General Forum

you're enthusiasm is too much.. i now have no choice but to root against argentina.
sorry, but your team is now doomed.

n/a

n/a

Argentina barely beat an injured riddled Nigerian team. Woopee.

The Nigerian keeper did a great job. Two great saves. It would have been 3-0 otherwise. Argentina looked good and played well. Even Maradona seemed to be pretty good. Capricorn...lets go to La Cabrera in Palermo and have a nice bife de chorizo and some malbec to celebrate.

will be interesting when they play south korea.they'll have even more running to do than today :--)

n/a

not saying they don't,but,in the first half nigeria weren't competitive (lucky it was only 1-0)the longer the game went the more nigeria was able to make impression& towards the end they even had chances. to me the koreans are even fitter & faster than them,play a more uptempo game.i think it will be interesting how argentina copes with that :--)

n/a

n/a

n/a

Under my policy, a woman would have 3 ways to enter the USA:

1. She is hot and is approved by at least 6 of the 10 judges. In such a case, she would get a one year visa whereby she would have one year to get married or she would be permanently banned from ever entering the USA.

2. She is not so hot and is only approved by a 5 or fewer judges but does have some redeeming qualities such as she is a doctor, nurse, et cetera and can serve some useful purpose here. In such a case, she could get a work visa for a period to be determined by the panel.

3. She could come by way of the current tourist visa rules.

In terms of your question, therefore, if you are a hot host, you would fall under method 1 or method 3. It would not matter that you could cure cancer or serve some other purpose. My administration simply would not care. If you're hot, and if you chose to go before the judges, you have agreed to the one year limit after which you must be married or leave forever.

Even if you think you are hot, if you go before the panel of judges and get 5 votes or less, then you can still come for a longer period. In this case, however, you would need to be able to perform some useful service such as being a doctor or whatever. If you are hot, we really don't care what you can do. You are already providing a useful service if you choosed to move to the USA by marrying one of us, but you must do so within 1 year. (You must be a faithful wife for at least 10 years or more by the way, or back where you came from!) After you are married, if you want to go save the world, fine, but first you must get married within one year.

If you don't want to go before the judging panel, you still can get a tourist visa and visit, but that can be hard depending upon where you are from. But if you want to stay for a longer period, you MUST go before the panel of judges and your fate will be decided by them. All I can say is that if you are hot feel that you have a skill of some type that the USA needs and want to try for a work visa, you will need to reduce your hotness by not wearing makeup, not sleeping enough, wearing old clothes, et cetera and making the judges think you are not hot. At that point, you will have the opportunity to explain that you have some other value and the judges may let you in anyway. But be forewarned... These judges will be CC members and have done things like seen a host when she first gets online without makeup, awakened her by entering video, et cetera and they will be able to tell that you are hotter than you are trying to let on.

n/a

n/a

Anybody but Obama

Sure, can I be on the committee ;)

And who says I'm going to give up my seat?

We, the people, in order to form a more perfect union!

However, if you choose to adopt my plan, I will withdrawl my candidacy. Otherwise, the clock is ticking. You have until January 20, 2013, and I might even start a movement to pressure the House to impeach you and the Senate to then remove you!!!

We want our hosts!!!

n/a

n/a

Maybe you don't but all other active hosts have the US blocked for privacy reasons. And to honest, have no idea why you don't as well.

n/a

n/a

Strange, I thought you already considered yourself The Greatest People (TM) so why would you need to go with the "let's import the most beautiful women from country X, Y and Z and then nuke what's left of it" attitude?
Thankfully, many are better informed than that.

"The Greatest People(TM)"?
Really now?

Direct quote from a certain former president, so yes - really now.

oh good god

Since when has the word "amongst" snuck into the common vocabulary of real modern day Americans?

You, sir, are very obviously an imposter.

otherwise it had the right combination of schmaltz,horse hockey & total bulldust to be american? :--)

have the right combination of condescension, prissiness, and false sense of intellectual superiority, to be a dick.

First, there is nothing wrong with saying "amongst".

Second, I made a few errors here and there such as saying "choosed", instead of "chose", but that just means I was typing fast and not being careful, not that I am not an American.

Double negative I am sorry !
and of course English

n/a

how different is this american team from the one that stopped spain's 35 game unbeaten streak last year?
surely this american team is being given better odds against an unimpressive english team than they were given to beat spain in last year's confederations cup, right?

The USA have lost striker Charlie Davies who was the star of the Confederation Cup and have a couple of other injury problems. England have peformed poorly in recent friendlies but since Capello took over have done well in competitive matches. Of course USA have a chance, especially if England have an off day, but if the England players perform at or close to their best they should win.

Lol i hope u understand that it was more of an exception than rule, and that it was pure luck, right?)))))) Happened once, so please, dont act like from now on it will be always this way lol)) So funny)

so you're saying that the "rule" in football is that the team most people favour to win always wins ... unless they don't, in which case it's pure luck for them to have been beaten?
err ... sure, ok.

so, anyway ... better luck next time england.

I bet you don't find it so funny now :D

read again, i didnt say anything about "rules" or any other not popular teams:) I was talking abt USA and Spain))) One of the best, greatest teams in the world, of the coutry where football is religion, art, style of living, and USA, where its a so-called game for "pussies, girls and kids?". U really think that it wasnt luck in the case? Lol if u do then ok nvm))))

As for this game with England, if u saw the game u sshould know that the result was like this mostly not cuz USA is so good, but cuz the English goalkeeper screwed up:) It was a lame, weak shoot, and he still managed to let the ball off his hands..And i call it luck for the USA lol. But i have to admit that the american goalkeeper is good, he saved his team lots of times, but thats it. We will see what happens next:) Was just the first game so..Time will show:)

It is easy to put the blame on the English keeper for his error but in reality the whole team should share it. I barely think of a single player whose performance was particularly good. Maybe Johnson and Gerard. Aaron Lennon was especially poor, considering the quality of the opposition full back. The one positive thing is that surely Rooney cannot have another game as bad as this for the tournamant. I just hope he doesn't try too hard in the next match and get sent off. The selection of Milner was a mistake, he was clearly not fit enough.

Well sure the whole team wasnt so good, but what i am saying is that if Green didnt miss that absolutly lame goal(btw the same happened today with the Algerian goalkeeper, he must be Green's cousin lol)l, England wud win no? Even if they played as they played, Stivie G still scored. Sure they werent in their best form, and they looked kinda tired, but still if not that stupid mistake of the goalie-they'd win. I just hope they will learn from this experience and next time we will see the game that we expect from them.

But the "stupid mistake" happened so saying England would have won if it hadn't is just nonsense. I could just as easily say if England hadn't scored their first goal the USA would have won which would be equally stupid.

My point is that if England had played better both individually and as a team they would have scored more goals so Green's mistake would not have cost them the game. When a forward makes a mistake he fails to score. Comments may be made but not at the same level as when a goalkeeper blunders because this usually results in a goal being conceded.

http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/ranking/lastranking/gender=m/fullranking.html

England is 8, USA 14. I think that is rankings in general, not for the tournament, but I don't really know.

Who cares?

n/a

England, ofc))

n/a

Didn't Know We had a USA Soccer team . . .

I knew we did, we won the World Cup at least once or twice recently.
I was just surprised to learn this past week that men actually played soccer.

n/a

men play a sport where they wear more padding than a flat chested,no ass streetwalker :--)

Won the World Cup once or twice recently???)))))))))))))) Is it what they tell u on TV?)))) Rofl)))))))

Btw, do you know why England only got a draw against USA?

Because their keeper is still...



Green!

LMAO =))

n/a

I agree with all except number 9. Viewers have other options.

n/a

What I meant was other sites. We viewers don't only come here.

Thanks Hun :) and as hosts we have other choices too but it's a great site with a lot of unique options (like forums and chat) and for the most part....really fun members and very few technical problems.

Yes you are correct, it is the only site with public forums.

better for your business if you tell who you are lol

Speaking out for most hosts that choose to work here :) I think many members do not understand that this is a biz for us and that we are here to follow the rules and guidelines and operate a biz.....not to just choose us based on our looks and expect us to do whatever they want for how much they want to pay. Personally I am not here to meet someone because how could I trust they wouldn't be on here looking for other girls all the time.....hehe

11.) I will always remember that I am working to please my customers within the rules of CC, my category and within my limits and interests.

13) My overhead costs to include the gym, sexy clothes and shoes, facials, tanning, botox, implants, makeup, hair and pampering myself and my CC fees shall all be covered by my service fees so that I at least break even and please my members so they drool and cum!

12) I will read numbers 11) and 13) over and over!

You're smoking way too much crack

n/a

That is exactly what I do.
Well... except number 3) should read: "Give her 20 seconds to get fully naked and start masturbating."

Hhhhmmm that must be why all the hosts block you....it's your charm!

Devastating!

read some of the chathost profiles. there is your answer.

non nude

Well first you are assuming that what you consider "pretty", I also consider pretty. Second, even if I like a host's pics, I still must think her price is worth it based upon what I see in her pics, her category, and her profile. Some really hot hots are over $3,00/minute, and I typically avoid them.

To give one example, if I want nudity, and I see an instant action host with hot pics, I don't just jump into her room. I will check her price and make sure she is hot enough to justify that price. I will further check her rating, her comments, and personal forum.

There are a lot of hot hosts that have 3,5 or 4 stars for example. Well, if a host is that hot and not getting 4,5 or 5 stars, then she must be doing something wrong. Maybe has a boring show. Maybe she stalls. Maybe she is on 3 sites at once and ignoring members. I don't know. But whatever she is, it obviously isn't how she looks if she had hot pics so there is some type of a problem. I have a lot of problems with the rating system, but regardless of how well it works, anything below 4,5 stars is hit or miss in terms of havng a good time in my view as I have stated before, not that 4,5 or 5 stars guarantees anything.

And like I said, I will consider the category. If I think I will need to chat awhile with a little shy host before getting a show or I will need to go 121, I will often not be willing to pay as much per minute since it will take longer to get the show.

In sum, I basically have a mental checklist and way of evaluating whether I think a host will be worth seeing for that price. I usually make my decision in about 15 to 30 seconds. I just skim a couple of pics fast, check the price, check the stars, skim the profile, and skim her forum. It doesn't take long. If things look good, I might take a closer look at things for another 30 seconds and if all still is okay, jump into video or text. If not, I move on.

By the way, for me to even check out a profile, THE MAIN PROFILE PIC MUST BE A GOOD ONE!!! I don't think a lot of hosts understand this point.

credit limit,
income,
opportunity,
desperation.
actually the last one usually takes precedence over theothers!

n/a

original poster are you a cover girl?

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

If she isnt nice and friendly I dont care how good she looks, not going to visit.

n/a

there's some truth to that for sure. very sexy women can be intimidating.

a lot of ladies have pics of themselves where they have this ice-cold expression on their face, as is fashionable when posing for pics, but does not really make them look approachable.

the best legs and breasts i saw has Zlata555

n/a

Cant say I find any of those overly attractive. KittyBb is one whose looks I really like. But mostly for me concerning looks it is the face, must not be sharp, but soft and gentle features. Also to much makeup or at least when it is evident they use a lot of it turns me off too. RomanticCurl, GlamPrinces, and also ChocoTati are ones I think are very nice and beautiful women.

But all in all it comes down to personality that makes beauty for me, not physical looks. Though I find these women also very attractive physically.

n/a

The best figure I ever saw here was $500 as it was credited to my account in one of the competitions so so long ago :) and :(

n/a

n/a

dont forget yourself , your very beautiful too .

n/a

That is a tough question because I don't have just one particular favorite body type. I love tall slender, small busted with long skinny (but shapely) legs - eg: tenderkelly. Of course, a woman doesn't have to be tall and her legs don't have to be long to be sexy and misslovely1 is testament to this. I love her tiny sexy body. I also love curvy, big busted types - eg: sattine. Then there are the tall slender, large busted types like sexycaprize, but somehow small busted and curvy just don't attract me (i have no example for this type). Hope this helps.

Yess..I look forward..
Im old enough to remember Argentina´s fantastico entertainment from World Cup 1978.. Since than i allways follow Argentina..

n/a

i'll have one eye on argentina as i drew them in work lottery to win world cup, my other glass eye will be on england (even if they are boring and crap)

n/a

I will be following Argentina for a couple of reasons, Lionel Messi, Not knowing what Maradona will do next (not play Messi as he's worried about Messi outshining Maradona) and I had some of the best times ever in Argentina, fabulous country and people

n/a

i thought messi was spanish. weird.

n/a

Barca payed for his growth hormone treatment when he was a kid, and flew all his family over to be with him when, no wonder he lover it there so much.
Argentina'78 was the first world cup I remember, Mario Kempes and the most tickertape you've ever seen, but well before your time Capric0rn. Would be great to have another world cup there, fantastic place, best beef anywahere and bottles and bottles of Quilmes

n/a

Vamos, vamos Argentina....
Argentina has a great chance to win it all...I will be watching tomorrow morning. I will be in Buenos Aires for the quater finals, semi finals and the finals. I want to party around the obelisco on 9 de Julio and watch Maradona run around it naked after Argentina wins...again.

n/a

Im with France, England and South Africa (after todays game, how they dance that cute "goal dance" is just sooooooooooo cool:) But i think Spain will be the champion))))

n/a

n/a

Yep France has a very VERY very bad coach, and they just cant wait for this World Cup to be over, cuz when it is, the new one will sign the contract, and this one shitted all their reputation((

Makes Thierry Henry's handball even harder to take now for us Irish fans watching absolute sh1te like that

Yeah i know the feeling...The fact that Russia didnt get there cuz of that absolutely not fair game with Slovenia breaks my heart, but thats life..Sure it wasnt THAT obvious in our case as it was in urs, but it was still sooo...heartbreaking.

I just hope that France will get back on the horse after this "coach" leaves, they need a good leader, who they respect and follow. Great team but no leader, esp after Zidane has retired((

Getting shot of him after world cup for Laurent Blanc, so should be back to the top of the tree, he's class and has respect.
Talking of Russia, got them in the qualifiers for Euro 2012, so apprehensive about going back to Moscow, had some problems there last time, they didn't seem to like Ireland for some reason

n/a

Yeah i know but i dont support them))) For some reason i hate Spanish and Italian teams)) No offence guys))

As long as Maradroga is at the helm picking his buddies instead of the best, i don't see Argentina winning any major competition at all. Even Messi seems lost in the middle of that lame excuse that they call a team...

As for me, it's Portugal and once we're out (that shouldn't take too long lol) i'll support Brasil, Spain and pretty much everyone who plays against France and England.

Cmon((((((((( Are u my friend or what?(((((((

As for Portugal, cant stand just one single person in there...I think u know who lol))

n/a

This may come as a surprise to you but soccer players from Northern Ireland ply for Northern Ireland, players from Wales play for Wales and players from Scotland play for .....


you'll never guess......



wait for it .......


Scotland !!!!
Unfortunately none of these teams qualified for the World Cup Finals this time.

Then why do the members of the U.K. unite for the Olympics?

It's one of those weird quirks of the union which creates the UK.... we are still 4 separate countries in some things but 1 country in others.

In the Olympics and European competitions in athletics we are the UK... but in the Commonwealth Games each of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland compete separately.

But in football the real reason we compete as separate countries isthat there are separate football associations for each of the countries and each one has its own league (although confusingly some teams from Wales play in the English leagues!!).... so the coutries are separate in all competitions in football.

In fact, this is a possibly problem for there to be a UK football team at the Olympics tournament - our country never sends a team to the Olympics football as we cannot send an English team, or Welsh or Scotish etc. as the Olympics would not let us... but similarly FIFA threatens that if we unite to form a UK team for the Olympics they may make us unite for ALL competitions and have only 1 football association for the whole of the UK. Might seem strange to people outside the UK, but this would be HUGELY unpopular with everyone... especially the fans who really associate with their own country's team.

Hope this helps a little?

Yep. Thanks.

The independent status of the England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Irelands FA's was actually guranteed in the Fifia congress of 1946 when the four of them rejoined having left Fifa in 1920. The current Fifa board has said this will not be threatened if a joint GB team plays in the Olympics but the three smaller countries do not believe in this. The irony is that a GB team might well be have been consistent World beaters. The majority of players would be from England but imagine the England team of the 1950's with John Charles added, the 1960's with George Best playing, the 1980's/1990's with Ryan Giggs.

well there is now an englishman, who plays his football in scotland, has never played professional football in wales, in fact has never lived in wales, but because the school he attended was just over the border in wales, under fifa's new ruling, that makes him welsh! Look for the football association of wales website and check andy dorman's profile for the men's a team.

the irony is that there is a gentleman's agreement between the four home unions (england, scotland, wales & northern ireland) that they will not pick a foreign born player who qualifies by residency, actually living in the country for the required number of years!

Well it's so because World cup, is Nation championship and not country, UK is a country, but in this country you find 4 nationalities, English, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish.. Olympics games are about country so they all together under the Union Jack Flag...

Not quite, it's a union of countries hence United Kingdom. It's confusing though because on official forms I am described as White British, not English. So we English no longer officially exist yet we have a football team called England.

because football is about the only sport they are competitive in on the world stage.the best example is: the olympics they compete as uk/great britain,while commonwealth games they compete as countries.

I think I understand!

People have discussed the issue you raised in terms of not knowing if there will be nudity or not, but I NEVER noticed that playback is "hardcore", and I've been here a long, long time. I don't think anyone has ever raised that issue.

Excellent post, and I 100% agree that members should have a way to know what to expect in the videos. I don't usually watch playback so maybe that is why I never noticed it is "hardcore", but it certainly would help to give everyone better information. I think that I've only watched not so shy and instant action hosts in playback so I got what one would expect. I just assumed a glamour or little shy host wouldn't do much although I know there are some exceptions.

it would not matter so much. but hosts for the most part put nonsense in the video description. what if cc lets each host make a library of their videos under a different tab on their host page. then each video could have its own description, and possibly ratings and comments from viewers.

You should learn to deal with incertitudes in life,fellows!
Playback is a hardcore category but many of us don't use to visit such category . Except if i'm curious about a certain host. In this case a hardcore video is not a must while the target to make a first impression about the girl. The web net is full of free porns .Blonde ,brunettes ,big tits,small tits ... i can practicaly choose what my soul pleads for.

Pls help me to make an opinion to get Rosebuds video back in business.
Her video playback´s wasnt only sexy, but also funny and sooo hot.

Yeah.. after her playback, strawberry with cream gave me a new meaning :-) and also bananasplit with icecream and chocosauce.. lol

n/a

.nudity is not always the sexiest thing.. To me it is

n/a

n/a

n/a

For me a live interactive vid can be very sexy without nudity but in recorded vid I expect it or at least topless.

same reason non-adult is mixed into adult... so you will give away more of your money

n/a

Reading your post bored me halfway through and I couldn't finish.
Please email me an audio version. Thanks.

Yes I have noticed that over the last few days. Long may it continue.

I only get one in 10 posts up on a good month

i only get 1 in 10 erections up in a month.

so why thank them lol

About 20% of my posts never make it...and that is an improvement.

Maybe it would be a bigger improvement if 100% didn't make it.

I don't always like his posts either, but comments like that are going to get CC to start censoring more. Focus on his individual posts and say what you don't like about them as he makes them instead of a blanket, catch-all attack which approaches being too personal.

I was joking. But if you want to be serious I did focus on the individual post which was ambiguous.

n/a

There are no posted guidelines so I wonder if this new phenomenon is random. CC has gone through periods of excessive censorship in the past so it stands to reason that there will be periods of almost no censorship.

I must say that CC has done a good job keeping this forum alive. Some competitor's forums were invaded by spammers and the real members stopped participating.

I get posts of mine that are nothing more that copied and pasted from CC's on Terms of Service censored

n/a

I just could not remember if it was spelled different or not. She is not the same as before. Whatever happened to her I do not recall. Wis I knew.

n/a

i guess you are right. I am going to miss her

I just could not remember if it was spelled different or not. She is not the same as before. Whatever happened to her I do not recall. Wis I knew.

I know her she was hot. I think she was in school and was finishing up.

n/a

she is doing great...got a good job and doing everything she always wanted :)

Tell her Bill was asking for her? Thanks man.

I will.

she is still on here under a different name...cant remember the name tho as it's been a few months since i tralked to her

Really? Thought she's been gone for 3 years. Hope the new screen name pops up

yeah i thought she had gone too but one day a couple months ago she popped into comm chat and we had a little chat....not sure if she reads the forums but if u post with ur screen name maybe she'll mail u...good luck

Are you sure it was the same girl as LittleSonya? Did you look at her photo archive? I don't recall her ever being a comm chat person. Thanks!

yep it was deffo her

ok thanks, it's only about 1500 hosts per category to search for since January 1, 2010!

lmao...u must really wanna see her badly if ur searching thru them all :p

I do want to, but I think your just messing with me and she really hasn't been here since 2007

i miss my BMW car ... LOL

shouldnt have crashed it then :p

She was online during the contest. Maybe she is tired and needs a break.

I think you're in love with her... or at least part... uh... parts... of her. :p At least wait a week before posting something like that, and if you want to have any chance with any woman, give her some space!

actually I was asking out of concern for her, because she is almost always here and always sends letters. why do you have to demean the concern of another human being?

It was not your concern that I was making fun of. I have no problem with that. It was that your concern rose to the level of needing to post after just 3 days. That seems like a bit much in most situations, of course I don't know the nature of your relatinship with her.

She was last here 6 June. (The last day of the contest.) It is now 9 June. Hosts often stay away a few days after a contest to catch on up their sleep and whatever they neglected in their personal lives during contest time.

I don't track her movements, but while she is here a lot, she doesn't seem to be here every day. You would know better, because apparently you are keeping track, but there seems to be nothing unusual in terms of her absence especially since it is post contest time.

If you are so close to her that you are writing each other "almost" every day, then maybe I would be a little more concerned. But I would also imagine you also have her number if you are that close and could call or send an sms. And if you truly are that close in your mind, I would reevaluate how important you are to her if she just disappeared for a few days and then comes back like it was no big deal.

Regardless, we are talking 3 days. I think it is premature to be overly concerned unless you know about some personal issue in her life that would cause someone to worry after such a short period. Good luck.

its exam time too...so alot of hosts wont b around as much as they usually r

KiaraDDD has been online today. Despite the panic, she was seen just 3 days after she went missing.

(I know 3 days can seem like a lot when you talk to someone almost every day, but I think next time give it a little more time. Plus, I think she is at a studio. Maybe you can ask some of the hosts she works with about her. And if not at a studio, maybe you can learn who some of her host friends are to ask about her in the future.)

HEY RELAX!-.... ITS OK TO NOT BE AN ASSHOLE ALL THE TIME

I know. I know. Part of me felt bad for the guy, but the other part of me couldn't resist. (Hence, my 1/2 nice, 1/2 not so nice posts.)

But come on.... He got all nervous after 3 days. In fact, there were only two actual days she wasn't online... 7 June and 8 June since she was there 6 June and 9 June. It was hard not to point out he was acting like an overprotective parent at best... maybe even a stalker in the worst case scenario. But I guess I should resist the a-hole inside of us all and be more sensitive. He really should reevaluate his feelings for her and make sure she shares them, however, even if he simply feels it is a good friendship. My closest friends here usually tell me when they won't be online, and I tell them too so nobody worries. That is what truly caring about another person's feelings is about.

you know, i have never gone to her confirm charges page without seeing a required password. is she EVER actually available for an open chat?

Yes. I have seen her a few times. It can be hard to visit, however, for the reason you have indicated.

Relax!-

I have just read the original posting, and the subsequent posts. I kind of have to agree with bmw and ANOTHER VIEWER. It was a simple question that seems to be asked out of concern. The tone of your replies was not warranted. He must be a stalker.???..... come on think about it, I would be willing to bet anything they live on two separate continents, how can he be a stalker?

Also, whether he is or is not in love with her..... really has nothing to do with the original posting. To me it seemed like a genuine question asking about her and if anyone knew if she was ok or not.

Well to balance things out I will say that I am on the side of relax! I think posting about someone who has only been gone two days is over the top unless there is something that we do not know.

If they are so close that a post is required after two days then I would have thought that the host would have told him/her where they were going.

The poster thinks that you cannot be stalked simply because of distance. Please explain what guys do such as hanging out in your rooms all of the time, interrupting video by typing publicly, et cetera. He seems to think that there is only one type of stalkling. Please give us your horror stories. Thank you.

Ohhh….. Of course….. by me posting this ONE message, and by the way, the only posting I have ever done in 2.5 years…. I can now completely understand why you would think it is stalking. What was I thinking, how rude of me to be so insensitive.

I see.

btw, your posts in this thread are hilarious, and I agree with the spirit in which you write them:

a "miss her" thread after 3 days absence? bmw might want to get a check up from the neck up.

I did meet a host from another site 5 years ago in person. We just hung out for a day, only contact was a hug when I go there one hen I left, but that was it. It was a very pleasant meeting, it was a 4 hour drive, but we never hooked up again.. We keep in touch from time to time in email, but the cyber world and real world are two separate things. This site is all about fantasy and the real world is well real.

n/a

Yes.I would not meet a guy in real if "we played" on here. If i`d ever meet someone from here would be cos i`d like him as a future bf maybe , and i dont want at our first date, him to know how my.... (u know) , looks like. Call me old fashioned, but in love i like when both discover eachover little by little .And just for sex , well , i would NEVER meet anyone from here ,or elsewhere. Have fun:)

Dana I am getting old and so if you showed me your "you know" by the time we met I would have forgotten what it looked like :P

So can we meet ?

n/a

ahhhh, and just another thing: i dont think all members here are pervs and i thats why i would not meet any. No.And i dont blame hosts who meets them even after they" played" .Everyone can decide for himself. And yes , i would meet a guy who i`d really liked and who would never ask me to get naked, even if i dont see that happen , cos i work in adult categories:) , and they always ask:). Oh well... lol, have a wonderful day everyone

Au contraire
per·vert (pr-vûrt)
tr.v. per·vert·ed, per·vert·ing, per·verts
1. To cause to turn away from what is right, proper, or good; corrupt.
2. To bring to a bad or worse condition; debase.
3. To put to a wrong or improper use; misuse. See Synonyms at corrupt.
4. To interpret incorrectly; misconstrue or distort: an analysis that perverts the meaning of the poem.
n. (pûrvûrt)
One who practices sexual perversion.

Well, I can see a situation where I am going to meet one special person to have a relationship with and would like to meet other hosts I know as friends without sex even if we played online because they live near the special host. Of course, that would drive the special host insane so it would probably be a bad idea. :p

I have no any reasons to meet with members from this site. Can be kinda dangreous i think. And around me a lot of men so i don't really need it. CC not a dating or freesexseeking site.
I feel a bit like an actress here and actresses don't meet with their spectators usually.

Cuz i was young and stupid i was meet in real with some memeber few times and in few years knew few things that he too old, married and have few kids :D Beware girls. Magic happens but its rare.

The comment is often made that CC is not a dating site. However several of the partner sites do in fact suggest that it can be for dating or even marriage.

I think we have a category on CC called "long term / marriage", lol, although obviously not many hosts are in it and I have never heard of a host and member actually ending up together that way especially once glamour was created and many nonadult hosts moved there.

there has been at least 6 marriages from here that i know of...and they r still together....yes its true this isnt a "dating site" but relationships do happen

What category was the host in at the start of the relatonship? (she may have moved to non adult later, but where was she at the start?)

And, I don't know if you would know this, lol, but do you know if they played first online?

from what i remember one was in IA and always stayed there till she left the site...the others were all non adult

been more than 6 marriages then because there are several others that didn't work out

I actually met a host who always thought I never watched her naked. I had 2 different member ids and i used one as a nice respectable guy and the other to watch the girls naked. She never knew i always came in to see her show. She always thought I was a gentleman :-P

lol I was going to warn LovelyDana about members like you :P

:) i know abt them Notmyfriend... no worries... i`m getting older too, lol .And , no, even if u forgot it, once u saw it , no date for u!!!! haha( btw, i dont think we ever met , so...)Anyways, this is getting nowhere... always will be some who will do some things and some who will not,and others who will wonder abt them, personal choice. have fun;)

No we have never met. You have fun too :)

n/a

n/a

This is a job for the hosts. Most would not want to meet you in person under any circumstances. They have real lives, real bfs, real interests outside of CC and none of them include you. You are a customer and they are actresses and the site is for fantasy and that rarely involves reality.

that's what they tell YOU. I have met 6 hosts from here in person and had a good time with all :)

And how many hosts have you chatted with and never met. He said most. That doesn't mean all. I have met more than you in real including some who initally said they would never meet someone from here. I would still say that mosts would not contemplate meeting any member.

Yes I agree :)

Happy Birthday Erl, every girl's favourite viking. :D

Good luck mate

Thank u Nick...hehehe....favourite viking....guess coz im the only one...hahaha

have a great day erl and hope u get many many kisses from the lovely ladies here (and free vids) :p

n/a

n/a

Hello and thanks Vanessa...... nice to hear this

Thank u Dasha...... ur very kind:-)

Thank u Wayne....free vids?.....i should go to cc chat i gues...lol

n/a

Hhehe....hi there Pam....and thank u... lick?...hmmm..... suree

Thanks Rossie... sweet of u:-)

n/a

You're very kind.
I think I love you.

You do realise that it is not a real meter and that the dog is just scamming you and keeping your cash ?

The world would recover fine. No, it would not be the same world as it is now, but it will go on with or without the US dollar.

Without $ or without US? Hmmm....how it will be...but it should be.

after what is going on in Europe, no way the euro will be the world's reserve currency. In fact, it might not even continue to exist, but I wouldn't expect that to happen. (Hey... I got an idea... Let's bring together a bunch of people that speak different languages, have different cultures, think differently, have nothing in common other than geography, and have a history of not getting along and unite them all under one poliltical and economic system.) Perhaps one day it will be China's currency, but not any time soon. In the meantime, it is the dollar.

.... "(Hey... I got an idea... Let's bring together a bunch of people that speak different languages, have different cultures, think differently, have nothing in common other than geography, and have a history of not getting along and unite them all under one poliltical and economic system.)"...

That pretty well defines the usa :D

lol :)

your american members= customers will probably be very happy to learn you feel the world "shoud be" without their country........lol

it was a joke, calm down please.

did laugh :P

Things are actually getting better for the US compared to what they were. The economy tanked and the world didn't end, and even though things aren't great, they're better than they were. Be optimistic, you'll live longer that way. I doubt any hosts will lower their prices, at least I won't. I get paid in dollars, most of my viewers are from the US, as am I. Yes, the euro is a little weaker now, but it's still stronger than the dollar and the pound is even stronger. Still a good deal when you consider that a lot of cam sites charge European viewers in euros.

Yeah, the global economy is in shambles, and all it means to me is that I need to pay a scosh more to get my wank on with my favorite camgirl. Oh, woe is me.

But seriously, don't you just get the feeling that the world in general is spiraling toward a major shit storm and that absolutely no one can do a lick to prevent it? And is it just me, or is there a part of you too that welcomes it just to see where the hell it will take us?

I don't "welcome" chaos, other than maybe on the forums, lol. And to be very serious, I sometimes think that I rather adopt a child than bring a new life into this screwed up world if I was ever to become a parent.... and I say that as someone that is very financially secure and barring a complete collapse of the world economy, will be okay. Too much bad sh*t going on. Of course, it could just be that with the media and internet, we just know more about the bad stuff. I am sure people thought the world was going to end during the time of the plague and stuff too. Of course, the difference now is that we now have the ability to blow up the earth a few hundred times.

I feel like your point is that you would like all the hosts to be $1 per min to fit your desire. There are plenty of hosts on here with varied prices so you get what you want to pay for....just like real life! If you can't afford a Mercedes then drive your Toyota because you're not going to harass Mercedes into lowering their price for you :)

First, I don't want a Mercedes. They drive nicely but have poor reliability ratings and are expensive to maintain. Second, I used to want a Toyota (may I remind you that Lexus is made by Toyota?), but Toyota has demonstrated that that they place their reputation and profitablity ahead of consumer safety so I probably would go for another type of car. Third, what is wrong with pointing out that hosts raised their prices and posted that they needed to do so because of a falling dollar, but now that the dollar is stronger, they are not now lowering their prices? (You wouldn't be such a hypocritical host, would you?) Fourth, I see hosts ranging from $0.50/min to $5,00/min and was simply pointing out to those that don't like higher prices that they can visit many excellent lower priced hosts. Finally, I also was asking about what people felt about the world's situation which you chose not to address.

Some advice....take a deep breath, relax, take a zanax and put down the gun :) Our world is not coming to an end because of economic disasters. We will recover just as we have in the past. We should be very aware and concerned about our environmental disasters that are occurring because of man (and women if you must) and everyone can make a difference to try to reverse the damage.
If you truly are heartfelt about your concern of the end do to economics then I think you should broaden your horizons and take a look at much more threatening issues happening in this world. I am afraid that you couldn't handle the stress though.
A simple solution to the hosts that you resent raising their prices would be to visit less expensive hosts and be content with what you get.....not try to create a panic here to force all hosts to lower prices...this is a job to many. Try that strategy at the grocery store and let me know how it works for you.

Hosts can charge whatever they want. That is fine by me. The only time it bothers me when they raise prices is when they do it solely for purposes of winning a contest. Unless a member asks for such an increase, I find such an act very greedy on the part of the host.

But in terms of prices, which was but one issue in my original post, I was simply pointing out that some hosts here, in this very forum, used the value of the dollar as an excuse for raising prices. Don't you feel that it would only be appropriate for these very same hosts to now announce a reduction in prices given that the dollar is much higher? If everyone made their price $5,00 open and $6,00 121 all the time, I would have no problem with that. I would probably go to another site, lol, but I wouldn't think anyone did anything wrong. But don't give me the excuse of a falling dollar as the reason you raised your price and then not lower your price when the dollar increases to the euro and the pound. That is hypocrisy, and all I did was point that out, and at the same time note that there were lower priced hosts that are worth seeing. (By the way, I would guess that the average price I pay here is about $1,50 to $2,00, which is probably at the higher end of things.)

If you check crefully you will find that recently some hosts have dropped their prices by $0.10 or so. I don't know if that is due to market forces or the falling dollar. The thing is that it has passed unnoticed. Members moan here about price increase which prompts hosts to post justifying themselves but for various reasons lower prices do not attract the same attention.

the hosts that I am friends with have told me that the reason they have dropped prices has been due to "market forces", i.e., less traffic. I have never heard a host say she was lowering prices because of a rising dollar, and obviously, if she felt her traffic was good enough, there would be no reason for her to do so other than intellectual honesty.

n/a

Sad because the entire point that he wanted to make after his nonsense and drama was that he wanted some hosts (that he can't currently afford) to lower their rates.....I guess he expected everyone to boycott these hosts so that he can afford to go see them after they lower their rates for him.

Some advice....take a deep breath, relax, take a zanax and put down the gun :) Our world is not coming to an end because of economic disasters. We will recover just as we have in the past. We should be very aware and concerned about our environmental disasters that are occurring because of man (and women if you must) and everyone can make a difference to try to reverse the damage.
If you truly are heartfelt about your concern of the end do to economics then I think you should broaden your horizons and take a look at much more threatening issues happening in this world. I am afraid that you couldn't handle the stress though.
A simple solution to the hosts that you resent raising their prices would be to visit less expensive hosts and be content with what you get.....not try to create a panic here to force all hosts to lower prices...this is a job to many. Try that strategy at the grocery store and let me know how it works for you.

I think we may see some hyper inflation in the near future. In a sense it would help resolve some of the issues in the US economy. If inflation took off and wages kept pace with inflation much of the consumer debt held by consumers would decline. You would be paying the debt with inflated dollars and you would be able to pay it off sooner or it would become less significant because you are making more money. Home prices would rise with inflation as well and home values would get above water. The home prices would be worth more than the mortgage. At CC inflation would mean higher prices as well....but in theory if member's income increased and their existing credit card debt diminished....let the good times roll.

not bad... i was just waiting to see how disturbing the punchline might be... i was relieved

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

What gives YOU the right to tell other people what they can say or post? ?

The same thing that gives you the right to ask "What gives YOU the right to tell other people what they can say or post? ?" Freedom of speech and an opinion.

dingleb they r not the same thing

What aren't ?

She was not claiming any right. She simply gave her opinion.

It's true, contests stir up a lot of emotion, both positive and negative, and that gets reflected here. I say something positive, and then get criticized for not being negative lol.

Some members come here hoping to feel better about themselves. When they don't, they blame the host. On the other hand, some hosts seem to feel entitled to take all they can get.

The rest of us, the vast majority, are decent people who occasionally get drunk, stoned, horny, angry, depressed, howl at the moon. Maybe on this forum. That's just life.

And you know what? That's okay. Gadflies like "member" keep us grounded to a certain extent. I certainly don't agree with much, if not most, of what he says, but he articulates his thoughts well and gives his reasons.

And others react perhaps more emotionally, with no less conviction, and deserve no less consideration.

So in the end, maybe let's just agree to respect each other, and we'll be okay.

n/a

You get sour grapes from the ones who did not win anything in the contest.

Fair enough. And just for the record, in terms of when I have been "member", I have never made a false allegation against a host. The truth is damning enough so I would have no reason to make things up. Nobody here has broken my heart or anything. They've just done things I consider inappropriate.

Just to give some examples of what I have experienced...

1. a host disconnecting me from video because I didn't vote for her fast enough during the bikini contest (her response, as we all saw, was basically "well, i never invited you into the room in the first place"... that should tell everyone here that I was not lying and what her true attitude about members really is.) This was reported to CC and dealt with as she well knows.

2. hosts acting like they are my best friend solely with the expectation that I will spend a lot of money on them during a contest. Even if I spend over $100 on them, which even though I can afford it, still is a lot to most people, that still wasn't enough. The one host mainly discussed here lately is the one I am referring to.

3. Once again, the one host mainly discussed here, has revealed personal information to me about a host (including that host's real name). She is clearly jealous of this host based upon what I have heard and has made up lies about her to steal members. I of course don't know all of "the truth" but to reveal personal information about another host is clearly out of bounds.

4. Again, the host most discussed her recently, has tried to lure me to another site for a contest they were having. CC knows about this as well, as I gave them proof, but I guess they have given her another chance.

5. The host mainly discussed here was knowlingly using two accounts at the same time with video in both accounts at the same time in not just a clear violation of CC's rules but also clearly showing her greed and disrespect for other hosts.

6. Hosts on many occasions not respecting the rules in categories that require nudity if requested in both open and 121 and stalling to milk the clock and my wallet more.

It is situations like these that I post about in the forums or report to CC. Nothing more. Nothing less. Fortunately, most hosts are not like that, and that is why I continue to come here. But there are a few hosts I wish would go elsewhere.

By the way, in terms of example #5, that was during a contest. She had video in both accounts at the same time and did it continuously until CC caught up to her.

You use the phrase "host most discussed here" as if to say that you would never stoop so low as to engage in this sort of mud slinging whilst actually making it obvious who you mean and when in fact you are the main one discussing her.

actually, in terms of the host mainly discussed here, i do not believe that I have posted about her in a very long time other than two recent posts. One was where LTGDboo69 posted below about how sweet she is and i said yes, she was until i was not playing enough during a contest. The second was where the host referred to in point #1 responded to something earlier in that thread.

Sorry to disappoint you, but the "host mainly discussed here" has a lot more detractors than just me. Moreover, I notice you do not attempt to refute anything I have said. You just defend her and apparently approve of her behavior.

I am not condoning the behaviour of the host in question. I do not know how you manage to infer that from my post. It is the self-righteous attitude in your post that makes me want to throw up.

i apologize. i took your attack at me as a method of defending her. And the only reason i didn't name names is that CC sometimes won't post critiques if you get too specific. It wasn't about being self-righteous. again, i am sorry that i misunderstood your response.

You are constantly coming to us with your panties in a bunch.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. But we are getting tired of it.

lol... maybe i go commando.

and actually, some good comes of all of this... whether people agree with a criticism of a host or not, it forces that host to be a better host because the moment she steps out of line in the future, it just made any criticism seem more believeable. Hosts will say "I don't care. I won't change anything." But between a public criticism and a note from CC, they will change even if they don't want to admit it. CC is a great opportunity for hosts, and they don't want to ruin it.

And I don't think anyone here is the devil or anything even if i don't think they are people i would ever want to be friends with. But it will make CC a better site by being able to point things out that members don't like especially when certain behaviours violate CC's rules and policies, and in terms of any criticisms I have made, almost every case is one where the host violated CC's rules and policies.

Thanks for the information......saved me some money and frustration!

Very true. Life's too short for running around bad mouthing people. I do exactly as you suggest when a host does not satisfy me. move on and find one that does :)

If members could read the host forum just like hosts can read the viewer forum so that members knew what hosts were saying about members just like hosts know what members say about hosts, AND if everyone was required to use their id to post in all forums, then I would have no problem with CC making it so our true identities accompanied our posts. But until everything is out in the open, I would not be in favor of such a rule.

In terms of any allegations I have made about any host, CC usually knows about them, and even if my posts do not accompany my name, the host knows as well (unless of course she is doing the same thing to a lot of guys lol).

I was going to post on this topic but I forget whether I'm allowed to express my opinion or if I'm not allowed to express my opinion if someone doesn't agree with my opinion so now I've forgotten what my opinion was so I won't post anything.

well, after my first two attempts didnt get posted, maybe the third time is a charm. yes, i can vouch for everything "member" says, as I have had similar experiences with her (except in contests, coz i don't play)

ally I had exactly the same thought and decided it wasn't worth it.

don't worry ally,if i want your opinion i'll give it to you :--)

and ?

I do not know why you posted this but considering you titled the post Restricted Video I point out that what you posted has no direct connection with restricted video sessions that have been discussed in forums recently.

Dont you just love the legal jargon? I wonder does a lawyer go home to his or her partner and say " I, in the first part, being the entity known as (name) hereto known as 'the applicant', do formally request that you, (name) hereto known as 'the supplicant' should remove any under articles of clothing and other vestments thereto concealed below the normal apparel and relocate to the room known as the master bedroom. Once 'the supplicant' has reached said vestibule, then should assume the position of both elbows and both knees being firmly placed on the bed covering with the face being pointed downwards. Once this position has been assumed the supplicant shall verbally make it known that they consent to an act of sexual nature while breathing in a fast and vigorous manner.??

n/a

n/a

Very well said, thankyou! : )

n/a

Dani...well-considered words. CC shouldn't be about hurting yourself; that is, unless you really want to heehee...

Speaking of which, your post about how to play mermaids in Dungeon was the wittiest post I've read on the forum in a long time. Sooooo funnnnny. I couldn't come up with anything to match it before your post got buried under the onslaught of contest pleas and whinings.

Just wanted you to know somebody was paying attention :D

n/a

You are welcome ;) Nice of you to thank us here :) ...well one day you can return the favour as you said. We should help eachother and our members to win if we can. Unfortunatelly not every host think like that.Anyway, take care, was my plesure to help ;).

You are a classy host, I hope to vid you soon.

n/a

n/a

Hope that you treat "your friends" better than you treat the members. Maybe one day you will realize that you need members to survive cause you have no other job and will stop treating the majority of us so badly.

n/a

Thanks for proving my point. People see you for what you are, a rude person who thinks the world revolves around her. One day you will be knocked from your ivory tower and there will be nobody to help you.

n/a

hun.. she is a goood persone;) but not for all people;) jerriko i like u vrery much;) stay yourself;)

n/a

I don't see your name on the list of winners... I guess people are starting to catch on about you. Though you have only won 4 times in the 4 years you have been here, I would give up on contests if I were you cause you are pathetic the way that you beg everybody to vid you. You are too thick headed though to take any advice that is given to you.

You seem to know just what everyone needs. Get over yourself.

I don't think I have ever claimed to know what everybody needs. I am only talking from my experiences with one host. I wonder how many members she has asked to buy her outfits for contests or for money to do other things. I bet that list is long. Just my two cents.

n/a

n/a

well, he isn't me Lia - I still love you even when you call me a fucking loser! :D

n/a

Humour Lia, humour. But anyway, thanks for thoughtful mail you sent.

I am probably any member you have come in contact with in your 4 years on this site. A leopard can't change its spots. How many members have you begged for help in contests or for money?

google it ma friend google it ;)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

im another member she begged money from, just to help her out. i'm sure there are others. honey if u think the idea that you need members is so laughable, then quit asking them for handouts...

wow she really sounds like a piece of work - i will avoid

n/a

n/a

oh no, THAT wouldn't be the reason to avoid you

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

My pleasure sweetie

For some reason my mind is now getting this image of a big old bear crawling into a dark cave for his period of winter hibernation :D

Lena, I had a great and wonderful time helping and I am disappointed we did not win together but, we both won. I am hurt about people says bad things about Bowiya. Glade we won. Luv B:-)

n/a

I've known ChanelDoll for years, I haven't helped her during any contest for a very long time, she is still sweet and nice to me.

dito. She is wonderful. I guess these boys don't know how to respect a woman.