General Forum

I used to post using my CC ID but then other people posted using the same ID which caused me some embarrassment. SInce that time I have generally posted anonymously. I don't really see that it matters whether or not someone uses their actual ID. It is the content of the post that matters.

well..true ppl have the right using any name this wish but if it's posted anonymously it is less likely to b taken so serious..anyone can post about "this host that host" or "this member that member" and not use their real id but then without the cc id there im less likely to believe what is written about said person...whereas if there is a name there it has more of a truth to it as the person isnt hiding under a false monica....how can u know what a member is saying about a host is true if he is hiding? at least with the cc id there the host can reply to it knowing that member was (or wasnt) in chat/vid with her

I understand what you mean. The proble I experienced was someone using a "false monika" and theone they used was mine. I would be happy if CC made it obligatory for members to use their actual nickname in the viewers forum.

n/a

I think its opposite way, most people tell the truth when they have opportunity to talk anonymous.
When posting here with own id, many people are careful for what they say, and propably they also lie just to please someone.
And about complaining here, it is ok, that is one reason why these forums are here for, a place where to share good or bad opinions about hosts or viewers, and because of that hosts much pay more attention on how they treat viewers, if they dont want to have bad comments about themself in here.
As the forum title say, ...express yourself! dont just tell silly jokes trying to please others, or lick asses.

If I really could lick the host's asses you'd never here from me on this forum again :D

Dude, the hosts here make friends among themselves regardless the geographical factor they communicate and share ideas among them. If I put my id here while complaining the other hosts will react against me even become unpopular as it already happened to me when I used my real id. Certain hosts will not show me and some others will give me the baddest attitude. One host even told me about my bad reputation among the hosts. All becuase I wanted to show other members the bad apples. I learn to post with my id only when I talk good of a host, then sometimes I get rewarded. It's easy for you to post your id as you are always defending the hosts. I understand your point of view. You want to be the host's pet and I think you already earned that....

seems to be an extra level of nonsense from both members and hosts.
I've just been skipping most threads lately.

Then of course there are the members with more than one screen name....usually a good cop/bad cop sorta thing......even if they used their 'real" screen name, is it who they really are.....personally, I think most members on here are in their "alter ego" mode to begin with...I am sure the rest of the world does not necessarily see their "cc personality".

Yes I think you are probably right about the "alter ego" thing. I'm actually quite friendly in real life :D

n/a

this IS my cc name

n/a

happy birthday honey :)muahh

Happy B'day ! Don''t forget to change age on your profile this year (wink)

I think it changes automatically now based on whatever date a host lists as her birthday. I wil have to tell her to add a year to the year of birth so that her listed age stays the same. :p

n/a

happy birthday and many more sweet akina, kisses and hugs

n/a

Ohayo gozaimasu.....Many Happy Returns of April 6...muahhhhhhh Ingat ka palagi...:-)

Thank you bb, best wishes 4 u too, kisses!!!!

This is nothing new, hosts have always had pre-recorded videos when they are busy or for whatever reason can't be personally available. The only difference is that where the host used to have to change her category to video playback, she now remains in her normal category but with the pre-recorded message showing.

I think they should at least have more info about the recording. As it is, you have to pay for a minute or two just to see if it's the same recording you have already seen.

For example, I would like to know the date, the length, etc. Even a brief description of what we can expect regarding content would be helpful.
I hate it when I pay for all those minutes, then the video starts over and the host didn't go nearly as far in the video as she does in a session. I'm not blaming her, because a video can be seen by anyone. But it would be nice to know that in advance.

If u want it live-check before going to video, in profile it shows if its live or prerecroded. Before it used to be a different category, now cc change the policy a bit, so the host remains in the same category, and in profile (i believe) it says that its prerecorded. I agree that it was more convinient for members and caused less confusion, but what can the hosts do?

As for my personal limits in prerecorded vids-i never go further that teasing in lingerie. The price is less when its not live so there is just some light teasing.

As for me, i find playbacks very profitable, as sometimes when im not online my regulars miss me and come to see the vid, aslo i got a lot of new regulars, as they come to see the video, they like what they see and come back later to see more or just to know me better.

i want xxx rated pre-recorded lol

i like the pre-recorded very much , sometimes i like it even more than the live videochat . some pre-records are very short + tame though . also i think more hosts should do a pre - record so i can see them before going to live chat

I think host that do pre-record are just being lazy and taking money the easy way.
Members want to come here to interact and watch. It does not surprise me she pre-records. She is very abrupt and rude at times.

i think youre totally wrong and are hiding ur true agenda ( get refused perhaphs ??? )

Im sure. I wont even bother to answer his post lol, it sounds so pathetic and absurd))

your right whoever post above, I dont even know this girl, but reading her statement above I will say you are right-she sounds rude, but anyway I'm not into pre-recorded shows and only go see my regulars for live shows--have a great day all

Well, I will answer Cass. Hosts cannot be here 24/7 It is physically impossible. Hosts need rest, they need time for themselves, time to eat, to be with family and friends. it is not laziness that makes for pre-recorded but necessity. There is nothing wrong with pre-recorded, so long as it is not the ONLY thing a host provides. I seen some hosts it is almost impossible to find them online live. But even then it may not be laziness. Maybe they have other job and this is just sideline job. Or maybe they attend university, or have the care of family members and very limited time to be live. So, Cass, I very much disagree with you. Besides the pre-recorded give chance to see what a host and her shows are like before committing to higher price videochat (and I think pre-record should be lower price since they do not require the involvement of the host)

All of that is fine if there is something that explains it just as you did. But I don't want to watch the whole thing and only when it starts over do i see that you only do light teasing.

I would also like to know if you recorded a new one yet without having to pay for minutes to get this info.

Wow Monika... sorry you have to deal with such nastiness here. You don't deserve it in my book.

I have no objection to prerecorded videos, if they're priced reasonably... I've seen a few that were done well. It would be helpful if we were told how recently the video was made, how long it is, and perhaps also a little description of its contents. And I agree with Casa... the videos are mostly for fans, although it can be a good way to get some idea of what a host is like.

prerecorded is good while we are sleeping or away:) some guys asking us to record our video in gym or whatever.its mostly for fans...if u dont want to go on prerecorded u can see on our profile that we have pre recorded video now.and do not log in.nobody force u,guys.to watch:)

casablancka got it spot on nobodys making you watch . its all choices and preferences .

n/a

I wouldnt spend a dime on pre-recording videos, they are not worth it, might as well go watch paint dry in the community chat room it is a lot better then those videos. Rather have a live video and preferred 121 if I see the host is very sexy sexy and interesting. But that just me.

I would go there if any girls wear pantyhose on without panties on hehehe :))))

n/a

you have to understand many members spend most of there none working life here,or at home listening to their wife's,gf's etc,whinge,whine & complain.so when they are here it's their chance to whinge,whine & complain.which means no matter how minor or trivial,the sound will be like an elephant being castrated.lmao

lol

agree with noidea, him and I spend way to much time here and not enjoying the life outside this computer.

n/a

n/a

one was in not so shy

the glorious uncertainty of women.it's her perogative to change her mind.you said they told you when you got in vid & when you been getting a show for... you expect the same.sounds like you might be regular visitor to the hosts.seems like there might be some omissions from your post

"I wont get naked or do anything dirty this close to easter". if that's your religion thing, than great, but then either don't work at all this week,
OHH ITS WHAT IM DOING :).DECIDE NOT TO WORK AT ALL THIS WEEK TILL EASTER ...if girls stay online .,probably they maybe only chat and have their fans who want to chat....no need2 b angry on them...

so u go to mcdonalds and they say "sorry we got no more strawberry milkshake left till our next delivery" they should all stop working too just coz u have always had it from them? get real....the hosts r allowed to do whatever they wish whenever they like

nobody has a monopoly on being right . trixter is just venting his frustration with hosts he visited today .

ir wrong. the girls are here advertising a service. if they dont wanna provide it for silly reasons, then they should stay offline. the gardener doesn't say - "i decided i don't want to mow the grass today, but you can still be nice and pay me."

correct me if i'm wrong,but they were still providing a service.perhaps not you were hoping,expecting or wanting but nonetheless...the problem with your grass mowing analogy is that there they come to you,here you come to them to cum because of them :--)

did u even ask first before the vid if the host will give her "usual show" to u? no u didnt..as u stated in ur first post u went right to vid...would u still expect the same show if the host is on her period or she should stop working then too? think about it ;)

Dude, I went to a host in not-so-shy on friday and she said hi, come to my vid bb. I went in video and i asked for a strip show. She said ok, but kept seating and kept asking me for my job, family, blah, blah. I told her I wanted a show. She said: Aren't you ashamed you are asking for a show this week? I am religious and I respect this week. LMAO! She respects this week and doesn't strip, but she can take my money without any consideration? Great to be religious! LMAO!!! The girls here are so spoil!!!

You are totally right, no matter what these "cyberprince" tisme and imshy say, if host is in Not So Shy category she must agree atleast to get naked, it is in rules. If host want to have right to decide to get naked or not, then she better go in Glamour or Little Shy

but spacedust,to attach categories you're misrepresenting the op.this isn't about categories..i'm sure if trixster had grounds like you suggest,he would of complained to admin,not posted here

ffs read the thread, the op said in his second posting that one host was in not so shy, so categories have been assigned!

sorry i missed that,but 1 not both.so if the 1 in notso didn't why is he posting here?

n/a

Come on, be nice to the girls!

n/a

n/a

McDonals is having a good week here on c.c. lol

but you're a known moana lisa

I would agree that they should let you know right away if you are a regular that they usually strip for regardless of the category.

If it is glamour and little shy, and if they have a bunch of pics in their archives that would make one think they strip, I also think that they should let you know right away even if you are not a regular. But if glamour and little shy, and if there is no reason for you to think that they would strip, I don't think they need to let you know anything until you ask since they are not required to strip and have not done anything to lead you to believe that they would. Even if you had seen them once or twice, they get so many visitors that you cannot expect them to remember what they did in the past for everyone so if glamour and little shy, unless pics indicated striping or you were a regular where you usually want striping, they have no need to warn you.

If not so shy or instant action, both of which are hardcore, they need to go another category. Nudity is required in those categories, holiday or no holiday, and they are 100% wrong.

Finally, in terms of religion, I would love to know how there is a big difference between sitting in one's bra and underwear and acting all sexy versus stripping. It is not for me to judge, but it certainly seems like a questionable distinction.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

not so shy category is not for strip? no nudity there i guess, according to you? right?

I hear what you are saying.
However it sounds like you were happy
with these chathosts before and returned.
So why not give them a break?
I think if you did, you would be rewarded! ;)

i could have complained to cc and got my money back - but i AM a nice guy and it would ruin the relationship I have with the host. it was just annoying is all. I like what LexusLady says about God taking the rest of the year off...if it seems like such a sin to work here this week - feel free to take the week off, but don't expect a freebie from me. i don't ask for free shows on my birthday, do i?

n/a

BuonA Pasqua
Joyeuse Pasques
Frohe Ostern
Feliz Pascua
Boa Pascoa
Kalo
Zalig Paasfeest
Schastilvoi Paschi
Srecan Uskrs
Sretan Uskrs
Giad Pàsk
Fericit pasti
A fraylekhn Pesah YIDDISH

agree with you 10000000%

n/a

n/a

n/a

Hey... If the guy is an a-hole, then f... him! The same for if he insists on your things after you say that you're not comfortable doing them.

Of course, hosts should read the fine print of what they agree to, however, when they choose their categories. Not so shy hosts agree to not just nudity, but also masterbation, and instant action hosts agree to the same plus actual insertion of either fingers or toys. Just look what it says when you choose a category. But outside of this, the rest is up to you, and anyone that doesn't respect your limits doesn't deserve any respect in return.

You two hosts are obviously some of the good ones. I can tell just by these short responses that you are doing what we hope for. I would say the vast majority of hosts are like you and make this site great!

There are just a minority that take advantage of the good reputation that you hosts have created for c.c.

Imagine if one McDonalds were allowed to serve food that was awful and stale. People would still go there because they expect to get the same quality that McDonalds serves everywhere else. That bad Mcdonalds would still make lots of money, even though no one would ever go there twice.

You may not like McDonalds, so just imagine your favorite restaurant chain. They can't allow a few bad restaurants to ruin their reputation. They WON'T allow it, and we wish c.c. didn't allow this either.

If a guy is rude, i think it's OK to end the session. You do need to respect yourself. I wish there was a way for you to challenge the rating that you get. I wish you could show the chat log to c.c. and just have them delete the rating if they agree it was unfair.

Now, for some people, being rude and degrading is kind of a fetish, so some members and hosts can get together and enjoy that. More power to them as long as they both like it. I like to be nice, and I like hosts that are nice too. I like McDonalds too, and I'm glad they don't allow bad ones to continue.

n/a

No need to be mad. A simple "no" should be enough for both the member AND the host. Then, if he doesn't accept that, go ahead and get mad. :P

n/a

n/a

Leave the room and dont come back that will surprize him ))

Was the first minute from our first video. So wasn't a regular of mine or someone i knew.So the dialog got a logic for all of u.:-D

wake up this is a porn site not a place for chat,he told he is fine so its enough...now move on with the show or if you want to chat use a chat site

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

but if she told him what show she had for him,it wouldn't be a suprise & he really likes surprises.

Let me get this straight. He is here in your video, PAYING to see you. He makes no special or hard to do requests. He is prepared to stay and pay for ANYTHING you want to do. And you have a problem with this?

you guys really don't see the ironic humor in a member asking,what show you have for me & i really like suprises,in the same sentence?jethro tull had a song for you lot.

I would say:
ok, lets see what I have got to surpise you...))
Really where was a problem for you? I suggest to see my show first to members.LOL

I still fail to see the gripe here from a chathost, and no, I am not "thick as a brick"! Of course, if you have never visited a host before, and don't know what they will be wearing etc (no free vid chat here) or what show they offer, of course it will be a surprise. The member that is the subject of this thread seems like a nice guy to me...

nowhere in her post is there a hint of gripe,except if you carry bad emotions on top

was you huh garyuk? :--)

heheh, no it wasn't me, I'm still at the "ur ass bb" level of articulation when it comes to opening chat lines. (only kidding of course, honest, I dearly hope that I have more respect for you hosts than that).

And I apologise for suggesting 'gripe', you are quite right to put me right on that, the subtle irony of the observation was a positive thing:)

then i'll consider your first post her due to"hangover related circumstances". seems you must have had a"hair of the dog"judging by your more relaxed second message,or perhaps a good empty :--)

member : hi
host : hi
member : how are you today ?
host : come in my 121 for show
member : but i m in private already you dont see ?
host : yes and so ?
sight ..... bye

n/a

n/a

n/a

seem more to be your asscat

n/a

Better 16 hours a day here than seeing hookers!

n/a

n/a

sometimes I try to make someone like you leave cc or at least do something in reality... but I always fail... try vacations?

well I have change my name 4 times for the same reasons, becuause I had several host ask me why I spend so much time here on cc instead of goig out, but I am old to start dating again so its easier here

well I think people should change their names, getting old seeing the same names in there

n/a

I can't tell you what is right for you and it is not my place to judge but 16 hours every day is a lot of time. If you want a real woman in your life then you could focus some of your time on that instead of here. Only you know if a real woman would make you happier than CC does and only you can decide if you need to do something about it. There are no guarantees out there but some things are worth the effort.

JMHO because you asked.

No we couldn't. I also think the world would be a much less appealing place without it. That wonderful feeling you get right at the start of the relationship which eventually fades but is replaced by a different, maybe stronger, type of love.

Although I'm just wondering that, if it was based on being rational, would that increase my chances of ever having sex again.

I say increase because it sure as hell couldn't decrease them :P

n/a

lol

n/a

I'm pregnant are 2 words guys never want to hear.
I bet he shit a brick!

Out of the blue my girl told me she was pregnant.
But it wasn't an April Fool's since she told me in March :(

Was he happy or mad? That's a great prank. Not only is it funny but how he reacted would say a lot about him. So what happened?

n/a

A piece NPR did a couple years ago on maple trees exploding in New England from being too full of sap.

i told my favourite chathost that cc was closing the site,u can guess what face she made:P

n/a

cellophane toilet under toilet seat

not the nice time4 jokes...:(

n/a

what is not a good time for jokes?

n/a

Bad things happen all over the world all the time. If we do not take time to joke and have fun, whats the point of living?

Everyone at work turned in a letter of resignation together in the bosses mailbox. Secretary told us the look on his face was priceless untill he read the third one, then realized what day it was lol.

n/a

n/a

I think if I was the last guy I would go to the hardware store and buy a 2 for $2 and then go back the next day for my 5 and 6 for $4 :P

sorry 256 costs $6

Why does the third one cost so much more then?

n/a

n/a

n/a

I think they are a lovely , but very rare, breed :D

n/a

Rider.... from IF? ...that you?

n/a

n/a

n/a

this hosts have more important things to do...then stay online 24.7 for 500$

This member would love to be online 24.7 playing with his private parts for $500 :P

In fact I could have left out the "for $500" and it would still be true lol

very good point I agree with you

infact i had even thought about becmming a host but then i might need viagra to keep up with the hard work

Some hosts find contests annoying to the point that they rather not be bothered, and one where you needed the member to jump in and out of video, was especially annoying to everyone. I know one top host that will only play puzzles since while she thinks contests are stupid, you don't need to do anything but chat during the puzzle contests so it doesn't make a difference if there is a contest or not. Others, of course, are obsessed with contests and winning which obviously can be annoying to members.

By the way, with the possible exception of this last contest, every top host that I can think of usually participates in contests. Other than this last contest, it would be interesting to see who you think are the top hosts that are avoiding contests most of the time because I cannot think of one.

Thank god I can have more time with her!!!!!!...Don't get me wrong, it would probably be good for her finacially, but like she says, she is satisfied with her "chosen" regulars, and makes enough to need anymore exposure.

n/a

n/a

BadPussyDoll I think the problem goes both ways. I suspect that the majority of hosts do not really care about getting to know members (apart from the financial incentive that goes with creating the illusion of friendship).

This is not a criticism of hosts as, if I was a hot good looking 20 - 25 year old guy I would not really want to chat with fat ugly old women in their forties and fifties :P

But I think that, while hosts treat members as a cash machine members will continue to treat hosts like sexual robots (although videos like this definitely have a very large something missing).

I now tend not to video with hosts who I see in comm chat as I find that once you video with them once all you ever get after that is private messages asking "Are you coming to video ?" whereas before that they chatted to you in open.

Obviously this isn't always the case as there are a lot of members who are a lot nicer than me :P

n/a

I think that is harsh we are not all like that- honest!

A popular host may not be a contest winner, especially in this last contest. The rules of this last contest favored Glamour and Not Shy hosts. Members who exited a private every five minutes could vote for their host many times. An Instant Action host just does not have many members who are inclined to do that. You can figure out why.

In general, an Instant Action host will charge more (the privates are shorter). That may affect how much time a member spends just chatting to an Instant Action host.

There are bright, intelligent, sexy women in every category. I think many members know this. And many members also realize this is not a dating site. But I consider some hosts as my good friends, and certainly the categories do not put any restrictions on friendship.

n/a

You're welcome. You seem like a thoughtful and responsive person; you'll figure it out, and I think you'll do well here. Good luck!

First hi back.

Yes you can see the glamour girls with open legs. In fact, as far as I can tell, the only difference is that, in Instant Action the host is expected to get naked whilst in Glamour hse does not have to.

I think that the main reason that most of the hosts who won are in glamour is because they are already popular hosts (see previous competition winners) and so choose glamour because of what I said above.

Glamour can also be cheaper than Instant Action but I do not think that this is really a factor as I know a few of the girls who won have prices equal to, or higher than, the average Instant Action price.

The last contest favoured Glamour and Littleshy hosts because memebrs were bale to vote for every 5 minutes spent in video. A softcore host could have a bikini price of 1:00 per min whereas an IA host had to have $2.00. I saw that some "big name" hosts dropped their prices for the contest. In previous contests winning mainly depended on money spent. Talking more generally I think members who frequent IA are mainly interested in a fast show and a cum. (this is what the category is about after all). They are not generally so interested in establishing the sort of relationship with a host that gives the urge to give them the support required to feature well in a contest.

I am afraid everyone is different I always went to instant action to try and cut out time wasting, but if true glamour is more to my taste these days we all need a bit of foreplay and teasing as long as the result still comes

First, please try using paragraphs and lines between them. I got a headache reading your post.

Second, CC is not like other sites. Many guys will spend a lot of time just chatting with hosts and won't even ask for a show or at least won't ask that often. And come contest time, the friendships that develop as a result of all of that time chatting naturally cause members to try to help out hosts that they like.

None of this means that instant action doesn't have its place or that one cannot chat and get to know and become friends with an instant action host. It just means that when given the opportunity to join together in an effort to achieve a common goal, a member is going to be more likely to team up with a host that he has a good relationship with and that relationship is more likely to develop via chatting than stripping. And don't forget that usually members can win a prize too so hosts are at least giving their members emotional encouragement too to their friends and once again, that friendship developed from chatting most likely.

One last point. Many members won't spend much time with glamour, or even little shy, hosts since they don't want to be bothered with worrying about whether a host will strip or if she only strips in 121. I will very often just look for not so shy or instant action hosts if I am in the mood for a show. There are probably many glamour and little shy hosts that would strip but I never even take the time to ask since it just isn't worth the hassel or they will tell me to go 121 at a very high price. The result of all of this is that while you might see mostly glamour and little shy hosts winning contests, you keep seeing the same ones win over and over since guys are reluctant to give unknown hosts in those categories much of a chance. That means that a host could end up making a lot more money in other categories even if she never develops a close enough relationship with members that they will return at contest time.

If you are looking for a "sweet spot", go for not so shy. This allows chatting and the potential to get to know members well, but does require nudity. It is like the best of both worlds. Then, in time, you can move to little shy if you don't mind stripping or to glamour if you prefer not to strip after you get a following. (I say little shy if you don't mind stripping since guys are more likely to request a show in little shy than glamour.)

n/a

Number one reason is cost. For most members the cost of a video is very important.

Number Two...members often like to think of themselves as seducers...men who can convince a girl to do something she normally wouldn't do ...and that fantasy is more closely related to soft core.

Finally, somewhat in keeping with 2, a lot of new girls, beginners start is soft and move to instant. Rare to have a host start there. Many members look for the girl next door experience..and that arguably can be found more often in soft. Instant Action is associated with pros...kind of like going to see a hooker instead of picking a girl up in a club. No offense meant.

n/a

n/a

n/a

In terms of what appears in a video? It seems anything is possible from Glamour through Instant Action. Also non-adult hosts are often willing to move to Glamour if you ask and of course at a higher rate. So in reality you are competing with every host on CC even though you are in Instant Action. I think the perception of Instant Action is the girls are more willing to do overtly sexual acts quickly ...hence the instant in instant action. In reality that may or may not be true. Some IA hosts are huge stallers. I wish you luck. Just give a good show for a fair price with a good personality and keep yourself looking good and you will do fine...easy. :)

By the way, did you get banned already or changed screen name? I thought I'd check your profile and can't find it from a Search...

n/a

At least nobody can argue that you are trying to make self advertisement! And even more, you didn't give the most clear clues how to find you ;-) I searched on "charm" and no lady appeared to be agressive as well. I searched on "agres" and well: there was AgressiveMe and I had found CharmingMe, but I don't think they were both your profiles ;-) Reading some profiles didn't help much... may I ask for another hint? ;-)

By the way, I'm not either using my screenname, so don't try to send me a cc-mail!

n/a

... with a strong and bright personality and a good sense of humour

this is also written in your profile and it seems I had perceived it that way :-)

I'll try to check other features "de visu".
Cheers, enjoy Easter!

Hurray !!!!! Get those posts flying out of your computer :P

I was trying to be nice and not comment. I actually was asking people if Glamprinces was the same person. :p

Why do you think, to gain favour, perhaps a cheaper rate, or a better (naughtier) show next time they are on

its simple, maybe someday i visit her in real and she will be nicer to me ;-)

In this latest contest, based solely on time spent in 121, members couldn't win a prize anyway. It's a good question to ask. I can think of several reasons...

You might actually like each other (gasp) and prefer to spend time together. Perhaps you the member will gain future favors, but this doesn't necessarily influence you. You just want to help a friend.

In the case of a contest involving some skill (word games, etc.), you might want to find a host who is good at the game, since her participation will affect your ability to do well also. I am assuming here that the member is trying for a prize also.

You could be trading contest time for freebies down the road.

You could be a money slave and not give a damn how much money you spend on your favorite host, so long as she's yours for the duration (and of course she is utterly grateful). And then when you win a prize you will spend all that money on your host.

I don't :)

I did it to help a few friends out a bit that I sometimes visit anyway and in some cases, they had lowered their price to close to $1,00 so I was able to spend more time with them. I didn't ask for or expect anything in return, but one host did provide some free time for those that helped her. But there was no agreement for this ahead of time.

I loved this contest and hada lot of fun. Some hosts dropped their price, or at leat their 121 price and some offered incentives to persuade viewers to leave, vote and come back such as taking off an item of clothing for each time. You could spend $20 - $25 and be guaranteed to see a host naked when this would normally have cost much more, with no guarantees.

n/a

Priority doesn't mean ignore other viewers that enter open session. It simply means that while the host should try to be fair to all viewers, if she is in the middle of something with the first viewer, she shouldn't all of a sudden stop what she was doing just because a subsequent viewer enters. The second viewer should wait his turn.

Sometimes there really is no conflict if the host is just chatting. But sometimes, if during a show, the first guy might be asking for something, and it is not appropriate for the host to all of a sudden forget about him when in the middle of fulfilling that request and defer to the second guy. Now if it is not so shy and instant action, and the first guy is chatting and the second guy wants a show, that would be a little different since the second guy has a right to the show in my view in those categories where nudity is required. But outside a sitution where the rules would dictate who should have priority, the preference should be given to the first guy in video and requests from other members that enter can then be worked in.

A good host knows how to do this. If just chatting, she can handle multiple conversations at once, and guys just need to be a little patient if there is a delay in her answer. If she is putting on a show, it is even easier since she can just move around a lot and keep showing various parts of her body and varying her routine. But what often happens is that a host will pretty much ignore the second guy which is not right or she will ignore the first guy in an effort to make sure that the second guy stays which is also inappropriate. She needs to find a way to balance her time better and let each guy know she is chatting with others, especially if she is on multiple sites. Good hosts know how to do this.

By the way, in light of your attitude, you would be a host that I would be very happy to totally ignore and would be even happier if you returned the favor. I find the tone of your post to be "pathetic".

According to CC rules a host should not ignore a member who enters her video. Even if she is about to orgasm she has to at least say "hi" , possibly followed by "I'm a bit busy now" to the guy who just joined.

n/a

If you are talking about a show rather than a conversation then the first member has already gone through the chatting phase and paid to get the host naked so what he has requested should take priority, unless like member suggests, she can accomodate both requests easily.

I usually go 121 for that very reason but sometimes the price difference is so great I take the gamble on an open show and hope, that the type of member you describe, does not enter.

If another member does come in,starts demanding stuff and the host stops doing what I had requested then I would leave but would probably not hold it against the host. I would be more likely to blame the member.

n/a

n/a

You say you totally agree with Candy but then you contadict what she says.

Candy : "if you want privacy-welcome in 121,its so easy,I really cant understand all these funny long talks "host should give priority to first viewer"blah blah blah ."

You : "If a guy enters into video while the host is with another he should respect that and either just watch and enjoy the show or leave and come back when the host is done."

So maybe you only agree about the 121 part .

You might want to read my post again. You agree more with me than with her. And since you are in the customer service business, I would suggest you reconsider your attitude and do your best to give customers what they want. Ultimately, in any business, it is the customers who tell people what they want and only those that deliver what the customers want will stay in business.

n/a

I would not visit a model anymore who ignore me if other viewer comes to her room and i never ask to be first priority if a show already started when i enter.

I think most members join an open session in hopes that a show is going on. Often that is not the case. The host is just chatting. In that case I think the second member should leave. If a show is going on....he should enjoy it but allow the first member in to call the shots. That is my etiquette anyway.

n/a

Given you are not so shy, a category where nudity is required, that is how you should handle things in my view. I might not ask if it is okay to give a show in your second example since the first guy might say no. I think it might be better to explain that the second guy wants a show and the rules say you need to give one. That way, the first guy can only get angry at the second guy, CC and its rules, or himself for choosing open instead of blaming you.

as a viewer i agree, if i want to have some fun and want the hosts whole attention which is 99% of the time then i 121

host dont care about members cause of $$$$$$$$$

n/a

Sindy I care about you earning lots of $$$$$$ :P

n/a

I agree, don't beg for love, respect his wishes and move on

n/a

Not nesseserily. Not long ago my bf told me that he wasnt in love with me anymore, he loves me but not in love anymore so he wanted to leave me and stay friends. I convinced him that for our 2 years relationships' sake he has to stay and promised him that ill get his feelings for me back and we will be as happy as before. So he gave me second chance (it was really hard to convince him to do so), and guess what? I did it, and now its even more serious between us than before. And he is so happy that 6 months ago i fought for our love cuz we used to be really happy and in love before, and that i didnt let him go. Well my advice is...fight for love if it really worth it but dont humiliate urself, dont beg for love, just fight. Change, be different, do what he doesnt expect u to do. Be bright and happy, dont let him see u miserable, u know how guys are-they dont want u if ure miserable and heartbroken, but once they see that ure fine and happy-they want u back. I know its hard to smile when u wanna cry, but force urself, pretend that ure happy. But do all this only if ure 100% sure that he 100% worth it. If not-just move on.

I agree 100% if there was love and any chance of keeping it you must keep trying .Its too rare to loose and i speak from much experience. Dont regret not making every effort

n/a

dont give up , after 2 and half years you need to fight for him if you love him .

n/a

why you ask cyber wankers for relationship advice, if they knew the answer to have a good relationship they would not be here

yes...more then 40 peoples die :(many injured

n/a

I really don't think people should do the bombs. That is way too dangerous. I pray for the peace in the world. For all time to come.

Thank you.

RIP to the people who were killed. :(

n/a

n/a

Now turn the page over and read

n/a

n/a

I don't get it :(

I have been scrolling up and down now for two days and still haven't found the answer to your question.

Oh well there is always the weekend to look forward to when my friend is going to tell me the answer to the question "How do you keep a fool in suspense ?" I've been waiting in anticipation for two months for that one :D