General Forum
RE: I LOVE YOU !!!
So now all I have to do is go to every girl's private and I will eventually find you :D
Of course I will tell every single host I visit that she was the first one on my list so that she feels special. You see I am nice like that :P
Of course I will tell every single host I visit that she was the first one on my list so that she feels special. You see I am nice like that :P
RE: I LOVE YOU !!!
Very true Thomas and even when I track them down they still deny it was them :P
RE: I LOVE YOU !!!
We perverts like to travel to other sites too. So in most cases you are dealing with the same perverts you deal with here.
RE: I LOVE YOU !!!
but what is more worse, pervert who is honest pervert, or a guy who talk sweet like a gentleman, spend alot of money, make you fall in love, and after you already fall in love you find out that he has no money left, he has just spend his gambling wins, he has wife and kids, and he just been playing with you..
who hurt you more, pervert who f..k with your brains,
or pervert who f..k with your ass?
who hurt you more, pervert who f..k with your brains,
or pervert who f..k with your ass?
RE: I LOVE YOU !!!
I hear ya....I love perv's just not rude perv's! Maybe they just stay in forum :)) Love CC too!!
RE: I LOVE YOU !!!
Rude is a relative word. What is rude to you may not be rude to others. At other sites pervs can run free. Here they are restricted.
Argentina - Mexico
When Argentina beats or ties Greece as expected they will play Mexico in the next round. That will be a good game.
Rating members, a solution'
Re an electronic discount card for members who have been rated by hosts. As far as I am aware supermarkets call them loyalty cards.
So members will be rated by hosts from 1 - 5 stars
1* = ok but a lil cheap & maybe rude but nothing too serious
5* = a big spender with good manners who often falls asleep & forgets to log out of vid chat.
We're gonna have a sliding scale for discounts 1* 0n 5% going upto 5* on 25%
Q, So who is gonna finance this discount?
A, The hosts of course ! That is, all hosts reduce their prices by a relevant % related to a members * rating. This will be an automated system.
In simple terms if hosts wish to rate members they pay to do so.
So members will be rated by hosts from 1 - 5 stars
1* = ok but a lil cheap & maybe rude but nothing too serious
5* = a big spender with good manners who often falls asleep & forgets to log out of vid chat.
We're gonna have a sliding scale for discounts 1* 0n 5% going upto 5* on 25%
Q, So who is gonna finance this discount?
A, The hosts of course ! That is, all hosts reduce their prices by a relevant % related to a members * rating. This will be an automated system.
In simple terms if hosts wish to rate members they pay to do so.
RE: Rating members, a solution'
I think that before we start rating the members, there should be a more complete ratings system for hosts.
I'd like to be able to read actual comments from others who have gone into a room before me, before I start spending $$$ to find out a host's tendencies.
is this too much to ask?
I'd like to be able to read actual comments from others who have gone into a room before me, before I start spending $$$ to find out a host's tendencies.
is this too much to ask?
RE: Rating members, a solution'
And what about those case when member enter in room, and notice that host there dont look nothing like she looked in photoshopped profilepictures? if price is 5$ per minute and room is dark, video sucks, host look like my granny.. member should still hang in the room for 2 minutes or he cant vote and give warning word for other members? like someone already pointed out, often there is a reason why member leave right after he entered.
RE: Rating members, a solution'
LOL very good point! To each his own though....somebody must love it!
RE: Rating members, a solution'
If you do fins any hosts that look like your granny can you give me the heads up :P
RE: Rating members, a solution'
I totally agree with U honey.
I see these days, we hosts also very clever & very logical on this issue :)
I see these days, we hosts also very clever & very logical on this issue :)
RE: Rating members, a solution'
How about Member categories:
Naive Tourist,
Rich Sugar Daddy,
Falls in Love Easily,
Horny Hank,
Out of work Homeboy,
Timewaster.
Naive Tourist,
Rich Sugar Daddy,
Falls in Love Easily,
Horny Hank,
Out of work Homeboy,
Timewaster.
RE: members want to have a profile ...
Not true! You might be that cold but don't speak for all hosts....I totally disagree and I take notes so that I can refer back to them when a guest is returning. Don't make us all look like heartless b_t____s, please.
RE: members want to have a profile ...
hahahaha....so funny (LOL)
maybe they want prices like 0.20/min with toys..and what? I DONT CARE !!!! because i want many things from cc..and who cares?
so guys...stop dreaming...if you dont want to spend ur money, watch a porn.. it is free...
maybe they want prices like 0.20/min with toys..and what? I DONT CARE !!!! because i want many things from cc..and who cares?
so guys...stop dreaming...if you dont want to spend ur money, watch a porn.. it is free...
RE: members want to have a profile ...
Thank you "host" for this thread, this will make it clear what hosts really think about members, are they really intrested to know anything about them, anything else than amount of money they might spend.
RE: members want to have a profile ...
I always knew this is not a dating site, but most hosts dont seem to know that this should be busines, not dating... based on comments they say when members are talking about "pay for a show"
But yes, this is busines, so hosts should also work like this a busines and member is a customer.
And i am really happy about hosts who can put busines and fun together, and become friends while earning some money... some hosts has become as a friend to me, and i dont mind it is busines at a same time :)))
But yes, this is busines, so hosts should also work like this a busines and member is a customer.
And i am really happy about hosts who can put busines and fun together, and become friends while earning some money... some hosts has become as a friend to me, and i dont mind it is busines at a same time :)))
RE: members want to have a profile ...
So as a host...... are you saying that all host are here for business purposes only.... and a relationship in real life between a host and a guest will never happen?
RE: members want to have a profile ...
This is one hosts opinion and I resent one person representing the attitude of all hosts. Very bold maybe a TG.
RE: members want to have a profile ...
Not true and a bad reflection on hosts! I totally enjoy my guests and I love the uniqueness of the individual relationships that I develop here. Sorry to see that post....makes us all look bad :(
RE: members want to have a profile ...
dont worry, most of members are not so stupid to think that every hosts are same.. i been using different camsites about 4 years already, and know this life enough, and my oldest friendships with camgirls have also lasted this 4 year and still lasting, so i know most camgirls are really nice persons.. but there are always some "bad apples" who are new to this busines and think they know everything lol
RE: members want to have a profile ...
Good to know!! One could really get jaded by reading about hosts and some posts here.....I think we are all here for fun :))
RE: members want to have a profile ...
There are other sites that have this and hosts definitely DO read them.
It's not a page profile like the hosts themselves have, but just a few lines of info that the hosts can look at when you enter their room.
As I said, they do read these because I've encountered quite a few hosts smart enough to give the profile a look and use the information there as a conversation starter when I entered their chat.
Of course it would be a dumb idea for a member to use to try to shave a little time off the chat. Go to Instant Action if that's what you want. What's the point of going to a CHATroom without expecting a little chat and the use of smalltalk to kick that off.
What is really surprising is some of the comments from the hosts here. Instead of taking something that could enhance and possibly provide a springboard for prolonging a chat, some use the concept instead to stupidly and mindlessly attack their customers.
Yes, this is a business and if you can't see a use for even the most basic of tools to make your business more successful, then you simply fail.
It's not a page profile like the hosts themselves have, but just a few lines of info that the hosts can look at when you enter their room.
As I said, they do read these because I've encountered quite a few hosts smart enough to give the profile a look and use the information there as a conversation starter when I entered their chat.
Of course it would be a dumb idea for a member to use to try to shave a little time off the chat. Go to Instant Action if that's what you want. What's the point of going to a CHATroom without expecting a little chat and the use of smalltalk to kick that off.
What is really surprising is some of the comments from the hosts here. Instead of taking something that could enhance and possibly provide a springboard for prolonging a chat, some use the concept instead to stupidly and mindlessly attack their customers.
Yes, this is a business and if you can't see a use for even the most basic of tools to make your business more successful, then you simply fail.
RE: members want to have a profile ...
lol. Yeah, that wouldn't make sense.
I mean to attack (potential) customers on this forum.
Of course, it may be welcome in The Dungeon, but I've never gone to a vid there, so I have no experience in that area. :D
I mean to attack (potential) customers on this forum.
Of course, it may be welcome in The Dungeon, but I've never gone to a vid there, so I have no experience in that area. :D
RE: members want to have a profile ...
And a host sitting in an empty room because of her shitty attitude doesn't get paid at all.
As I said before: Simply Fail.
As I said before: Simply Fail.
RE: members want to have a profile ...
Sorry that you are so angry with hosts. I thought your original post started out really good until I got to bottom. There is certainly a lot of bashing of hosts in here and viewers forum. It only makes sense that some get tired of it and speak up. You can control where you spend your money not the place that you spend your money....plain and simple. There is something for everyone at this site!!!
RE: members want to have a profile ...
"There is something for everyone at this site!!!" That is not correct. But luckily for viewers the competition is fierce in this business and only a mouse click away.
RE: members want to have a profile ...
looooooooooool
1. i WORK here, u WORK here, all hosts WORK here...so..work=job, job=money...stop saying that u are here for fun.yes, i agree is fun here too, i have friends, hosts and members, and i love them, i have nice customers, i have rude ones also, but we are here for money..when we have fun..is better, i agree, but is not always fun here.
2. if u are here for fun, that means ur all session are free and u do this only for fun...try a disco, but there u will not earn MONEY. i dont think ur vids are FREE dear..so stop saying this.is a lie.
3. i am not a rude person/girl/host...i said the truth and u all know this. is not a big secret.dont be so nice and desperate only to attract more mem in ur vid.be smart ;)
4.yes, i agree, is not a site for dates..but i believe in a relationship between a mem and a host.
5.so...we are paid here by members...this is a job..when we have friends on cc and when we have fun too...and cc has good conection and good traffic ..i agree..is the best place for money and fun also.
any question?
1. i WORK here, u WORK here, all hosts WORK here...so..work=job, job=money...stop saying that u are here for fun.yes, i agree is fun here too, i have friends, hosts and members, and i love them, i have nice customers, i have rude ones also, but we are here for money..when we have fun..is better, i agree, but is not always fun here.
2. if u are here for fun, that means ur all session are free and u do this only for fun...try a disco, but there u will not earn MONEY. i dont think ur vids are FREE dear..so stop saying this.is a lie.
3. i am not a rude person/girl/host...i said the truth and u all know this. is not a big secret.dont be so nice and desperate only to attract more mem in ur vid.be smart ;)
4.yes, i agree, is not a site for dates..but i believe in a relationship between a mem and a host.
5.so...we are paid here by members...this is a job..when we have friends on cc and when we have fun too...and cc has good conection and good traffic ..i agree..is the best place for money and fun also.
any question?
RE: members want to have a profile ...
yes i have a question, is your post a reply for someone, or what was it about?
Slovenia vs En-ger-land
In an effort to inject more passion and flair into their upcoming game this wednesday, it has been suggested to give Brazillian sounding names for England's stars. Gerrard will be known as Gerrado, Wayne Rooney will be Rooninho and Emile Heskey will be forfucksakeno
Teacher to Class: What does your Daddy do? Little boy goes "My Daddy is a dancer in a gay bar and sometimes, if the money's right, he lets punters bang the lights out of him and cum in his mouth". Teacher, shocked, asks Is that true? No, says the little boy, he keeps goal for England, but I'm too embarrased to say
Teacher to Class: What does your Daddy do? Little boy goes "My Daddy is a dancer in a gay bar and sometimes, if the money's right, he lets punters bang the lights out of him and cum in his mouth". Teacher, shocked, asks Is that true? No, says the little boy, he keeps goal for England, but I'm too embarrased to say
RE: Slovenia vs En-ger-land
england sux. bunch of whiners. even if they squeak through, they wont survive the second round. the cup goes to south america this year.
RE: Slovenia vs En-ger-land
i hear we are getting a new coach.
it will pick them up from heathrow on July 12th
it will pick them up from heathrow on July 12th
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
i think it says as much about north koreas as it does portugal......lol
comgrats anyway :P
comgrats anyway :P
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
...it says as much as it was supposed to say about the Algeria, New Zealand, USA and Switzerland teams. Funny isn't it?
Even though i still think we'll get thrown out by the first decent opponent we encounter, it's curious how people always prefer to tone down one's merits by lowering the other team and not by giving credit where credit is due.
I thought North Korea was the same team who only lost 2-1 against Super-Brasil, but i probably watched another game afterall...
Even though i still think we'll get thrown out by the first decent opponent we encounter, it's curious how people always prefer to tone down one's merits by lowering the other team and not by giving credit where credit is due.
I thought North Korea was the same team who only lost 2-1 against Super-Brasil, but i probably watched another game afterall...
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
Right. Portugal beat the 106th ranked team in the world. Good show, Portugal. Excellent show of sportsmanship running up the score like that too. I wouldn't expect anything less of your team. Bravo.
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
Are you serious? Do you really believe that people should be singing the praises of Portugal for dispatching lowly North Korea?
And in all honesty, just admit it, don't you too find Rinaldo a bit of a douche?
And in all honesty, just admit it, don't you too find Rinaldo a bit of a douche?
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
you know what's fun?
go to google and type in "cristiano ronaldo is a" and see how google's autocomplete feature suggests you finish that phrase:)
go to google and type in "cristiano ronaldo is a" and see how google's autocomplete feature suggests you finish that phrase:)
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
or, like everyone who isn't portuguese or a 13 year old girl, maybe just sick of one of the game's most infamous divers.
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
...at least he's good at something while others only complain about the ball, the pitch, the stadium's light system, yada, yada, yada...
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
portugal was good,it was a pleasure to watch them play.funny goal from ronaldo.! but that was not the highest result in a worldcup match.
worldcup 1982 hungary-el salvador 10:1
worldcup 1974 yugoslavia-zaire 9:0
worldcup 2002 germany-saudi arabia 8:0
worldcup 1982 hungary-el salvador 10:1
worldcup 1974 yugoslavia-zaire 9:0
worldcup 2002 germany-saudi arabia 8:0
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
Portugal just condemned the entire team and their families to a lives at a north korean workers camp. I hope you are happy Portugal. If only the Dearl leader, Kim Hung Low had played the score would have been different.
RE: 7-0 !! PORTUGAL CAMPEAO!!
Yep, that's very sad, but true. The North korean team will now have to face not only national shame, but lifetime denial from their own government....
the ultimate test
A man goes to the doctor for his wife's test results.
Mr Smith : "I'm here for Mrs Smith's test results."
Receptionist : "Oh, I'm sorry Mr Smith, there's been a problem. We have two sets of test results for a Mrs Smith and we don't know which belongs to your wife..... I'm afraid it's bad news or terrible news. One test shows Alzheimer's Disease, the other shows Aids!"
Mr Smith: "That's awful! What should I do?"
Receptionist: "The doctor suggests you drop her off in the middle of town. If she finds her way home, don't shag her."
Who's The Boss
A young couple on their wedding night were in their honeymoon suite.
As they were undressing for bed, the husband, a big burly man, tossed his trousers to his new bride and said: "Here, put these on."
She put them on and the waist was twice the size of her body.
"I can't wear your trousers," she said.
"That's right,'' said the husband, "and don't you ever forget it. I'm the one who wears the trousers in this relationship."
With that she flipped him her knickers and said: "Try these on."
He tried them on and found he could only get them on as far as his kneecaps.
"Hell," he said. ''I can't get into your knickers!"
She replied: "That's right... and that's the way it is going to stay until your attitude changes."
Dirty Laundry
A newlywed couple arrived back from honeymoon to move into their tiny new flat.
"Care to go to bed?" the husband asked.
"Shh!" said his blushing bride. "These walls are paper thin. The neighbours will know what you mean! Next time, ask me in code - like, 'Have you left the washing machine door open' - instead."
So, the following night, the husband asks: "I don't suppose you left the washing machine door open, darling?"
"No," she snapped back, "I definitely shut it." Then she rolled over and fell asleep.
The next morning, she woke up feeling a little frisky herself, so she nudged her husband and said: "I think I did leave the washing machine door open after all..."
"Don't worry," said the man. "It was only a small load so I did it by hand."
Mr Smith : "I'm here for Mrs Smith's test results."
Receptionist : "Oh, I'm sorry Mr Smith, there's been a problem. We have two sets of test results for a Mrs Smith and we don't know which belongs to your wife..... I'm afraid it's bad news or terrible news. One test shows Alzheimer's Disease, the other shows Aids!"
Mr Smith: "That's awful! What should I do?"
Receptionist: "The doctor suggests you drop her off in the middle of town. If she finds her way home, don't shag her."
Who's The Boss
A young couple on their wedding night were in their honeymoon suite.
As they were undressing for bed, the husband, a big burly man, tossed his trousers to his new bride and said: "Here, put these on."
She put them on and the waist was twice the size of her body.
"I can't wear your trousers," she said.
"That's right,'' said the husband, "and don't you ever forget it. I'm the one who wears the trousers in this relationship."
With that she flipped him her knickers and said: "Try these on."
He tried them on and found he could only get them on as far as his kneecaps.
"Hell," he said. ''I can't get into your knickers!"
She replied: "That's right... and that's the way it is going to stay until your attitude changes."
Dirty Laundry
A newlywed couple arrived back from honeymoon to move into their tiny new flat.
"Care to go to bed?" the husband asked.
"Shh!" said his blushing bride. "These walls are paper thin. The neighbours will know what you mean! Next time, ask me in code - like, 'Have you left the washing machine door open' - instead."
So, the following night, the husband asks: "I don't suppose you left the washing machine door open, darling?"
"No," she snapped back, "I definitely shut it." Then she rolled over and fell asleep.
The next morning, she woke up feeling a little frisky herself, so she nudged her husband and said: "I think I did leave the washing machine door open after all..."
"Don't worry," said the man. "It was only a small load so I did it by hand."
The Queen & Dolly Go To Heaven
Queen Elizabeth and Dolly Parton die on the same day and they both go before an Angel to find out if they'll be admitted to Heaven.
Unfortunately, there's only one space left that day, so the Angel must decide which of them gets in.
The Angel asks Dolly if there's some particular reason why she should go to Heaven.
Dolly takes off her top and says, "Look at these, they're the most perfect breasts God ever created, and I'm sure it will please God to be able to see them every day, for eternity."
The Angel thanks Dolly, and asks Her Majesty the same question.
The Queen takes a bottle of Perrier out of her purse, drinks it down. Then, wees into a toilet and pulls the lever.
The Angel says, "OK, your Majesty, you may go in."
Dolly is outraged and asks, "What was that all about? I show you two of God's own perfect creations and you turn me down. She wees into a toilet and she gets in! Would you explain that to me?"
"Sorry, Dolly," says the Angel, "but even in Heaven, a Royal Flush beats a Pair - no matter how big they are."
Unfortunately, there's only one space left that day, so the Angel must decide which of them gets in.
The Angel asks Dolly if there's some particular reason why she should go to Heaven.
Dolly takes off her top and says, "Look at these, they're the most perfect breasts God ever created, and I'm sure it will please God to be able to see them every day, for eternity."
The Angel thanks Dolly, and asks Her Majesty the same question.
The Queen takes a bottle of Perrier out of her purse, drinks it down. Then, wees into a toilet and pulls the lever.
The Angel says, "OK, your Majesty, you may go in."
Dolly is outraged and asks, "What was that all about? I show you two of God's own perfect creations and you turn me down. She wees into a toilet and she gets in! Would you explain that to me?"
"Sorry, Dolly," says the Angel, "but even in Heaven, a Royal Flush beats a Pair - no matter how big they are."
RE: question to members
sometimes we are curious to see if the girl in video looks like the girl in the profile picture.
RE: question to members
The first thing I want to see in vid chat is your face, not your fine ass ;) 5 times in one day? Damn!
RE: question to members
Sorry about that, but it couldn't be helped.
I entered your chat, but you were SO beautiful that I came in 3 seconds!
I entered your chat, but you were SO beautiful that I came in 3 seconds!
RE: question to members
A host chooses what she will or will not do in video and a viewer can choose to got to another site.
RE: question to members
Whilst I very rarely do that (I will usually chat for 5 minutes and then pretend that someone is at the door :P) I leave for two reasons.
1. The cam quality is crap and slow.
2. The girl looks nothing like her photos
1. The cam quality is crap and slow.
2. The girl looks nothing like her photos
RE: question to members
Those are your only two reasons? I leave because I've run out of money, or can't figure out a logical, true lie to tell my wife about the charge on the credit card :)
RE: question to members
Ah, well..is clear why you never came to me , the webcam is very old and I cannot look in 2010 as I looked in 2002, my breasts are falling.
If you wait few more years I might be able to reach the nipples with my tongue.LOL
If you wait few more years I might be able to reach the nipples with my tongue.LOL
RE: question to members
sometimes we click the video button by mistake. sometimes we have a change of mind because the credit card will not allow us to spend the hour that we need in order to get off with a host. sometimes the finger is willing but the credit card is not. sometimes the host is not there, and who wants to pay for empty minutes?
RE: question to members
sometimes I hit the wrong button. I mean to view photos but hit the chat button. Then I panic! he he. If I make the mistake again, I will stay and chat and explain.
RE: question to members
Good Idea....wish others thought like you. Might cost you 2 bucks to explain to the host what happened and tell her how pretty she is and then for sure don't forget to say BYE....very important to many hosts. :)
RE: question to members
Good Idea....wish others thought like you. Might cost you 2 bucks to explain to the host what happened and tell her how pretty she is and then for sure don't forget to say BYE....very important to many hosts. :)
RE: GO BRAZIL
What the hell this french football referee think that he is doing ? His first world cup and doing shit agaisnt Brazil.
RE: GO BRAZIL
When are they gonna start doing something about the referis????? Stupid french.. Asshole... Kaka didn't do anything. Can't believe....
RE: GO BRAZIL
AND after each game they should really start handing out yellow cards to those players who dive and fake injuries. per incident too, even if that means so many yellow cards that the italian side doesn't have enough players to man a team in the next game.
RE: GO BRAZIL
VIP, I wasn't saying brasil didnt deserve the win nor that Kaka was screwed but that there were not 3 beautiful goals unless fabiano's double handball is considered beautiful by some.
It is the thing I hate most about futbol, the refs and the flopping. It doesn't have to be this way. More refs? 1 challenge per side per half? limited instant replay? something! Do futbol fans really enjoy having the outcomes in a high percentage of games at the World Cup called into question because of this? And don't tell me every possible solution will slow down the game.....the game is already slowed down by fakers writhing in "pain" as they wait for the stretcher to carry them off before they jump back in the game.
It is the thing I hate most about futbol, the refs and the flopping. It doesn't have to be this way. More refs? 1 challenge per side per half? limited instant replay? something! Do futbol fans really enjoy having the outcomes in a high percentage of games at the World Cup called into question because of this? And don't tell me every possible solution will slow down the game.....the game is already slowed down by fakers writhing in "pain" as they wait for the stretcher to carry them off before they jump back in the game.
RE: GO BRAZIL
brazil are talented enough without being such drama queens .im supporting Argentina now!
RE: GO BRAZIL
True enough Pam but Fabiano followed in the great Argentinian tradition, the Hand of God. :P
Funny to see the ref ask Fabiano if he had handled the ball. What me ref? No ref! LOL
Funny to see the ref ask Fabiano if he had handled the ball. What me ref? No ref! LOL
RE: GO BRAZIL
Jealous ppl, if we start to talk about the other teams now , we will laugh a lot. Are England , France or Italy and some other teams doing good at this World Cup? ? Brazil is doing some mistakes, but wich team is not ? At least , we do know how to play the FOOTBALL OR SOCCER < whatever u want to call . And talking about Argentina, if i can recall, Maradona did so many hand GOLS LOL, aM I wrong ?
Rating Members
I think it would be good if CC would rate members by the amount of money that they spend. Example VIP, Gold, Silver or new Member. Also possibly how many times they have been blocked by hosts.
If this showed for hosts in chat they could determine if they were worth chatting for a half hour to an hour with....or if they just come in to chat and waste time.
Also with the levels of membership would also qualify if the member was very cheap and spent very little money :)
Just a thought....would help members that deserve special treatement. Also maybe through in some free credits when they reach each level that could be used in any hosts room.
If this showed for hosts in chat they could determine if they were worth chatting for a half hour to an hour with....or if they just come in to chat and waste time.
Also with the levels of membership would also qualify if the member was very cheap and spent very little money :)
Just a thought....would help members that deserve special treatement. Also maybe through in some free credits when they reach each level that could be used in any hosts room.
RE: Rating Members
oh yes and it would also be great if better customers in subway could get better seats near the door...
and also we should have rating tattooed in our forehead, based on amount that we spent, so that we could get better service in shops, and those who dont spend enough would be kept outside.
Oh and dont forget the restaurants, if you go eat there for first time, ofcourse you must wait for your turn patiently, because those who have been eating there often must be serviced first.
And when you go shopping for women clothes, dont expect to get good service and good quality clothes if you havent already spend enough money in that shop, and if you have money for only one shirt, forget it, its just a waste of time to service you.
great idea, lets rate all the customers in every place so that rich peoples get better service
and also we should have rating tattooed in our forehead, based on amount that we spent, so that we could get better service in shops, and those who dont spend enough would be kept outside.
Oh and dont forget the restaurants, if you go eat there for first time, ofcourse you must wait for your turn patiently, because those who have been eating there often must be serviced first.
And when you go shopping for women clothes, dont expect to get good service and good quality clothes if you havent already spend enough money in that shop, and if you have money for only one shirt, forget it, its just a waste of time to service you.
great idea, lets rate all the customers in every place so that rich peoples get better service
RE: Rating Members
Many businesses do it already and it gives their best customers
better service. In fact other sites do it too to reward their customers
for being so dedicated. No different than hosts getting rated really.
Haven't you heard of rewards cards, platinum members, etc.
It seems works well :))
better service. In fact other sites do it too to reward their customers
for being so dedicated. No different than hosts getting rated really.
Haven't you heard of rewards cards, platinum members, etc.
It seems works well :))
RE: Rating Members
What could be worse than that?
Maybe being a cheap bronze wanker?
Some similar sites have a privalged member scheme in which members pay a set amount to be classed as 'important' or a sort of premier league wanker.
The idea of adding status levels to jerking off is an interesting one.
The idea of hosts being able to rate members is also interesting, perhaps such a scheme would be as useful as the host rating system.... EG as useful as a chocolate fire guard.
How about no rating system & visible prices ???????
Maybe being a cheap bronze wanker?
Some similar sites have a privalged member scheme in which members pay a set amount to be classed as 'important' or a sort of premier league wanker.
The idea of adding status levels to jerking off is an interesting one.
The idea of hosts being able to rate members is also interesting, perhaps such a scheme would be as useful as the host rating system.... EG as useful as a chocolate fire guard.
How about no rating system & visible prices ???????
RE: Rating Members
I was a member at a site like that and I was a VIP there, I spent lots of money. I got bugged all the time to goto video. It would be the same here. Hosts I am sure have their own way of deciding if they want to talk to somebody or not, they don't need a formal system.
RE: Rating Members
That's fine -- but then I'd want to see a much better rating system put in place for the Hosts TOO. After all, fair is fair.
So, instead of a vague 5 star system that really doesn't tell a new customer very much, get rid of the personal forum section that each host has and instead -- like other sites -- replace it with an actual "review page". Then when a session concludes, a customer could leave a star rating AND a few personal comments regarding the show he received. Or at the very least, CC should create a multi-star system, so a guest could rate a Host on several things -- and thus the star rating system would really tell you more about the host. That way a new guest shopping around could see that a Host has a 5 star body, but has only been rated 3 stars for her personality or even only 1 star for constantly trying to drag out her sessions.
If this sounds bitchy, it's because I agree with Spacedust above. If you want to separate guests by their bank accounts and essentially create a class system that ranks guests solely on their bank accounts -- which would obviously be something the Hosts would love, since it would allow them to instantly zero in on "Gold Level" guests while ignoring lesser guys -- then like I said before fair is fair. If you're going to separate the guests into different classes, then it's only fair that the Hosts somehow get more levels of separation TOO.
So, instead of a vague 5 star system that really doesn't tell a new customer very much, get rid of the personal forum section that each host has and instead -- like other sites -- replace it with an actual "review page". Then when a session concludes, a customer could leave a star rating AND a few personal comments regarding the show he received. Or at the very least, CC should create a multi-star system, so a guest could rate a Host on several things -- and thus the star rating system would really tell you more about the host. That way a new guest shopping around could see that a Host has a 5 star body, but has only been rated 3 stars for her personality or even only 1 star for constantly trying to drag out her sessions.
If this sounds bitchy, it's because I agree with Spacedust above. If you want to separate guests by their bank accounts and essentially create a class system that ranks guests solely on their bank accounts -- which would obviously be something the Hosts would love, since it would allow them to instantly zero in on "Gold Level" guests while ignoring lesser guys -- then like I said before fair is fair. If you're going to separate the guests into different classes, then it's only fair that the Hosts somehow get more levels of separation TOO.
RE: Rating Members
I agree 100% about the rating system for hosts....it is too vague and also allows room for abuse by a guest. I like your idea of different categories of rating and also have accumulated so that all comments and ratings count. Host are separated by their ratings now....low star gets the least exposure.
If the hosts are rated why shouldn't the members and also give
bonuses to dedicated members.
If the hosts are rated why shouldn't the members and also give
bonuses to dedicated members.
RE: Rating Members
i dont think is good idea. as loong he going stay with you in vid and as much he wants to spend depend only about you . he can spend 1$ with other girl for 3 years and million just for you ... you never know... and im sure CC ll never make this option here bc that would be good way to lose clients. Memeber who spend lost we are all already know :D
RE: Rating Members
Ok, so block them when you have made up your own mind about them as opposed to what other hosts think of them. If I judged a host based on what other members say about them, I would have missed out on meeting some great people here.
RE: Rating Members
>> The low spenders would probably be the ones that come in for 30 seconds and leave when you are not naked yet....lol. Then they leave bad review.
Yes, but there's an easy solution to that. CC could simply program the system so a guest CAN'T rate a host or leave a review until he's spent a specific amount of time in one-to-one. In other words, if a guy only spends 30 seconds with you, he would NOT be allowed to rate or review you at all.
Then it balances out. For the hosts, you would only be rated and reviewed by guests who actually spent a good block of time with you. And for the guests who are shopping around, that would make things better too. Because now they'd know that any rating or review that they're reading came from guests who actually spent time with the host.
Yes, but there's an easy solution to that. CC could simply program the system so a guest CAN'T rate a host or leave a review until he's spent a specific amount of time in one-to-one. In other words, if a guy only spends 30 seconds with you, he would NOT be allowed to rate or review you at all.
Then it balances out. For the hosts, you would only be rated and reviewed by guests who actually spent a good block of time with you. And for the guests who are shopping around, that would make things better too. Because now they'd know that any rating or review that they're reading came from guests who actually spent time with the host.
RE: Rating Members
Guys what you are forgetting is the reason why some people are 30 second viewers and why it is vital that they CAN leave a review. Now generally most people on the site want a good show, from a pretty girl. But quite often the profile photos and the girl look different, i.e. she is gorgeous in the photos then just crawled out of bed in real life and on other occassions the video/light of the room is so bad I can hardly see her, so decide to go somewhere else to spend my well earned VIP miles ;-) Seriously ASK WHY someone is a 30 second viewer and I think you want them to leave a vote and comment
RE: Rating Members
Actually, that's a good point, so I stand corrected. Some guys are 30 second men because the host DOESN'T look like her photos or they get out quick because her "work area" isn't nearly as private or intimate for a one-on-one chat as promised.
So you're right. Why should anyone have to stay in that kind of chat situation longer...and run up their credit card bill too...just so they could truthfully warn other guests that the girl is a bit of a fraud? In that instance, all you'd be doing by staying in the chat room longer is reward a host financially for NOT delivering on what was promised on her profile page.
So again, you're right -- in a weird way, it could be argued that the review or comments from a 30 second guest could sometimes be MORE accurate than the comments or review of someone who stayed longer. I hadn't really thought of it that way till you pointed it out, so kudos to you!
So you're right. Why should anyone have to stay in that kind of chat situation longer...and run up their credit card bill too...just so they could truthfully warn other guests that the girl is a bit of a fraud? In that instance, all you'd be doing by staying in the chat room longer is reward a host financially for NOT delivering on what was promised on her profile page.
So again, you're right -- in a weird way, it could be argued that the review or comments from a 30 second guest could sometimes be MORE accurate than the comments or review of someone who stayed longer. I hadn't really thought of it that way till you pointed it out, so kudos to you!
RE: Rating Members
That might be the case in a low percentage of situations but it happens to all hosts even when they look stunning. I personally get comments that I am much more beautiful in video than my pics show so go figure. It feels more like the viewer is hoping for some instant action. Be kind to hosts in your comments.....we are here to put a smile on your face and excite your senses with our beautiful faces and bodies :))
RE: Rating Members
I have never understood those 30 second guys. You get charged a minimum of a minute anyway so I always stay 55 seconds :P
RE: Rating Members
That makes no sense. Let's say in one hour you have 3 "cheap" members as you say, each have one 20 minutes show, or you have mister big spender, how has one hour-long show. Follow? You still get approximately the same amount of money. Or another scenario, you have mister big spender hogging you in 121 for an hour, when if you had 2 or more "cheap" members come and go in open for that hour, you would clearly make more money that way, depending on the difference between your open and 121 prices. I treat all hosts equally, regardless of their star rating, so I think it is only fair that I be treated equally, whether I am in their room for 20 minutes or an hour. There are so many other scenarios I can think of, but anyway, I'm glad you're not running CC.
RE: Rating Members
Yes and there is always that old adage "Don't put all your eggs in one basket". What happens when mister big spender gets a new favourite and all the "cheap members" have moved on.
RE: Rating Members
In my experience most hosts would do a show for Osam Bin Laden or for anyone with money. A bad rating wouldn't deter most hosts.
RE: Rating Members
Not all members are good people with good intentions. I think that the ones that are should be given special credit to identify them and reward them. It takes a lot to keep a good rating for hosts here especially when there are jerks that rate totally for instant nudity in open even when the host has indicated differently and is not in that category. They deserve to be rated low in return for their actions.
RE: Rating Members
"Not all members are good people with good intentions" I would argue that No members are good people with good intentions. I openly admit that I am scum of the earth and proud to be a pervert.
RE: Rating Members
LOL....thank you for your honesty!!
I knew there had to some in forum but
did not expect them to stand up and announce it...lol
I knew there had to some in forum but
did not expect them to stand up and announce it...lol
RE: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MonikaBabe!
Happy Birthday Monika. Just think in one years time you won't be a teenager anymore :P
RE: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MonikaBabe!
When someone is as nice as you it’s natural, you know,
For friends to often think of you and want to tell you so
That’s why this special greeting has come your way to say
That many warm and cheerful thoughts are there with you today
I wish for you to have a very happy birthday.
Thinking of you and hoping your birthday is a really great day – the way it ought to be for someone as special as you!
For friends to often think of you and want to tell you so
That’s why this special greeting has come your way to say
That many warm and cheerful thoughts are there with you today
I wish for you to have a very happy birthday.
Thinking of you and hoping your birthday is a really great day – the way it ought to be for someone as special as you!
RE: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MonikaBabe!
Happy Birthday K!!!
... and remember... smile while you still have teeth! :*
... and remember... smile while you still have teeth! :*
RE: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MonikaBabe!
Happy Birthday dear Monika :) love u, wish u lots of $$$$$, love, diamonds n so on, so on :)) be always so beautiful and kind hugs
RE: hard question!
In my case it would be fish soup because I would get a surgeon to amputate her tail, boil that up for soup and keep the top half for sex :D
RE: hard question!
depends which part u cook since in mythology a mermaid is half fish and half human, if you cook the fish part it'll be fish soup but human part it'll be human meat soup....but if cook together it'll be a mix...im not sure taste will be so good
RE: hard question!
there are only two things that smell like fish.......and one of them is fish :-))
RE: hard question!
This question was officially answered by the Cathlic church! Fish!
Manatees are sea mamals that used to be mistaken for mermaids. Or called mermaides by sailors. Spanish sailors needed to know if they could eat the meat from them on Fridays. The church classified them as fish, so that ther could be eaten on Fridays.
Manatees are sea mamals that used to be mistaken for mermaids. Or called mermaides by sailors. Spanish sailors needed to know if they could eat the meat from them on Fridays. The church classified them as fish, so that ther could be eaten on Fridays.
RE: hard question!
why would anyone want to make a soup of it, that s what i dont understand, it s half human:))):O
RE: hard question!
Well, it seems clear. Since you can still skullfuck the head and certainly the tits, we're simply removing the bottom half to make soup.
And in that case, you have to go with a light white wine. :)
And in that case, you have to go with a light white wine. :)
what viewers DO and DO NOT like in prerecorded video
i will start the thread, flame away!
what i DO like in prerecorded video
1. a session title with time duration and some kind of description. tell us if you are nude or not please in the video
2. current photo from the prerecorded video on the chathost main page. i can see what you will look like in the video.
3. some photos from the prerecorded video in the archives would be good, two or three?
4. i saw one video where the host had even recorded it so the time was showing in one corner, so you knew what part of the video you were on.
what i DO NOT like in prerecorded video
1. meaningless session title like 'sexy video'
2. photoshopped photo of host on main page that has NOTHING to do with the video
3. long video of teasing and then at the end no nudity it just restarts
this is a complaint of sorts, but i have included both positive and negative. more constructive this way? more chance that hosts will even listen?
what i DO like in prerecorded video
1. a session title with time duration and some kind of description. tell us if you are nude or not please in the video
2. current photo from the prerecorded video on the chathost main page. i can see what you will look like in the video.
3. some photos from the prerecorded video in the archives would be good, two or three?
4. i saw one video where the host had even recorded it so the time was showing in one corner, so you knew what part of the video you were on.
what i DO NOT like in prerecorded video
1. meaningless session title like 'sexy video'
2. photoshopped photo of host on main page that has NOTHING to do with the video
3. long video of teasing and then at the end no nudity it just restarts
this is a complaint of sorts, but i have included both positive and negative. more constructive this way? more chance that hosts will even listen?
RE: what viewers DO and DO NOT like in prerecorded video
I usually avoid prerecorded video because u never know what u will get. I might watch a little bit more often if they followed your suggestions, but I still rather interact with someone if I am paying.
Sometimes I watch them a little bit just to see what a host looks like on cam since usually the price is lower than regular video. Others I watch because I know the host already and her price is lower than video and I am in the mood to see her. And finally, some I just check out out of curiosity since the price might be very low.
I would say that I rarely spend more than a few minutes in a prerecorded video since most are pretty bad and not worth it. And the ones that are $3,00 or more.... I would need to know exactly what I am going to see to ever try that. But I have seen a couple tha are okay... One may have even been when I was in video with a host, lol.
One suggestion I could add is to simply ask the host. Get her to tell you in writing via email or text chat (then copy the chat) in case she misleads you. This could delay your seeing a video, but that is the host's problem just as much as yours.
Sometimes I watch them a little bit just to see what a host looks like on cam since usually the price is lower than regular video. Others I watch because I know the host already and her price is lower than video and I am in the mood to see her. And finally, some I just check out out of curiosity since the price might be very low.
I would say that I rarely spend more than a few minutes in a prerecorded video since most are pretty bad and not worth it. And the ones that are $3,00 or more.... I would need to know exactly what I am going to see to ever try that. But I have seen a couple tha are okay... One may have even been when I was in video with a host, lol.
One suggestion I could add is to simply ask the host. Get her to tell you in writing via email or text chat (then copy the chat) in case she misleads you. This could delay your seeing a video, but that is the host's problem just as much as yours.
RE: what viewers DO and DO NOT like in prerecorded video
Forest Gump: "Life is like a box of choc'lates: you never know what you're gonna get."
True. Yet I don't stop buying, or enjoying, chocolates because of it. Sometimes it's the not knowing that makes it fun. It's the surprise -- "Oh wow! An orange cream!" -- that makes the experience rewarding.
I almost never buy chocolate with the intent of knowing everything that I'm getting. Generally, a box of chocolates is a sampling of the variety of candy a candy maker offers.
Pre-recorded is a lot like that, in my opinion. It's the surprise, the not knowing that makes it fun. And generally the PR's are at significantly lower price. So I use them to get my "sampling" of the host, and to wet my appetite for further
Now if I get a box of chocolates and none of them are good, I won't buy that brand again. And if my sampling of the host turns out to be just a bad experience altogether, then I'll see no need to return to live videochat. later on.
In my opinion, the sampling should be great in PR's... a little of this, a little of that. Some tease. Some softcore, Some explicit (i.e., if the host does explicit in live vc) But it doesn't have to be all of that in every PR. But for me, for the most part, it's the surprise of not knowing quite what to expect that makes it fun.
True. Yet I don't stop buying, or enjoying, chocolates because of it. Sometimes it's the not knowing that makes it fun. It's the surprise -- "Oh wow! An orange cream!" -- that makes the experience rewarding.
I almost never buy chocolate with the intent of knowing everything that I'm getting. Generally, a box of chocolates is a sampling of the variety of candy a candy maker offers.
Pre-recorded is a lot like that, in my opinion. It's the surprise, the not knowing that makes it fun. And generally the PR's are at significantly lower price. So I use them to get my "sampling" of the host, and to wet my appetite for further
Now if I get a box of chocolates and none of them are good, I won't buy that brand again. And if my sampling of the host turns out to be just a bad experience altogether, then I'll see no need to return to live videochat. later on.
In my opinion, the sampling should be great in PR's... a little of this, a little of that. Some tease. Some softcore, Some explicit (i.e., if the host does explicit in live vc) But it doesn't have to be all of that in every PR. But for me, for the most part, it's the surprise of not knowing quite what to expect that makes it fun.
RE: what viewers DO and DO NOT like in prerecorded video
I am here to see live not pre recorded.
RE: what viewers DO and DO NOT like in prerecorded video
your post is completly worthless & pointless.why did you even bother?
RE: what viewers DO and DO NOT like in prerecorded video
Maybe you would like them to email you a copy to preview in advance too? 8-|
RE: why?
I love to see 5 star hosts. Any host at 4 or below indicates to me they most likely do not strip in video.
RE: why?
Maybe it's me, but it sounds like you're taking a shot at "Viewer" with your "Gender Benders" comment, which wouldn't be nice. I'm sure they work just as hard as anyone else here and try to put on a good show too, in their own ways. Not to mention, I'm sure they'd like equal respect for who they are on a purely human level.
As for his post, his point crosses ALL categories here. He's simply saying that a lower rating traditionally means that a host's show wasn't very satisfying -- usually because the host didn't give the kind of show that she promised. Which could mean, as he said, that the host didn't strip at all or she stalled on the stripping for as long as possible, to run up the bill. That's all he was saying.
As for his post, his point crosses ALL categories here. He's simply saying that a lower rating traditionally means that a host's show wasn't very satisfying -- usually because the host didn't give the kind of show that she promised. Which could mean, as he said, that the host didn't strip at all or she stalled on the stripping for as long as possible, to run up the bill. That's all he was saying.
RE: why?
Tell me who you are and I will come and give you 1 star just to help you earn some $'s :P
Have you ever found the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow ?
Have you ever found the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow ?
RE: why?
5 stars never keeps me away... Maybe it is ur price, ur pics, ur profile... who knows? But it makes no sense that a guy would stay away just because of ur stars if u have 5.
RE: why?
I think 5 stars can suggest a high degree of profssioanalism. Guys who like 'girl next door types' maybe stay clear of 5 star ladies.
As has been suggested many times the star rating system is very, very, very subjective. I take little notice of stars, big notoce of price.
To a large degree a ladies price will decide how busy her room is.
In simple terms i can get all i require here for less than 1.00 & may go up to 1.20 in exeptional circustances.
The saying " you get what you pay for" is most certainly not true on cc. There a beautiful, charming,sexy, awsome girls at less than 1.00.
Market forces are far more relevant than stars, simple as...
As has been suggested many times the star rating system is very, very, very subjective. I take little notice of stars, big notoce of price.
To a large degree a ladies price will decide how busy her room is.
In simple terms i can get all i require here for less than 1.00 & may go up to 1.20 in exeptional circustances.
The saying " you get what you pay for" is most certainly not true on cc. There a beautiful, charming,sexy, awsome girls at less than 1.00.
Market forces are far more relevant than stars, simple as...
RE: why?
Do hosts with low star ratings also have quite times ? Maybe a low visitor count has nothing to do with stars & all to do with the ebb & flow of business. All business' have slow periods, these can be caused by many differing reasons Eg time of day, time of year, credit crunch etc etc. I suspect that the amout of effort a host puts into her profile pics may also be relevant to the number of paying guests.
I just can not see how a good star rating can damge business. From what i've read on these forums in the past, profile pics & price are the key factors for 1st time visits.
I just can not see how a good star rating can damge business. From what i've read on these forums in the past, profile pics & price are the key factors for 1st time visits.
RE: why?
I think you are being a little unfair as the poster does mention that his opinion is based on what he has read on the forums.
Also after criticising him you then go on to say "The higher priced hosts are not hurting at all :)". Have you canvassed them all or are you just speaking for all ?
Also after criticising him you then go on to say "The higher priced hosts are not hurting at all :)". Have you canvassed them all or are you just speaking for all ?
RE: why?
You never mentioned what category you are in? Also, what 5 star host is at $1? We all could give you better advice if you would have used your screen name so that we could look at it and tell you. Obviously there is a big problem.
RE: why?
your post is valid,but you can only speak for yourself(though others might feel the same)price for me isn't part of the equation.,neither is rating
RE: why?
YOUR Comment "To a large degree a ladies price will decide how busy her room is." Is your opinion and is not founded. The higher priced hosts are not sitting there idol! Your comments should supported with "in my opinion" because there is certainly no fact in that comment.
RE: why?
I said " to a large degree" which means that my comment was not carved in stone & as such was not intended to be absolute. If you disagree with the content thats fine. If you deliberately Misinterperate & spin my words thats also fine. I am aware that the subject of price can be very controversial. particularly with hosts.
The main point of my comment was this ' I do not need to pay more than 1.20 to get what I require here'. This is a simle fact. Does this make me a cheap old wanker? of course it does ! But of course I am being subjective...
The main point of my comment was this ' I do not need to pay more than 1.20 to get what I require here'. This is a simle fact. Does this make me a cheap old wanker? of course it does ! But of course I am being subjective...
RE: why?
Your comment was:
To a large degree a ladies price will decide how busy her room is.
This comment sounds like you are announcing a fact which is not!!
That is your opinion and obviously not fact or the higher priced hosts wouldn't be doing so well :)
So you're cheap and happy....that is fine! So you never go to 5 star hosts room so why would you contribute to the "why" question at all.
I don't need an answer :)) Have fun doing what you do :))
To a large degree a ladies price will decide how busy her room is.
This comment sounds like you are announcing a fact which is not!!
That is your opinion and obviously not fact or the higher priced hosts wouldn't be doing so well :)
So you're cheap and happy....that is fine! So you never go to 5 star hosts room so why would you contribute to the "why" question at all.
I don't need an answer :)) Have fun doing what you do :))
RE: why?
Presumably the comment you made "the higher priced hosts wouldn't be doing so well" must be fact as you didn't precede it with "In my opinion".
Can you let me know how you collected al the data you used to validate this comment ?
A second point is that it could still be a fact that the lower priced hosts are busier than the higher priced hosts and the higher priced hosts could still be doing okay. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Can you let me know how you collected al the data you used to validate this comment ?
A second point is that it could still be a fact that the lower priced hosts are busier than the higher priced hosts and the higher priced hosts could still be doing okay. The two are not mutually exclusive.
RE: why?
You sound like a groupie :) Obviously you belong to this select group that is trying to force hosts to reduce their prices.
Let me know where you work and I can come and harass you too telling people that you make too much money and your reviews should be rated low because of it :)
Don't you have anything better to do than harass hosts on here that you can't afford to see? That goes for your other friends on here too :)
Let me know where you work and I can come and harass you too telling people that you make too much money and your reviews should be rated low because of it :)
Don't you have anything better to do than harass hosts on here that you can't afford to see? That goes for your other friends on here too :)
RE: why?
and you come across as the sort of person who only reads what they want to see and not what is actually written.
1. Where in my post did I suggest any host should reduce her price or that she should be rated badly if she doesn't ? If you think that post was harassing hosts then you've led a far too sheltered life (Although I am touched that you think I wield that much influence over what price hosts charge). Feel free to come to my work and complain that I get paid too much. I probably do :D
2. My post was actually about your double standards in decrying someone for stating something as fact (which it could very well be) rather than clarifying that it was just their opinion whilst doing exactly the same thing yourself. Unless you are going to provide me with the data you collected to justify your comment that all high priced hosts are doing well.
3. I can afford to visit any host on here if I wanted to but don't see the point in paying $4 - $6 when there are just as beautiful and sexy women who provide me with the very best shows ever for around $2 or less. In other words I don't want draft beer at champagne prices :P (that isn't an attack on hosts it is a direct response to your posts).
4. As for having nothing better to do I now have 4 posts in this thread you have 7. Although I suspect others such as the one from "in your opinion" are also from you. Don't YOU have anything better to do ?
5. I see, from reading your replies to freelance writer, that you are once again only reading what you want to see not what is actually written and I see that you are still claiming that your opinion is fact.
6. As for being anonymous at least ImNotYourFriend is my member name. luv sunshine is certainly not your member or host name.
1. Where in my post did I suggest any host should reduce her price or that she should be rated badly if she doesn't ? If you think that post was harassing hosts then you've led a far too sheltered life (Although I am touched that you think I wield that much influence over what price hosts charge). Feel free to come to my work and complain that I get paid too much. I probably do :D
2. My post was actually about your double standards in decrying someone for stating something as fact (which it could very well be) rather than clarifying that it was just their opinion whilst doing exactly the same thing yourself. Unless you are going to provide me with the data you collected to justify your comment that all high priced hosts are doing well.
3. I can afford to visit any host on here if I wanted to but don't see the point in paying $4 - $6 when there are just as beautiful and sexy women who provide me with the very best shows ever for around $2 or less. In other words I don't want draft beer at champagne prices :P (that isn't an attack on hosts it is a direct response to your posts).
4. As for having nothing better to do I now have 4 posts in this thread you have 7. Although I suspect others such as the one from "in your opinion" are also from you. Don't YOU have anything better to do ?
5. I see, from reading your replies to freelance writer, that you are once again only reading what you want to see not what is actually written and I see that you are still claiming that your opinion is fact.
6. As for being anonymous at least ImNotYourFriend is my member name. luv sunshine is certainly not your member or host name.
RE: why?
you seem to have zeroed on on this comment. it was a subjective point & like I said earlier not carved in stone. I'm afraid no amount of pedantic spin on your part will alter this. Perhaps you should do some research into relativity & the difference between 'subjective' & 'objective'.
Of course I may have been wrong & a hosts price is in no way related to how busy her room is. If this is the case all the hosts can charge what they like & there will be no down turn in business. This would mean that cc is not subject to market forces...
If all the hosts on cc raised their prices to 2.99 would cc's gross income rise or fall? Would the income of each individual host rise or fall?
PS if any of those beautiful & wonderful hosts who charge 1.00 or less happen to read this post please disrgard my comments as you're perfect in every way & don't need to change anything.
Of course I may have been wrong & a hosts price is in no way related to how busy her room is. If this is the case all the hosts can charge what they like & there will be no down turn in business. This would mean that cc is not subject to market forces...
If all the hosts on cc raised their prices to 2.99 would cc's gross income rise or fall? Would the income of each individual host rise or fall?
PS if any of those beautiful & wonderful hosts who charge 1.00 or less happen to read this post please disrgard my comments as you're perfect in every way & don't need to change anything.
RE: why?
Cheap Cheap Cheap.....Quit harassing hosts in an attempt to force their prices down. Your opinions don't apply to all members and hopefully they have their minds that they listen to and not you.
RE: why?
I think it's silly to argue over the choice of words that "Low Star" used. The real debate is pricing overall. With regards to that, I think there's one fact we can all agree on. FACT: The world economy SUCKS right now. Entire COUNTRIES are facing bankruptcy. MILLIONS of people are unemployed with MILLIONS MORE facing the loss of their jobs. And for those lucky to have a steady job, even they are seeing their incomes & benefits dropping like a rock. So with that grim picture in mind, let's try to politely agree on two simple things.
1) There will always be hosts who charge a high price. Simply because they feel they are worth it due to their looks or the show they give. If they charge a high price and still have guests, I say good for them. There will always be guys willing to pay a higher price, who feel they are paying for quality over quantity (so to speak). So "Luv Sunshine" is right -- some hosts can keep their prices high if they choose to AND if the market will bear that price.
2) On the other hand, "quality" is subjective. For some guys (like "Low Star") a $1 host can be as sexy or fun as a $3 or $5 host. That's the point he was making and he's right too. During these hard times, I'm sure many guys are discovering there ARE lots of fun, hot looking, low priced hosts at CC. So I wish the Low Price girls all the best too. Economically speaking, they are doing better financially due to volume. That's just basic math. If a guy has $30 to spend that could be a nice and quick 10 minute chat with a $3 host -- but it could also be a full half hour with a $1 host.
I'm NOT saying that ALL hosts should lower their prices. Every host should price herself according to what she feels she is worth. I'm simply saying that during these hard economic times it only makes sense that guests are probably rethinking "how much" they're willing to spend and on "who". And I don't think that's guys being cheap. I think that's simply a normal human reaction to the way things are in the REAL world these days, away from the FANTASY world of playing online.
1) There will always be hosts who charge a high price. Simply because they feel they are worth it due to their looks or the show they give. If they charge a high price and still have guests, I say good for them. There will always be guys willing to pay a higher price, who feel they are paying for quality over quantity (so to speak). So "Luv Sunshine" is right -- some hosts can keep their prices high if they choose to AND if the market will bear that price.
2) On the other hand, "quality" is subjective. For some guys (like "Low Star") a $1 host can be as sexy or fun as a $3 or $5 host. That's the point he was making and he's right too. During these hard times, I'm sure many guys are discovering there ARE lots of fun, hot looking, low priced hosts at CC. So I wish the Low Price girls all the best too. Economically speaking, they are doing better financially due to volume. That's just basic math. If a guy has $30 to spend that could be a nice and quick 10 minute chat with a $3 host -- but it could also be a full half hour with a $1 host.
I'm NOT saying that ALL hosts should lower their prices. Every host should price herself according to what she feels she is worth. I'm simply saying that during these hard economic times it only makes sense that guests are probably rethinking "how much" they're willing to spend and on "who". And I don't think that's guys being cheap. I think that's simply a normal human reaction to the way things are in the REAL world these days, away from the FANTASY world of playing online.
RE: why?
Wrong....that is like creating a world panic. Do you think that the girls that work here to support themselves should support themselves on half of the wage? While prices go up our income should go down? Certainly members would not be willing to do their jobs at a half of their income!! What logic is that? Few hosts have someone in video the whole time that they are working. Also your assumption that $1 host are busy all the time is not fact. Quite the contrary in fact, many hosts have more than one room with opposite in pricing and the higher price room does better...I am not condoning it but it is true. Further just because there is a forum here doesn't mean that it should be used to drive down the prices of the hosts or make them suffer. Seems to be the attitude with a select few here. The efforts seem to be so that they can enjoy champagne at the price of draft beer...lol.
Where else can you go "anonymous" and demand a business to lower their prices and threaten them with bad reviews and boycotts if they do not accept less....this is vindictive to try force this in this forum.
Where else can you go "anonymous" and demand a business to lower their prices and threaten them with bad reviews and boycotts if they do not accept less....this is vindictive to try force this in this forum.
RE: why?
>> Wrong...that is like creating a world panic. Do you think that the girls that work here to support themselves should support themselves on half of the wage? While prices go up our income should go down?
I can see this is an emotional issue to you based on your posts. But to answer what you said above -- and sorry to pick on your reading comprehension skills -- but I guess you decided to SKIP the part in my post where I SPECIFICALLY said (quote): "There will always be hosts who charge a high price. Simply because they feel they are worth it due to their looks or the show they give. If they charge a high price and still have guests, I say good for them."
See? I was acknowledging that higher priced girls can do business as usual -- in fact, I even wished them well. What more do you want? Hell, later in the same paragraph, I even AGREED with you and said (quote): "So, Luv Sunshine is right -- some hosts can keep their prices high if they choose to AND if the market will bear that price." Not to mention, I ended my post by also saying (quote): "I'm NOT saying that ALL hosts should lower their prices. Every host should price herself according to what she feels she is worth."
For crying out loud, Luv, I can't be any more fair than that. I flat out said that every host should feel free to price herself however she wants, and the market will ultimately decide if its right or wrong. I'm sorry if that offends you somehow, but that's simply a lesson in Basic Economics 101.
I can see this is an emotional issue to you based on your posts. But to answer what you said above -- and sorry to pick on your reading comprehension skills -- but I guess you decided to SKIP the part in my post where I SPECIFICALLY said (quote): "There will always be hosts who charge a high price. Simply because they feel they are worth it due to their looks or the show they give. If they charge a high price and still have guests, I say good for them."
See? I was acknowledging that higher priced girls can do business as usual -- in fact, I even wished them well. What more do you want? Hell, later in the same paragraph, I even AGREED with you and said (quote): "So, Luv Sunshine is right -- some hosts can keep their prices high if they choose to AND if the market will bear that price." Not to mention, I ended my post by also saying (quote): "I'm NOT saying that ALL hosts should lower their prices. Every host should price herself according to what she feels she is worth."
For crying out loud, Luv, I can't be any more fair than that. I flat out said that every host should feel free to price herself however she wants, and the market will ultimately decide if its right or wrong. I'm sorry if that offends you somehow, but that's simply a lesson in Basic Economics 101.
RE: why?
Freelance if your theory was true then your statement would also be that high end department stores would be out of business readily while cheap stores would stay in business.....reality says that is not a true statement. There is no government bailout money for them either...hehe. What I see ( or is the underlying statement) quite often in these posts is where members want hosts to lower their prices so that they can afford to enjoy them, when in reality they don't shop at the high end department stores either so their concept of true value is different and should not effect any hosts pricing :) They simply can not afford the finer things in life..... I honestly think if we could read the posts from 5 years ago.....there would be very similar comments and having nothing to do with the economy. This site obviously provides something for everyone's budget and taste and some can't afford their tastes.....
RE: why?
I only go to girls who r rated 5
if the are not too expensive, more than $1.50/min
i donot enter into their room
but i usually stay for an hour
i am in love with someone who works at CC
we met 5 years ago
she was rated a 5 for the past 3 years
i think the rating system started 3 years ago
but she had connection problems one day
and someone rater her a poor score
now she is rated a 4.5 because someone rated her unjustly
she is in Glamour
i feel that no one who stays less than 10 minutes can leave a rateing
either good or bad
i have gone to several different girls thru these past 5 years
but i cannot find a more beautiful, sweet, intelegent , kind and curtious girl than my Natalya
so I donot know why you donot get alot of customers with a rateing of 5
unless you are just priced too high
i am self employed
and i would rather charge a little and make a lot
than charge alot and make a little
peace
good luck to you
if the are not too expensive, more than $1.50/min
i donot enter into their room
but i usually stay for an hour
i am in love with someone who works at CC
we met 5 years ago
she was rated a 5 for the past 3 years
i think the rating system started 3 years ago
but she had connection problems one day
and someone rater her a poor score
now she is rated a 4.5 because someone rated her unjustly
she is in Glamour
i feel that no one who stays less than 10 minutes can leave a rateing
either good or bad
i have gone to several different girls thru these past 5 years
but i cannot find a more beautiful, sweet, intelegent , kind and curtious girl than my Natalya
so I donot know why you donot get alot of customers with a rateing of 5
unless you are just priced too high
i am self employed
and i would rather charge a little and make a lot
than charge alot and make a little
peace
good luck to you
US-Slovenia Ref Koman Coulibaly just cost US the goal and the game
What the fuck did he see on that free kick? He just cost US the comeback victory.
RE: US-Slovenia Ref Koman Coulibaly just cost US the goal and the game
totally agree . the ref is very stupid .
RE: US-Slovenia Ref Koman Coulibaly just cost US the goal and the game
what cost you more than that decision was attitude.usa needs to realise that your last performance doesn't coubt in your next match.usa was lucky to be only to down at oranges.just be thankful usa has a very good coach.
RE: US-Slovenia Ref Koman Coulibaly just cost US the goal and the game
what the? translator please?
RE: US-Slovenia Ref Koman Coulibaly just cost US the goal and the game
Lakers beat Celtics in Game 7
RE: US-Slovenia Ref Koman Coulibaly just cost US the goal and the game
What ever happened to that rape charge against Kobe Bryant? Did he just pay her off to go away?
And did Ron Artest climb into the crowd and punch some fans to celebrate winning the championship?
Man, I love the NBA.
And did Ron Artest climb into the crowd and punch some fans to celebrate winning the championship?
Man, I love the NBA.
RE: US-Slovenia Ref Koman Coulibaly just cost US the goal and the game
yes and soccer players are so virtuous, you sure you want to play this game Woo?
USA vs. Slovenia
I can't say he cost the USA the game because he sucked so much that there were probably a lot of calls against Slovenia that were bad too. BUT THAT GUY SUCKED!!! And one thing was at the end when he blew the whistle on a phantom foul when the USA should have had a go ahead goal or at least a penalty shot. It was ridiculous.
I am not a big fan, but why doesn't football have two refs on the field? The National Hockey League has two refs and that is just on a hockey rink. A football field is much bigger, and the judges on the side don't have enough authority to make calls to assist the ref enough. Football needs two refs on the field so that one is behind the play and the other is in front of the play so that a ref isn't making calls when out of position.
I am not a big fan, but why doesn't football have two refs on the field? The National Hockey League has two refs and that is just on a hockey rink. A football field is much bigger, and the judges on the side don't have enough authority to make calls to assist the ref enough. Football needs two refs on the field so that one is behind the play and the other is in front of the play so that a ref isn't making calls when out of position.
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
It was a dreadful call. I hope it does not cost the USA the chance to advance out of group play, they have been quite entertaining.
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
Sounds familiar to me...Russia-Slovenia, the match that decided who will go to the World Cup. Refereeeeee SUCKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Life is unfair, shit happens(
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
refs are like girls,they all suck,it's just a matter if they suck to our satisfaction
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
i wish,but in truth i'm just a horny loser with a credit card looking for cheap thrills that leads to 1 great spill.
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
I agree with your suggestion, but apparently he was in excellent position...what he was looking at is anyone's guess. I read that the FIFA match report called it a foul on Edu (after watching footage I cant see anything close to a foul on Edu) though I can see three slovenes bearhugging.
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
It was a good game, agree! Why is there so much animosity towards USA teams? I hear a lot of that and just wondering.
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
Because we are the greatest country in the world. People love to hate us cause of all the things that we enjoy here and take for granted. Also cause we control the majority of the worlds economy....
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
OMFG=))=))=))
................
=))=))=))=)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
................
=))=))=))=)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
just a little tip
If you are going to try to troll a forum you have to make a post that will make people pissed off at you... not make people point and laugh at you.
Better luck next time, and happy trolling! :D
Better luck next time, and happy trolling! :D
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
Yes I love my country and would not want to be anywhere else on this earth....so you think they are jealous, ok thanks. :)
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
You can «control the majority of the worlds economy» and yet you can't control a damn oil leak... it would be laughable if it wasn't so sad...
RE: USA vs. Slovenia
Interesting. After trying three times to post a response which points in the opposite direction of the "We Are The Greatest" (TM) attitude, it seems obvious that they all fell under censorship.
Thank You And God Bless (Only America Of Course) For Freedom Of Speech.
Thank You And God Bless (Only America Of Course) For Freedom Of Speech.
RE: hey hey
It would be a travesty and an insult to the game if the champion doesn't turn out to be either Brazil or Germany, let alone a team coached by a crazed hedgehog.
RE: hey hey
I know I will be standing in the middle of 9 del Julio drinking a cold Quilmes and dancing around with 1 million crazy Argentines after the final game....
RE: Tease
totally naked.
open legs.
fingers inserted.
but then she stops at the elbow.
ohhh that sweet tease of seduction
open legs.
fingers inserted.
but then she stops at the elbow.
ohhh that sweet tease of seduction
RE: Tease
Tease is ok if the aim is to please in the end. Upskirt with panties or no panties is all time fav.
RE: Tease
Imagine your boy friend is away for several weeks. He misses you and you miss him. He has a chance to see you online. What would you do to turn him on, make him happy and show him that you miss him....that is what you have to do in your tease. Not too much...not too little...but in the end enough for him to want to hop on a plane and fly back to you immediately. Easy.
RE: Tease
Thanks for the encouragement and inspiration. Your post is like a standing ovation...
RE: Tease
a good tease is sensual moves, upskirt, a slow striptease. Tease could be everything. We cannot touch the hosts and we will not have actual sex. So everything and anything done on cam is a tease.
go greece
I did not care who won but im glad the greeks woke up go greece )) Maybe the vuvuzela woke them
RE: with or without horns .....
2-1 at the half. Should be 2-0...a little lapse on defense right before the half. Tevez and Messi look great. A couple of more goals in the 2nd half and I can go to work a happy man..... Dale Argentina....Siempre.
RE: with or without horns .....
even if those baby blue vertical stripes make for the queerest jerseys in the entire tournament, those argentines are still real fun to watch play.
congrats!:)
congrats!:)