General Forum

n/a

Oh I say, you are all very silly indeed!

Japan suffered a resounding defeat on Friday at the International Whaling Commission, calming fears among conservationists that it might finally win enough support in the world body to start attacking a ban on whaling.

The commission voted against two proposals by Japan, one for secret ballots that it said would allow Caribbean and Pacific nations to back its pro-whaling stance without fear of reprisal, and another to prevent the IWC from discussing the fate of dolphins and porpoises as well as whales.

n/a

n/a

is she at home? how good a show

On their first night together, a newlywed couple go to change. The new bride comes out of the bathroom showered and wearing a beautiful robe. The proud husband says, "My dear, we are married now, you can open your robe." The beautiful young woman opens her robe, and he is astonished."Oh, oh, aaaahhh," he exclaims, "My God you are so beautiful, let me take your picture. Puzzled she asks, "My picture?" He answers, "Yes my dear, so I can carry your beauty next to my heart forever".

She smiles and he takes her picture, and then he heads into the bathroom to shower. He comes out wearing his robe and the new wife asks, "Why do you wear a robe? We are married now." At that the man opens his robe and she exclaims, "oh, OH, OH MY, let me get a picture". He beams and asks why and she answers, "So I can get it enlarged!"

A nun is sitting with her Mother Superior, chatting.
"I used some horrible language this week and feel absolutely terrible about it." said the younger nun.
"When did you use this awful language?" asks the elder nun.
"Well, I was golfing and hit an incredible drive that looked like it was going to go over 280 yards, but it struck a phone line that was hanging over the fairway and fell straight down to the ground after going only about 100 yards."
"Is that when you swore?"
"No, Mother," answered the nun. "After that, a squirrel ran out of the bushes and grabbed my ball in its mouth and began to run away."
"Is THAT when you swore?" asks the Mother Superior again.
"Well, no" says the nun. "You see, as the squirrel was running, an eagle came down out of the sky, grabbed the squirrel in his talons and began to fly away!"
"And Is THAT when you swore?" asks the amazed elder nun.
"No, not yet." she answered. "As the eagle carried the squirrel away in its claws, it flew near the green and the squirrel dropped my ball."
"Did you swear THEN?" asked Mother Superior, becoming impatient.
"No, because the ball fell on a big rock, bounced over the sand trap, rolled onto the green, and stopped about six inches from the hole."
The two nuns were silent for a moment.
Then Mother Superior sighed and said, "You missed the f**ing putt,didn't you?"


There's this pretty young thing out for a walk. She comes to a river and sees another pretty young thing on the opposite bank. "Yoo hoo!" she shouts, "How can I get to the other side?"
The second pretty young thing looks up the river then down the river and shouts back, "You ARE on the other side."


A pretty young girl pushes her BMW into a gas station. She tells the mechanic it died. After he works on it for a few minutes, it is idling smoothly.
She says, "What's the story?"
He replies, "Just crap in the carburettor"
She asks, "How often do I have to do that?"


If you ever testify in court, you might wish you could have been as sharp as this policeman.
He was being cross-examined by a defense attorney during a felony trial. The lawyer was trying to undermine the policeman's credibility....
Q: "Officer -- did you see my client fleeing the scene?"
A: "No sir. But I subsequently observed a person matching the description of the offender, running several blocks away."
Q: "Officer -- who provided this description?"
A: "The officer who responded to the scene."
Q: "A fellow officer provided the description of this so-called offender. Do you trust your fellow officers?"
A: "Yes, sir. With my life."
Q: "With your life? Let me ask you this then officer. Do you have a room where you change your clothes in preparation for your daily duties?"
A: "Yes sir, we do!"
Q: "And do you have a locker in the room?"
A: "Yes sir, I do."
Q: "And do you have a lock on your locker?"
A: "Yes sir."
Q: "Now why is it, officer, if you trust your fellow officers with your life, you find it necessary to lock your locker in a room you share with these same officers?"
A: "You see, sir -- we share the building with the court complex, and sometimes lawyers have been known to walk through that room."
The courtroom erupted in laughter, and a prompt recess was called.

A crowd had gathered around the Notre Dame Cathedral.All were looking up at the strange figure of Quasimodo the hunchbackas he perched on the ledge of the highest tower.Suddenly without warning he fell and landed with an almighty bang on the ground below the Tower.Luckily his fall had been softened by landing on his hunchback and as he looked back up at the Tower he was heard to mutter "Esmerelda,Esmerelda when i said toss me off that wasn't what i meant " ......

can you tell me when you have a new member come to your vid session and you see his cam and perhaps you dont like the members looks.
and he wants to get you know you and may be meet in real.
do you.
A tell him you do not do meet,s with members and hope he comes back to you any way.
B say maybe when you him better so you get more visits and more $$$$$$ or
C say yes you would love to and get even more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ or
D or are you told you have to be nice to members regardless .
thanks and please be honnest after all you do not have to say your
name.

n/a

n/a

Judge Rules That U.S. Has Broad Powers to Detain Noncitizens
Indefinitely
By NINA BERNSTEIN

A federal judge in Brooklyn ruled yesterday that the government has
wide latitude under immigration law to detain noncitizens on the basis
of religion, race or national origin, and to hold them indefinitely
without explanation.

The ruling came in a class-action lawsuit by Muslim immigrants detained
after 9/11, and it dismissed several key claims the detainees had made
against the government. But the judge, John Gleeson of United States
District Court for the Eastern District of New York, allowed the
lawsuit to continue on other claims, mostly that the conditions of
confinement were abusive and unconstitutional. Judge Gleeson's decision
requires top federal officials, including former Attorney General John
Ashcroft and Robert S. Mueller III, the F.B.I. director, to answer to
those accusations under oath.

This is the first time a federal judge has addressed the issue of
discrimination in the treatment of hundreds of Muslim immigrants who
were swept up in the weeks after the 2001 terror attacks and held for
months before they were cleared of links to terrorism and deported. The
roundups drew intense criticism, not only from immigrant rights
advocates, but also from the inspector general of the Justice
Department, who issued reports saying that the government had made
little or no effort to distinguish between genuine suspects and Muslim
immigrants with minor visa violations.

Lawyers in the suit, who vowed to appeal yesterday's decision, said
parts of the ruling could potentially be used far more broadly, to
detain any noncitizen in the United States for any reason.

"This decision is a green light to racial profiling and prolonged
detention of noncitizens at the whim of the president," said Rachel
Meeropol, a lawyer for the Center for Constitutional Rights, which
represented the detainees. "The decision is profoundly disturbing
because it legitimizes the fact that the Bush administration rounded up
and imprisoned our clients because of their religion and race."

A spokesman for the government, Charles S. Miller, would not respond to
those assertions, saying only that the Justice Department was "very
pleased that the court upheld the decision to detain plaintiffs, all of
whom were illegal aliens, until national security investigations were
completed and plaintiffs were removed from the country." He said the
government was reviewing the rest of the opinion to decide whether to
appeal the rulings Judge Gleeson made to allow the plaintiffs' other
claims to proceed.

In his 99-page ruling, Judge Gleeson rejected the government's argument
that the events of Sept. 11 justified extraordinary measures to confine
noncitizens who fell under suspicion, or that the attacks heightened
top officials' need for government immunity to combat future threats to
national security without fear of being sued.

But his interpretation of immigration law gave the government broad
discretion to enforce the law selectively against noncitizens of a
particular religion, race or national origin, and to detain them
indefinitely, for any unspecified reason, after an immigration judge
had ordered them removed from the country.

"The executive is free to single out 'nationals of a particular
country' and focus enforcement efforts on them," the judge wrote. "This
is, of course, an extraordinarily rough and overbroad sort of
distinction of which, if applied to citizens, our courts would be
highly suspicious."

Yet, he continued, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that Congress
and the executive branch, in exercising their broad power over
naturalization and immigration, can make rules that would be
unacceptable if applied to American citizens.

In the judge's view, the government has the right to detain people
indefinitely as long as their eventual removal is "reasonably
foreseeable." If that interpretation stands, it could apply to millions
of noncitizens, including tourists removable for visa violations, said
Gerald L. Neuman, a law professor at Columbia who is an expert in human
rights law and was not involved in the case.

"It doesn't seem to limit the motives the government has to have in
being slow in removing them; it could even be just basic neglect," he
said.

But Professor Neuman cautioned that "it's only a district judge's
decision."

"The decision encourages the government to behave this way without fear
of financial liability," he said, but it does not carry the weight of a
ruling by an appellate court. "This interpretation is attackable even
among other judges in Brooklyn, let alone Lower Manhattan."

But David Cole, a law professor at Georgetown University and a
co-counsel in the lawsuit, said the ruling was the only one of its kind
and made New York "an equal protection-free zone" because the
government can detain immigrants wherever it chooses.

"What this decision says is the next time there is a terror attack, the
government is free to round up every Muslim immigrant in the U.S.,
based solely on their ethnic and religious identity, and hold them on
immigration pretexts for as long as it desires," he said. "We saw after
9/11 what the government did in an era of uncertainty about how far it
can go. Judge Gleeson has essentially given them a green light to go
much further."

The class-action lawsuit, Turkmen v. Ashcroft, is the first and largest
of several brought by immigrants held after 9/11. The named plaintiffs
in the case include former detainees who came back to the United States
this year for depositions and were required to be in the custody of
federal marshals at all times. Among them were Hany Ibrahim, a deli
worker, and his brother, Yasser, a Web designer, Egyptian Muslims who
said then that putting themselves back in the hands of the government
they were suing was an act of faith in America.

Yesterday, Yasser Ibrahim, who had lived in New York for three or four
years on an expired tourist visa and was delivered in shackles to the
Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn soon after Sept. 11, said
through his lawyers that he was shocked and very disappointed by the
judge's decision.

"I can't believe the court would allow this to happen," he said." I am
frightened for other Muslims in the United States, who could face the
same discrimination and abuse that I suffered."

n/a

sorry to spoil the forum with negative comments, but i have ask your opinion.

...he came to me, to my vid, we chatted nice...
he came for the second time.. after i said i had a bf, he got damn mad as if i was married but swore in eternal love to him...
we really had a good chemistry together... but he took it too seriously i think.. he said i mean very much to him, he wants to have me as a gf (in real) and so on... jeezzz we didnt' know each other at all! and when i said that i'm not sure we are gonna have smth serious in real, he got angry, disappointed, whatever...
he started to treat me like a female only, not like a person.. there was nothing left from his "love" or smth he was talking about... he kept coming but started to ask me to show him my body and so on and after i was saying a no, he was losing his interest...
i know i can be of no interest for a guy whom i dont' like by some reasons.. but i liked him, he liked me too... but after all, he said i'm not interesting, narrow-minded and so on and that i get what i deserve.
i know there are ppl who just can't admit their failure...
was it my fault that he was too fast and asked too much after such a short period? did i deserve to be said those things? or i just became a victim of a common weak person who is not confident enough to get a no?

not that i'm gonna be upset over him, just curious why that happens... what lesson can i get from it...

thx all

HOUSE SEX - When you are newly married and have sex all over the house in every room.

BEDROOM SEX - After you have been married for a while, you only have sex in the bedroom.

HALL SEX - After you've been married for many, many years you just pass each other in the hall and say "Fuck you"

COURTROOM SEX - When your wife and her lawyer fuck you in the divorce court in front of many people for every penny you've got.

n/a

As ham sandwiches go, it was perfection. A thick slab of ham, a
fresh bun, crisp lettuce and plenty of expensive, light brown,
gourmet mustard. The corners of my jaw aching in anticipation, I
carried it to the picnic table in our backyard, picked it up
with both hands but was stopped by my wife suddenly at my side.

"Hold Johnny (our six-week-old son) while I get my sandwich,"
she said.

I had him balanced between my left elbow and shoulder and was
reaching again for the ham sandwich when I noticed a streak of
mustard on my fingers. I love mustard. I had no napkin. I licked
it off. It was not mustard. No man ever put a baby down faster.
It was the first and only time I have sprinted with my tongue
protruding. With a washcloth in each hand I did the sort of
routine shoeshine boys do, only I did it on my tongue. Later
(after she stopped crying from laughing so hard) my wife said,
"Now you know why they call that mustard 'Poupon.'"

1

GOING

n/a

Sexy Hana, brazialian princess she was, great sense of humor and a amazing smile. I enjoyed my chat session with her very much. Great conversation, great person. Thanks for the good time and the laughs hana.

n/a

n/a

n/a