General Forum

reminds me of when I want to kill the person ahead of me when she pays with a check, and yes, 99% of the time it is a woman.

They take out the fucking check and everyone has to wait for the total bill and for her to fill it all out instead of just using cash, a credit card, or an ATM/Debit card. And if she isn't a regular customer, you need to wait for ID to be checked and manager approval and all that bullshit!

I fucking hate that! Get into the 21st century!

You think I could shoot them and get away with it?

n/a

I likes that joke as I have often complained about the same thing when standing in a supermarket queue.

n/a

Dear Horse Dick, "And one final thing, a Senior Citizen Discount for members over 65 of maybe 5%.except on weekends." lmao
men in the age of 65 are usualy more rich than 20-30 ;) coz already build some business and have money. In general i like everything here, thats why i closed accounts on all the rest sites.the only thing which is annoying here its ----> rating sistem (which i think should count only if guy spent 10 minuts in video.( this way guy jealous members and envy hosts will think twice before come in the room of Top host and rate 1 star)all the rest is fine. As well, i would like to see more promotion things,not money contests, but promotions for hosts. top girl of the day for example. or 3 top girls of the week. why i think so.? i think evrybody want to be on the first page. this way hosts will have the goal to work more hard. and also more girls will be visible on the site.not only covergirls..i would also put some bonus thing like. for example host earn 3000 a pay period -this way she get 100 $ bonus, and if host made 4000 a pay period -she get 200$ bonus from site etc. this would stimulate the host activity. and host will try to earn more.Some thing like 5 HARDERS WORKER of pay period. THE Best smile,the most friendly chathost,etc.CC had such things before few years ago. but then its all dissapeared. and now its getting boring to work from contest till contest like 2-3 months. i think cc need some little things,which would make hosts work harder.and also bring a lot of new members on the site. Being a Public Relations and Advertisment Specialist by profession,i would add a lot of things here;)

n/a

To My pussy is wet,
You think they should give u bonus because host is hard worker? no way! This site is not for work cause of fun and enjoy. If u work in Bank or Nurse,Lawyer, work in office then yes they should give u nice bonus!

Yes I agree with incentives for hosts. But still want my Senior Citizen Discount! Being older does not mean one is rich, far from it.

why would they do such a thing on the weekends when they are busiest. as a senior over 65 you're probably retired and have nothing better to do during the week anyway.

When a host earns that much in a month she doesn't need a bonus...lol. Also ten minutes before rating....omg that is so over
the top. The standard is 2 minutes and the ability to stay for 20 seconds without costing anything and unable to rate. Seems like that makes a lot of sense. Then you don't have the sabotage hosts.

n/a

"it's annoying when some hosts use NA to draw people to their IA rooms"

only if a viewer demand adult things in NON-ADULT category

I agree with the idea of similar categories, but NA and Softcore should stay there and not be able to open in IA.

n/a

Totally agree....

maybe she needs NA to cool off, take a break, catch a breather ;) All that finger play in hardcore, all that moaning and groaning, all that climaxing again and again, HAS to be physically draining and exhausting ;)

"So, is it wrong to ask when I can find a host online for future visits?"
It was just one host, doesn't mean all others hosts think the same. Of course you can ask about it, nothing wrong with it.

why not put her in ur favourite list or set an alert ?

n/a

n/a

My posts, lol.

n/a

ThomasPaine is my actual screen name.

I don't believe you :)

To verify mine or anyone's screen name , all you have to do is CC Mail them

I have a strong feeling that you have other screen names that appear when you go into hosts room!! If fact I know it!

n/a

n/a

you really think most of those in escort met members?

I know of two hosts here that would qualify as real escorts. I think only one of the two was ever in that category. For the rest, it was just another category to use for a second session.

I think if you have a good relationship with hosts and are willing to spend a lot of money on them and take them on a nice vacation, there are several here that you can meet. Some of these hosts might surprise you, and not all of them must be back before midnight, hehehe.

funny! :)

Escort = prostitution. That is against cc rules.

not necessarily. I would only pay an escort for her time. Guiding me thru her city, being fun company. If anythig else happened, that would be purely two adults deciding to have fun.

I think you might be using the word "escort" differently than most people, lol. An escort meets you with the presumption that you will be having sex with her. You might never actually ask for sex if it is illegal where you live, but both parties assume there will be sex. You are paying her for sex even if nobody actually formally states this.

The two hosts I was referring to definitely meet guys and almost definitely have sex with them. Well, one I know has sex with guys (no, not me, lol) and the other I am pretty sure has done it. I am not sure if they have done it with CC members, but I think both have. But I am confident that neither of them would ever be foolish enough to talk about it on CC.

You are using the term in terms of a personal tour guide. I don't think 99.9% of hosts chose that category to mean that. Once again, it was simply an ambiguous category that hosts chose just to have a second session in a category where there were few hosts to draw attention to themselves. Actually, it was escort & massage, and I doubt too many, if anyone, met a massage therapist this way, lol.

Maybe when the category was first established it actually had a few real escorts and a few massage therapists, but definitely not in the few years before it was removed. At most there was one that I know of.

I would suggest simply establishing a good relationship with a host and propose meeting her as a tour guide. I don't know if it will work or not, but it might. It will all depend upon how the two of you interact online and how much she trusts you. But I doubt too many hosts will meet you until they are sure of your motivations. CC is primarily an interactive porn site after all.

I was not born yesterday. Ambiguity can be a good thing. I like escorts and I know the game.

Ok... Here is your revised post:

I would like CC to bring back the escort category, and I want only real, legitimate escorts to work there. They can operate under the guise of tour guides for hire, and if we happen to hit it off, we can have sex too.

Better?

I agree, but "escort" is hard prostituion for me! Here the host just sell feelings, flirting and their body to some extend...
But on some sites there's even a categorie "give a personal tour of my town" to meet - they should put that here in CC also!
And if you get a long good many many times in chat, and you fit together you can see what and if it happens after a cup of coffee and a nice holiday...

n/a

It was a fantasy category...the girls in that category were not more or less obliged or willing that girls in any other category. The possibility of meeting a host from any category exists if you have the time and money and the host agrees to the meet. Bring money.

n/a

as I'm sure a member's profile would be so intellectually conceived, that us , hosts, would be amazed . Let's forget that most of the guys answer with "horny bb" when asked "how are you ?".
If you want good quality lecture, I suggest you a library. Good luck !

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

never happened with me to be honest, price always the same as it was before till i change it

Yes a host losing their connection happens frequently, but usually does not affect the price. But I have had a few hosts in Glamour raise their 121 price significantly after agreeing to do a show in 121.

n/a

Hmmmm. Well she just had had a private in open session at the same price about 1 minute before so unless you mean it went back to the price it was the last time she logged into CC that was not what happened.

In fact, I entered right after the last guy had left and she was still undressed. I said it was okay but she got dressed anyway, but then she stripped. Potentially a stalling tactic or maybe it just seemed strange to start off a session being naked already.

I suppose she might have thought I wasn't coming back so she raised the price, but I've never had this happen before. The price has always been the same when I have gone back, and anyway, she said that she hadn't raised it.

I guess it all comes down to whether she intentionally disconnected me or not because she either wanted more money or had an upcoming appointment with a guy that usually spends more. I know hosts sometimes raise the price for certain members. But I don't think she stayed online much more after I left because I checked to see if she put the price higher again.

Anyway, this was all strange, and a first for me after years on CC.

Yes. It happens from time to time. When it does, I just go into text-chat and ask them to lower it. No harm, no foul.

It has happened to me a number of times for various reasons....generally the host has a connection problem, or I have a connection problem...once my credit card reached the max before verification...but the price never changed.

n/a

and why would you be charging a 'friend' money to see you?

Yeah, it happened to me recently. I had a brief chat with a new host, but one of us had to go, so she told me next time I see her online to come to her room and we would have some fun. So, I go there and check the price - same as last time. Anyway, I go to her text chat and remind her of what she said before. Then she tells me to come back in 5 minutes because she was on the phone. So I come back, and saw that she had increased her price! Hah! Needless to say, I didn't resume. So then I get an email from her asking why I didn't come back, and my reply was that I had to go because someone had a bridge to sell me. She is still waiting.

n/a

ok... i will be a 2 min man next time.... i know hosts love that :p

Internet sex seems to be the only place where being a premature ejaculator is a plus. It saves lots of money. Of course there is the minor humiliation of the dissapointed host asking "Are you done already?" LOL

Only my being done matters. What I pay her compensates for any lack of orgasm.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

loooll good story wildeyess but what does that have to do with the original post, which was done to advice people of what was on the news the other night?

i did not post it as a joke, i posted to inform everyone of what is happening with the internet and any connections problems people might be having.

n/a

I am not here from the early days so i dont know how it was like,but yes you do make a point.I agree.

damn,you wasted a dream on that! :--)

I dont like and don't agree. I have some rooms in different categories and in all rooms different type of guests. I somehow manage it, that give me all time busy. Just one room doesn't work so good.And even if CC forbid it, hosts in that case open rooms in other sites at the same time. So it will be the same.

Usually the problems are when hosts have softcore and hard core sessions open at the same time. This can lead to a host that has a little shy session and a not so shy session to saying "only 121" for the not so shy session too.

Maybe CC could do something like they do with restricted sessions. For example, they could have a warning message for nonrestricted not so shy and instant action sessions. The nonrestricted not so shy warning could be something like "Reminder: You must strip in open session in a reasonable amount of time if the member asks. Requiring 121 is not allowed." For the nonrestricted instant action session, the message could be something like "Reminder: You must strip the moment the member asks. No delaying tactics such as trying to continue chatting or requiring 121 are permitted."

That seems to imply (which is correct) that it is the hosts that are ignoring or not reading the rules and need to be patrolled to make sure they are.

I don't know what you consider the "early days" I joined in 2002 and at that time some ohosts had two or three rooms open in littleshy and another couple in not shy with different prices in all of them. Personally I enjoyed those days more.

I joined in early 2000

n/a

".I didn't even know u can have 1 room open in hard and one in soft...isn't this against rules?"

I don't think it is. I see girls have room in non adult and one in Glamour and at least one in Not So Shy and another one in
Fetish. Have seen several over time that had one in Glamour and one in Not So Shy or IA. I think the host has to close one of the rooms when she gets a viewer in one room.

yes it is great news, ive been a host for years and never realised this ha ha so your saying when I go live later, I can have 1 room open in Fetish and 1 in Dungeon, as both represent my activity ???????

Yes that is my understanding and what I have seen. And Fetish and Dungeon are the same to me. All nails, feet, shoes, and Dominas and their slaves. And the Dungeon only has the Dominas and their slaves and no nails, feet or shoes. And unlike their counterparts in Not Shy and IA there is no nude requirement in Fetish or Dungeon.

Yes...yes....yes!! You make so much sense and it seems so simple and with much less confusion especially to the members who are supporting the site!! Seems to me that members would be happier and the retention rate would be much better. CC really does offer something for everyone's desires so why not keep it as it was designed without all the confusion!

Redundant and boring

I agree. I don't like the BB expression. Tons of hosts use it. I think it cheapens the chat.

n/a

pls dont di BB!

How about "Hey toots"? Would that be ok?

I mean why is it hard to type the 2 extra letters and just write Baby..

oh i thought hosts were calling me big boy, damnit.

That was a good one!!

I agree and only use the term when the host uses it first

n/a

n/a

I think it is the foreign hosts that use it and actually started the expression from the beginning. I would think that members think that is what they want to hear after so many times.

n/a

n/a

n/a

You talk smart here, but you forget that in the end we pay and it is your hostess-job to do the mood right and you must like what the guest talks and please the paying guest in your room. The guest don't care if you are turned on, like it or compatible, because we pay and get what I want from the girl and then you please me and then I leave you until I need it again or get boring and find a better pleasing sexgirl.

n/a

There is a big difference between self esteem and sexual satisfaction. Yes you are entitled to respect in your pvt, but not to sexual gratification. You are well paid to do your job and satisfy your paying customer, not the other way around.

n/a

I agree, man! The hostess is wrong! It is no matter of self esteem, the girl must do her job here and please me in all categories! The girl gets money to smile and give sex and than the girl receives genuine money. And I tell you I know you that you want to put away your self esteem here to get my money when you show me and strip and please me in every way I tell you and do what I want and need when I am horny and need it! Yes, sometimes Alpha plays and tells the girl I care and treat with respect to get everything out of the girl in make new friends or glamour category to get what I need and they give it to me sooner or later... It functions, I need many chats and money long sometimes in any categorie you hide but I win and get my screenshots at the end. Dont cry, because all are happy after the day!

n/a

n/a

so many suggested"improvements"in this forum are taken from other sites.if these"improvements"are so good i wonder why the members are here & not there?maybe because although not perfect,it's the best. if even half these"improvements"were implemented,cc would lose what makes it unique.ohh & as sure as night follows day,there would be more suggested"improvements"
that's my rant for the day,time to sleep,the ouzo has finally kicked in.take care people :--)

The rules are fine. The problem is people don't always know the rules or follow them.

Hosts often will not know the rules, not pay attention to the rules, or even if they know the rules, will ignore them. All of these things are usually their own fault since most hosts have decent English language skills although there are times a host has poor English, a studio boss gives the host incorrect information, or the rules are confusing (for example, I misread the nonrestricted verus restricted explanation the first time I saw it since I read it pretty quickly, although it is pretty clear if one reads it carefully).

Fortunately, this isn't usually a problem. I've written numerous complaints about hosts and CC is very good about giving credits, but I'd say the vast majority of hosts follow the rules (or at least the higher rated hosts usually follow the rules... hint hint, ladies!). That doesn't mean I'm always happy since some just might not be very good at their jobs, but in terms of following the rules, which is what your post is basically about, it isn't too big of a problem in general.

What is a problem, in my view, is that CC doesn't seem to be strict enough with their punishment and will, for example, let the not so shy host that has been on the site for 2 years get away with saying "only 121" when she almost definitely knows this is wrong. Usually, it seems, they just warn hosts over and over instead of punishing them more severely so they stop inappropriate behavior.

But some members are guilty too in that they expect things that they are not entitled to. This usually deals with Glamour and Little Shy hosts. These can refuse to strip or say "only 121", and many members rate them poorly for this. A member rating this way is 100% wrong since the host has the option in these categories regarding what she wants to do. But again, CC could do a better job, namley about explaining the category requirements to members. It very clear to hosts what they most do, but it isn't very clear what members have a right to expect. And since many members might not even pay attention to categories and just think "I'm on a porn site and expect nudity", this just makes things worse.

CC works well 90% of the time even though that other 10% of the time can royally piss me off and sometimes keep me away for awhile. I'm usually satisfied with most hosts I visit, of course, I'm also the person that has said be careful of visiting hosts under 4,5 stars so the odds are in my favor given I focus on higher rated hosts. That doesn't mean avoid anyone under 4,5 stars, the lower the stars, the more likely you might be disappointed. So, in sum, I don't think any big change is necessary other than CC finding a way to make the rules clearer to everyone (such as mutiple languages.... some rules are only available in English), and after having done so, being a bit harsher towards those that don't follow the site's policies.

Quote: 'These can refuse to strip or say "only 121", and many members rate them poorly for this. A member rating this way is 100% wrong since the host has the option in these categories regarding what she wants to do.'
But then a rating below 4.5 stars really is not their fault - so give them a chance to make up for these idiots!

n/a

n/a

n/a

"121 can cost the same as open video, a host can open passowrd protected session... so?"

This is true but not on the fly.

n/a

You mean set same price for open and 121? OK you would know, but I've never seen it. Most of the time it is almost double.

n/a

That's good to know. Thx for the info.

So is that the case with your open session and 121 costs?

n/a

You mean regulars who are good spenders

There was something similar called sinulator on another site a few years ago. It was a dildo connected to the computer that the viewer could control from his side. It had many glitches and girls would often fake inserting it because men are so disillusioned on what would feel good LOL

Think you replied to the wrong post....look below!

n/a

yes ,i heard of this,i have such dildo :)) but never tryed it here, lmao

And when you call her BB, the host pulls her end out and reaches for a hammer........ lmfao )

n/a

not funny!! lol

n/a

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teledildonics

This is a real product already, marketed to cam hosts. I haven't seen anyone use it yet but it's out there. Host uses a dildo and via the magic of the internet you slide a device over your member and it makes it feel like what she is doing. Do some googling it should pop up.

You should write a book.

I have always used my member username here, and I have always spoken my mind (and have gotten into a few rows, anyone remember the huge "evolution versus creationism" row? served me right !).
And to hosts posting under your own name, and not being anonymous...I bow down to you and admire you, respect...I don't understand why you call this advertising? What kind of cam site would this be if the hosts were all anonymous? This site is meant to be a place to be seen, to be known, and to meet. If you see a host in this forum, under their own name, no-one is forcing you to check them out and spend pvt time with them.

Gary I was not being critical of the hosts that use their screen names. I was only pointing out that it attracts viewers to their room. I've gone to many over time. And I was only offering my opinion why CC has the forum set up for posters to post with their name as you do anonymous as I do. I was not being critical or supporting either side.

Ok, good discussion. I guess folks will continue doing what they feel comfortable with...

n/a

Non-members of CC can post in the forums. They have no valid CC id so in essence they will always be annoymous. I don't see anything particulary cowardly in using a fake name or particularly heroic in use a real ID. I think the freedom annoymity gives people makes for a more exicting and controversial forum.

Ok, though I do not understand what you mean by "freedom of anonymity". For example, I am not anonymous here, now, yet I feel completely free to write what I please. What further freedom do you think I would enjoy if I posted under the name of "anonymous member"?

The only reason I can think of for your "freedom of anonymity", is that there is some element of fear if you are posting under your own name. Fear of what, I don't know (though I may find out after this post :). Using your own terms now (i.e. heroic/cowardly), I would class posting under your own name then, in a climate of fear (if this was indeed the case) as being heroic.
Or thinking again, I guess anonymity would give me the freedom to post controversial, insulting, or other negative remarks, so that no one could trace them back to my otherwise good name. Now that would be sneaky, and hiding behind a false name, again using your own terms, I would class as cowardly.

I do not understand the value of anonymity in a forum of personal opinion. Using your own name gives your comment an identity, so that you can tell who said what in a discussion containing many layers of responses and replies.

,,,Though I do take your point about non-members being able to post here without having an identity.

Another danger of being able to choose and hide behind any identity - what is to stop someone from stealing mine, i.e. maliciously posting poisonous or inappropriate comments under my username? Yes, that would be a fear for me...

exactly, it happened to me just the other day in Viewer forum. I posted a reply, from "the REAL not2bright"" and asked why he was using my name to make his posts. CC removed his post altogether.

if CC really wanted people to voice their opinions and say what is on their mind, then they wouldn't be so proactive (or maybe it's reactive) in deleting out posts. Not every deleted post is luring business away from the site, nor is it detrimental to CC. Many of the posts deleted are regarding honest, albeit very perturbed feelings regarding certain hosts or practices. Sometimes I have been hard-pressed to see any rational rationale for censoring some posts. Truly wanting hosts and members to voice their opinions they would refrain from deleting posts, except those promoting other sites or which could damage CC's business, or which are just plain deception and lies. Just my opinion.

Anonymity doesn't guarantee anyone's ability to be honest. It simply reinforces cowardice, and especially hiding behind anonymity to voice criticism (often unjutified, or biased) That also is just my opinion.

I agree

n/a

You'd be surprised how many I come across that either don't know or ignore the site rules for their own benefit.

n/a

Dude, if somebody screws you, just email CC and get a refund. They're very good about issuing refunds when they're warranted. They're also good about issuing reprimands to hosts that are in genuine violation of the rules.

n/a

The girls in your studio used to do this a lot, didn't they?

n/a

LOL And I suppose you haven't seen all the complaints about you Tver girls here in the forums.

n/a

you know its true for a fact, because you have done it yourself in the past

n/a

I agree yes! The CC is a very good site and the rule is the rule. All the hostesses must remember all the times: THE GUEST IS KING! And the hostess must do what the guest says and agree with you and then she breaks a contract and cheats on you you must get your money back from her when she steals it from you! I am very inteligent I contact CC often to refund, and sometimes I become my money back. And also if the hostess breaks the rules of the CC and not show she should be bannished from the CC. She too hurts the CC and all other hostesses here with bad service! So I am strict and tough so when she cheats I just then dont visit there room anymore never again and then no Alpha money not more even if they beg and cry. Alpha has a lot of money and is cool then and says cool: No! I dont need them I have a lot of sex! The girls here should thank us for giving them a lot of money and they cant earn so much money in there poor countries where they are from! We guests must help together and report bad hostesses and write them to CC and here on the forum! So if the girl steals money from me and the CC and is too stupid and not understands the rules of the CC, she must search for a different work and she can better wash dishes or something there are other more sexier girls also to become my money and please me!

happy Birthday my babe!!!!!!!!!!!! all the rest is personal :* xxx

n/a

n/a

n/a

A couple days late sheesh... but I hope you had a wonderful day!

n/a

Gamour is the new non-nude, non dildo in the vagina category. Not for everyone...pretty dull if you ask me....

Yes I agree. I would have differed before I came on site, but you are correct.

It is good to hear from a member that can appreciate the true meaning of Glamour! So many of the hosts that have migrated to there have no idea how sexy and sensual a girl can be without a strip and a toy. I don't believe that she is the only host there that understands that though! Good that you spoke up but think many will not understand your theory.

n/a

ahh forgot to say, that pics could be made not professional.outside is ok also.but good quality of coz...this way 11 girls could get a chance to be advertised each month.

n/a

n/a

that sounds like an awesome idea. cc will have to determine how much they can give away as a prize etc, but would be nice to have some covergirls every week or two weeks or something like that.

Or, rather than a prize, CC could simply waive their percentage of the host's income for the 1 or 2 week period (though no guaranteeing her studio would pass on all the extra). Which would also be an added incentive to the chosen covergirl during her reign, and from a commercial perspective wouldn't be any different to CC than when a host goes on holiday and isn't generating any income.

i think studio hosts usualy have 3-4 stars,lazy and have too low price,for be a good deal for cc...and as well ,working on too many sites...i think it is better idea for girls who are working at home.there r hundreds girls who are working from home,and who are not known,but have a potential, And ofcouse high earners should be advertised too, low earners too, evreyone who is beautiful,and cute,and sweet,and which fotos will attract more members on site and make them to stay here for long.i think here should be contests for hosts even without money prize-the prize for example will be some spesial PR , etc,i have too many ideas anyway,who cares of them:))just an opinion

n/a

n/a

n/a

Seems that would take over chathost forum daily with did you hear from them yet? Did you get cover girl? I sent mine but did not hear! Maybe I not a cover girl :(( Also, all the spiteful jealous hosts could pick apart the other hosts that did get cover girl and get a member account and go in and sabotage those hosts ratings. Sounds like more problems to me.... There is enough of that already!!

do i understand you correctly that to be a covergirl, you have to be a top earner, such as $500/week? That hardly seem fair. Sure, it s one thing to celebrate the achievers, but it becomes CC ensuring continued success with free promotion, thus further disabling other hosts from possibly having a chance

No, you don't understand her correctly.

what about members?lol

Ah, i think i see. I misread what she said. Looking at it again, i see she is saying that hosts are paid $500 for being covergirl.

well how does a host become a cover girl? is it based on how much she makes each week, or can every host have an opportunity to be a cg? I can't imagine it is not by how much the host makes, as a special honor for all her hard work. But some hosts work a helluva lot and are totally frickin hot, and have nothing to show for it. It is still a whole lot about luck, being online at right time, having people stop in to see you. And if camcontacts is honoring big income hosts in that way then I agree with MH4Y, they are helping making easier for top hosts to stay on top and making shooting the lesser known hosts in the foot.

are you sure its not codename for escort services? )))

Don't overthink the obvious. Love to meet you in video. Most 19 year old girls have no desire to meet 30-50 something year old men in any situation except by long distance, not in person, only on video and most importantly getting paid for it. Fantasy. Repeat fantasy.

n/a

n/a

Since this is a virtual site one would assume that all meetings would be virtual (at least I would think that would be a common assumption).
I would question more when I see in viewers forum when a gent has written "I consider her an online friend and lover" That sticks in my mind and makes me question how anyone can consider someone a lover without actually touching and physical interaction....think you know what I mean...

Unrequited love has been a theme throughout history. Men fall for women totally out of their each and despite the impossibility of ever having a physical relationship they have all the emotional and pyschological attachments of a real relationship. How many men or women fall in love with actresses or actors, sports figures,,,musicians.

I have fallen in love with a few hosts here. It was a nice feeling. But of course not too deep down I knew it was not returned and was based on money. The hosts loved that I spent time and money in a video. It could be anyone as long as the meter was running. But alas...the fantasy was nice while it lasted.

unrequited love can be its own special kind of pleasure.

Interesting how you think of lover! I will always consider a lover to be who I am physically and emotionally connected with outside of video which is cyber contact only and makes it no more than a fantasy!

The world is changing. I read where over the past 10 years international travel increased dramatically and a good part of that was attributed to people meeting on the web and traveling to see each other. The web changes everything. It allows a man and woman to get to know each other (assuming both are truthful) and be comfortable with a person's history and life before they meet in person. I think there has to be a feeling of love or at least the exciting anticipation of love before people would travel to see each other. I think cyber romance (and I am not talking about CC) is real and can lead to a stronger connection in real life when people meet for real.

n/a

"maybe there bad smell from mouth or something else that will be a big turn off...don't mess virtuality and reality."

Well stated.

The fact is in the real world, women cheat as much as men do. You only go around once in life, so go for the gusto!

n/a

ExMe... It is whatever you decide it to be. You have one life, and just one. You'd better make that one count.

Hear, hear.

n/a

I think it is obvious most people start at C&C as hosts to make money. And members come primarily for sexual excitement. But we are human and run the risk of getting more than we bargained for. This can be a place that toys with our emotions, especially at some times of our lives when we are more vulnerable. Perhaps some of us more than others. I am no expert on these matters. But my advice is at the very least back off for a couple of weeks and let the heat of the relationship cool down. Then in a quiet and clear moment ask yourself if destroying your marriage is really where you want to go. In some ways CC is like going on vacation. And that paradise you are seeing may dissolve in the reality of everyday living.
You sound like a sincere person. I wish you well no matter what.

i am married too and the very same thing happened to me too 1,5 years ago. I did meet him because i had to know if in real it feels just as good...and it didnt felt just as good it felt EVEN BETTER! i dont regret meeting him and i hope in future to be with him. I cant at the moment because i have a son with my husband and that complicate things, but me and my husband we practicly separated ....would like to talk to you if u want.

It sounds like your boyfriend is just preparing himself for the possibility that you might choose differently in life -- which is, of course, possible. I think this is a natural reaction, born from that concern and from stress, both of which will subside with time.

I don't know if XoXo is correct about working things out with your husband. Sometimes we settle for what we can have when we can have it, without believing something better exists. Sometimes we're right. Sometimes we're not.

I think you owe it to yourself to at least meet this guy and discover if he really is something better. Otherwise, every time you close your eyes, a "what if?" world will be there, haunting you.

n/a

Would you like to think that your spouse is just with you everyday until someone better comes along? I wonder how often the spouses feel that how much that must hurt them. These sound like young girls have no ability to have deep loving feelings for anyone. Always thinking of themselves without much regard to their children or spouse and the family unit. So so sad...

He got overwhelmed perhaps, realizing how complicated the situation might be. Maybe he needs some time, and maybe you do too. Or he got cold feet, and he's gone...

I completely sympathize with your situation; you think this relationship might have a chance, but you haven't even met in real life yet. You're not ready to stake your marriage on what others will tell you is a fantasy. So, you've arranged to meet; this is the next big step. Maybe this step takes a little longer to happen. Or maybe not, in which case you're better off knowing now that it would not work out.

All the best to you, and I hope all turns out well. I am in a long-distance relationship, and it's so fucking complicated even just to get together. But it might just be the best thing I ever do.

i know what you mean too damn well as im in the same sinking boat myself and if i had any good advice id use it in my own case but sadly enough im completely perplexed. it didnt work out for me but all my best to you lets hope you get what you want and it turns out to be worthy

Sorry but it is hard to give you encouraging thoughts when so many relationships have been ruined by cyber relationships that turned out to nothing more than a fantasy. I am sorry that you let it go that far when you already had a commitment. We hear and feel what we want with an internet connection but when you get into reality mode and actually with that person most times you see what you had before was real. and much better.
Sorry but I think for you to take it further will just make you another statistic of what others have experienced. Life is totally real when you are with someone other than the internet. Hard to show compassion when it is easy to see that you are making a huge mistake.

Im a member here since 02. Fell in love and was afraid it was all fantasy..10 years later we still comunicate even tho she went on to marry another because i was a coward....In my opinion you get to see a side of someone here you may not see in real time...when your young lust sometimes blinds the heart...true beauty and love is not skin deep....just make sure your casanova is real..

n/a

you should post yr cc name so we can come to yr video and give you advice and you get paid too

everyone like latina girls,big silikon tits and big ass

no I dont

Their big asses are silicone too. Take a good look.

It aint the meat it's the motion! This is true for men and women. I like both curvey and slim girls, as long as they now what to do with what they got.

n/a

n/a

n/a

you totally ruined my life philosophy girl. i thought"real" men were the ones who come last :))))
going to hook up with a chick, since no "real" man will want my skinny ass. delirioussss!!!
either way, i'll be more than happy to take all the "dogs" on cc and leave you with the "real" men. woof woof!

Woof woof

n/a

Slim with nice round breasts..nice butt...overall lean and fit.

i like slim with small perky tits, big juicy ass, long legs, short arms and a rich father

n/a

n/a

hahahah + 10000 ))))

Slim is in!

Turn on-- beautiful inside body

Turn off- shaved or waxed.

n/a

yes beauty inside, like hot wet and tight! in th dark, all cats are black.

you are taking it all too serious i think. The guy said about his experience and i think there are many girls in non adult that really dont speak good english! Sure there are exeptions like yourself his post however wasnt having as subject the non adult quality service.

n/a

One Question?
Why non-adult cost more expensive than adult I mean that I notice that some hosts offered for a minute around range 1.50-2.85 dollars!
Wonder why too expensive for just talk huh? I think this is silly but I think Cam contacts should made reduce fee charge for hosts whoever are in non adult so hosts can reduce price charge for members.
What do u think?

n/a

might be a shock to you gentlman but even the non adult hosts must eat,pay bills and such! and the number of ppl visiting non adult is very low compared to adult, so the price makes sense in my opinion. No one put u a gun to your head to pay for it thou!:)

n/a

ccmail me, i want to video chat with u :)

n/a

n/a

n/a

i understand u just express your opinion on the matter of non adult beeing under evaluate it, however u do sound very bothered by the fact that the guy in previous post wasnt lucky enough to have meet u and that he got wrong impression on the non adult.

n/a

Sounds like American English to me.

n/a

n/a

Many of the non-adult hosts have IDs in Glamour or Little Shy. It is quite common. That in my mind negates the label Non-Adult from thoses hosts as they have the option of jumping to adult with a log off and log on. I think many men love the concept of seducing or talking a non-adult host into doing something adult. It excites them. Of course the hosts know just what they are doing.

To the handful of truly non-adult hosts I wish you luck. In the past we had tons of non-adult hosts in the .40 - .70 a minute range. They would chat and be careful about breaking the rules or they would get suspended or whatever.

n/a

Of course. The true non-adult hosts I know would never go to Glamour or Little Shy since they are actually NON-ADULT. No amount of begging, whining, crying, or pleading will get them to do anything remotely adult. Not even money. My point is true non-adult hosts and hosts who are happy to jump to adult are not the same.

n/a

n/a

n/a

In my post I had my mind on one particular host in Glamour who has sound and if I didn't know better I wold swear she was an American. And I as I think more I have spoke to 2 non adult hosts who were very fluent in English, but did speak to 2 others who struggled with English. I never meant to offend any non adult hosts.

In my opinion CC is a great chat site. There are many lovely very well educated hosts. I like CC the way it is configured. And I also like the many choices the internet offers. And I make different choices according to my mood.

So glad that you again clarified for these defensive NA hosts. I thought it was pretty clear the first time you wrote without any intention of offending anyone.
I liked your origian post and was glad that you spoke up :)

Generally I use large pictures...but occasionally I use small pictures because the hosts sometimes post things like special pricing and other incentives in the text area. I also am also always on the lookout for new hosts...and often then will post that they are new there. Of course ..some never remove it.

big pics, then if i'm interested i go into their profile and read more. If i think we got common ground i go into vid chat

i find photos are usually not up to date, and description is usually filled with ambiguous nonsense. i take it as a gamble and just click on rooms these days.

Small pictures with description

Small pictures with description, (though I hadn't had to search for such a long time, I had to go back and check).

small with descriptions

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz