other adore only petite girls, or cuddly or whatever. So every man has own type of women he likes most (not always the same as the mass-media chose like ideal). I have no idea how possible to fall for someone who are not attractive for you and even appear ugly....hmmm. If I find man ugly he has no chances with me, not matter how nice person he is, I dont like tricking to myself.

I think you both have a point. I have known girls that, when I first met them, I did not get a spark off of. Then, once I got to know them, they became more attractive to me and became someone I would be glad to date. However, while I did not immediately fine them attractive I also did not find them unattractive.

I think if I found them unattractive then, I agree with woman that, no matter how nice the personality, I would never want to date them.

Sure a lot of meetings in bars and clubs might lead to nothing more than meaningless sex (or no sex) but I also know several people who are married to the person chatted up in a bar.

I thought the only dating you did was cyber dates on site?

No where in my post did I say they agreed to date me :P

n/a

n/a

n/a

I assure you if I came over to chat to you T it would only be because of your charming personality and nothing to do with the fact that I thought you looked attractive, sexy. looked like you would be a devil in bed, had a great set of boobs and a lovely bum in a tight pair of jeans

Honest :P

n/a

With a face and body like mine I would be the last person to ever make disparaging remarks about anyone else's :P

n/a

I dont find it flattering at all, i find it cheap and annoying and macho-like.So when it happens the answer is usually "Its just u and ur hand tonight" (c) Nice guys do it too sometimes, when they really like a girl. But they are usually easily recognized by acting all shy and blushy :) Its obvious that it wasnt easy for them to dare to come up to a girl. Thats cute actually :)

TY. i'm always so confused when I see girls that are oblivious to the kind of man that casually approaches a woman out of now where like that.

cute or a possible slave??

I suggest you get a cute little dog and walk them often. Girls love dogs and will stop you to talk :))

The women responding seem like the exact kind of women i'm looking for. I guess that's why I come here lol.

Being judgmental isn't attractive. Don't bother yourself with what other guys do. Just be yourself, be casual, be honest, and let things come your way.

it depends on the bar and the night. It is fun to pick up women in bars, and some just want sex. Each town has its bar for pickups. And in usa, the middle of the week is best. That when women like to sneak out, when their man is working late

Middle of the week in bars is usually ladies night when they get free drinks. Hardly because they sneak away from their hubby....lol

yes, the free drink provides good cover, they are "just out with the girls". All I know is I have had some very hot one night stands in the middle of the week. laugh all you want!

Then why are you here instead of one of your bars?

n/a

I am also different from the other rude members here... I see a nice friend in you. I can feel that you are very smart, witty and your personality makes you really special. I feel so comfortable with you, because we understand each other...


Now that we both feel so comfortable, could you also do something for me as a friend? Could you switch to Glamour, I won't tell. And might I beg you to just give me me a very short innocent show to make it perfect, just for me, only once? Please, all the girls do it, believe your friend, please. I won't record anything and I will return as a friend forever!

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

hello and welcome, now can i have a free video?

n/a

Welcome! Alpha search for a new girl and cannot wait to try you out!

n/a

n/a

Thanks

n/a

n/a

i have seen this a number of times with a host i know, it was a cc glitch, her 2nd room she had actually made offline but it was showing her as being in open video.
nothing's perfect, not even me, although XXX's below seems to come pretty close to perfect, apparently.

lol Joe

n/a

Well, she's not supposed to, if a host has two rooms open to text chat and someone enters video in either room she must immediately close the other room.

not being tech savvy,i'd go for the obvious.either she forgot to close the other session,or you're so(insert the insult of your choice)that she needed to keep it open so she didn't fall asleep,puke,scream,slash her wrists :--)

So? He was paying 121 and he should had gotten all the attention. Its not that she was giving him a freebie! Hosts like these should be banned.

that's true but shit happens in life.no need to carry it like a weight around your neck into the next day :--)

he never said he was in 121, it is your assumption, my assumption is he simply saw this by checking her 2 rooms, if he was in 121 how would he be checking her other room?

I always do it. Its easy two, three, four, five tabs opened with cc in all of them in a browser and you can have vid in one tab and still check your favorites on the other tab, Duh!

so your paying for 121 and checking out other hosts and stuff on other tabs at the same time, that makes alot of sense, to you at least, enjoy duh x2

Sure, I do enjoy it otherwise I wouldn't do it, Duh! LOL

But someone has been in 121, she got the money for a service thats named "exclusive" and tried to fish others at the same time

along the same lines, i was about 10 minutes into a 121 and we were having a nice sexy time, all naked and hot, when all of a sudden she sits up and begins to type then gives a little wave, the thing is i didn't see the words, well i just overlooked it as she began playing again,but about 2 minutes later sits up back at the keyboard and types, 'ok lover i can do that for you, mmmm' and proceeds to change position, not something i wanted or asked for
so assuming she was here with a second room i said 'wtf' and left
but seems from reading this thread she must have had a room on another site open, not here
now that is totally wrong in my opinion

"but seems from reading this thread she must have had a room on another site open, not here
now that is totally wrong in my opinion"

It happens all the time.

n/a

Thats exactly for what I come here for. I am not loser, in my early 30's, not bald, and not fat and work out everyday. I am also married and 2 kids. I have a great job and I am aware I can go in any club and find a woman to get laid and no need to pay, but this is putting my life on the line. The risks of getting a STD high nowadays if you fuck with an unknown person.
I come here solely for a little extra excitement without the risks. Many hosts asked for my Yah, my email, and my mobile. I come to their vid for the 2nd time and they tell me: I love you, I miss you and I want to meet. Some even become sad. Might be acting, but i doubt it. One got very upset even block me when I say I can't meet and dont lover her. I feel sorry for them because I am not here for relationship. I will never meet and start a new relationship. Its just not right, I already have a great life. I hope hosts understand that not all members are here trying to find a wife and realize that we are here to spend our money on adult entertainment.

You said 3 kids in your initial post... it's 2 now. Where's the 3 child gone? :D

Not the initial poster!

n/a

n/a

I know, from host comments here, it seems they think we're all just pathetic guys trying to meet every host we talk to.
I'm actually not interested in meeting anyone i've met here either. I'm just using you to get off, and ur just using me for money. It's a nice relationship lol

n/a

damn i hope that is only for hosts & you're still open to meeting members.you sound like a cool,funloving guy who doesn't take life too serious & knows how to parteeee.cc mail me if it's so big boy :--)

Oh boy, you are becoming and sounding more gay everyday.

lol roggy bb.even if i am we know both know you're safe.a virile,skirt chasing stud muffin like you,would never succumb to the latent homo inside you,no matter how charming,well hung & promiscuous i am :--)

I'm married with 3 kids 3 too! I like extra spice here at CC. I also like extra spice for real. So I am happy to meet or not. But if I meet it is just for sexy fun, NOT another relationship. My wife is great. I dont want to leave. I just want more sex!

n/a

fidelity and loyalty in relationships on a sex site??? I have a wife for that. She is loyal and faithful for both of us! I'm the yang to her yin.

n/a

she likes to be faithful. I dont. We got it worked out. So it is ok for us. Not everyone is a saint like you.

n/a

i can't make out if your being sarcastic or not, if you are then respect to you.
If your not then your wishing that your husband or any man your having a relationship with, visits other hosts behind your back, nice, very nice :)

n/a

n/a

That explains why I always feel like a bit of a tit :)

n/a

you are a yaro girl, dear. no one ever sees your breasts.

n/a

he's just frustrated because you're the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.a dream he wants but knows he can't have :--)

virgin ????

n/a

n/a

n/a

Thats a women's worse version of the story :-P

But it can also be a no-win situation for the hosts. If they are honest and say they don't do something, they still risk getting rated 1* by a member for the refusal, as some people get upset if their every request isn't obeyed, like the hosts are some sort of automata.

n/a

good point. I always tell them first. If they admit it, then we can continue. It is only when they continue to lie that I rate 1.

n/a

lol Sunday. Don't ever change :P

just like you punished me (((((

n/a

Honesty is the best policy.

n/a

he did not say you had to do anal, just do not fake it. if u dont do it, just say no! We pervs will go elsewhere or try some other distraction

n/a

n/a

at least it's better to be pissed off than pissed on(for the majority) :--)

n/a

lmao smile :--)

they think we are dumb and blind.

Only dumb :)

I'm always up for faking anything that can be done!
No girl enjoys any sort of penetration when not horny, and let's face it, if we're horny we'll go have sex or pause and masturbate without anyone interrupting.

But I have to say who care? Impotant is that the guest with money is horney! But I know many girls always like it also when not horney! You are ok to get used for single use tissue and you use us for our money. So fair deal, all win!

viewer forum about faking... would be nice to have had some of you reply to jerksauce's post on this, rather than just having those saying they don't care if hosts fake....