General Forum
any subbys out there ready to do as told
Any subbys out there ready to surrender and do exactly ast told....limites but not with clothes..you can start with them if they are tight jeans or provocative
RE: any subbys out there ready to do as told
I need a dom mistress....... to get me a beer and blow me
RE: any subbys out there ready to do as told
Lol D!! I take it you don't care to play this infantile game, huh guy? Your repartee was great and goes right to the heart of the whole Master/Slave, Dom/Sub, BDSM thing: The politics of power in sexual relationships. That power struggle has been with men and women from the very beginning and is alive and well today. The whole BDSM thing---which the practitioners loftily refer to as the "lifestyle", as if a mysterious cult---strikes me as little more than an infantile desire to play out what normally goes on in a mostly psychological way. It's as if a group of adults decides to do what a group of 4-5 year olds do, except instead of saying, "Let's play house and I'll be the...." they say, "Okay let's play Master/Slave and I'll be the Master."
D, your joke here reminds me of a joke I heard about a guy who goes to prison for the first time. He is scared and after he is checked in he is escorted toi his cell. He is greeted by his cell mate who is a big muscular guy, whereas he is a runt. The cell mate doesn't waste any time in asking the new arrival, "Well, since we're gonna live together do you wanna be the husband or do you wanna be the wife?" Wow, the new guy thinks to himself, I don't know why this guy is letting me have a say in which role I'm gonna play here, but hey, ... Somewhat relieved, he replies, "Since you're giving me the choice, I'll be the husband." Without hesitation the big man replies, "Alright, now get down on your knees and suck your wife's dick." lol!
D, your joke here reminds me of a joke I heard about a guy who goes to prison for the first time. He is scared and after he is checked in he is escorted toi his cell. He is greeted by his cell mate who is a big muscular guy, whereas he is a runt. The cell mate doesn't waste any time in asking the new arrival, "Well, since we're gonna live together do you wanna be the husband or do you wanna be the wife?" Wow, the new guy thinks to himself, I don't know why this guy is letting me have a say in which role I'm gonna play here, but hey, ... Somewhat relieved, he replies, "Since you're giving me the choice, I'll be the husband." Without hesitation the big man replies, "Alright, now get down on your knees and suck your wife's dick." lol!
RE: any subbys out there ready to do as told
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit.
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit.
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit.
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit.
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit.
RE: any subbys out there ready to do as told
Thank for the cliché. I'm sure everyone here feels a debt of gratitude for the contribution you have just made, even though by all appearances it has nothing to do with the subject of the thread.
RE: any subbys out there ready to do as told
And your verbosity had nothing to do with the original post.
RE: any subbys out there ready to do as told
Au contraire, "agent," my post, unlike yours, did indeed have something to do with the host's subject. She was soliciting for someone to play Sub to her Dom. I responded first to D's humorous rejoinder, then commented on the the whole Dom/Sub, BDSM, Master/Slave thing. Implicit in my comment is a "no" to her request.
As to your charge of verbosity, okay, I plead 'nolo contendere.' You have registered your complaint before and it is duly noted. I would praise you for your brevity, for as the Bard says, "Brevity is the soul of wit...," but I have yet to see what your brevity is in the service of. I urge you to think about participating in an exchange of ideas instead of coming in to register a petty, personal grievance with another member.
Lastly, I urge you to consider paying fellow members the courtesy of reading their posts a bit more carefully and check your unseemly habit of lifting your leg to piss on others. Expand your repertoire "agent." You might even enjoy it.
As to your charge of verbosity, okay, I plead 'nolo contendere.' You have registered your complaint before and it is duly noted. I would praise you for your brevity, for as the Bard says, "Brevity is the soul of wit...," but I have yet to see what your brevity is in the service of. I urge you to think about participating in an exchange of ideas instead of coming in to register a petty, personal grievance with another member.
Lastly, I urge you to consider paying fellow members the courtesy of reading their posts a bit more carefully and check your unseemly habit of lifting your leg to piss on others. Expand your repertoire "agent." You might even enjoy it.
RE: any subbys out there ready to do as told
There is a Subway right across the street from me. They dont deliver but they do accept coupons. I ike the steak, cheese and onions. On whole wheat with lettuce, tomato and mayo. 12 inch. Sub girls, a submarine sandwich, calm yourself.
What does this mean to you?
What do Christ mean to you?
What does the Christian faith mean to you?
What does the Christian faith mean to you?
RE: What does this mean to you?
I was raised a Roman Catholic, but I have not attended church since the age of eighteen. In fact, strictly speaking, I am not really a Christian. Culturally yes, but not as a matter of religious belief, because I do not believe in the central tenet of Christianity on which everything hinges, namely the Resurrection. In short, I don't belief Christ beat death. I believe in the historic Jesus of Nazareth. I believe he was crucified under Roman Law, but I do not believe he rose again from the dead three days later, let alone ascend into heaven as scripture tells us. And finally I don't believe Christ is "coming again." Saint Paul thought the second coming of Christ was imminent and it would happen in his lifetime. Well 2000 years have gone by and JC has yet to make an appearance.
I believe Christ was a teacher and a holy man in the same way Socrates and the Buddha were. However, I do not believe he died for my sins or that I am "redeemed" by the blood of Christ.
Christ and Christianity are two different things, of course. Looking over history and all the blood that has been shed in the name of God and religion, one has to wonder if the benefits religion has bestowed on society haven't been outweighed by the negatives. The blood man has spilled---and continues to spill---over the past 2000+ years is mind boggling. Even as I write this, men who want
I believe Christ was a teacher and a holy man in the same way Socrates and the Buddha were. However, I do not believe he died for my sins or that I am "redeemed" by the blood of Christ.
Christ and Christianity are two different things, of course. Looking over history and all the blood that has been shed in the name of God and religion, one has to wonder if the benefits religion has bestowed on society haven't been outweighed by the negatives. The blood man has spilled---and continues to spill---over the past 2000+ years is mind boggling. Even as I write this, men who want
cont'd
.....even as I write this, people are killing each other in the name religion: Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland; Arabs and Jews in the Middle East; Muslims and the native population in North Africa; Sunni Muslims and Shiite Muslims in Iraq and elsewhere. The Balkan Wars of the 1990's were rooted in the centuries old conflicts that divided the Serbs (who are Greek Orthodox) and the Croatians (who are Roman Catholic).....the list goes on and on....
RE: cont'd
All of what you say is true of course. Organized religion since the beginning of time has caused such conflicts and horrors in the name of God, or the one you pray to. A religion can start of pure, but once you introduce the human component into it, that is when it fails IMHO. Who is right, who is wrong… it does not matter if it is religion, politics, love throughout history it has always caused conflicts, bloodshed and horror.
For some reason, I was actually hoping with this post to hear from the believers opposed to anti religion folk. :) No offense intended at all :) I am still hoping to hear an answer from a non-disillusioned Catholic, atheist or other anti-religion person. :) I guess we will see.
For some reason, I was actually hoping with this post to hear from the believers opposed to anti religion folk. :) No offense intended at all :) I am still hoping to hear an answer from a non-disillusioned Catholic, atheist or other anti-religion person. :) I guess we will see.
RE: cont'd
Ani, I take no offense at all. Just to clarify my position, I am not anti-religion as such, just organized or institutional religion. Dante said, as have others, the true spirit of Christianity was undermined when it was made the official religion of the Roman Empire at the beginning of the 4th century. Dante writes about this in his essay "De Monarchia."
The problem is by no means clear-cut--at least for me. Just as individuals are flawed, one can argue the faults found in institutions are simply individual flaws writ large. But this is not where my own doubt resides. My question is, can one believe and "practice" his or her religion alone, that is without the ties of fellowship that together make a "community" possible? What's more, can one really be said to be bona fides member of a Church (or true believer), but never participate in the rites and rituals by which people commune with the Church?
Btw, what is your belief in regard of Christ and the Church?
The problem is by no means clear-cut--at least for me. Just as individuals are flawed, one can argue the faults found in institutions are simply individual flaws writ large. But this is not where my own doubt resides. My question is, can one believe and "practice" his or her religion alone, that is without the ties of fellowship that together make a "community" possible? What's more, can one really be said to be bona fides member of a Church (or true believer), but never participate in the rites and rituals by which people commune with the Church?
Btw, what is your belief in regard of Christ and the Church?
RE: cont'd
I actually have always had a similar thought. For me God is not necessary in a building per say, but I do believe he is out in the world, in nature, in the smile of someone walking past in the street and so forth. I do believe it is possible to worship without the surrounding of the church or community. Saint Paul of Thebes for example, c. 250, is regarded as the first Christian hermit. Lived to be 113 :) Not to bad in those days, or these for that matter.
Well, as some know the Catholic Church was actually split off from the Orthodox many hundreds of years ago over a few details you might say. Icons, is the Pope holy or is he the first of many and so on. It was also about this time when people started crossing themselves backward, from left to right and not from right to left as we Orthodox do. :) Strange, but true.
As for what I believe, well that is part of the reason I asked, I actually needed/wished to hear others words. I feel it in my heart and soul, but for some reason have found it difficult to put in to words.
Well, as some know the Catholic Church was actually split off from the Orthodox many hundreds of years ago over a few details you might say. Icons, is the Pope holy or is he the first of many and so on. It was also about this time when people started crossing themselves backward, from left to right and not from right to left as we Orthodox do. :) Strange, but true.
As for what I believe, well that is part of the reason I asked, I actually needed/wished to hear others words. I feel it in my heart and soul, but for some reason have found it difficult to put in to words.
The 'Great Schism' & Present Day Theocrats
Ani,
I thought it was you Orthodox who were crossing yourself backwards! lol! When did that practice change, do you know? In this vein, I remember seeing a painting at a museum in Sankt P (not the Hermitage. Can't remember the name offhand). Someone familiar with the history of the Orthodox Church in Russia pointed out to me that this painting depicted a theological dispute that actually resulted in war. One side said the proper way to make the sign of the cross is by joining the thumb and the first finger together. The other side said that one must join the thumb and the first two fingers--together these three digits corresponding to the Trinity.
The history of "The Great Schism" is very interesting and apparently was brewing for several hundred years until it was made formal in 1054(?) There were many factors, not the least of which was the historical division in the Roman Empire between the Greek speaking East (Constantinople) and the Latin speaking West (Rome). As you said, there was also the struggle between the East and West as regards the authority of the Roman Bishop (i.e.Pope) over the entire Church. But apparently the formal reason for the Schism had to do with some theological hair-splitting concerning one line in the Nicene Creed known as the "filoque" clause. As I'm sure you know, in the Roman rite the creed reads that the Holy Spirit "proceeds from the father and the son," whereas in the Orthodox rite the Holy Spirit proceeds only "from the father."
I don't much care for theology as a field of study. It's a rather wooden enterprise. Moreover, there is often a great irony about those who profess theology. How often can we observe that many, indeed maybe even a majority of those who make a formal study of God (theos), seem the least acquainted with him! lol!
I love the musical tradition of a capella choral music in the Russian Orthodox Church. In fact I had an opportunity to sing (in Russian) Rachmaninov's Midnight Vigil (or is it Midnight Vespers?) Interestingly, we performed this music in a Roman Catholic Cathedral, not an Orthodox one. I suppose as recently as fifty years ago this would have been heresy. Perhaps there is some progress being made in the matter of religious institutions willingness to promote communion and unity rather than arrogantly claiming their particular religion or sect within that religion is the one "true" faith and all others are deficient and subject to censor.
But clearly the practice continues among the ultra-Orthodox of all faiths. The ultra Orthodox Jews, for example, regard their fellow Jews who are Conservative or Reform as "apikorsim," which in Hebrew means "heretic." More derisively they are called "Jewish Goyim," i.e. Jewish Gentiles. The most conservative Catholic reactionaries are no better. Then there is the claim by fundamentalist Protestants (mostly Baptist or non-denominational "evangelical" Christians, who together are about 80-90 million people in the States!) that unless you are "reborn" and accept Christ as your "true and personal saviour" you will not be among the elect to be "saved" on the day of the "Rapture." These folks are a powerful political constituency who have been great supporters of our benighted President Bush (who once told a reporter that Jesus Christ is his "favorite philosopher!" lol!) These people have openly declared their opposition to what they call the "artificial separation between church and state." These people are scary because if they had their way, they would subvert the US Constitution and create a theocracy. They deplore theocratic rule of the Islamic variety, but would gladly set up a Christian version and govern according to their bible-driven fundamentalist precepts. They don’t care to give much thought to why the Founding Fathers thought it wise to separate matters of church and state.
It is very easy to make fun of these half-witted fundamentalist zealots, just as it is easy to make fun of the mullahs who mouth medieval doctrines spun of literalist interpretations of the Koran. But the fundamentalists here are a force to be reckoned with. They combine the dangerous elements of ignorance and fervent belief that is reinforced at Amway-like meetings in so-called “mega churches,” which look more like entertainment or sports venues. They are also well organized compared to their liberal critics, who underestimate this group’s capacity to restrict the civil liberties we enjoy under the US Constitution. Those who fully appreciate the threat these people pose are not unified in any significant way to raise public awareness or to press our elected representatives to act on their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution and defend the liberties this document provides for its citizens. The vast majority of our elected officials are for sale to the highest bidder.
In the US our golden calf is money. It is the supreme idol, an end in itself. There is no other god that can claim greater allegiance. Its most recent initiates bear witness with gaudy, obscene display of their new wealth. It is good to be rich, and recent polls suggest a national delusion is at work, with a recent poll showing 38% of all Americans believing they are going to be rich one day. This is in stark contrast to the hard economic facts over the past several decades which clearly indicate the great middle class is shrinking and returning to the ranks of the working poor. Meanwhile the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.
In the context of these growing economic inequities, I think of Jesus throwing the money lenders and usurers out of the temple. The true Christian spirit bears witness by protesting injustice and all its agents. I don’t believe in the Second Coming of Christ, but I had to smile when I read a bumper sticker that said, “Jesus is coming, and boy is he pissed!”
I thought it was you Orthodox who were crossing yourself backwards! lol! When did that practice change, do you know? In this vein, I remember seeing a painting at a museum in Sankt P (not the Hermitage. Can't remember the name offhand). Someone familiar with the history of the Orthodox Church in Russia pointed out to me that this painting depicted a theological dispute that actually resulted in war. One side said the proper way to make the sign of the cross is by joining the thumb and the first finger together. The other side said that one must join the thumb and the first two fingers--together these three digits corresponding to the Trinity.
The history of "The Great Schism" is very interesting and apparently was brewing for several hundred years until it was made formal in 1054(?) There were many factors, not the least of which was the historical division in the Roman Empire between the Greek speaking East (Constantinople) and the Latin speaking West (Rome). As you said, there was also the struggle between the East and West as regards the authority of the Roman Bishop (i.e.Pope) over the entire Church. But apparently the formal reason for the Schism had to do with some theological hair-splitting concerning one line in the Nicene Creed known as the "filoque" clause. As I'm sure you know, in the Roman rite the creed reads that the Holy Spirit "proceeds from the father and the son," whereas in the Orthodox rite the Holy Spirit proceeds only "from the father."
I don't much care for theology as a field of study. It's a rather wooden enterprise. Moreover, there is often a great irony about those who profess theology. How often can we observe that many, indeed maybe even a majority of those who make a formal study of God (theos), seem the least acquainted with him! lol!
I love the musical tradition of a capella choral music in the Russian Orthodox Church. In fact I had an opportunity to sing (in Russian) Rachmaninov's Midnight Vigil (or is it Midnight Vespers?) Interestingly, we performed this music in a Roman Catholic Cathedral, not an Orthodox one. I suppose as recently as fifty years ago this would have been heresy. Perhaps there is some progress being made in the matter of religious institutions willingness to promote communion and unity rather than arrogantly claiming their particular religion or sect within that religion is the one "true" faith and all others are deficient and subject to censor.
But clearly the practice continues among the ultra-Orthodox of all faiths. The ultra Orthodox Jews, for example, regard their fellow Jews who are Conservative or Reform as "apikorsim," which in Hebrew means "heretic." More derisively they are called "Jewish Goyim," i.e. Jewish Gentiles. The most conservative Catholic reactionaries are no better. Then there is the claim by fundamentalist Protestants (mostly Baptist or non-denominational "evangelical" Christians, who together are about 80-90 million people in the States!) that unless you are "reborn" and accept Christ as your "true and personal saviour" you will not be among the elect to be "saved" on the day of the "Rapture." These folks are a powerful political constituency who have been great supporters of our benighted President Bush (who once told a reporter that Jesus Christ is his "favorite philosopher!" lol!) These people have openly declared their opposition to what they call the "artificial separation between church and state." These people are scary because if they had their way, they would subvert the US Constitution and create a theocracy. They deplore theocratic rule of the Islamic variety, but would gladly set up a Christian version and govern according to their bible-driven fundamentalist precepts. They don’t care to give much thought to why the Founding Fathers thought it wise to separate matters of church and state.
It is very easy to make fun of these half-witted fundamentalist zealots, just as it is easy to make fun of the mullahs who mouth medieval doctrines spun of literalist interpretations of the Koran. But the fundamentalists here are a force to be reckoned with. They combine the dangerous elements of ignorance and fervent belief that is reinforced at Amway-like meetings in so-called “mega churches,” which look more like entertainment or sports venues. They are also well organized compared to their liberal critics, who underestimate this group’s capacity to restrict the civil liberties we enjoy under the US Constitution. Those who fully appreciate the threat these people pose are not unified in any significant way to raise public awareness or to press our elected representatives to act on their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution and defend the liberties this document provides for its citizens. The vast majority of our elected officials are for sale to the highest bidder.
In the US our golden calf is money. It is the supreme idol, an end in itself. There is no other god that can claim greater allegiance. Its most recent initiates bear witness with gaudy, obscene display of their new wealth. It is good to be rich, and recent polls suggest a national delusion is at work, with a recent poll showing 38% of all Americans believing they are going to be rich one day. This is in stark contrast to the hard economic facts over the past several decades which clearly indicate the great middle class is shrinking and returning to the ranks of the working poor. Meanwhile the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.
In the context of these growing economic inequities, I think of Jesus throwing the money lenders and usurers out of the temple. The true Christian spirit bears witness by protesting injustice and all its agents. I don’t believe in the Second Coming of Christ, but I had to smile when I read a bumper sticker that said, “Jesus is coming, and boy is he pissed!”
RE: The 'Great Schism' & Present Day Theocrats
Again so much verbosity, but at least in this case it can be argued to be necessary. However, it can also be greatly simplified.
After the Resurrection the apostles/diciples scattered to the winds to preach The Word. They were incredibly successful, but in those days of limited communication added to the individual personalities the interpretations and exact worship practises began to drift, especially when non-Jews were converted.
All those bishops decided to get together and not only did they decide on basic unifying principles they also fell into personal politics. Anyone who didn't sign on to the final document was declared heretic.
In those days in that part of the world if you didn't agree on religious/social you were killed, much like today.
After the Resurrection the apostles/diciples scattered to the winds to preach The Word. They were incredibly successful, but in those days of limited communication added to the individual personalities the interpretations and exact worship practises began to drift, especially when non-Jews were converted.
All those bishops decided to get together and not only did they decide on basic unifying principles they also fell into personal politics. Anyone who didn't sign on to the final document was declared heretic.
In those days in that part of the world if you didn't agree on religious/social you were killed, much like today.
RE: The 'Great Schism' & Present Day Theocrats
Thank you "agent" for granting that in this case my lengthy comment was arguably "necessary." Since verbosity is, by definition using more words than necessary, in this instance I am not guilty of it.
As regards your claim that what I said could be greatly simplified, I agree, but a brief synopsis is only a snapshot of the substance of what in this case is a rather complex affair.
I take that what you dashed off there was intended to show me how it might be done. If that is the case, you have not demonstrated your point in a convincing way. Apart from your careless and hasty construction---which is easily forgiven in the context of this slap-dash manner of communicating in places like this---your push in the direction of "greatly simplifying" carries the risk of representing matters that are complex and equivocal in an overly simplistic and reductive way.
Thus your picture of "All those bishops decided to get together and not only did they decide on basic unifying principles they also fell into personal politics. Anyone who didn't sign on to the final document was declared heretic,” and your representation of this Schism as a black and white matter of proclaimed dogma gives a false and misleading picture of the true state of affairs.
I grant that verbosity can cloud concision, but brevity is not in-and-of itself a virtue if it is inadequate to explain the thing being described. Although I am a biased party, I would argue that too many words is preferable to an insufficient number. One can always prune back the superfluous verbiage and better see the essence of the thing, but you cannot supply language about a matter of which you have no knowledge in the first place.
I had a teacher in graduate school who expressed his irritation with John Locke's writing style (not his thought) by saying, "When you've read Locke once, you've read him five times." lol! Admittedly, verbosity is tedious. (To complete the Bard's remark on brevity, he said, "Brevity is the soul of wit and tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes.") An apt image, for one can prune back the limbs and outward flourishes and the "soul of wit” remains.
The opposite is not true. If the essence of a thing is not present in the first place, the brevity is no virtue and the addition of superfluous language will not remedy this deficiency. Should Tolstoy have “greatly simplified” War and Peace so that this 1200 page story might be told more simply? My rhetorical question brings to mind Woody Allen’s remark that he had taken the Evelyn Wood speed reading course and read War and Peace in three hours. When someone asked him what the novel was about he said, “Russia.” Lol!
So, before you presume to offer me a prescription to remedy my verbosity, remember brevity has its own pitfalls. However, if you insist on showing me how it’s done, at least write it well! I suspect we are at least a generation apart. My guess is that you are half my age or even less. (If you are 28 or younger, I would be right.) In any case, the current generation does not, in the main, write very well and this is at least in part attributable to the habit of communicating via Instant Messaging and the like and growing accustomed to being sloppy about their use of the language. I may be verbose, but I am attentive to how I use the language. Brevity is not synonymous with concision. One can be brief but unclear, just as one can be verbose and unclear. Neither brevity nor verbosity has a monopoly on clarity.
As regards your claim that what I said could be greatly simplified, I agree, but a brief synopsis is only a snapshot of the substance of what in this case is a rather complex affair.
I take that what you dashed off there was intended to show me how it might be done. If that is the case, you have not demonstrated your point in a convincing way. Apart from your careless and hasty construction---which is easily forgiven in the context of this slap-dash manner of communicating in places like this---your push in the direction of "greatly simplifying" carries the risk of representing matters that are complex and equivocal in an overly simplistic and reductive way.
Thus your picture of "All those bishops decided to get together and not only did they decide on basic unifying principles they also fell into personal politics. Anyone who didn't sign on to the final document was declared heretic,” and your representation of this Schism as a black and white matter of proclaimed dogma gives a false and misleading picture of the true state of affairs.
I grant that verbosity can cloud concision, but brevity is not in-and-of itself a virtue if it is inadequate to explain the thing being described. Although I am a biased party, I would argue that too many words is preferable to an insufficient number. One can always prune back the superfluous verbiage and better see the essence of the thing, but you cannot supply language about a matter of which you have no knowledge in the first place.
I had a teacher in graduate school who expressed his irritation with John Locke's writing style (not his thought) by saying, "When you've read Locke once, you've read him five times." lol! Admittedly, verbosity is tedious. (To complete the Bard's remark on brevity, he said, "Brevity is the soul of wit and tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes.") An apt image, for one can prune back the limbs and outward flourishes and the "soul of wit” remains.
The opposite is not true. If the essence of a thing is not present in the first place, the brevity is no virtue and the addition of superfluous language will not remedy this deficiency. Should Tolstoy have “greatly simplified” War and Peace so that this 1200 page story might be told more simply? My rhetorical question brings to mind Woody Allen’s remark that he had taken the Evelyn Wood speed reading course and read War and Peace in three hours. When someone asked him what the novel was about he said, “Russia.” Lol!
So, before you presume to offer me a prescription to remedy my verbosity, remember brevity has its own pitfalls. However, if you insist on showing me how it’s done, at least write it well! I suspect we are at least a generation apart. My guess is that you are half my age or even less. (If you are 28 or younger, I would be right.) In any case, the current generation does not, in the main, write very well and this is at least in part attributable to the habit of communicating via Instant Messaging and the like and growing accustomed to being sloppy about their use of the language. I may be verbose, but I am attentive to how I use the language. Brevity is not synonymous with concision. One can be brief but unclear, just as one can be verbose and unclear. Neither brevity nor verbosity has a monopoly on clarity.
RE: The 'Great Schism' & Present Day Theocrats
A thing to remember is that most of your readership hear has English as a second (or third or fourth) language and the $2 words may be a bit much. Can you at least tone it down to $0.75 words so their eyes don't glaze over. Unless, of course, your intention is to weed them out of the discussion in the first place.
RE: The 'Great Schism' & Present Day Theocrats
his intention is to bore them to sleep.he is trying out a new cure for insomnia.its called"melonitis"
RE: What does this mean to you?
Christ to me is the embodiment of goodness,not sure exactly where i stand on him being our saviour.trying to live by doing what is right not what is best for me.Christianity is the way of living this as opposed to being religious which to me carries a little to much hypocrisy for my liking.still like me my thoughts are constantly evolving.
RE: What does this mean to you?
It reminds me when I used to smoke dope. It was all good, getting high and laughing and so on.
Then my firends and I started making little rules about how to smoke, how to pass the joint, who gets first and next, how big to make it and so on and so on.
So the simple thing of getting high was ritualized into a complex procedure. I think religion and relationship to God went through this and continues.
Those who keep belief private are happier and closer to God. Those who must control the thoughts of others are unhappy, indeed!
Then my firends and I started making little rules about how to smoke, how to pass the joint, who gets first and next, how big to make it and so on and so on.
So the simple thing of getting high was ritualized into a complex procedure. I think religion and relationship to God went through this and continues.
Those who keep belief private are happier and closer to God. Those who must control the thoughts of others are unhappy, indeed!
RE: What does this mean to you?
Who's him?
Nothing... absolutely nothing. Empty spot. Nothing nought nil etc.
Nothing... absolutely nothing. Empty spot. Nothing nought nil etc.
RE: What does this mean to you?
he was a dude that did some good things
people that believe the stretched out truths/lies of his deeds follow the set of rules set forth by the authors of the story book.
people that believe the stretched out truths/lies of his deeds follow the set of rules set forth by the authors of the story book.
RE: What does this mean to you?
Born a jew - died a jew
He had his story adjusted by those in the early christian church to fit in with there political rise to power.
His brother was the first Christian bishop !
He had his story adjusted by those in the early christian church to fit in with there political rise to power.
His brother was the first Christian bishop !
Love In The Air
Spring Break Fever-play the song "Dream Weaver" ooh dream weaver, I believe you get me through the night--ooh dream weaver, I believe we can make it through the morning light,,,,,
Now listen to the words in this ballad written by.......
Too often we understand the power of a woman touch, her smile, a kind word she speaks, a listening ear, an honest compliment or the smallest act of caring. All of which she has the power to turn a life around. This world is big as your dreams so never stop dreaming
P.S.: so around the world from here treat her nice-cool
Now listen to the words in this ballad written by.......
Too often we understand the power of a woman touch, her smile, a kind word she speaks, a listening ear, an honest compliment or the smallest act of caring. All of which she has the power to turn a life around. This world is big as your dreams so never stop dreaming
P.S.: so around the world from here treat her nice-cool
Confused
My gf was playing with Mr. Happy last night and he went off prematurely in her face and she got really mad at me..................is this my fault?
RE: Confused
id say it was her fault, tell her next time dont do it so well
but you knew it was cumming, should have warned, so i guess
yes it is your fault
but you knew it was cumming, should have warned, so i guess
yes it is your fault
RE: Confused
She had it Cumming.
Next time do what I do; right before Mr Happy spits out his love juice I shout at the top of my lungs "GEORGE BUSH IS A FASCIST!!".
Sure it's a little weird at 1st but now my g/f knows when the hot molten lava is abput to spew.
Next time do what I do; right before Mr Happy spits out his love juice I shout at the top of my lungs "GEORGE BUSH IS A FASCIST!!".
Sure it's a little weird at 1st but now my g/f knows when the hot molten lava is abput to spew.
freeda
I have (finally) come back on site, and left a reply to the post about freeda. Cos it is so far own, I thought I'd drop this off here for any interested people.
RE: freeda
know where she is, and who she is with, but it is personal and private. There may be some truth in the rumours she is leaving, but nothing is decided. Dylan, thanks for your intervention. the know-nothing-low-life doesn't have a clue about the real meaning of Non-Adult. freeda doesn't pull scams. She says no stripping and means no stripping. AT ALL. She offers chat, a laugh, a joke and a flirt. Nothing more, as is made clear in her profile.
RE: Shaking hands?
There are so many host to choose from so I'd bet each host is going to see less and less visits. My advise to you is start drinking heavily and lower your prices. You can trust me, I'm Pre-Med.
RE: Shaking hands?
Perhaps you aren't getting as much business because your price is TOO low! Lol! There is a psychological component to pricing as well. If a price is too low people will sometimes not buy the goods or services because they think there must be something wrong with it. Try $0.69 and I bet you will do more business. Charging $0.69 not only makes use of the number's sexual connotations, but it also happens to be a 38% increase over your current price of $0.50.
RE: Shaking hands?
Are you in non-adult? I bet the adult host get more visits on this site. Leave you name and you may get a visit from me.
RE: Shaking hands?
It's quite understandable. People in the same business like to commiserate if business is slow. It's rather like Mark Twain's remark about the weather, "There isn't anything you can do about it, except talk about it!"
hi all
what u think about girls with hairy pussy on this site? im think its seems sexy . if dont right , answer me please. good look all
RE: hi all
I like trimmed, Shaved is ok, but if the girl has razzor stubble it's like snadpaper when she rides on top. If she's hairy it keep the kitty too moist and smelly.
RE: hi all
If they choose to have a hairy pussy, at least keep it trim. The 70's porn star bush is just disgusting.
who was i?...boring post comming
those who've known me from the begining , i noticed a change.
what are your thoughts about who i was an what i have become?
seriously !
what are your thoughts about who i was an what i have become?
seriously !
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
well in the beginning you would never do the peanut butter/Fido training, now you are an enthusiastic participant.
RE: im
well johny looks like you also lost your sense of humor. now back to 121 training for you!
RE: to queen
the part of "seriously" when you said "seriously mistress I will be your birthday cake and stick the lit candle up my ass"
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
you havent been around long enough then, i was johnzhon before i became johnz and breastaholic.
but mean is slightly helpful, generally speaking or to the insects only?
but mean is slightly helpful, generally speaking or to the insects only?
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
how was that rude?
you want rude, i'll give you rude...
(censored)
and you can just
(censored)
and furthermore you
(censored)
how dare you
(censored)
i have nothing more to say to you!!!!!!
you want rude, i'll give you rude...
(censored)
and you can just
(censored)
and furthermore you
(censored)
how dare you
(censored)
i have nothing more to say to you!!!!!!
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
I didn't know you before but judging by this question I'd say you become a rude self-centered member.
Do you think others are concerened about how you changed since you started here? jeezz.
Do you think others are concerened about how you changed since you started here? jeezz.
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
quite right, rude, self-centred, obsessed by own self, no respect 4 women, also with plenty of time on hands 2 give non stop abuse 2 lovely ladies here. Hanging out in comchat for hours passing sly,disgusting remarks, fortunately most of ladies here have the measure of you.
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
that is tisme with the added adjective, "flaccider" I think I just invented a word.
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
i show respect to the lovely ladys and to the rude ones i am rude.
maybe my style isnt your thing,
maybe my style isnt your thing,
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
if you didnt speak to me, then how did i treat you bad?
explain..?
my only guess is that you (private) me hi hi hihi as i am talking to someone. or possibly you mass flooded emocon. otherwize i dont think i know reason of hand.
explain..?
my only guess is that you (private) me hi hi hihi as i am talking to someone. or possibly you mass flooded emocon. otherwize i dont think i know reason of hand.
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
oh i see thats better.
well i care how you are as much as you care care how i am, unless you are someone who does really care.
so you are new, i see, well ive been here long enuff to see ''hru'' 100's of times each day and once i say i cant see you, chat ends.
i understand its your job here, thats good, it is my duty as a memebr to pay you. well if you think ...hi hru, deserves getting paid, get a job as a doorman in a fancy hotel. it doesnt earn you a tip on my screen.
well i care how you are as much as you care care how i am, unless you are someone who does really care.
so you are new, i see, well ive been here long enuff to see ''hru'' 100's of times each day and once i say i cant see you, chat ends.
i understand its your job here, thats good, it is my duty as a memebr to pay you. well if you think ...hi hru, deserves getting paid, get a job as a doorman in a fancy hotel. it doesnt earn you a tip on my screen.
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
ur rude jonz face the fact! u rude 2 this grl and u did not even need to talk wit her! #$%#$%# need manner lesson? me teach u!! :D
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
as for you young lady. be quiet and go clean my toilet and bring me a potato. oh an a banana and a gallon of milk, i have a show for you.
RE: who was i?...boring post comming
i dont care if they are concerned for my wellbeing. im looking for something , but not sure. im not self centered , im way off center, tipping on the edge more so i think
Bye all...
I'm off to my new life with a very lovely woman, so it's time to say goodbye to my CC friends.
I've met 2 hosts in Romania and both are lovely people...one is still working here...and she'll always have a little piece of my heart.
Can I ask both hosts and guests to respect each other and maybe you can all enjoy the benefits of this site.
Bye everyone.
I've met 2 hosts in Romania and both are lovely people...one is still working here...and she'll always have a little piece of my heart.
Can I ask both hosts and guests to respect each other and maybe you can all enjoy the benefits of this site.
Bye everyone.
RE: Bye all...
yeah, i always get along with women especially after they give me a good blow, hehe
RE: Bye all...
see ya in 6-12 months when the bank account runs dry and she back working at CC
RE: Bye all...
Charlotte how jaded you are!!!
My experience is that the women run!!
Run to more money, another bed, even another woman!!
Hmm I think I am jaded too!!!
Maybe we can be jaded together!!
My experience is that the women run!!
Run to more money, another bed, even another woman!!
Hmm I think I am jaded too!!!
Maybe we can be jaded together!!
RE: to put the evil eye
as we grow up, we learn that even one person that wasn't supposed to ever let you down probably will. You will have your heart broken probably more than once and it's harder every time. You'll break hearts too, so remember how it felt when your's was broken.
This is always somebody story-cool
P.S.: listen to the song "Owner of a broken Heart" by Yes
This is always somebody story-cool
P.S.: listen to the song "Owner of a broken Heart" by Yes
RE: to put the evil eye
chaser.... me and my friend have had long discussions about everything lol including the darker side of life...
and we came to this one conclusion...
friends, good friends, close friends, best friends and even family will all let you down one day. That's garuanteed.
I have friends that i've known for close to 10 years and for about 7 of those years we were close friends, we told each other pretty much everything and anything and we helped each other through a lot of things when we were growing up.
The last three years have been completely different. I've realised i can no longer rely on them to save my life if i need it or to guide me like they once did.
Bottom line is... only person you can really trust 100% is yourself. Sad but true :(
and we came to this one conclusion...
friends, good friends, close friends, best friends and even family will all let you down one day. That's garuanteed.
I have friends that i've known for close to 10 years and for about 7 of those years we were close friends, we told each other pretty much everything and anything and we helped each other through a lot of things when we were growing up.
The last three years have been completely different. I've realised i can no longer rely on them to save my life if i need it or to guide me like they once did.
Bottom line is... only person you can really trust 100% is yourself. Sad but true :(
RE: to put the evil eye
the evil eye, a voodoo curse, the easter bunny, tooth fairy and a perfect wife are all stories to sell to the weak minded.
RE: to put the evil eye
I don't believe in the "evil eye," but I can understand the power ascribed to it. It has been said the eyes are a "window to the soul," and I doubt there is even one human being who could honestly say he or she has not been affected by an evil stare.
For some cultures, the "Evil Eye" is an imbedded concept in the fabric of its mythology or belief system. I don't know much about it, but I do know the evil eye (malocchio) is a long standing belief in Italian culture and my bet is that the the belief predates the Christian era.
For some cultures, the "Evil Eye" is an imbedded concept in the fabric of its mythology or belief system. I don't know much about it, but I do know the evil eye (malocchio) is a long standing belief in Italian culture and my bet is that the the belief predates the Christian era.
RE: to put the evil eye
My momma had an evil eye!!
And she could see things that had not yet happened.
She actually saved me one time when I was working on a farm and fell into a well!!
She saw me struggling and sent help!
And she could see things that had not yet happened.
She actually saved me one time when I was working on a farm and fell into a well!!
She saw me struggling and sent help!
Someone Here
ok-its Spring Break-im off this week from work-cool, so lets get down to some fun with people who are in love: This is dedicated to that love in the air: listen to the song "Take It Easy" and read this:
You've got someone here, wants to make it all right, when your long day is over and you can barely drag your feet and you have the weight of the world on your shoulders, I know what you need, bring it on home to me. Gonna lie with you till you fall asleep, when the morning comes I'm still gonna be right here looking at you. So take your worries and just drop them at the door, baby, leave it all behind, you've got someone here wants to make it all right, someone who loves you more than life right here.
You've got someone here, wants to make it all right, when your long day is over and you can barely drag your feet and you have the weight of the world on your shoulders, I know what you need, bring it on home to me. Gonna lie with you till you fall asleep, when the morning comes I'm still gonna be right here looking at you. So take your worries and just drop them at the door, baby, leave it all behind, you've got someone here wants to make it all right, someone who loves you more than life right here.
RE: Someone Here
And I thought "Take it Easy" was ...
Running down the road
trying to loosen my load
I got seven women on my mind.
Four that want to own me,
Two that want to stone me,
One says she's a friend of mine.
etc.
Running down the road
trying to loosen my load
I got seven women on my mind.
Four that want to own me,
Two that want to stone me,
One says she's a friend of mine.
etc.
RE: Someone Here
yes Take It Easy goes like that, but was said read these words and medidate while listening to Take It Easy song, not meaning these words are to that song
RE: Someone Here
Actually I wa just teasing, I just thought there was more then one song titled "Take it Easy"
Question for Female Host
With so much going on in the world today, can't we do something to end woman's sufferage?
Who's with me on this?
Who's with me on this?
RE: Question for Female Host
YES, all the major problems in the USA started with women getting the right to vote,prohabition ,organized crime got the bigest it ever was, we got anti-wife beating laws. MAN we did have a big oops.
RE: Question for Female Host
Dear Gop member, Sadly, there's little that can be called "grand" in the Grand Old Party anymore. The Eisenhower Administration was the last Republican Administration that governed in a way that did justice to the Party of Lincoln. There was even an echo of this in the Nixon Administration, but it has been all downhill since the Reagan Administration, reaching its nadir in the current administration,which presidential historians believe may prove to be the worst, most corrupt, most abusive administration in the history of the Republic. Rush Limbaugh is the perfect mascot for the GOP: a laughable buffoon & sanctimonious gas-bag.
I assume you proposed the repeal of suffrage as a joke just to get under the women's skin. But hey, why stop there? If we are going to reform our society according to the Bush "vision," let's carry out his only slightly veiled agenda---as seen in his "faith based initiatives"---and do away with what his Fundamentalist Christian constituency likes to call the "artificial separation between church and state" and transform our society into a Fundamentalist Christian Theocracy in the style of John Calvin's Geneva. In fact, we are living in moral turpitude because our Senate leaders decided not to impeach Bill Clinton for lying about a blow job. Had our government been governing in accordance with Divine Laws, Bill Clinton would have been burnt at the stake and our nation purged of this vile sin. And let us hope and pray that our merciful Father not judge the entire nation by the perfidy of godless liberals. And we ask this in Jeeeeeesus name.
I assume you proposed the repeal of suffrage as a joke just to get under the women's skin. But hey, why stop there? If we are going to reform our society according to the Bush "vision," let's carry out his only slightly veiled agenda---as seen in his "faith based initiatives"---and do away with what his Fundamentalist Christian constituency likes to call the "artificial separation between church and state" and transform our society into a Fundamentalist Christian Theocracy in the style of John Calvin's Geneva. In fact, we are living in moral turpitude because our Senate leaders decided not to impeach Bill Clinton for lying about a blow job. Had our government been governing in accordance with Divine Laws, Bill Clinton would have been burnt at the stake and our nation purged of this vile sin. And let us hope and pray that our merciful Father not judge the entire nation by the perfidy of godless liberals. And we ask this in Jeeeeeesus name.
RE: Sorry
they will do it. happened to me many of times. thought my post got lost, tried again and 2 showed up for the price of 1 :)
RE: Question for Female Host
Sadly, there's little that can be called "grand" in the Grand Old Party anymore. The Eisenhower Administration was the last Republican Administration that governed in a way that did justice to the Party of Lincoln. There was even an echo of this in the Nixon Administration, but it has been all downhill since the Reagan Administration, reaching its nadir in the current administration,which presidential historians believe may prove to be the worst, most corrupt, most abusive administration in the history of the Republic. Rush Limbaugh is the perfect mascot for the GOP: a laughable buffoon & sanctimonious gas-bag.
I assume you proposed the repeal of suffrage as a joke just to get under the women's skin. But hey, why stop there? If we are going to reform our society according to the Bush "vision," let's carry out his only slightly veiled agenda---as seen in his "faith based initiatives"---and do away with what his Fundamentalist Christian constituency likes to call the "artificial separation between church and state" and transform our society into a Fundamentalist Christian Theocracy in the style of John Calvin's Geneva. In fact, we are living in moral turpitude because our Senate leaders decided not to impeach Bill Clinton for lying about a blow job. Had our government been governing in accordance with Divine Laws, Bill Clinton would have been burnt at the stake and our nation purged of this vile sin. And let us hope and pray that our merciful Father not judge the entire nation by the perfidy of godless liberals. And we ask this in Jeeeeeesus name.
I assume you proposed the repeal of suffrage as a joke just to get under the women's skin. But hey, why stop there? If we are going to reform our society according to the Bush "vision," let's carry out his only slightly veiled agenda---as seen in his "faith based initiatives"---and do away with what his Fundamentalist Christian constituency likes to call the "artificial separation between church and state" and transform our society into a Fundamentalist Christian Theocracy in the style of John Calvin's Geneva. In fact, we are living in moral turpitude because our Senate leaders decided not to impeach Bill Clinton for lying about a blow job. Had our government been governing in accordance with Divine Laws, Bill Clinton would have been burnt at the stake and our nation purged of this vile sin. And let us hope and pray that our merciful Father not judge the entire nation by the perfidy of godless liberals. And we ask this in Jeeeeeesus name.
RE: Question for Female Host
mmm, I was just curious how many people would confuse sifferage with suffering. I saw news clip from a collage campus asking women to sign a petition ending sufferage and they had plenty women sign up thinking it was petting an end suffering. Good to see no one fell for it hear.
RE: Question for Female Host
I suppose that is one small consolation. However, the extent of illiteracy in America is alarming and does not bode well for the future. Many of the current generation of college students---and the status quo who govern---are of the mistaken impression that information is knowledge. They have been counseled to forego the study of history, literature, foreign languages, art, music, etc. in favor of business and computer science. The result is we are graduating a lot of technocrats who are uneducated. For example, I recently had a conversation with a young woman, in which I mentioned Churchill. The woman is a high school graduate in her early 20's. When I mentioned Churchill she asked me"Who is Winston Churchill?" This woman did not even know Churchill's name, let alone his role in 20th century politics. Yet, she could tell you anything you wanted to know about Anna Nicole Smith, Brittney Spears and other hollywood non-entities. Heaven help us.
Would you?
If a member asked you to stick out your tongue, pat your head and rub your stomach in a one to one video would you do it?
RE: if...
Hmmm Good question. I think it would boil down to two: Leonardo da Vinci or Johann Sebastian Bach.
RE: if...
alias, Your answer gives the impression you misunderstood the question. "I'mshy" did not ask who we would like to "be", but who we would like to meet.
RE: if...
myself, before i became what i have become.
i wouldnt want to change what i am now, i just want to remember.
i wouldnt want to change what i am now, i just want to remember.
RE: if...
i was goinf to say anna nicole smith, but she is dead, so i would say pamela anderson
RE: if...
DM and Jiverman, AmazingAnne and a lady here I can't mention, imshy if he's sober and sem if he's not high, davedave cos he such a warm guy, BBW and Ginger cos they so nice, PrettyWitch and ChickoryBlue cos they so funny. Also, the 20 year old me - 'Wear a condom always! Don't marry, have kids or get into debt you irresponsible mindless little c*nt!'
Because we all need to be special once in a while. i know i do! :D
"Special Fred"
Even if Fred was a little bit special...
When I was a boy of ten
I had a very best friend
Fred was kind with good intent
But just a little different
Oh special Fred
Momma dropped him on his head
Now he’s not so bright instead
He’s a little bit special
Just a little bit
We played tag
And he’d get hurt
I’d play soldier
He’d eat dirt
I liked math and the spelling bee
Fred liked talking to a tree
Oh special Fred
Momma dropped him on his head
Now she keeps him in the shed
Cause he’s a little bit special
Just a little bit
I ran track, hung out in malls
Fred ran headfirst into walls
I had girls and lots of clothes
Fred had names for all his toes
Oh special Fred
Momma dropped him on his head
Now he thinks he’s a piece of bread
Cause he’s a little bit special
Just a little bit
One day talking to special Fred
He grabbed a brick and he swung at my head
And as he laughed at me that’s when I knew
That special Fred just made me special too
No-oh
Now I laugh as I count bugs
I give strangers great big hugs
Next to me Fred is fine
Yeah he’s a fucking Einstein
On special Fred and me
Now we’re not right in the head you see
Now we’re not so bright instead
We’re a little bit special
Just a little bit special
That bastard Fred made me special
Just a little bit
Just a little bit special
Even if Fred was a little bit special...
When I was a boy of ten
I had a very best friend
Fred was kind with good intent
But just a little different
Oh special Fred
Momma dropped him on his head
Now he’s not so bright instead
He’s a little bit special
Just a little bit
We played tag
And he’d get hurt
I’d play soldier
He’d eat dirt
I liked math and the spelling bee
Fred liked talking to a tree
Oh special Fred
Momma dropped him on his head
Now she keeps him in the shed
Cause he’s a little bit special
Just a little bit
I ran track, hung out in malls
Fred ran headfirst into walls
I had girls and lots of clothes
Fred had names for all his toes
Oh special Fred
Momma dropped him on his head
Now he thinks he’s a piece of bread
Cause he’s a little bit special
Just a little bit
One day talking to special Fred
He grabbed a brick and he swung at my head
And as he laughed at me that’s when I knew
That special Fred just made me special too
No-oh
Now I laugh as I count bugs
I give strangers great big hugs
Next to me Fred is fine
Yeah he’s a fucking Einstein
On special Fred and me
Now we’re not right in the head you see
Now we’re not so bright instead
We’re a little bit special
Just a little bit special
That bastard Fred made me special
Just a little bit
Just a little bit special
RE: Because we all need to be special once in a while. i know i do! :D
that was special
just a little
just a little
RE: Because we all need to be special once in a while. i know i do! :D
My name is Fred, do u know me ????? lollllllllll
RE: Fluffy
she in my backyard
i use to luve her , but i had to kill her
she buried in my back yard
gunsNroses
i use to luve her , but i had to kill her
she buried in my back yard
gunsNroses
13 months
wow i just realize i been a member here now 13 months-hmm its time for me to do some soul searcher-cool
RE: 13 months
lol, chaser, wait till you hit 4 years like me.. I'm looking for a new hobby.. I might take up stamp collecting..
RE: 13 months
thats cool gete--i think i take up photograhy-taking pictures of birds and people on the streets
RE: 13 months
there are birds?? and people on the street?? What is a street?? and what catagory is she in ?
Warning: Time to rant
Dont let this shit bottle up inside, because its time to rant. Others have mentioned this happening to them. Up to now, it has never happened to me. I was in video chat with a "friend" the other day. I had noticed there were rather long pauses between her answers. I also noticed her hands seemed very busy for having such long pauses. i finally asked her if there were others with us. She said the room was full, but he could handle it. After more long pauses i asked what other sites she belonged to. Of course she answered only this one. I finally had enough and told her she was too distracted and i was going to leave. While i was waiting for the screen to clear she said "Listen, i am really sorry". Blah blah blah. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isnt this a pay site?? I'm paying for time to chat with someone who is busy chatting with others. Am I asking too much for just a little attention?? Sad part is, this has probably happened before, but I wasnt paying attention to notice what was going on. The really sad part is some time is going to pass and this will be a distant memory and i will go back. She is extremely hot. Thanks for letting me get this off my chest. Hopefully we have all learned from this. Yeah, right.
RE: Warning: Time to rant
It happens all the time. Either you have to deal with it or go into one-to-one. Obviously the more people in the room, the more cash the host is raking in.
That's the only advice I have to give you.
That's the only advice I have to give you.
RE: Warning: Time to rant
Hey Gang...
Who's ready for some hot, stinky grooves. Yeah me too...
Chuck11
Who's ready for some hot, stinky grooves. Yeah me too...
Chuck11
RE: Warning: Time to rant
Thanks for the jam. Milber the honk, honk and sex jeans in america...kisses sweety.
RE: Warning: Time to rant
Forgot to mention, after the chat, i went back to see if others were there from cc's. I was the only one from cc's.
RE: Warning: Time to rant
You're acting to fucking apologetic. You should tell her if she is in video with you she should be only with you if she wants to keep you as a customer. If she can't cover her tracks then she is a REALLY bad typist or she has at least 3 conversations going. You should make her promise in textchat that she has no other rooms open, including Yahoo or Comm Chat, then if she doesn't give all her attention to the room you are in you bail and ask cc for a refund. Give her one quick warning and then leave and complain. With that promise made in text it becomes a contract and cc will enforce it. Then come here and give her name as a multi-site girl.
RE: Warning: Time to rant
hmmm--sounds like someone is cheating here-okie dokie--keep it up-love it-smiles
RE: Warning: Time to rant
A professional chathost doing her job properly does NOT textchat on second/third screens and Yahoo/CommChat when she is in a video.
A paying customer gets a host's full attention .
A paying customer gets a host's full attention .
RE: Warning: Time to rant
I agree enforcer, if a viewer comes in2 my vid, they get my attention immediately, if i have other convos on the go, they dont even get a brb, however you cannot be guaranteed full on 121 attention, UNLESS u enter 121 video. OPEN SESSIONS, any viewer can join,. If u want exclusive 121 then enter 121, and if you dont get it then complain.Personally when I have more than 1 viewer i chat 2 ALL, so all convos can be seen, and its obvious Im humouring more than 1 viewer, I also tell them im in a show already, and if they wish 4 exclusive 121 2 comeback, this seems fair 2 me. Wot more could we do ? Im open 2 sensible suggestions.
RE: Warning: Time to rant
Dalingk, please to come back, I vill only chat to you, I miss your money...opsss I mean I miss you already.
Das Vidonya
Das Vidonya
RE: Warning: Time to rant
and my other middle name is "petri dish" thats what my bf calls my twat.
RE: Warning: Time to rant
I was once friends with four girls in the same studio at the same time. I would chat with them each whenever they were online and sometimes 2 at the same time.
(Yeah, hard to believe, but we were all pals together. In fact on my first visit to Bucharest, six hosts and me got together and they threw me a birthday party. Too bad the one I was in love with turned out to be married. :-(
Anyway, one of them convinced me to get a host account and see what it was like to have my own room. Before I knew it I was juggling textchats with a girl from Italy, one from Chicago and one from London. Imagine a novice juggling three chats on much more primitive software! This went on for over five minutes and I was about to pull out my hair, trying to keep up.
Then imagine that all three of my visitors were from that studio and they were falling out of their chairs laughing at what they were doing to me.
(Yeah, hard to believe, but we were all pals together. In fact on my first visit to Bucharest, six hosts and me got together and they threw me a birthday party. Too bad the one I was in love with turned out to be married. :-(
Anyway, one of them convinced me to get a host account and see what it was like to have my own room. Before I knew it I was juggling textchats with a girl from Italy, one from Chicago and one from London. Imagine a novice juggling three chats on much more primitive software! This went on for over five minutes and I was about to pull out my hair, trying to keep up.
Then imagine that all three of my visitors were from that studio and they were falling out of their chairs laughing at what they were doing to me.
RE: If you were not in 121 you can't tell that the girl was on other sites
Thats just it Vera. There was no in vid when i went in, yet all these conversations were going on. after i left, there was still no one in vid with her.
RE: If you were not in 121 you can't tell that the girl was on other sites
Protector, How do you KNOW there was no one in her video? Guests can elect the "private" option and their conversation cannot be seen by other guests, only the host.
RE: If you were not in 121 you can't tell that the girl was on other sites
Both options were open. Could have chosen open chat or one2one. When the one2one option is not available, it means the host is in video chat.
RE: If you were not in 121 you can't tell that the girl was on other sites
Protector, You don't understand what I mean. I am referring to the two options guests have WITHIN Live Video (not One 2 One). At the bottom right of the screen, immediately below the box in which you type, there is a 2 choice menu. The default setting says "public", but you can also change that to "private," as can every guest. It doesn't mean you are the only guest in the room, but it does mean you can communicate with the host without the other guests seeing what you type? I hope that helps. That's why I said you could not KNOW with certainty that no one else was in the room just because you saw no other guests written communication.
RE: If you were not in 121 you can't tell that the girl was on other sites
Some hosts have the common courtesy when you enter their vid to say up front, "I have another guest or guests" giving you the option to come back later, some even prefer that you come back later. these type of hosts, (rather than the ones juggling 3 conversations, and often denying that they have other conversations going)are the hosts I am more likely to spend my money.
RE: If you were not in 121 you can't tell that the girl was on other sites
Well maybe some hosts are able to juggle 3 conversations at once... Maybe they are able to jugle even more than 3 at once.
Anyway, from the moment u don't see the one 2 one option, you know for sure that she's in video, so if u want the entire attention, why bother to enter anyway??
Anyway, from the moment u don't see the one 2 one option, you know for sure that she's in video, so if u want the entire attention, why bother to enter anyway??
RE: If you were not in 121 you can't tell that the girl was on other sites
if you see the 121option, she may or may not be taking with another member..those hosts who up front and say, "excuse me I have another member, do you mind or can you come back later?" are more likely to get my business. It is common courtesy.
RE: Warning: Time to rant
Protector, Let's just say you were naive. First off, it's understood--and I believe directly stated by CC--in Live Vid you may not be the only guest in the room. As Dazed & Confused (no doubt the brother of Shocked & Amazed) has already pointed out, only One 2 One guarantees you exclusivity. Do some hosts lie about other members being present? Sure, but many (if not most) will tell you directly, "Yes, there is another guest here."
Not only do hosts often entertain more than one guest at a time, some work---in the free mode---3, 4 or even more sites at once. In principal, this is against the agreements hosts (and studio owners) enter into with the sites, but this is an agreement that is likely more often broken than honored. The studio bosses intruct the hosts not to talk about the competiton. The studios try to at least keep up appearances.
So there's the reality. If you want to be guaranteed that you are alone with the host, spring for the extra money and go One 2 One. Otherwise you have no grounds for complaint.
Not only do hosts often entertain more than one guest at a time, some work---in the free mode---3, 4 or even more sites at once. In principal, this is against the agreements hosts (and studio owners) enter into with the sites, but this is an agreement that is likely more often broken than honored. The studio bosses intruct the hosts not to talk about the competiton. The studios try to at least keep up appearances.
So there's the reality. If you want to be guaranteed that you are alone with the host, spring for the extra money and go One 2 One. Otherwise you have no grounds for complaint.
The Magic Seat
Hey Gang...
Who's ready for some hot, stinky grooves. Yeah me too...
Chuck11
Who's ready for some hot, stinky grooves. Yeah me too...
Chuck11
host beware
I wanted to pass this information along to other host on here. Im doing this in general to let other members know what i think about this. I wont tell my name in order to protect me for happening again and I wont mention the name of the member to protect his foolish ways on how to get attention from host. I know some host probably might like this attention but be aware on how far it goes and good luck to you. This member started out in cc chat room talking to me and 2 other girls in community room until he was told to make a choice on whom to pick. I found out he was using us 3 girls to chat with in pvt and only came in video chat a few times with us and us girls found out he was saying the same things to all of us, true I think I fell in love with this man, but later on, Im not, found out he was using me to get freee pvt chat with him only. He even got jealous when i talk to other members in chat room. He was promising us a lot of things but o-well to cut this off its getting to long, all I want to say beware of this, I lost revenue because of this and hope to make it up now with members in chat room and on cc. To all other members that I didnt chat with before because of him I am sorry and hope you will forgive me. My head is cleared up now
RE: host beware
sorry dear, hope the bastard gets his kicks off on this--im glad you came to your senses--wish i knew who you where.
RE: host beware
Funny story. Sorry, do you expect anyone to feel sorry for you? You are here stripping for cash in front of many men. What do you expect? This isn't letsfallinlove.com
RE: host beware
No apology required and your post serves as a timely reminder that , up to a point, people can be whoever they want to pretend to be on this site.
RE: host beware
Wow!! and all this time I thought this site was supposed to be for fun Huh, who'd of thunk????
RE: host beware
It is for fun, but there are some instances where people are looking for something more and he could have told her lies to make her believe he wanted her for "more"
RE: host beware
I often have similar conversations with more than one host at a time as all hosts do as well. Any member who is jealous of casual conversation is an idiot, as is any host.
However, if a host convinces me that we are heading to a relationship I will either stop talking to her or stop talking to her colleagues.
However, if a host convinces me that we are heading to a relationship I will either stop talking to her or stop talking to her colleagues.
RE: host beware
hmmm--sounds like another one cheating here-okie dokie-host come and see me--we make friends and have sex under the stars and we make him wonder what he is missing
RE: host beware
Darling, please give me one more chance. I will only be with you. I miss your free shows already...opss...I mean I miss you already.
Your little Snuggle Bunny.
Your little Snuggle Bunny.
RE: host beware
it's fun to have serious chat with someone while in vid with someone else, watch them say all kinds of stupid things while I have fun.
RE: host beware
it sounds like someone is cheating to me--thats good-keep it up, thats what i love about this place, no one gets serious-
RE: host beware
i found out the hard way to-but im ok with it now, so host if you need a new lover let me know
RE: host beware
no i am not giving my name--didnt you read it first no name to protect future revenue, i am over it-so let it be, i have new clients now, and I didnt say all members i just said beware, so this is the last time you will hear about it from me, and to all others above, i will see you in chat room, we shall talk (wink)
RE: What r u looking for???
some hot,wild sex that lasts all night long and maybe a beer or two.oh and a pepperoni pizza and some ice cream.but sex first please.
RE: What r u looking for???
hmm--sex-bed-cash-and all the above--but not looking for paco-hehe
Would u change for a viewer.
Ok imagine sunday evening after working even on saturday, you are all relaxed and flicking thru the channels, sitting on ur sofa in ur warm bath robe, a stranger jumps in one2one and asks if u could change in a sexy top and skirt. You have a wardrobe full of shirts, tops and skirts in the bedroom but that's what u wear when u go to work and never at home.
How would u react? Will u tell him to stay in video and run to pick something or? I personally said i can't be bothered to change now, why would i change for goodness sake. There r so many girls online and there will be certainly some in a top and skirt.
Why do u guys bother to ask for changing?
How would u react? Will u tell him to stay in video and run to pick something or? I personally said i can't be bothered to change now, why would i change for goodness sake. There r so many girls online and there will be certainly some in a top and skirt.
Why do u guys bother to ask for changing?
RE: Would u change for a viewer.
Because we are paying. If you dont want to change that is your choice. Just dont complain about the lack of members, videos and money. Call me crazy but members want their hosts to fit a fantasy and they want them to look feminine and sexy. Surely that is not news to you.
RE: Would u change for a viewer.
lmao i never complaint, my job pays the bills, money from here r for spoiling myself :)
RE: Would u change for a viewer.
Some girls forget that this is a fantasy site and they need to be creative to earn more regulars. A girl that can be unique and interesting will get RICH.
RE: Would u change for a viewer.
Many hosts make LOTS of extra money by having a few costumes hanging nearby. I knew one studio where the boss hired only girls who wore the same size clothes so they could all fit itno the big fanatasy wardrobe that he had there.
RE: Would u change for a viewer.
I like my host to wear leather fishnet stockings, a latex mask, wooden clogs and a bright orange wig, makes me feel like I'm the only one to ask for this. Can you help me out?
RE: Would u change for a viewer.
if you're laying on your back and he wants to see you on hands and knees...if your showing your breast and he wants to see your ass..would you change that? why is it hard to believe a viewer would want to see something different? if we all enjoyed seeing the same thing, there would only be a need for one host on the site. we all have different preferences. no need to be puzzled by that. same as if you tell someone you won't use a toy, you can always tell him, i won't wear a skirt. there's no difference and it's really not that difficult to understand. do what you'll do...don't do what you won't do. he'll either learn to enjoy or move on. there are lots of hosts here working hard to make a buck. i am sure they would welcome simply changing outfits to do so.
RE: Would u change for a viewer.
Milena, Looks like you've gotten a lot of different perspectives from hosts and viewers. As for my part, I'm mostly interested in seeing a girl take her clothes OFF!, not changing into something else. But as someone pointed out here, some guys apparently have a fetish about having a girl put on different outfits.
I was in a Live Vid once and was not the first guest there. When I entered the host was naked. She was gracing us with her sinuous motions. Her lovely feminine form was a delight to behold. Suddenly she got up and began to get dressed. She got fully dressed, including her outdoor winter coat. When I asked if she had to leave she explained that this was a request from the guest that had gotten there before me. I couldn't imagine foregoing the sight of her naked body for this, but as someone has already pointed out, each to his own taste. (Also, a host recently told me she has a guest who always requests that she eat pizza...nothing more.* He doesn't ask her to remove her clothing [she is in Adulty category], just eat pizza. That's his thing. She finds it an easy request to fulfill and she doesn't have to remove a stitch of clothing! )
____________________
* There is a group of Indians from the Brazilian Rainforest whose word for "eat" and "copulate" are the same.)
Asking that a girl change outfits sounds like a reasonable request, but it also depends how and to what purpose the request is being made. If it is apparent from the guy's tone and manner that he is doing this as an excercise in control and treating you like a Barbie doll that he dresses and undresses, that would rub me the wrong way----paid or not. When it's clear that such a guest wants to treat you like a Mr. Potatoe Head or some sort of dancing bear for his amusement, he's pushed beyond the limits of the protocol. In that case I would politely refuse his request and show him to the door.
Good Luck Milena
I was in a Live Vid once and was not the first guest there. When I entered the host was naked. She was gracing us with her sinuous motions. Her lovely feminine form was a delight to behold. Suddenly she got up and began to get dressed. She got fully dressed, including her outdoor winter coat. When I asked if she had to leave she explained that this was a request from the guest that had gotten there before me. I couldn't imagine foregoing the sight of her naked body for this, but as someone has already pointed out, each to his own taste. (Also, a host recently told me she has a guest who always requests that she eat pizza...nothing more.* He doesn't ask her to remove her clothing [she is in Adulty category], just eat pizza. That's his thing. She finds it an easy request to fulfill and she doesn't have to remove a stitch of clothing! )
____________________
* There is a group of Indians from the Brazilian Rainforest whose word for "eat" and "copulate" are the same.)
Asking that a girl change outfits sounds like a reasonable request, but it also depends how and to what purpose the request is being made. If it is apparent from the guy's tone and manner that he is doing this as an excercise in control and treating you like a Barbie doll that he dresses and undresses, that would rub me the wrong way----paid or not. When it's clear that such a guest wants to treat you like a Mr. Potatoe Head or some sort of dancing bear for his amusement, he's pushed beyond the limits of the protocol. In that case I would politely refuse his request and show him to the door.
Good Luck Milena
Real vs Cyber
Which would you rather have a cyber relationship with a pretty sexy lady or a real relationship with average looking lady?
RE: Holy Cows :)
why not just spend the money ON your wife instead of here and work on making your relationship better?
RE: Holy Cows :)
Cuz my wife knows I'm a fat balding stinking pasty face slob. In the internet world I'm handsome, rich and attractive.
RE: Holy Cows :)
even thinking of counting to 492 makes me want to sit down & take a nap....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz