General Forum

n/a

You have obviously never watched womens Tae Kwan do or karate.

n/a

You may take it as an insult but it helps you, any fool who messed with you expecting you to fight like a girl would get a rude supprise.

n/a

hmmmmm. part of me is turned on, but the other part thinks a guy wrote that so i am a bit worried, lol.

Well...Meow, meow. meow.. lol

i have seen many guys fight like that too.

No way ... pulling hair as their first act in a fight ? hmmmmm maybe at the Toupee Club :)))) or a Gay hairdressers convention :)) i doubt at the Afro Club ....... and certainly not at the pacifist hippie club :))

sure mostly basket weavers or basketballers,lol

Someone once said if women fought wars they would be over in 2 weeks...a testament to their ferocity and focus.

Just in time for the sales to start :P

LMFAO

n/a

n/a

n/a

Best for a girl's self defense would be some actual proven art like Judo, Jiujitsu or Sambo.
Most Kung fu styles will get you killed against a resisting opponent.

judo is proven? it's a sport style dude. and jiu-jitsu is outdated. same problem as with a lot of kung-fu styles, it's lost it's connection to reality. sword defense training won't help you in most bar brawls ;)

n/a

n/a

:-(

I think you are kissofheaven

why would you think it's her?

I agree that you shouldn't get a low rating just because you won't strip when not required to strip. If you were in glamour or litte shy and said u don't strip, I would NEVER give you a lower rating because of that. And I still might visit you and chat awhile, and most likely give you 5 stars unless you were being rude or something.

But read the posts again when guys complain. Yeah, some guys are idiots and demand glamour or little shy hosts (or even a nonadult host from what I hear) to strip, and give 1 star if she won't. But others are angry when hosts promise things and don't deliver, stall simply to make more money, don't comply with category rules, et cetera.

The member in your example was wrong and you are correct to be upset. But often it is the other way around.

n/a

any host that doesn't strip should get low ratings.

What is your basis for saying this? - or are you just trying to jerk everyone's chains?

This place is for stripping, and all of a sudden we have to spend half our time and too much money just finding out if it will happen. No thanks. Low ratings for not stripping, and hopefully I'll never get that far down the page. You guys that like it can spend your time looking for the "no no"s.

n/a

There are many, many dating sites on the internet, but this is not one of them. Lots of guys think it is, and lots of hosts make big money because of that. Go ahead and treat it like one. I won't stop you. I will continue to hope that hosts who don't strip are lower on the page.

No one is saying this is a dating site. Just that different members like different types of shows, There are categories here that cater for exactly what you need. Marking down hosts in the softcore categories just because they will not immediately strip for you screws up their rating for them and the rest of us. Your attitude is totally selfish and that makes you ....a jerk.

It is unfortunate for you and others that you don't have the intelligence or the understanding to figure out the simple concept of this site or other sites similar, for that matter. The site owners obviously have it figured out to cater to the wants of all.... not just YOU with your limited thoughts. It is sad that you are out to change the site one host at a time! Why don't you block yourself from softcore and non-adult and you would be much more satisfied as well!! Otherwise you are just out to be a jerk! I agree with A Member and I am sure many do.
You sound like a very angry person...and you're going to take it out on others...

n/a

I didn't say anything about immediately. I like teasing, and I'm OK dealing with a host who takes her time. You want me to stay away from Glamour and Little shy, but the vast majority of hosts there strip, and that works for me.

There are lots of levels of stripping, and there is no reason that I should be relegated to Not So Shy. However, the landscape of those two categories is littered with a few hosts who make money based on the fact that members expect them to strip.

Go ahead and make a place for all those "shows" that you say so many members like to see. Let's see how long that lasts, when the hosts aren't getting money they don't deserve, from members who expect stripping.

These hosts are getting a few dollars every time a member stumbles in and doesn't realize they won't strip. Those dollars add up, and allow them to get away with that strategy.

You didn't make the rules at CC and yet you are deciding what hosts should do to please you!! You are speaking from your own simple mind and yet you don't speak for the majority! Obviously others are happy with the plan for Glam and Shy and instead of using the rating system inappropriately....you don't deserve the right to go into a hosts room when she says "no strip". Your defending your selfish actions and causing pain for others which is being a jerk....no regard for another. In fact sounds like you intentionally go into those two category's to misuse your ability to rate hosts and cause them undo hurt.......You don't get it! Further you are not a host in those categories to know what men like......Jerk!
Just remember .......what you do to others...always comes back around in life eventually.

n/a

I see.....so you can't get a date from a glam, shy girl or non-adult so you're going to ruin it for all!!! Very logical thinking....LOL! Grow up...you're not going to change the site to your twisted way of thinking....you WILL just piss off a lot of people.... Then again if your thing is you like to be verbally abused....there is a section for that too....LOL!

I'm not looking to change the site. The rating system is there and I use it. If you think I'm the only one then good luck with that.

You ruin it for both members and hosts in those categories because you are wrong in assuming that all members think like you! Others aren't rating on if a host strips or not when they go to Glam or non-adult and ESPECIALLY when she clearly tells you in her post or chat.
You are ignorant and certainly did not get any of the information to support your claims based on anything that CC has written.

Also, for your information Hosts can turn in members for intentionally rating them low when they specified what they don't do. Also, hosts discuss between themselves and before long the "blocking system" works very well for members that abuse their rating privledges for the sole purpose to hurt hosts and misrepresent them.

Who said anything about all members? If i am alone then what are you worried about? You claim to have a "ring" of hosts who have been targeting members already, so I will leave it to you to police this site.

My rating is my opinion. C.C. has not given me any rules about how to form my opinion. However, feel free to "turn me in".

If a host has a few pictures in her profile that don't look good because of no make up, etc, then I go into her video and she looks ugly because she didn't bother to wake up, shower, and get ready to work, am I obligated to rate her high because I had warning from her profile? Will you attack me with your dreaded "turn me in" strategy? If another member likes girls who look this way, does that mean "I" have to agree and make my rating higher?

If I buy a car and somewhere in the manual it says that the top speed is 60 km per hour, I don't have to rate that car high because someone else likes cars that only go that fast. I have my own opinion, and I don't care that if I read the manual I would know it. Most cars go faster than that, and I don't want to read the manual to make sure mine will too. I won't get my money back, and I'm not asking for my money back. I'm just giving it a low rating, because I DON'T LIKE IT.

Most hosts here are EARNING their money. A few, and it certainly sounds like you are one of them, are making money that they don't deserve because they are swimming in the same pool and taking advantage of it.

It all works out fine in the end, and I don't need to change anything in c.c. I can rate hosts low if they do not provide a service that I like.

n/a

You are clearly the type of guy referred to in the title. "This place" which you seem to think you are an authority on has never been only about stripping. If there is one thing "this place" has always been about it is freedom and range of choice for both hosts and members. No host in Glamour or Littleshy deserves a low rating simply because she will not strip. A host in non-adult should not strip at all.

Very well said!

n/a

n/a

guys can be such bastards,except the gay ones :--)

yes I agree with tisme-he is my lover

it's the sweetness of your words that won my heart.how you won my ass is a different answer :--)

It was the big round redness, like a baboon that did it for me :-))

n/a

Well yeah im pretty sure that was him that voted me bad...im pretty new around here and i had no problems with any of the members here..I got voted bad twice ... the first one told me he was gonna give mea bad vote cause he found me anoyng and i didn;t understand why he kept returning over and over since i was such a pain in the ass...and i could see the rating going bad the second day after his private...and then this guy last night...im not here often and 99 % of my privates are with regurlars... last night that guy was the exception from the rule...and this morning...rating went bad...

ask a host how to block members although he can make a new account... however, at that point, if you think there is a problem with his voting, write to cc... they can see how everyone votes

No one is suggesting you should be forced into something you don't want to do...particularly getting naked. If you make it clear you do not strip then the member should respect that and not enter the video expecting you to change your mind. However, I think the comments you are reading are about hosts who specifically promise or strongly suggest they would get naked and after several minutes of video and stalling they announce they changed their mind, or they are not in the mood, or the member must have understood the phrase...Yes I will get naked to mean that the host will strip. Again, a host can say ...look..I changed my mind. But the member has the right to tell CC and get a full refund. Do we all agree on that? You make a deal...if both parties go through with it...everyone is happy.

Yes agree....honest communication by both parties = all to be happy :)
Unfortunately there are people that abuse "respect and communication" on both sides.....this is a problem and they should be beheaded....lol. This is not the majority either direction so let's make them know this is unacceptable....

Are you sure he gave you one star because you didn't get naked? Perhaps he gave you one star because you said that you wanted to go to bed instead of continuing to chat with him in private. Did you get so bored that you couldn't take his money any more?

about ratings... maybe some members use this rating system how it was ment to be used, and i think original purpose for rating scale was that 1 = really poor, 3 = average, 5 = excellent... so when someone give 3 star it dont have mean he didnt like your show, it just mean it wasnt one of the best shows he have seen.

not sure how that got in here but.....that certainly isn't the way hosts see it or members looking for a host. A "3" rating would be considered a poor rating which would only be deserved if she was rude, disinterested or on the phone part of the video.... You are wrong about that one!!

yes i know most think it like that, but then why have scale from 1 to 5, if options are just poor or good?
If 3 is poor, then what is 2 and 1 for? every adult person understand that if rating scale is 1 to 5 it is not ment to give everyone 5 or 1 star

n/a

n/a

Some girls in Glam for instant sit there naked in open or use toys.... Why can't I ever find these girls?

the problem with your complaint is I can count on one hand the number of girls who said they don't strip or get naked and actually didn't strip or get naked when I saw them in their video. Most of the ones I've seen who say they don't get naked end up getting naked, so that could be why it's hard for members to take the "I don't get naked" line all that seriously.

But it should be respected when a girl says no.....it means NO....not maybe....:)

Ice hockey is over, Stanley Cup us awarded so there's no sports to watch until next October

n/a

I am not sure if "the groups" means the next round, but if it does, I cannot believe that England and the USA (unless the goalie is hurt) won't at least move on to the next round. After that, I think it is single elimination so it could be one and done for both of them if they aren't careful.

Ultimately, for both, the issue is can they win the cup, and I doubt it, but it was just one game and I am far from an expert. I just watch a lot of sports and can tell when a team "has it" and when they don't. The USA obviously does not have what a team needs to go far in all liklihood, and the fact that England didn't win something like 3 - 0 or 3 - 1 given how many opportunities they had tells me they won't go far either. Championship teams capitalize on opportunities, and England did not. It was one game, but a championship team really should come out and be playing at its best, or at least a lot better, in a tournament like this. It isn't like it is the beginning of a season. These guys are all familiar with each other and should have done better. But perhaps they were with their league teams and are a little rusty in terms of being on the same page. We shall see, but both teams better be looking their best out of this round or they might as well pack it up and go home. They each have two games to get their acts together otherwise, they might as well go home now.

A draw is a draw is a draw. We might actually get out of the operning round. Cool beans. Go USA.... Thank god the English goalie isn't Colombian or they would be digging the grave now....

I remember that. That poor Colombian who scored an own goal and was murdered for it when he returned home. Sad when people take this game that seriously.

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yeah, all that and England still couldn't win. They must really be awful.

That's why it's called footBALL, no?

... and not footBALLS lol

LOL Now that would be something fun to watch!

why is FOOTball, footBALL, or FOOTBALL, however you want to call it, even called a "sport" ????

n/a

n/a

A Romanian sport of which I am unaware, perhaps? I hope so and I hope to learn of it and become and very big fan soon. Imagining a sport in which teams of men run around kicking each other is quite delightful.

so using your logic,thinking,in sports where they use their hands it should be a gropefest :--)

Your mind seems to have quickly gone to a very definite place. I applaud your wonderfully creative way of thinking.

You can kick another player but only in the balls and only if the ref is not watching and he is smaller than you.

Obviously never saw football in the 70's, used to kick the shit out of each over, Claudio Gentile on Maradona 1982 world cup, kicked the crap out of him.

Well im not from England unfortunatelly, but im with them with all my heart))))) My fav team ever!! U rock guys!!!!!

i think u better give their keeper some extra loving after yesterday

As always your preferences the Brits :-P

i'm not from england but i want you to finish top of your group so we can kick your ass in the round of 16 :--)

n/a

and it's taken you how long to have this epiphany?thanks for sharing your enlightment :--)

It comes down to who has the power. But at the end of the day the hosts have your money. So your figure it out.

n/a

Lets not fool ourselves. The vast majority of members come here for nudity and the vast majority of host must deliver nudity in order to make money. Simple. While there are some members who are seeking chat only or non sexual contact they are the minority. Same with hosts who don't strip...there are a few (I am not talking about the scammers who lie about stripping)...but most hosts know they have to strip or just sit in front ot their computer all night doing nothing.

So......what is your point? You do not know what the members want as well as the hosts do darling so don't speak for the majority :) My point is there is something for ALL to enjoy and many different options so don't put a host in a position where she has told you otherwise (there are a few that are liars just like members) and then create a bad rating when she doesn't do what she said she wouldn't do.....

n/a

Believe it or not but not all members want instant naked or even naked....that is why there are so many choices......you want naked got to Hardcore and get naked! Too many whiners on here......

n/a

Yep, and because we love variety so much we want to see nudity in every category possible ;)

you're enthusiasm is too much.. i now have no choice but to root against argentina.
sorry, but your team is now doomed.

n/a

n/a

Argentina barely beat an injured riddled Nigerian team. Woopee.

The Nigerian keeper did a great job. Two great saves. It would have been 3-0 otherwise. Argentina looked good and played well. Even Maradona seemed to be pretty good. Capricorn...lets go to La Cabrera in Palermo and have a nice bife de chorizo and some malbec to celebrate.

will be interesting when they play south korea.they'll have even more running to do than today :--)

n/a

not saying they don't,but,in the first half nigeria weren't competitive (lucky it was only 1-0)the longer the game went the more nigeria was able to make impression& towards the end they even had chances. to me the koreans are even fitter & faster than them,play a more uptempo game.i think it will be interesting how argentina copes with that :--)

n/a

n/a

n/a

Under my policy, a woman would have 3 ways to enter the USA:

1. She is hot and is approved by at least 6 of the 10 judges. In such a case, she would get a one year visa whereby she would have one year to get married or she would be permanently banned from ever entering the USA.

2. She is not so hot and is only approved by a 5 or fewer judges but does have some redeeming qualities such as she is a doctor, nurse, et cetera and can serve some useful purpose here. In such a case, she could get a work visa for a period to be determined by the panel.

3. She could come by way of the current tourist visa rules.

In terms of your question, therefore, if you are a hot host, you would fall under method 1 or method 3. It would not matter that you could cure cancer or serve some other purpose. My administration simply would not care. If you're hot, and if you chose to go before the judges, you have agreed to the one year limit after which you must be married or leave forever.

Even if you think you are hot, if you go before the panel of judges and get 5 votes or less, then you can still come for a longer period. In this case, however, you would need to be able to perform some useful service such as being a doctor or whatever. If you are hot, we really don't care what you can do. You are already providing a useful service if you choosed to move to the USA by marrying one of us, but you must do so within 1 year. (You must be a faithful wife for at least 10 years or more by the way, or back where you came from!) After you are married, if you want to go save the world, fine, but first you must get married within one year.

If you don't want to go before the judging panel, you still can get a tourist visa and visit, but that can be hard depending upon where you are from. But if you want to stay for a longer period, you MUST go before the panel of judges and your fate will be decided by them. All I can say is that if you are hot feel that you have a skill of some type that the USA needs and want to try for a work visa, you will need to reduce your hotness by not wearing makeup, not sleeping enough, wearing old clothes, et cetera and making the judges think you are not hot. At that point, you will have the opportunity to explain that you have some other value and the judges may let you in anyway. But be forewarned... These judges will be CC members and have done things like seen a host when she first gets online without makeup, awakened her by entering video, et cetera and they will be able to tell that you are hotter than you are trying to let on.

n/a

n/a

Anybody but Obama

Sure, can I be on the committee ;)

And who says I'm going to give up my seat?

We, the people, in order to form a more perfect union!

However, if you choose to adopt my plan, I will withdrawl my candidacy. Otherwise, the clock is ticking. You have until January 20, 2013, and I might even start a movement to pressure the House to impeach you and the Senate to then remove you!!!

We want our hosts!!!

n/a

n/a

Maybe you don't but all other active hosts have the US blocked for privacy reasons. And to honest, have no idea why you don't as well.

n/a

n/a

Strange, I thought you already considered yourself The Greatest People (TM) so why would you need to go with the "let's import the most beautiful women from country X, Y and Z and then nuke what's left of it" attitude?
Thankfully, many are better informed than that.

"The Greatest People(TM)"?
Really now?

Direct quote from a certain former president, so yes - really now.

oh good god

Since when has the word "amongst" snuck into the common vocabulary of real modern day Americans?

You, sir, are very obviously an imposter.

otherwise it had the right combination of schmaltz,horse hockey & total bulldust to be american? :--)

have the right combination of condescension, prissiness, and false sense of intellectual superiority, to be a dick.

First, there is nothing wrong with saying "amongst".

Second, I made a few errors here and there such as saying "choosed", instead of "chose", but that just means I was typing fast and not being careful, not that I am not an American.

Double negative I am sorry !
and of course English

n/a

how different is this american team from the one that stopped spain's 35 game unbeaten streak last year?
surely this american team is being given better odds against an unimpressive english team than they were given to beat spain in last year's confederations cup, right?

The USA have lost striker Charlie Davies who was the star of the Confederation Cup and have a couple of other injury problems. England have peformed poorly in recent friendlies but since Capello took over have done well in competitive matches. Of course USA have a chance, especially if England have an off day, but if the England players perform at or close to their best they should win.

Lol i hope u understand that it was more of an exception than rule, and that it was pure luck, right?)))))) Happened once, so please, dont act like from now on it will be always this way lol)) So funny)

so you're saying that the "rule" in football is that the team most people favour to win always wins ... unless they don't, in which case it's pure luck for them to have been beaten?
err ... sure, ok.

so, anyway ... better luck next time england.

I bet you don't find it so funny now :D

read again, i didnt say anything about "rules" or any other not popular teams:) I was talking abt USA and Spain))) One of the best, greatest teams in the world, of the coutry where football is religion, art, style of living, and USA, where its a so-called game for "pussies, girls and kids?". U really think that it wasnt luck in the case? Lol if u do then ok nvm))))

As for this game with England, if u saw the game u sshould know that the result was like this mostly not cuz USA is so good, but cuz the English goalkeeper screwed up:) It was a lame, weak shoot, and he still managed to let the ball off his hands..And i call it luck for the USA lol. But i have to admit that the american goalkeeper is good, he saved his team lots of times, but thats it. We will see what happens next:) Was just the first game so..Time will show:)

It is easy to put the blame on the English keeper for his error but in reality the whole team should share it. I barely think of a single player whose performance was particularly good. Maybe Johnson and Gerard. Aaron Lennon was especially poor, considering the quality of the opposition full back. The one positive thing is that surely Rooney cannot have another game as bad as this for the tournamant. I just hope he doesn't try too hard in the next match and get sent off. The selection of Milner was a mistake, he was clearly not fit enough.

Well sure the whole team wasnt so good, but what i am saying is that if Green didnt miss that absolutly lame goal(btw the same happened today with the Algerian goalkeeper, he must be Green's cousin lol)l, England wud win no? Even if they played as they played, Stivie G still scored. Sure they werent in their best form, and they looked kinda tired, but still if not that stupid mistake of the goalie-they'd win. I just hope they will learn from this experience and next time we will see the game that we expect from them.

But the "stupid mistake" happened so saying England would have won if it hadn't is just nonsense. I could just as easily say if England hadn't scored their first goal the USA would have won which would be equally stupid.

My point is that if England had played better both individually and as a team they would have scored more goals so Green's mistake would not have cost them the game. When a forward makes a mistake he fails to score. Comments may be made but not at the same level as when a goalkeeper blunders because this usually results in a goal being conceded.

http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/ranking/lastranking/gender=m/fullranking.html

England is 8, USA 14. I think that is rankings in general, not for the tournament, but I don't really know.

Who cares?

n/a

England, ofc))

n/a

Didn't Know We had a USA Soccer team . . .

I knew we did, we won the World Cup at least once or twice recently.
I was just surprised to learn this past week that men actually played soccer.

n/a

men play a sport where they wear more padding than a flat chested,no ass streetwalker :--)

Won the World Cup once or twice recently???)))))))))))))) Is it what they tell u on TV?)))) Rofl)))))))

Btw, do you know why England only got a draw against USA?

Because their keeper is still...



Green!

LMAO =))

n/a

I agree with all except number 9. Viewers have other options.

n/a

What I meant was other sites. We viewers don't only come here.

Thanks Hun :) and as hosts we have other choices too but it's a great site with a lot of unique options (like forums and chat) and for the most part....really fun members and very few technical problems.

Yes you are correct, it is the only site with public forums.

better for your business if you tell who you are lol

Speaking out for most hosts that choose to work here :) I think many members do not understand that this is a biz for us and that we are here to follow the rules and guidelines and operate a biz.....not to just choose us based on our looks and expect us to do whatever they want for how much they want to pay. Personally I am not here to meet someone because how could I trust they wouldn't be on here looking for other girls all the time.....hehe

11.) I will always remember that I am working to please my customers within the rules of CC, my category and within my limits and interests.

13) My overhead costs to include the gym, sexy clothes and shoes, facials, tanning, botox, implants, makeup, hair and pampering myself and my CC fees shall all be covered by my service fees so that I at least break even and please my members so they drool and cum!

12) I will read numbers 11) and 13) over and over!

You're smoking way too much crack

n/a

That is exactly what I do.
Well... except number 3) should read: "Give her 20 seconds to get fully naked and start masturbating."

Hhhhmmm that must be why all the hosts block you....it's your charm!

Devastating!

read some of the chathost profiles. there is your answer.

non nude

Well first you are assuming that what you consider "pretty", I also consider pretty. Second, even if I like a host's pics, I still must think her price is worth it based upon what I see in her pics, her category, and her profile. Some really hot hots are over $3,00/minute, and I typically avoid them.

To give one example, if I want nudity, and I see an instant action host with hot pics, I don't just jump into her room. I will check her price and make sure she is hot enough to justify that price. I will further check her rating, her comments, and personal forum.

There are a lot of hot hosts that have 3,5 or 4 stars for example. Well, if a host is that hot and not getting 4,5 or 5 stars, then she must be doing something wrong. Maybe has a boring show. Maybe she stalls. Maybe she is on 3 sites at once and ignoring members. I don't know. But whatever she is, it obviously isn't how she looks if she had hot pics so there is some type of a problem. I have a lot of problems with the rating system, but regardless of how well it works, anything below 4,5 stars is hit or miss in terms of havng a good time in my view as I have stated before, not that 4,5 or 5 stars guarantees anything.

And like I said, I will consider the category. If I think I will need to chat awhile with a little shy host before getting a show or I will need to go 121, I will often not be willing to pay as much per minute since it will take longer to get the show.

In sum, I basically have a mental checklist and way of evaluating whether I think a host will be worth seeing for that price. I usually make my decision in about 15 to 30 seconds. I just skim a couple of pics fast, check the price, check the stars, skim the profile, and skim her forum. It doesn't take long. If things look good, I might take a closer look at things for another 30 seconds and if all still is okay, jump into video or text. If not, I move on.

By the way, for me to even check out a profile, THE MAIN PROFILE PIC MUST BE A GOOD ONE!!! I don't think a lot of hosts understand this point.

credit limit,
income,
opportunity,
desperation.
actually the last one usually takes precedence over theothers!

n/a

original poster are you a cover girl?

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

If she isnt nice and friendly I dont care how good she looks, not going to visit.

n/a

there's some truth to that for sure. very sexy women can be intimidating.

a lot of ladies have pics of themselves where they have this ice-cold expression on their face, as is fashionable when posing for pics, but does not really make them look approachable.

the best legs and breasts i saw has Zlata555

n/a

Cant say I find any of those overly attractive. KittyBb is one whose looks I really like. But mostly for me concerning looks it is the face, must not be sharp, but soft and gentle features. Also to much makeup or at least when it is evident they use a lot of it turns me off too. RomanticCurl, GlamPrinces, and also ChocoTati are ones I think are very nice and beautiful women.

But all in all it comes down to personality that makes beauty for me, not physical looks. Though I find these women also very attractive physically.

n/a

The best figure I ever saw here was $500 as it was credited to my account in one of the competitions so so long ago :) and :(

n/a

n/a

dont forget yourself , your very beautiful too .

n/a

That is a tough question because I don't have just one particular favorite body type. I love tall slender, small busted with long skinny (but shapely) legs - eg: tenderkelly. Of course, a woman doesn't have to be tall and her legs don't have to be long to be sexy and misslovely1 is testament to this. I love her tiny sexy body. I also love curvy, big busted types - eg: sattine. Then there are the tall slender, large busted types like sexycaprize, but somehow small busted and curvy just don't attract me (i have no example for this type). Hope this helps.

Yess..I look forward..
Im old enough to remember Argentina´s fantastico entertainment from World Cup 1978.. Since than i allways follow Argentina..

n/a

i'll have one eye on argentina as i drew them in work lottery to win world cup, my other glass eye will be on england (even if they are boring and crap)

n/a

I will be following Argentina for a couple of reasons, Lionel Messi, Not knowing what Maradona will do next (not play Messi as he's worried about Messi outshining Maradona) and I had some of the best times ever in Argentina, fabulous country and people

n/a

i thought messi was spanish. weird.

n/a

Barca payed for his growth hormone treatment when he was a kid, and flew all his family over to be with him when, no wonder he lover it there so much.
Argentina'78 was the first world cup I remember, Mario Kempes and the most tickertape you've ever seen, but well before your time Capric0rn. Would be great to have another world cup there, fantastic place, best beef anywahere and bottles and bottles of Quilmes

n/a

Vamos, vamos Argentina....
Argentina has a great chance to win it all...I will be watching tomorrow morning. I will be in Buenos Aires for the quater finals, semi finals and the finals. I want to party around the obelisco on 9 de Julio and watch Maradona run around it naked after Argentina wins...again.

n/a

Im with France, England and South Africa (after todays game, how they dance that cute "goal dance" is just sooooooooooo cool:) But i think Spain will be the champion))))

n/a

n/a

Yep France has a very VERY very bad coach, and they just cant wait for this World Cup to be over, cuz when it is, the new one will sign the contract, and this one shitted all their reputation((

Makes Thierry Henry's handball even harder to take now for us Irish fans watching absolute sh1te like that

Yeah i know the feeling...The fact that Russia didnt get there cuz of that absolutely not fair game with Slovenia breaks my heart, but thats life..Sure it wasnt THAT obvious in our case as it was in urs, but it was still sooo...heartbreaking.

I just hope that France will get back on the horse after this "coach" leaves, they need a good leader, who they respect and follow. Great team but no leader, esp after Zidane has retired((

Getting shot of him after world cup for Laurent Blanc, so should be back to the top of the tree, he's class and has respect.
Talking of Russia, got them in the qualifiers for Euro 2012, so apprehensive about going back to Moscow, had some problems there last time, they didn't seem to like Ireland for some reason

n/a

Yeah i know but i dont support them))) For some reason i hate Spanish and Italian teams)) No offence guys))

As long as Maradroga is at the helm picking his buddies instead of the best, i don't see Argentina winning any major competition at all. Even Messi seems lost in the middle of that lame excuse that they call a team...

As for me, it's Portugal and once we're out (that shouldn't take too long lol) i'll support Brasil, Spain and pretty much everyone who plays against France and England.

Cmon((((((((( Are u my friend or what?(((((((

As for Portugal, cant stand just one single person in there...I think u know who lol))

n/a

This may come as a surprise to you but soccer players from Northern Ireland ply for Northern Ireland, players from Wales play for Wales and players from Scotland play for .....


you'll never guess......



wait for it .......


Scotland !!!!
Unfortunately none of these teams qualified for the World Cup Finals this time.

Then why do the members of the U.K. unite for the Olympics?

It's one of those weird quirks of the union which creates the UK.... we are still 4 separate countries in some things but 1 country in others.

In the Olympics and European competitions in athletics we are the UK... but in the Commonwealth Games each of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland compete separately.

But in football the real reason we compete as separate countries isthat there are separate football associations for each of the countries and each one has its own league (although confusingly some teams from Wales play in the English leagues!!).... so the coutries are separate in all competitions in football.

In fact, this is a possibly problem for there to be a UK football team at the Olympics tournament - our country never sends a team to the Olympics football as we cannot send an English team, or Welsh or Scotish etc. as the Olympics would not let us... but similarly FIFA threatens that if we unite to form a UK team for the Olympics they may make us unite for ALL competitions and have only 1 football association for the whole of the UK. Might seem strange to people outside the UK, but this would be HUGELY unpopular with everyone... especially the fans who really associate with their own country's team.

Hope this helps a little?

Yep. Thanks.

The independent status of the England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Irelands FA's was actually guranteed in the Fifia congress of 1946 when the four of them rejoined having left Fifa in 1920. The current Fifa board has said this will not be threatened if a joint GB team plays in the Olympics but the three smaller countries do not believe in this. The irony is that a GB team might well be have been consistent World beaters. The majority of players would be from England but imagine the England team of the 1950's with John Charles added, the 1960's with George Best playing, the 1980's/1990's with Ryan Giggs.

well there is now an englishman, who plays his football in scotland, has never played professional football in wales, in fact has never lived in wales, but because the school he attended was just over the border in wales, under fifa's new ruling, that makes him welsh! Look for the football association of wales website and check andy dorman's profile for the men's a team.

the irony is that there is a gentleman's agreement between the four home unions (england, scotland, wales & northern ireland) that they will not pick a foreign born player who qualifies by residency, actually living in the country for the required number of years!

Well it's so because World cup, is Nation championship and not country, UK is a country, but in this country you find 4 nationalities, English, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish.. Olympics games are about country so they all together under the Union Jack Flag...

Not quite, it's a union of countries hence United Kingdom. It's confusing though because on official forms I am described as White British, not English. So we English no longer officially exist yet we have a football team called England.

because football is about the only sport they are competitive in on the world stage.the best example is: the olympics they compete as uk/great britain,while commonwealth games they compete as countries.

I think I understand!

People have discussed the issue you raised in terms of not knowing if there will be nudity or not, but I NEVER noticed that playback is "hardcore", and I've been here a long, long time. I don't think anyone has ever raised that issue.

Excellent post, and I 100% agree that members should have a way to know what to expect in the videos. I don't usually watch playback so maybe that is why I never noticed it is "hardcore", but it certainly would help to give everyone better information. I think that I've only watched not so shy and instant action hosts in playback so I got what one would expect. I just assumed a glamour or little shy host wouldn't do much although I know there are some exceptions.

it would not matter so much. but hosts for the most part put nonsense in the video description. what if cc lets each host make a library of their videos under a different tab on their host page. then each video could have its own description, and possibly ratings and comments from viewers.

You should learn to deal with incertitudes in life,fellows!
Playback is a hardcore category but many of us don't use to visit such category . Except if i'm curious about a certain host. In this case a hardcore video is not a must while the target to make a first impression about the girl. The web net is full of free porns .Blonde ,brunettes ,big tits,small tits ... i can practicaly choose what my soul pleads for.

Pls help me to make an opinion to get Rosebuds video back in business.
Her video playback´s wasnt only sexy, but also funny and sooo hot.

Yeah.. after her playback, strawberry with cream gave me a new meaning :-) and also bananasplit with icecream and chocosauce.. lol

n/a

.nudity is not always the sexiest thing.. To me it is

n/a

n/a

n/a

For me a live interactive vid can be very sexy without nudity but in recorded vid I expect it or at least topless.

same reason non-adult is mixed into adult... so you will give away more of your money

n/a

Reading your post bored me halfway through and I couldn't finish.
Please email me an audio version. Thanks.

Yes I have noticed that over the last few days. Long may it continue.

I only get one in 10 posts up on a good month

i only get 1 in 10 erections up in a month.

so why thank them lol

About 20% of my posts never make it...and that is an improvement.

Maybe it would be a bigger improvement if 100% didn't make it.

I don't always like his posts either, but comments like that are going to get CC to start censoring more. Focus on his individual posts and say what you don't like about them as he makes them instead of a blanket, catch-all attack which approaches being too personal.

I was joking. But if you want to be serious I did focus on the individual post which was ambiguous.

n/a

There are no posted guidelines so I wonder if this new phenomenon is random. CC has gone through periods of excessive censorship in the past so it stands to reason that there will be periods of almost no censorship.

I must say that CC has done a good job keeping this forum alive. Some competitor's forums were invaded by spammers and the real members stopped participating.

I get posts of mine that are nothing more that copied and pasted from CC's on Terms of Service censored

n/a

I just could not remember if it was spelled different or not. She is not the same as before. Whatever happened to her I do not recall. Wis I knew.

n/a

i guess you are right. I am going to miss her

I just could not remember if it was spelled different or not. She is not the same as before. Whatever happened to her I do not recall. Wis I knew.

I know her she was hot. I think she was in school and was finishing up.

n/a

she is doing great...got a good job and doing everything she always wanted :)

Tell her Bill was asking for her? Thanks man.

I will.

she is still on here under a different name...cant remember the name tho as it's been a few months since i tralked to her

Really? Thought she's been gone for 3 years. Hope the new screen name pops up

yeah i thought she had gone too but one day a couple months ago she popped into comm chat and we had a little chat....not sure if she reads the forums but if u post with ur screen name maybe she'll mail u...good luck

Are you sure it was the same girl as LittleSonya? Did you look at her photo archive? I don't recall her ever being a comm chat person. Thanks!

yep it was deffo her

ok thanks, it's only about 1500 hosts per category to search for since January 1, 2010!

lmao...u must really wanna see her badly if ur searching thru them all :p

I do want to, but I think your just messing with me and she really hasn't been here since 2007

i miss my BMW car ... LOL

shouldnt have crashed it then :p

She was online during the contest. Maybe she is tired and needs a break.

I think you're in love with her... or at least part... uh... parts... of her. :p At least wait a week before posting something like that, and if you want to have any chance with any woman, give her some space!

actually I was asking out of concern for her, because she is almost always here and always sends letters. why do you have to demean the concern of another human being?

It was not your concern that I was making fun of. I have no problem with that. It was that your concern rose to the level of needing to post after just 3 days. That seems like a bit much in most situations, of course I don't know the nature of your relatinship with her.

She was last here 6 June. (The last day of the contest.) It is now 9 June. Hosts often stay away a few days after a contest to catch on up their sleep and whatever they neglected in their personal lives during contest time.

I don't track her movements, but while she is here a lot, she doesn't seem to be here every day. You would know better, because apparently you are keeping track, but there seems to be nothing unusual in terms of her absence especially since it is post contest time.

If you are so close to her that you are writing each other "almost" every day, then maybe I would be a little more concerned. But I would also imagine you also have her number if you are that close and could call or send an sms. And if you truly are that close in your mind, I would reevaluate how important you are to her if she just disappeared for a few days and then comes back like it was no big deal.

Regardless, we are talking 3 days. I think it is premature to be overly concerned unless you know about some personal issue in her life that would cause someone to worry after such a short period. Good luck.

its exam time too...so alot of hosts wont b around as much as they usually r

KiaraDDD has been online today. Despite the panic, she was seen just 3 days after she went missing.

(I know 3 days can seem like a lot when you talk to someone almost every day, but I think next time give it a little more time. Plus, I think she is at a studio. Maybe you can ask some of the hosts she works with about her. And if not at a studio, maybe you can learn who some of her host friends are to ask about her in the future.)

HEY RELAX!-.... ITS OK TO NOT BE AN ASSHOLE ALL THE TIME

I know. I know. Part of me felt bad for the guy, but the other part of me couldn't resist. (Hence, my 1/2 nice, 1/2 not so nice posts.)

But come on.... He got all nervous after 3 days. In fact, there were only two actual days she wasn't online... 7 June and 8 June since she was there 6 June and 9 June. It was hard not to point out he was acting like an overprotective parent at best... maybe even a stalker in the worst case scenario. But I guess I should resist the a-hole inside of us all and be more sensitive. He really should reevaluate his feelings for her and make sure she shares them, however, even if he simply feels it is a good friendship. My closest friends here usually tell me when they won't be online, and I tell them too so nobody worries. That is what truly caring about another person's feelings is about.

you know, i have never gone to her confirm charges page without seeing a required password. is she EVER actually available for an open chat?

Yes. I have seen her a few times. It can be hard to visit, however, for the reason you have indicated.

Relax!-

I have just read the original posting, and the subsequent posts. I kind of have to agree with bmw and ANOTHER VIEWER. It was a simple question that seems to be asked out of concern. The tone of your replies was not warranted. He must be a stalker.???..... come on think about it, I would be willing to bet anything they live on two separate continents, how can he be a stalker?

Also, whether he is or is not in love with her..... really has nothing to do with the original posting. To me it seemed like a genuine question asking about her and if anyone knew if she was ok or not.

Well to balance things out I will say that I am on the side of relax! I think posting about someone who has only been gone two days is over the top unless there is something that we do not know.

If they are so close that a post is required after two days then I would have thought that the host would have told him/her where they were going.

The poster thinks that you cannot be stalked simply because of distance. Please explain what guys do such as hanging out in your rooms all of the time, interrupting video by typing publicly, et cetera. He seems to think that there is only one type of stalkling. Please give us your horror stories. Thank you.

Ohhh….. Of course….. by me posting this ONE message, and by the way, the only posting I have ever done in 2.5 years…. I can now completely understand why you would think it is stalking. What was I thinking, how rude of me to be so insensitive.

I see.

btw, your posts in this thread are hilarious, and I agree with the spirit in which you write them:

a "miss her" thread after 3 days absence? bmw might want to get a check up from the neck up.

I did meet a host from another site 5 years ago in person. We just hung out for a day, only contact was a hug when I go there one hen I left, but that was it. It was a very pleasant meeting, it was a 4 hour drive, but we never hooked up again.. We keep in touch from time to time in email, but the cyber world and real world are two separate things. This site is all about fantasy and the real world is well real.

n/a

Yes.I would not meet a guy in real if "we played" on here. If i`d ever meet someone from here would be cos i`d like him as a future bf maybe , and i dont want at our first date, him to know how my.... (u know) , looks like. Call me old fashioned, but in love i like when both discover eachover little by little .And just for sex , well , i would NEVER meet anyone from here ,or elsewhere. Have fun:)

Dana I am getting old and so if you showed me your "you know" by the time we met I would have forgotten what it looked like :P

So can we meet ?

n/a

ahhhh, and just another thing: i dont think all members here are pervs and i thats why i would not meet any. No.And i dont blame hosts who meets them even after they" played" .Everyone can decide for himself. And yes , i would meet a guy who i`d really liked and who would never ask me to get naked, even if i dont see that happen , cos i work in adult categories:) , and they always ask:). Oh well... lol, have a wonderful day everyone

Au contraire
per·vert (pr-vûrt)
tr.v. per·vert·ed, per·vert·ing, per·verts
1. To cause to turn away from what is right, proper, or good; corrupt.
2. To bring to a bad or worse condition; debase.
3. To put to a wrong or improper use; misuse. See Synonyms at corrupt.
4. To interpret incorrectly; misconstrue or distort: an analysis that perverts the meaning of the poem.
n. (pûrvûrt)
One who practices sexual perversion.

Well, I can see a situation where I am going to meet one special person to have a relationship with and would like to meet other hosts I know as friends without sex even if we played online because they live near the special host. Of course, that would drive the special host insane so it would probably be a bad idea. :p

I have no any reasons to meet with members from this site. Can be kinda dangreous i think. And around me a lot of men so i don't really need it. CC not a dating or freesexseeking site.
I feel a bit like an actress here and actresses don't meet with their spectators usually.

Cuz i was young and stupid i was meet in real with some memeber few times and in few years knew few things that he too old, married and have few kids :D Beware girls. Magic happens but its rare.

The comment is often made that CC is not a dating site. However several of the partner sites do in fact suggest that it can be for dating or even marriage.

I think we have a category on CC called "long term / marriage", lol, although obviously not many hosts are in it and I have never heard of a host and member actually ending up together that way especially once glamour was created and many nonadult hosts moved there.

there has been at least 6 marriages from here that i know of...and they r still together....yes its true this isnt a "dating site" but relationships do happen

What category was the host in at the start of the relatonship? (she may have moved to non adult later, but where was she at the start?)

And, I don't know if you would know this, lol, but do you know if they played first online?

from what i remember one was in IA and always stayed there till she left the site...the others were all non adult

been more than 6 marriages then because there are several others that didn't work out

I actually met a host who always thought I never watched her naked. I had 2 different member ids and i used one as a nice respectable guy and the other to watch the girls naked. She never knew i always came in to see her show. She always thought I was a gentleman :-P

lol I was going to warn LovelyDana about members like you :P

:) i know abt them Notmyfriend... no worries... i`m getting older too, lol .And , no, even if u forgot it, once u saw it , no date for u!!!! haha( btw, i dont think we ever met , so...)Anyways, this is getting nowhere... always will be some who will do some things and some who will not,and others who will wonder abt them, personal choice. have fun;)

No we have never met. You have fun too :)

n/a

n/a

This is a job for the hosts. Most would not want to meet you in person under any circumstances. They have real lives, real bfs, real interests outside of CC and none of them include you. You are a customer and they are actresses and the site is for fantasy and that rarely involves reality.

that's what they tell YOU. I have met 6 hosts from here in person and had a good time with all :)

And how many hosts have you chatted with and never met. He said most. That doesn't mean all. I have met more than you in real including some who initally said they would never meet someone from here. I would still say that mosts would not contemplate meeting any member.

Yes I agree :)

Happy Birthday Erl, every girl's favourite viking. :D

Good luck mate

Thank u Nick...hehehe....favourite viking....guess coz im the only one...hahaha

have a great day erl and hope u get many many kisses from the lovely ladies here (and free vids) :p

n/a

n/a

Hello and thanks Vanessa...... nice to hear this

Thank u Dasha...... ur very kind:-)

Thank u Wayne....free vids?.....i should go to cc chat i gues...lol

n/a

Hhehe....hi there Pam....and thank u... lick?...hmmm..... suree

Thanks Rossie... sweet of u:-)

n/a

You're very kind.
I think I love you.

You do realise that it is not a real meter and that the dog is just scamming you and keeping your cash ?