General Forum
RE: A question for members
Those who spend time in Freechat and do not enter videochat: we call them Freeloaders - they want sex talk for free, or to dominate a host's time, with no intention of coming into videochat.
Or a member may make one brief visit into videochat and then feel the host owes them and they are no more obligated to pay for video session.
Some members operate under the delusion that they have a relationship with the host, and that the host loves their company. They don't care that they are distracting the host, that she needs to earn a living here, or that they may be preventing the host from doing other things.
In terms of those who promise to come into video after spending time in free and then disappear... well, it speaks for itself. They are either liars or lack the balls to say, "Hey, I've got to go." They are not shy. They are just deceptive assholes (sorry for my language).
Or a member may make one brief visit into videochat and then feel the host owes them and they are no more obligated to pay for video session.
Some members operate under the delusion that they have a relationship with the host, and that the host loves their company. They don't care that they are distracting the host, that she needs to earn a living here, or that they may be preventing the host from doing other things.
In terms of those who promise to come into video after spending time in free and then disappear... well, it speaks for itself. They are either liars or lack the balls to say, "Hey, I've got to go." They are not shy. They are just deceptive assholes (sorry for my language).
RE: A question for members
Nobody is perfect... and we'll always deal with different types of people (either as a host or as a member). In any place or site there will be such individuals. It's just up to the host if she choose to consume her time and energy with such members.
RE: A question for members
well you should rather ask the hosts about it.
its just like meeting ppl in the real life. youre not going to get along with most ppl you meet but youre going to make a few good awesome friends along the way.
many of the guys lose themselves in this virtual "reality" that they create for themselves and forget that actual girls are different but bear in mind that just because some of your friends disappointed you , you just cant give up on ppl just because of those who sucked.
RE: A question for members
Think your losing site of the fact you still need to sell yourself to a customer? We all like to try before we buy in most things in life so why not here?? yes i understand if someone is constantly just free chatting and not going any fiurther, however the option is one of the better and more positive things on this site.
RE: A question for members
Maybe they wanna let you down gently, but yes agree...should just be honest.
RE: A question for members
what can i say.men are enigmas,a riddle wrapped in a joke.how can you know what is happening in our pea sized brains when we don't.to us words are confetti,thoughts are fleeting,feelings are abnormal.we act & react,without thought for outcomes,it is only about us,if you get hurt in our self centred activities,that is your problem,not ours. :--)
RE: Wish we had LIKE buttons here
or DISLIKE =) or leave comments other people could read. or suggest viewers move faster and be more obedient, or suggest them to post pictures more often, or express our ideas about their clothes, manners, make-up and so on. WOuld be also fun to let hosts rate viewers and viewers's pictures, behavor and so on =)
playfullsmile
i was talking to this woman and she readily claims to fuck 4 to 5 different guys every week. am i crazy to believe this? lol. i dont see how its even possible.
RE: playfullsmile
Thank you guys a lot. I just ask her to say the truth and she can't even do that. Quite strange really. She says all women fuck that many a week lol.
RE: playfullsmile
hey, any guy with a name like cumgeyser, clearly has a great imagination. Build on that. Maybe all the women in your life call it "Ol' Faithful"
RE: playfullsmile
i don't want to burst your bubble but HPV ,herpes and many other STD's can be easily passed even with a condom.
HPV and herpes cause lesions on the skin, especially around the pubic area which is not covered by the condom.:) Aids ca be transmitted with a condom too...
Example : the woman has HIV , the virus is discharched in her fluids. You shaved and have irritation or small lacerations from the blade, you have an ingrown hair o any lesion in that area, her fluid will come in contact with the laceations you have on you pubis (around the dick) and you can get HIV.
HPV is the same, some forms of hpv look like moles or tiny warts which may or might not be visible straight away. As it comes in contact with your skin, you can get infected. It is the same for a lot of disease.
Sure, the condom reduces the risk overall but it is by not means safe.
HPV and herpes cause lesions on the skin, especially around the pubic area which is not covered by the condom.:) Aids ca be transmitted with a condom too...
Example : the woman has HIV , the virus is discharched in her fluids. You shaved and have irritation or small lacerations from the blade, you have an ingrown hair o any lesion in that area, her fluid will come in contact with the laceations you have on you pubis (around the dick) and you can get HIV.
HPV is the same, some forms of hpv look like moles or tiny warts which may or might not be visible straight away. As it comes in contact with your skin, you can get infected. It is the same for a lot of disease.
Sure, the condom reduces the risk overall but it is by not means safe.
RE: playfullsmile
Yea i agree with all comments. She read the thread here too. And i said no such pills exist and she looked a bit sad. Then she said she had just fucked delivery man earlier in the day but didn't actually swallow his load of cum. it was only on her back.
RE: playfullsmile
Gotcha, my fault didn't mean for it to come off like that. She was just making these claims to me and she specifically says she doesn't get with men for money or gifts. Thought it was crazy to have over 150 guys a year. Thought i'd bring that up and see if such is possible.
RE: playfullsmile
Of course it's possible. Maybe not probably, but who knows. The great Oscar Robertson claimed 20 000 women in his lifetime. (I think it was the Big O)
RE: playfullsmile
Ah yes, Wilt is right. That' was why I kind of question marked the Big O ... it didn't quite seem right but I was too lazy to look it up. Thanks for the correction.
RE: playfullsmile
Lol thats whats up. I appreciate the back and forth. It was crazy talk that she was saying. She uses no protection because she takes some sort of pills that protect her. She likes the taste of cum, etc. I said nobody does such things. She said to ask around and i'll find that most women do. So asked i did.
RE: playfullsmile
there's this condition called "nymphomania", you know ?? some women have that problem, some claim to have it when they're on cam. For those that just claim to have it, it's probably just to keep you hooked, for those that really have that problem, some smart people invented dating sites. Not only she could find 5 guys a week to have sex with, she could find 5 different guys A DAY to fuck, you know? Happens when you're pretty (lol).
Also, some people have sex daily when in a relationship. And that is fun, sexy, why not do the same when she's single? If the guys are different, then no fear of getting bored or sex becoming boring ;) ta daaaa
Also, some people have sex daily when in a relationship. And that is fun, sexy, why not do the same when she's single? If the guys are different, then no fear of getting bored or sex becoming boring ;) ta daaaa
RE: playfullsmile
wtf, guys and girls? Why r u discussing her sex life? Isnt it her own business?
And the question to a topic starter: was it really necessary to mention the host`s name here?
And the question to a topic starter: was it really necessary to mention the host`s name here?
RE: playfullsmile
yeah , I have just wanted to write the same. Even if it is truth. she told him about it in private chat. And to write about it in public is unethical, to say the least.
RE: New anecdote - variant
A wife also points out to her husband that it was time he had a conversation with their thirteen year old son about the birds and the bees. So the father goes to his son's room and says "Son, do you remember how the bull was acting on his cow during our walk?". "Oh yes papa, I remember very well" says the son. Next day, the son goes to Ginette, standing behind her, shouting out loud "Moooooooooo!"
RE: U know noone can stop me Mr. OneMinVideoDuration :) Dont you?
So true? Really? WTF did she even say?
RE: U know noone can stop me Mr. OneMinVideoDuration :) Dont you?
How in the world did you get that from what she posted? You must be using some kind of translator that I don't have access to, because in plain, simple English, what she said in her post was nothing at all like what you said it meant.
RE: U know noone can stop me Mr. OneMinVideoDuration :) Dont you?
I am a member and i find that childish and sickening.. if his name is known report it to CC. Just because money is spent on the host does not give any member to be that disrespectful and childish. If you know the name send me a mail and i will report his sorry ass
RE: Anecdote"I mean ...."
Is it really necessary to say "old one"? I see things like this a lot here when someone shares a joke. So what if it's old? Maybe it was new to the one who shared it, and thus their joy in sharing it.The fact is nearly all jokes are old, very few are actually new, they are often just recast with new settings. Can't we just smile and laugh and enjoy the humor without having to criticize it? Yeah, I've heard it before but it still made me laugh.
RE: Anecdote"I mean ...."
A lil while ago someone asked here ,, why isnt the forum how it used to be?
There it is..You can’t post any comment at all, without someone jumping in you’re head and trying to find a bad meaning to you’re words..
Jeez...
There it is..You can’t post any comment at all, without someone jumping in you’re head and trying to find a bad meaning to you’re words..
Jeez...
RE: Anecdote"I mean ...."
Nah, I think the reason the forum ain't what it used to be has little or nothing to do with that. In the old days, there was a whole lot more of that kind of bantering. It was just overshadowed by there being so much more stuff. I think the reason for the forum's decline has more than one factor, and has more to do with changing clientele and changing inter-communication needs than anything else. CommChat is the same way. Chez does have a point, even if he was a bit strong in communicating it.
When I read your comments, I get the feeling it's kind of like an "I love you, but..." statement. The expression of love is there but it is negated or minimized by the "but". In your case, the compliment about being funny was there, but the "old" comment kind of makes a “so what” out of it. Just my thoughts on the matter. Anyway, Peace!
~L4S
When I read your comments, I get the feeling it's kind of like an "I love you, but..." statement. The expression of love is there but it is negated or minimized by the "but". In your case, the compliment about being funny was there, but the "old" comment kind of makes a “so what” out of it. Just my thoughts on the matter. Anyway, Peace!
~L4S
RE: Anecdote"I mean ...."
"You can’t post any comment at all, without someone jumping in you’re head and trying to find a bad meaning to you’re words"
Actually, that's not true. You have posted a great many things, as have a great many others, which neither I nor anyone else has "jumped in their heads."
And truth is, it wasn't even your head, I was jumping in. I wasn't specifically targeting you. You just happened to be the most recent in a long line of people who have made such comments. I've seen that "old joke" comment many times, not just from you. I just wish people would enjoy a joke without having to qualify it by pointing out its vintage. I guess, whenever we post a joke, we ought to apologize for it ahead of time: "Sorry if this is old, sorry if you have heard this before..."
Actually, that's not true. You have posted a great many things, as have a great many others, which neither I nor anyone else has "jumped in their heads."
And truth is, it wasn't even your head, I was jumping in. I wasn't specifically targeting you. You just happened to be the most recent in a long line of people who have made such comments. I've seen that "old joke" comment many times, not just from you. I just wish people would enjoy a joke without having to qualify it by pointing out its vintage. I guess, whenever we post a joke, we ought to apologize for it ahead of time: "Sorry if this is old, sorry if you have heard this before..."
RE: Anecdote"I mean ...."
lol funny joke, i remember how i heard this first time from my grandpa, and he told me that he heard this from his grandpa ;)))
RE: You look at them - warm, sunny, positive, but deep in their essence slippery, insidious, and misty
No!
RE: You look at them - warm, sunny, positive, but deep in their essence slippery, insidious, and misty
Your words reinforce my love for the Ladies of cc and my desire to please them.
Kiss, marry, sleep with
Who would you kiss, who would you marry, and who would you sleep with?
Hosts about members, members about hosts. Let's see if anyone's brave enough to play the game ;)
Hosts about members, members about hosts. Let's see if anyone's brave enough to play the game ;)
RE: Kiss, marry, sleep with
If I had anything interesting to say, sure, but all the questions have just one answer
RE: Kiss, marry, sleep with
I call bullshit... also that answer defeats the entire purpose of your original question. So thanks for wasting everyone's time, go have a drink and come up with something better.
Never thought....
Never thought I'd see the day when the Viewer Only Forum was more active than the General Forum.
RE: Never thought....
Yeah...so true. Back in the days when people could post anonymously it was much more active...granted some of the comments were deeply offensive but it was lively. Is that the trade off? Active and offensive versus dead? Might be a false choice but is sure seems that way.
RE: Never thought....
No i don't think that is the cause. I think it is more of changing clientele changing needs. Someone suggested that with social media like Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, etc., that could possibly be a factor. I'm not much on ComChat but it, too, seems to me to have lost its luster and lacks the extent of participation that it used to have.
group drains
Looking for a Mistress who wants to have at least 2 pigs in open vid for a drain
RE: group drains
Don't bother too much, he was in my room asking to be exposed and once i allowed him to join one2one, he left. So, i doubt he has anything to drain. Also, i frown upon slaves who directly ask for certain privileges, such as messaging another member to join at the same time in open...if he wants to be drain, he will be drained under your terms, not his. Where has this world gotten to?
RE: just thinking
I don't need to come here to have my money drained for my pleasure, my wife drains me, every paycheck, for HER pleasure -- new shoes, new clothes, new purses, new jewelry, new perfumes, and all I'm stuck with is the bills. So guys, you want to be drained? GET MARRIED HAHAHA!
RE: just thinking
oh, it is really stupid to call yourself a slave and expect a mistress to do what YOU want. :)) I mean, what if you got a job as a chef because you hate washing dishes, but you end up washing the dishes. It's just dumb!
Marriage isn't that bad. It depends WHO you married. It was your choice and nobody is forcing you to do anything , right? Why didnt you marry an independent woman who makes her own money?
Maybe because it's safer when she is bound to you financially ?Hmmmmm, penny for your thoughts?
Marriage isn't that bad. It depends WHO you married. It was your choice and nobody is forcing you to do anything , right? Why didnt you marry an independent woman who makes her own money?
Maybe because it's safer when she is bound to you financially ?Hmmmmm, penny for your thoughts?
RE: group drains
basically I think its all about greedy nature of some males. I will explain. Some would like to try findom and have a fantasy about paying big price per minute to Domme. but many have no balls to pay it for real. So they ask others to contribute.
Mistress get higher price per minute. slaves - pay their normal price for Findom session.
so cmon I wouldnt say its a big drain. I would call it just group session with some slaves not able to pay One2One or higher price themselves. the rest is just an optical illusion to create a better picture for this pathetic action.
Mistress get higher price per minute. slaves - pay their normal price for Findom session.
so cmon I wouldnt say its a big drain. I would call it just group session with some slaves not able to pay One2One or higher price themselves. the rest is just an optical illusion to create a better picture for this pathetic action.
RE: group drains
basically charging a higher amount for open sessions so that when 2 members join in open, they will spend a lot more money quickly
RE: group drains
Why would I want to pay a host more because there are other members present? It should be less if I am sharing the host time in a video.
RE: group drains
That`s the thrill for those whose dream is to to be screwed and mentally castrated. If you don`t get it - means that`s not your thrill. But QueenSophieT has good point there - pigs looking for fun/entertainment, asking Mistress/Goddess of what is she ready to do for their money or will she be entertaining them he way they want - nonsense :) Mental castration in general prevents a slave from even having those thoughts of "what will be more fun for my dick hummm, let me try the new trick". So that one above, who started the topic, is just seeking to try a new trick, to get thrill at least from something - thats a complete sexual frustration - soon he`ll stumble apon the Mistress who`ll crack him and make him realize the full picture of his inadequacy and thats when the real fun begins. :)
RE: group drains
I usually don't speak up on "theories" like this but feel compelled. Ever hear of the term "topping from below"? Even in a sub/domme relationship the sub is getting what he wants from the Domme ( to be a sub). In reality the sub (below) is getting exactly what he wants from the Domm. In essence it is the Domme giving the sub what he desires. So the sub is really in control. However here on CC it is a paid situation and the Host ultimately should give the viewer what he or she is paying for. This is a virtual situation not real life. That is the bottom line
RE: group drains
well obviously it's an exchange of services. Both the sub and the domme get what they want, but usually under the dom's terms. Of course we are always in control of what we do, realistically speaking. Even if someone had a gun to your head, you still have a choice. The sub isn't really in control because the domme can decline or allow his request under some specific terms, or not. Basically, in the end everyone gets what they want (in the ideal situation).
RE: group drains
you feel compelled? LOL well, wow you`re a good boy you so smart and understand so many things in this life that others don`t. Go get yourself another candy and don`t feel compeled to explain others your own theories that are too obviously obvious to even rise the voice.
What I was speaking has nothing to do with what you mentioned. That "topping from the botom" or the "paid situation" is not what smarty10 asked about. He was curious what the "group drains" is and why that can be enjoyable. I explained. And explained when it gets most fun for Mistress, and why that is not the right way for a sub to seek entertainment/fun - thats simply the wrong road for that type of "sexual frustration" to get the release.
Again - there are so many ways of seing this situation, being in the D/s relations and ways of people enjoy spending their money, that I wouldn`t try to put all this in strict frames of "this is a pay situation" as you did. In the case of strong sexual frustration, submissive often doen`t know what exactlly he wants and thats why he comes to the Domme asking to guide him. Yes it is one of the situations when "topping from the bottom looks like an absurd. So trying to frame everyone in your own frames of understanding is at least not so smart.
What I was speaking has nothing to do with what you mentioned. That "topping from the botom" or the "paid situation" is not what smarty10 asked about. He was curious what the "group drains" is and why that can be enjoyable. I explained. And explained when it gets most fun for Mistress, and why that is not the right way for a sub to seek entertainment/fun - thats simply the wrong road for that type of "sexual frustration" to get the release.
Again - there are so many ways of seing this situation, being in the D/s relations and ways of people enjoy spending their money, that I wouldn`t try to put all this in strict frames of "this is a pay situation" as you did. In the case of strong sexual frustration, submissive often doen`t know what exactlly he wants and thats why he comes to the Domme asking to guide him. Yes it is one of the situations when "topping from the bottom looks like an absurd. So trying to frame everyone in your own frames of understanding is at least not so smart.
RE: group drains
Why should it be less? Isn't it the same host ?:)) It's true that her attention will not be 100% yours,but there are members who enjoy spending a lot of money on women (just like in real life) that is why there are so called "group drains". A lot of men (and women) enjoy humiliation and they get turned on by it. Just like some people are aroused by pain.