General Forum

n/a

Or smartass replies

why only care about what you dont see instead of what we do see , and thats sexy beautiful women from all over the world .

and its not as it used to be....
cc is falling behind other sites for not renovating. The only one thing that "keeps some" of the members is the fantasy and interaction between host and member. Performance and host service is far better found in other places.

n/a

Wow I never thought of each dollar going a certain place for a bisquit or 2 bills. Wouldn't like the desperate feeling of being online if I thought of it that way. I think of what fun it can be while in video and to assure the member also has fun. Is always a nice surprise when I log off of how much that fun paid :)

1. Free public videos - have this .... even saw nudity in one but i guess that isn't allowed

2. Tipping - i am sure a host and u can find ways to get her more money lol..


3. HD video - this will happen sooner or later but connections not good enough for many hosts and members

4..Member friendly contests - if u win and didn't spend a lot, it is friendly, lol, and the one where we jumped in and out of video every 5 min was member friendly since hosts kept prices low but it was annoying

5. A reduction in the number of categories.- two were eliminated about two years ago... could be more if need be

6. REAL porn stars - there are at least two i can think of that i have seen on cc somewhat recently... look for hosts that use first and names such as kylie nash.... some of them could be porn stars.

other than the above, ur 100% correct lol

n/a

n/a

If I wanted to see a porn star, I would rent a DVD for far less than a video chat would cost. And most porn stars look more like plastic Barbie Dolls and real women.

With the exception of HD video that would be my list of things I never want to see on CC.

Exactly. That's like my "please don't do these things" list.

1. Tipping. If tipping is allowed, it will become expected. Hosts will complain about members who don't tip, or tip less than they hope for. The same members who complain now about having to spend 30 seconds in video before the host strips will complain 10x as much about hosts not doing things because they weren't tipped last time.

Real Porn Stars? Actually, there are a few here. But it's not as if they're exactly hard to find, either at their own sites or other networks. As others have said, most members here like the fact that most of the hosts are regular women -- students or whatever, just better looking and sexier (and willing to talk to us).

Fewer Categories: Why? To make it harder to find what I want? To increase the amount of misunderstandings between members and hosts? If I'm not interested in a category, I just don't go there.

HD Video: I have enough video problems without trying to shove lots more bytes down my connection. By the time I have the capacity, I predict CC will have it.

Totally agree!! More changes usually cause more technical problems and it works fine now. Another site that has tipping also keeps 2/3 of the tip and the girl gets 1/3. Who needs it!
Happy with CC and it works fine....

Free Public Video: What would this site POSSIBLY gain from that. First, hosts universally say they hate it. I started at a site that had it, years ago. Don't miss it one bit. I can't imagine how I host could possibly get tired of posing for drunk jerks, answering "where are you from" and "hi" 500x each hour, and thinking of creative responses to "show your tits" (or pussy, or whatever). If you want to know what a host looks like, you can look at her photos. If you go in video and she doesn't look like her photos, you're out 1 minute of video, and if you can't afford that you should probably focus your $$'s on important things like paying your mortgage and keeping the electricity turned on than on video chat. And if you want to know what a host will do, you can always ask in text chat or a mail -- yes, they could lie, but they're a hell of a lot more likely to lie in free video.

Absolutely correct about FLC on other sites. They make you do it so that you can utilize other benefits including not having to do it after so many hours. All hosts hate it and it brings very few paying customers. It has never been worth the torture that you have to endure during FLC. Sure cheap guys can get their jolly's and wank away harassing the hosts to take it off. Other sites the hosts pay is dependent on tips so they do it. The hosts could start blocking every member that doesn't come into private or tip...guess they didn't think of that....meaning the members that love it so much.

n/a

n/a

Have you ever thought in your moments of despair with this site that not all thinks like you and those things might not have any value to others? With the execption of HD I think most don't really need those things. When saying HD I am pretty sure it is mostly guys that want the fine details. If this is upsetting you so much that you have to look ahead to create more sadness for yourself then I suggest seeing your Dr.

n/a

Exactly, If I wanted those things, I would visit other places instead of here, but here is the only site I visit so maybe those are not so important.

n/a

Steak menu on a cheeseburger budget.. its always the same thing here...
People want the moon.. don't want to pay for rocket fuel..

That was very good and so true!!

Remember it is the HOSTS who don't favor teaser vids, not the members.

While some of these things are probably never going to happen here, I have thought about them and would like to chime in as a long-time visitor to CC.

I don't want free vids so much as a more accurate up-to-date view of the host. Yes, I can go into vid but that still costs money, no matter how little. Profile pics are sometimes VERY outdated and the host could have a new hair color or style, for instance. Once in a while it is even an entirely new host. There are viewers who value things like that. Also, I hate jumping into chat and finding no host there. Some ideas:
a) Update the profile photo with snaps from current or most recent video session. The host could even take the snap themselves to avoid pics that show too much (if they care about that).
b) Allow the host the option of posting a preview vid. It can be a short "Hello I'm so-and-so" or they can do (or show) whatever they like. Again, it could be optional, but it might attract viewers to a host if they see a personality versus just a "posed Glamour Shot".
c) Have a "quick peek" of the host's current video session. A short 10 seconds maybe from their profile page. This could even be a pay service offered by CC themselves, though I personally would not pay a lot for it (maybe $10 for a year? who knows).

HD video is definitely high on my wish list.

Other things I would love to see here:
1. More detailed profiles. CC has one of the most generic and least informational profile setups out there. There are many physical features that some viewers find more desirable. Breast size, height, how they trim themselves below, etc. "Body type" tells me almost nothing. I am sure some girls are self-conscious about putting weight on there, but maybe guys are interested in that as well.
2. A better evalutaion forum or comment area for viewers. One that cannot be edited by hosts! It is extremely rare to find ANY comments about a host in the very poorly designed "Forum" on their profile. Yes, it can be abused but that is the case on every other cam service site out there. Maybe it will make some of the less-personable hosts a little more wary. These could be moderated, I guess, with foul language and personal attacks being unallowed.

Just tossing some thoughts in there. Some might agree or not, but hey. this is a discussion forum, is it not? Personally I feel that CC has fallen behind in the technical aspects, not necessarily in cost or host quality. I mean, it took years for them to do anything about updating the video area, and pictures still only work halfway.

What?

Have the forums sunk to a new low, that a thread is started making fun of people with serious mental illnesses. I thought your previous postings had been reasonably sensible...just shows how wrong one can be!

Oh get off your politically-correct high-horse.

A group of senior citizens was going to the movies and Betty was asking John if she could sit next to him, John said "sure you can". Betty then asked " can I hold you hand during the movie" John said "sure you can". Betty became more bold and asked John "can I put my hand in your pants and hold your member during the movie" John said" No, Irene gets to do that"

Betty becomes upset and asks" What does Irene have that I don't?"

John replies " Parkinson's disease "

That was terrible.
I fucking loved it.

LOL!

Well....I might have Alzheimers but thank God I don't have Alzheimers...

Pfff.. they were saying today on the radio that around the earth, theirs something like 1500 earthquakes a day.. virtually all are in places no one notices or to small to notice. Nature is always active.. the earths not going to end. It will be here long after what we know today is nothing but dust..

n/a

n/a

Richard Dawkins?

We should all be more environment earth friendly. Unfortunately we are the ones causing through time the natural disasters that we see today. Our weakened ozone layer from what we put into the air, how long can we drill into the earth before it starts to cave in causing earthquakes, tsunami's, etc. How much pollution can we bury in the ground and toss recklessly into waterways and ocean before we create toxins. Man kind has done this and we are just now becoming aware enough to implement safeguards. Many are still too lazy to change. Have fun here while you can go out with a smile at least :))

Whilst I agree we should all be environmentally friendly, it serves the cause no favours to make extravagant claims, and earthquakes and tsunamis will continue to be caused by natural tectonic plate movement, irrespective of any drilling by man.

People don't willingly give up anything. The only hope that particular cause has is a huge culling of humankind.

Humans are no more to the Earth than a flee on the back of an elephant. We really won't even make it itch and definitely not make more earth quakes and such with our little tiny effects. Only in the movies can we make such problems for the planet.

Google "Hank Johnson Guam" and click to view the YouTube video in the first link.

n/a

Every day we are one day closer to our death, regardless of the date. And how do you know we will make it to 21 december 2012?

All you can do is try to be a good person, help others and be happy. I don't really think you can stop natural disasters although perhaps global warming increases the number of floods, hurricanes and tornadoes. But earthquakes and volanoes... don't think we can stop those or that we do anything to increase their number.

We are definitely not causing the earth quakes and volcanoes and honestly the whole global warming scare is only the earth naturally warming as it comes out of the last ice age. The earth has been much warmer in the past and instead of everything dying, life actually exploded with much faster growth at those times. The only thing man will lose because of it will be the cities we built too close to the oceans. We try to hold back the changes nature throws at us and we always lose in the end, this will be no different. If we will stop worrying how to stop it and begin planning on how to adapt we will be much better off.

Just like all the floods in the middle of the US this year were caused by man trying to keep the rivers from flooding, more damage along the coasts will be caused by man trying to control nature instead of learning to adapt to it.

Don't worry! Once you're gone you'll have no memories of what you're missing :))

No need to do that here; there are other sites better suited for that.

I agree completely. You can ask any host and they will tell you they hate free public video. We don't have that here and that is the No1 reason hosts are here.

he didn't say "free"

n/a

Public?? No I don't schedule shows in Public :) I think in most places it would be against the law to do a strip show in Public, that's why I come here!

As I mentioned in a post a while back Dave Dave the Rave would arrange for a host to do a wet t-shirt contest and let all his buddies know. So the host would do an open video with a wet t-shirt and strip and there were several men watching. It was a lot of fun and the host walked away with making far more per minute than she ever could in 121. Think about it ladies....

I would watch if it was a fun host

Yeah they were pretty much fun girls with good english and a sense of humor...plus they were hotter as hell. Also smart enough to figure out it was a win-win for them. I know I went back to see a couple of the hosts who did a group show on my own. The issue is the process started in Comm Chat. Back a few years ago there were a bunch of fun regulars...now it is like walking down a street in a red light district....just solicitations.

a host could post here, and set a time, and we could all show up! Any girla like the udea?

n/a

there are no better/worse categories, just categories for each and everyone, d'uh!

the original post is on the money.

the idea that guys like to come here and watch the dollars mount while watching a woman do nothing more than type is ludicrous. And that's basically all that Glamour offers. It's a useless category.

Most of the discussion it garners expresses frustration with it.

You are a hardcore viewer and do not think like viewers that appreciate softcore and glamour. Speak for yourself since you do not know how others think that appreciate it. Stay in hardcore and you should be happy!

It isn't necessarily a better category to the hardcore viewers it is a pain in the *ss for them and those are the complainers that post here. Before you get yourself in a fluff with feeling "glamour is better" i think you should read the comments posted...

n/a

The girls that do hardcore in glamour do not do well because they are not hardcore viewers that hang there. They are not looking for a show and toys etc. If hosts and viewers would stay in the categories that they enjoy all would be fine and wouldn't get so confused....those are the ones that post here.

n/a

my fav categories are Not So Shy and Fetish, many great girls. And IA is too expensive.

"men dont care about the one they fuck but they care about the ones they dont get!"

Very true. Men want what they can't have and hosts in Glamour and shy take advantage and makes loads of money because of it.

They don't do well for long....sorry that you are so confused in your comments.

Glamour is about tease and play by a host that is very glamorous and doesn't necessarily strip. Guys that appreciate girls there do not post here often. They enjoy the interaction in getting to know the host and get excited by her beauty and tease and play only. It is the seduction for them that is their foreplay.
The guys that complain here constantly are hardcore viewers that get lost and go to softcore expecting the same action and they don't get it. Funny but the girls that don't belong there and perform hardcore usually end up at the bottom with low stars. It's like a love hate for the guys that complain here. They are not a typical softcore viewer that enjoys that softer category. Hardcore viewers would be more apt to have a one night stand. Softcore viewers that frequent softcore would never consider sex with a stranger without developing a relationship.
So what you see here are generally complaints about Glamour and the ones that enjoy it don't post here. It's not necessarily good comments here because they don't understand the difference where honestly they should stick to hardcore shows.

"Glamour is about tease and play by a host that is very glamorous and doesn't necessarily strip. Guys that appreciate girls there do not post here often. They enjoy the interaction in getting to know the host and get excited by her beauty and tease and play only. It is the seduction for them that is their foreplay."

Exactly! But you forgot to mention the money slaves, money pigs, cuckolds etc.

They belong in fetish or dungeon along with the hosts that like to play their games :)

"They belong in fetish or dungeon along with the hosts that like to play their games :)"

I agree. But they are everywhere on site. All hosts in Glamour are Dominas

n/a

n/a

That's true. This site has become "Slave Central".

n/a

"What is the use to work on a porn site if you dont do porn "

Most members and hosts agree CC is NOT a porn site.!

n/a

Maybe he need to go out more, but you too and need too look into the mirror... 'Gentlemen', 'appreciate', 'woman'... Thank you for the laugh.

Maybe you wouldn't know because you have to be a lady before you can attract gentlemen...

n/a

What is PPS?

password protected session

"i don't get it, why would anyone complain about a host using this?"

If you are referring to the post about hosts in not shy/IA using it, the post was asking if hosts in not shy/IA could require 121 for show as softcore hosts do.

n/a

"Just don't be asking every host here to do it!! "

No, was not saying hosts in hardcore require 121 for show, but some do.

thank you but i have found out what it means.

enjoy the site and have a great day.... :)

n/a

To Wondering,
You should have answer what "sit mei narro bonus"? Cause u already post here so i don';t think that would be fair to all of us "host and Members" if u refused to answer then next time we will not help u at all... You are smart in ass because u use wondering as "host" nickname lol

I do apologize for not saying what it means...... it means "he is mine now say goodbye". i was not in any way trying to be unfair, so i apologize again for not saying what it meant.

I am not sure what u meant when you said "You are smart in ass because u use wondering as "host" nickname lol " is there a problem with me using the name wondering, so many on here (both hosts and members) use other names such as host, another glam host, a host, good point, don't panic, and so on....did i do something wrong with using the name wondering?

I hope I did not upset anyone as again my question nor my not answering was meant to upset.

YOU SUCK!!!!!
there you go, i hope it helps! :p

Good for you. I say the same when I leave work too. Totally different work but never-the-less.

yup, that's me.... :p

I do not see how you got the impression from the forum that all or most members are rude. When hosts complain here it is usually clear that they are talking about one or two members. Some actually say things like "most members who come to my rom are polite but today...."
Considering the number of members and hosts there are no so many compalints. If hosts posted here every time they had a day without a rude member the forum would be very full.

hostesses call me "bb." I like it. Is it rude for me to call them bb if everything else I say is nice?

It is rude if the host is offended by it. I usually follow the host's leading, if she calls me BB, then I will feel free to reciprocate. But I don't use the term except under those conditions because I realize that some take offense at it. Personally, I don't like the term BB but prefer the full Babe, or Baby. BB smacks me as lazy. I'm not offended by it, but I do find it extremely annoying.

You could always ask, "Is it okay if I call you BB?" Just because you like the term, doesn't mean everyone does.

Well when I read what viewers post, I get an impression that 99% of them come here to be unhappy... ;) "The prise was too high/ she didn't get naked fast/she didn't get naked at all/she didn't get naked for me but did for someone else"... the thing is that people (both hosts and members) tend to share negative expreinces more than good ones. It would be weird if at the end of the day every girl started a new thread "hey today no one was rude to me" ;)

"It would be weird if at the end of the day every girl started a new thread "hey today no one was rude to me" ;)"

It looks like someone did.

Well it's nice to see someone still has a sense of humour here :)

n/a

"useing bad words,curses"

You mean on an adult cam site you don't expect to hear curse words? WTF?

She expects to sometimes hear the words but not applied to her without reason as in "Get naked now you fucking bitch"

n/a

You must be a softcore or non adult host.

slight correction, AC. (and probably how you intended it) but I think members come here TO EXPRESS their unhappiness, not simply to be unhappy. They were already unhappy when they came, and needed to vent.

n/a

yes, I understand your meaning. thank you

n/a

"90% of members are,how to say,unpolite,arrogant,so on.It's a hard job to get them back at better feelings.So I guess u are rare,u should feel special."

Well I'm not special. And every host I have ever asked while in pvt has told me most of her viewers are polite and respectful. If this job here is that difficult for you, maybe you should consider a change? No one ever said being a cam girl is for everyone. For some it works and others it doesn't.

n/a

n/a

I do not hink you are a host. No host I had contact with has ever suggested that anything like 90per cent of members are rude. The rude ones are the exceptions.

n/a

n/a

n/a

You said, "..90% of members are,how to say, unpolite (sic).." OK so instead of rude you used unpolite, a word that does not exsit. The construction and way you used it suggest you mean the opposite of polite which is rude. Referring to posts in forums does not back up your case since a relatively small percentage of members post here.

I have no idea what category you are in or how you act to have 90% rude members. Do you like abuse? I also agree or wonder why you would get all the rude ones from the site or perhaps what your idea of rude is but I agree that if it is that bad for you then this is not the right work for you.
I probably get 2-3% that are rude!

n/a

n/a

You wrote "one gets the impression that all or most viewers are rude."

only because they are not the majority, they stand out all the more. And fact is, one rude obnoxious, nasty person, can cast a shadow on, and even ruin, an entire day of nice, pleasant, polite persons.

I used to be on another site, where free shows were offered (as teasers for coming into private) and the amount of demanding, barking orders, rude members was appalling. They are out there, and I'm sure that even in paid chat, they can be just as rude. In fact, in those times when I've shared the room with other viewers, and they weren't typing in whisper mode, it was quite obvious the rude ones also came into paid chat. More than once I have had to bite my tongue (well, hold back my fingers) from typing my reaction to the rude members. I remind myself, it's not my room, it is the host's responsibility, and who am I to try to chase her member away. If she asks me to say something to the other member, I feel free to do so, but those instances have been rare.

Frankly, I don't understand why people feel they have to be rude. Maybe it's because they see the host as simply an object rather than a person, or maybe its because they think they are entitled to whatever they want because they are paying, regardless of what other members in the room may want, or what the host is willing or able or comfortable to do.

That is exactly it, they do not see hosts as people, and they do not care about anything but what they want when they want, they dont care who they hurt to get it..

n/a

n/a

do you get more bees with honey or flowers? and surely you get more honey the more bees you have? personally i've noticed there are less bees these days, also butterflies but that's another topic.

well the complete saying is "You attract more bees with honey than with vinegar". Personally, I've never seen bees coming to honey or to vinegar. Bees make honey. Are they also attracted to it? LOL

Its an analogy to show that people react better to sweet words than sour ones.

Thank you again, Captain Obvious.

There an article in a Phlly paper not long ago talking about the large number of college students from eastern Europe who work on the Jersey Shore during the summer. They can't hire American kids because they are lazy and high on drugs.

btw. I rarely go to playback because of the silly prices many girls charge and not knowing the length of the video.

i am not really interested in her, but applaud her for putting what is in the video in the description and how long the video lasts.

n/a

agree it is hardly finally as several have been doing similar for a long time and it was mentioned in viewers forum. but bravo moni

seen it and i agree i am waiting to set up a pvt with her next time i see her live :)

For me the important thing with playback video's is that there is a clear description on length and what you will see. Also hosts need to understand that what is fine in a show may not work in a video. A video needs more movement, poses and action than a show. Playback videos can be good because you can sometimes see hosts doing things in 10 minutes that you would take her an hour to do in a show. For this reason I don't mind paying more per minute for recorded video. One one of the hottest videos I saw finished with the host on her back, feet up by her head sucking a banana while f*cking her pussy with another one. I never even got her to use toys in video. Did anyone else see that? Unfortunately i can' t remember her name and she doesn't seem to be on line any more.

"Unfortunately i can' t remember her name and she doesn't seem to be on line any more."

Maybe it was just a dream?

If it was I wish I could dream it every night. But I definitely viewed it a few times.

Agree. I like her because she is "real". I have been coming here longer than I care to admit and I have visited lots of gorgeous girls, but only a few that I would put in that "real" category. She's one of them. A total straight shooter. The "gorgeous" thing is a given.

just wait-they are coming (I Think)

just found out they are not coming and than goodness, I am tired of these cc contest-hope no more in future

from the experience of just one viewer the contests have caused cc to lose a lot of money from me in the long run, although yes they got some in the short run. one of my fav hosts always goes crazy at contest time and really they became all she cared about. so that drove me away so i do not go to see her anymore. maybe this happens in other cases besides just mine and therefore cc is not doing so many of them.

n/a

Any suggestions?

Good news then.

fix what is already on the site before adding new things. so that the site works the way it is suppose to be...

just my few cents...lol

I hate these contests....Performers get crazy and being online 20 hours each day.....and are mad if you tell them, you havent time for playing thses stupid contest games with them...
During contest time i visit other camsites...its too silly here

i agree totally

n/a

good one-thanks for sharing, I needed a laugh tonight

she will be back (maybe) if not, let me tell you about a few more you need to check out--awesome, beautiful, sexy, fun, Intelligence, and don't take no for a answer

Well let's hear them!

Yes. I'm with Tom. Let's hear them. And how can you be so sure ("maybe") that "she'll be back?"

opps-sorry I did forget the names: wilddreamsx-milksquirting-night of akina-carpediemyx-pevertvip-blissham-perfecktion-xgingerbaby-myboobs-pinkyblack-jerriko-sunny jenny-blessed me-ohhmypussie-....just to name a few-now don't ask me which is which on the description i mention above-all i can say about all of them is cc next covergirls and i am sure their are hundreds of more here and you are welcome-have a good day-stay cool-keep on smiling and love your neighbors

I wish you had posted yr name

"minus the 2 min guys that come in say show me ass show me tits when you are in the middle of doing something a prev member asked only to have that guy leave after you show ass an tits"

This sounds to me like you have members that come to your pvt just to chat and you prefer chatting to doing shows. So you password protect your sessions so you don't have to do shows for members you don't know.

Any excuse to bring up once again the curent flavour-of-the-month criticism. <<in the middle of doing something a prev member asked>> doesn't sound to me like a reference just to chatting, but you hang-on in there with your prejudices!

We'll have to agree to disagree. I can only speak for myself, but if I go in an open video and the hosts is in a show I quietly watch. If she is in a long chat in the so called nude categories, I have a problem. If a member wants exclusive time with the host he can use the 121 option. That is why there is such an option.

n/a

"Dont forget Im not changing my rate.I dont see why its a problem to others when a host does a password maybe if the host only did it for some members but I do it for all members that ask."

Well you are the exception as others I asked for a password have told me I had to be a frequent viewer to get one. And I am used to seeing password protected sessions in Glamour/Little shy but I rarely see them in not shy/IA. And when you say not many members are respectful as I am in pvt, I have to disagree. No, I do not know any other members, but I've had many pvts over time and every host without exception has told me that the great majority of her viewers are respectful and polite. And yes I know there are some very rude members and no one doubts that. But to say most are rude flies in the face of what every other host have ever told me.

Do you actually read the posts? She did not say most members are rude. The majority of members here may be polite but if only 10 or 20 pct are rude a host may be getting 2 or three rude members a day in her room.
And do you really ask every host you visit whether the other members are polite and respectful towards her?

"And do you really ask every host you visit whether the other members are polite and respectful towards her?"

If you read my post, it says every host I have ever asked, not every host I have ever been in pvt with.

Maybe you also need to read your own posts. Quote "No, I do not know any other members, but I've had many pvts over time and every host without exception has told me that the great majority of her viewers are respectful and polite. And yes I know there are some very rude members and no one doubts that. But to say most are rude flies in the face of what every other host have ever told me." Maybe I have suddenly become dyslexic but I cannot see where you said "any host I have ever asked".

n/a

If I came in your open vid and you were doing a show as you describe, I would remain quiet until the show was over. When a host is doing a show, the first member has priority in the nude categories. The problem arises from members wanting to just chat in open vid in these categories. I have no doubt that you and many other hosts do as you say, but I have first hand knowledge of many other hosts that do not do as you describe, in their pvts. And that is where the problem is.

n/a

In your case it may be you are giving your viewers a good deal. But I've seen many password protected sessions that have the same price as 121. It is the decision of each individual host.

n/a

I don't get it...why not just lower your 121 rate to 0% if you want to give private shows for the price of open?? If someone asks for your password and you give to all why keeps the 2 min guys from coming in as well.
Please don't suggest that members ask hosts for that. It is your thing and I don't think it makes sense for me. I welcome all into open or 121 which I keep a low percentage to encourage it.

give me your password- check you out and then come back and post a comment

Unless things have changed recently a host can't put 0% as a 121 rate. There is a minimum above her open rate.

n/a

Not sure why you posted that. I am simply confused why she posts a password for all to join her in a password protected session so she can charge them an open rate! Makes no sense...why not keep her 121 % low and avoid going to password protected? She gives it to all that ask so what is the difference between that and open session?
Whatever, if that makes sense to her then let her do it. Just don't suggest that guys should ask all girls to go along with her theory.

It makes sense in certain circumstances. If a host has a number of regulars who she knows don't mind "sharing" her when she is doing a show and will not start demanding she immediately does what they say she can give the password to several members. They get a good show without paying the 121 rate, the host earns more than with just one guy in 121 and nether the host nor the members are disturbed by rude guys jumping in. Only experienced hosts can manage their rooms in this way.

It is her preference period! Not something that she should suggest that others ask hosts for because she chooses that in not shy! Seems to be many down falls by doing that ...perhaps she has experienced them yet. Who to decide gets a password and who doesn't? Lose many members because they have to feel obligated to stay for a period of time rather than just pop in and see what she is offering first. Nonetheless it is her choice as it is other hosts choice not to do it!

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

I have attended a childbirth and found it an amazing very positive experience that i would not have wanted to miss for anything. And it certainly did not make me lose my desire for sex.

n/a

I was present at the birth of both of my children, and I am glad I didn't miss that experience. However, the husband/boyfriend whatever can just forget about being an integral part of the birthing process... I was cussed out at one point loool., and I felt like the fifth wheel most of the time (the first one took 41 hours from first contractions to birth). You are there to provide support, and to bear witness, and that is your role. I did get to cut the cord though... and welcome both my children to the world.

n/a

Good question AvrOra! I was banned from the delivery room of the birth of all my 3 children. I resented it. I wanted to be with my wife to support her and share the wonder of the arrival of our child. Fortunately, fathers are now allowed to be present.

Let's face it, all the hyper-activity about sex really boils down to making babies. At the final conclusion, the father really should be there.

to become rich and famous

then start ur own reality show:P

to be owner of this site would be by accomplish and as for wanting to do something--to feed the poor and hunger of the world

would like to see the war end before my time up and would like to accomplish becoming a senator

you got my vote clara

thanks for your support

low price, long time. When I look for new girls in not so shy, if they are over 1.20 in open, I do not even try them. What categories are you in?

n/a

n/a

Sometimes it seems like CC is the Dollar Store of cam sites..

You guys are just plain cheap...

if you want to pay more money, knock yourself out. it's not cheap to appreciate a bargain. it cracks me up when a host charges $3 in Little Shy and refuses to strip and then complains about low traffic and "cheap" members...

n/a

maybe he has a wife, how could u know it?

n/a

n/a

Poor guys like to have fun too :)

Seriously though I like to stay an hour or two, just can't do that when it is much over $1. To be honest some of the most exciting shows I have ever had were at around $1, can't really think of anything in them that wouldn't have been done by someone charging more and truthfully some of the more expensive videos I have had were terrible in comparison.

Some will say "you get what you pay for" but it is also true "a fool and his money are soon parted". I learned a long time ago here that price does not ensure quality.

n/a

if a total session has cost me over $200 then i feel depressed for weeks.

I've been depressed for years. D

n/a

n/a

CC rules state that hosts are allowed to have more than one room open, however if they have a video in one of the rooms (open or 121) they must pause the other room. So they shouldn't be actually in video in more than one room at a time.

I see no problem in hosts offering two different shows in Hardcore and Softcore at two different prices, providing they abide by the 'must pause other rooms when in video' rule. It gives a viewer more choice over price and what type of show they want from a host.

n/a

My beef is Friends/Family for a buck, then peddling Glam, Shy, etc for $3. I know, nobody has a gun to their heads and the chicklets need to earn a living but how many takers they have for $3.

"how many takers they have for $3."

Apparently enough to earn a decent living here. And I've seen higher than $3 keeping busy.

n/a

Must be one that he is talking about! Seems like a legitimate gripe to me.

n/a

"hosts are all the same"

Yes and that is the issue. The way the categories are defined are in contrast to the way the hosts act in these categories.

n/a

"whats the problem?"

The problem is hosts forget they are in IA or not shy and treat viewer like they do in Glamour or shy. Or they know where they are and still act like they are in Glamour or shy.

The problem is not hosts having sessions in softcore and hardcore at the same time but of them not properly understanding the rules. This tends to happen most with new hosts, especially in studios. To be fair to the hosts, the complete set of rules is complex and it is not surprising some of them get confused. Studio owners/admins sometimes get them wrong when explaining to hosts.

n/a

Its not that easy

What is difficult about it?

what hole are u stuck in?

hilarious :P

damn you!until i read your thread this had even crossed my mind.now i don't know how many sleepless nights i'll have,firstly deciding what i think & secondly waiting for the official results of the forum.i hope you're happy! :--)

Always happy my friend. Maybe I should have posted this in the Tech Forum?

It would be rather ironic if, only recently having got full-screen video sessions on computers, members were to start preferring pictures limited to the dimensions of their mobile handset.

Yes I agree with viewers like you and I, but I've heard mobile users are very young and their numbers are increasing rapidly. I've been lead to believe it is a new segment of the overall market. And like any other business, your core customers change over time.

I prefer the convenience of being mobile. I have been using IPad since it came out and now I am using a different tablet and its way better than carrying a notebook or a laptop and even much better than a stupid desktop that only reminds me WORK, lmao! I can see what I want anywhere when I wish, of course, with discretion.

n/a

It would take young eyes to watch a video on those small screens. For me I hate how small the archive pics are even when you enlarge them to their largest size on a huge monitor lol. But you know, every person I meet under 30 seems to constantly be staring at their phones, even while walking down the street, and they all have in earphones that I am sure have grown into their heads because they never remove them. I just wonder if you were to pull one out and listen to it if it would be saying "Breath in,,, Breath out,,,, Breath in,,,, Breath out" :)

I hear ya, but the 18 to 30 age group is coveted by marketers worldwide in all business. They have all of that disposable income. No mortgage, no wife and kids etc.

Yep, thats why I never paid attention to peer pressure as to get married, have kids, and bust your ass to support the family. I am 45 doing anything I wish and still enjoying life and no regrets ;-)

It's just a different form factor for different occasions, no big deal. Smart phones have there place alongside desktops and laptops. Personally, it's the tablet pcs that I don't get. They're basically just netbooks priced at a premium for all the added inconvenience of not including a keyboard, right?

n/a

n/a

If you don't show your breasts or anything else why would you be in an adult category?

n/a

You deem indeed confused between erotism and porn.
And at times it's better to keep the illusion of imagination rather than the crude truth...

Honestly as a host I didn't realize that is not the case! Thought they were tougher here since another popular site the majority are 5 star. Here it seems most are 4.5 or 4.

If that the sites I'm thinking about, you have to have spent a certain amount of money on site to be able to leave a written review. And you have to be in pvt at least 2 minutes to vote.

In my opinion most viewers on all sites tend to rate the highest, 5 stars on most and 10stars on that starts out My.

There are a few exceptions I'm sure, but the majority of hosts here are just trying to earn some money to the best of their ability, with the best equipment they can afford, when circumstances allow, and perhaps when they would much rather not have to. It is not my place to compromise their efforts, so everybody I visit gets 5* regardless of how satisfied I am with the session. And it also helps to counterbalance the unjustified low ratings from jerks who deserve to be disenfranchised.

n/a

I tend to rate mostly 5's because my expectations are easily met, and I am easily satisfied. A host must really irritate me or disappoint me for me to rate lower, and to give a 1, I have to be really pissed... and I have never been that pissed.

"And it also helps to counterbalance the unjustified low ratings from jerks who deserve to be disenfranchised."

There are no doubt jerks in the membership. I think there is universal agreement there, but there could be circumstances where a host deserves a 1 star. I agree with your assessment of the hosts in general, but scattered among them are a few dishonest hosts. And I'm sorry but there is no way I can rate a dishonest host 5 stars. Its jut not happening.

that is the third silliest thread i've read here just behing daylight which isn't even in the same galaxy as inyfs"i only joined to read the forums" :--)

I really don't agree with you on your criteria for giving a 5. I think regardless of the criteria you mention, points should be awarded on the degree of satisfaction the member receives from his/her visit with the host. Higher the satisfaction, higher the point. Of course, it is clear that the criteria you mention are what gives you satisfaction, But for me, good English is not all that important, as long as we can still communicat. Sound is not important at all, but is a nice plus. Video quality is important, but can be outweighed by other factors

Points are subjective, and really they can't be otherwise. And so there will always be opinions as to whether the points given are too high or too low. One person's experience may see a host's performance as exceptional because of what that person's expectations are. Another person at the exact same show in the exact same time, may see the performance in an entirely different light, because the expectations were different.