General Forum

Well I'm an old boring fart ally. So ears and belly button are about my limits.

n/a

cos I like you, I won't post a link here to Pete Burns. :P

piercings are what keeps your policeman's whistle from ending up in the wrong mouth inyf! :--)

No tisme. My ugly face manages that all by itself :P

I like some, but not too much. Girls with eyebrows and lips and more look like they fell in the tackle box. Ears and navel are fine, maybe tongue and pussy.. Lips, eyebrows, cheeks always turn me off. A small nose pin is ok, a big nose ring looks like a pig. And I never did enjoy screwing pigs!

"fell in the tackle box" lol but a good one. Piercings are ok, they mostly go away unlike tattoos which are very difficult to get rid of, unless the new type of ink is used, which can be made to dissipate and go away if you want it to

n/a

i'm piercing together a montage ally,when i'm finished should i hand it in to the relevant authorities or are you willing to pay,so your reputation i9sn't pierced? :-)

Tattoos are most ugly on the skin of a person. If this person is a beautiful woman, it is much more ugly. Tattoos sometimes look similar like bruise. MY opinion.

It is good to hear guys express their opinions about them. I have thought a lot about it over the years and have never considered it an option that would enhance a woman's beauty. I rarely check out girls or women so I don't have an opinion about others choices. I have just opted out. I do think that just like men if they are happy with it and it has personal meaning then it is a personal choice just like implants. :)

I did my tattoo once to hide a little scar on my belly. Even it's pointless that looks better than scar i think. You are... men, sometimes so cruel and not very smart too. :(

What makes you think that i am not smart?

if i met a girl i liked i wouldnt probably care too much about the tattoo and a tattoo to hide a scar is fine .... i dont really have much of a problem with tattoos but pointless tattoos or following fashion or an ill thought out tattoo without long lasting meaning .......... is generally regretted later and I am just tired of looking at some hosts photos and always seeing the tramp stamp on the back . I like to be different and when all my friends were getting tattoos i thought i was being different by not getting and when i talk to them now ..... well i dont think there is one who is proud of their tattoo , they just came to live with them . One guy who lived with me had a big tattoo on his arm of the cartoon character the tasmanian devil ..... actually that tattoo always makes me smile when i think of it but i think its because i liked the tasmanian devil )))))))))))

n/a

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and it doesn't make them rude or not smart just voicing how they feel. If you got the tatoo be proud of it and don't let others opinion effect you. I am sure you have opinions about things like guys with huge guts and you wouldn't mind saying it :) Just be confident in your choices.

n/a

For me it is ugly. I thought i can say my opinion in this forum. But one answer on my opinion says: "men are cruel and not smart" / you say: "...your personal taste is ideal for everyone?"
When i say my own opinion on this subject, it is clear that this is my personal taste and i never argued it to be ugly for all.
Do you call only these folks as "nice" that follow your taste? :)

n/a

While I would rather not see a tattoo (or at least not those big ones that you talk about) it's the person getting the tattoos body and if I met a sweet, charming woman I certainly wouldn't let the fact that she had a tattoo put me off.

Although I'm sure your right that, when they are 90, senile and walking around the nursing home naked, the tattoo won't look quite so good.

hey i'm already 90, senile and walking around the nursing home naked, and I think the tats look damn good!

send me a pic please Roman

what were we talking about?

I'm sure your ones do Roman lol

you forget that lots of these hosts are 1. very young and 2. from east europe/russia, and as such they think they will never grow old and their fashion sense is 7 years out of date. most still like smoking, tribal armband tattoos, absolut, and britney spears....

you don't like east european hosts, do you? LOL (Britney Spears... is that a type of asparagus?)

Yeah and we have polar bears walking around down the streets and call each other "tovarish". Omg, u need to get out of the house more;)

I'm sorry I do not like tattoos on girls. I have one on my right arm I got in the service 44 years ago in Alongapo in the Phillipines and wish I never got it.

))))))) i was waiting for you to defend the honour of russian women ))) , actually polar bears walking down the street is alaska

They come here for winter:)))))))) Cuz brown bears sleep during this time of year)) But we need bears!!!!!! Tovarishes cant live without them! Thats why they come:)

n/a

oh Moni, I wd love to meet a polar bear who called me tovaritch, especially while I'm walking through Red Square - so cool!

yes? how many drinks can YOU stand in a St. P pub before the smoke drives you out? and fitness clubs in moscow are about as rare as gay pride festivals....

n/a

n/a

I can't agree more, when I see a beautiful woman with a tattoo I feel sorry for them. If I find a host has one, I'm gone and never to return.

n/a

It's MY fantasy that I am paying for here. If I don't like them, Why should I pay money for something I don't want to see?

n/a

You have a PHOBIA, get help!

n/a

n/a

Yes but, in my opinion, it isn't the tattts that make them sexy.

Yes, but a guy said about tatts on a beautiful women, no? So how it can be that even one tattoo turn sexy woman in not sexy anymore, huh?
Some guys are just too fussy for my opinion.

Beautiful Woman = Perfect
Tattoo on Beautiful Woman = No more perfect, but still Beautiful Woman
Tattoo = Disturbing Beauty

n/a

n/a

Whats not cool is how closed your mind is or
has become.
Every person has the right to express themselves
however they like to.
Your over reacting about tattoo's.

Not so sure - knew a woman with a small tattoo of a rose on her shoulder - it was curiously sexy

....but I suppose a guy having elephant ears tattoed on his thighs is a bit old hat now.

I tried to imagine that on my thighs ally but I thought it would look weird. I mean an elephant without a trunk is just wrong :P

n/a

If there is one term i find offensive it is "tramp stamp". The idea that having a tattoo there suggests the woman is a tramp seems to be uniquely american, although yr choice of posting name suggests you may be from UK. My girlfriend has just had a tattoo on her lower back, the design has a specific meaning for her and I think it looks great, a real work of art.

tramp stamp, Tennessee license plate, ass antlers, slag tag, approach light - universally horrible...

n/a

Tattoos are a question of personal choice , i think tramp stamp is fine , its catchy and to be honest most people i ever met with one ..... was pretty brainless - men or women . Up until 20 years ago you never really saw tattoos on the lower back , then some celebrities did and well . As for Angelina Jolie , sorry too many tattoos and same for david beckham and Megan Fox well she is half wit .... oops back to the brainless tramp stamps . I just express my personal opinion , i accept other peoples opinions and its their choice what they do with their bodies . I am just tired of tattoos everywhere ........ and having a tattoo definitely doesnt show you have personality and character .... if anything the opposite ))))

Tattoos are not just a fashion statement or the cool thing to do, I'm diabetic and got a Medical Alert tattoo on the inside of my left wrist. If I get injured and cannot talk, it lets people know of my condition. It is much easier than wearing a bracelet or necklace, those tend to break at the most inopportune times.

n/a

If I even half understood what you just said, I might agree, then again, maybe not LOL

Your making an issue out of nothing.

Does that mean that you have Tats....Tit?? LOL

It means people have tattoos, peircings, implants, they smoke, have different color eyes, hair, skin, laugh different, smile, cry, have different ideas and beliefs. The list goes on and on.
Its about looking past all these things and seeing the real person.

n/a

I don't like tattoos either and wouldn't have one myself. I don't mind them on other people.. it's a personal choice.

I live in Bristol and I like Banksy's art ... why do you use his name?!

Yes I am english and I chose Banksy because of Banksy himself and thought a good name to use with tattoos . Of course it could also be after Gordon Banks , the great english goalkeeper or some kind of rhyming slang :))) and hey Dean ' tramp stamp ' is the tag name many people use not just american and whenever its used people know immediately what it means unless of course you are elderly in which case its something to stick on an envelope )) . I could have called it ' slag tag ' but that goes too far ))

n/a

tattoo is a way to express your indentity

and when everyone has a tattoo, how is that identity?

n/a

if you have the same butterfly on your back that you picked off the tattoo shop wall with 300 other girls that week, how is that "special meaning"? it just makes you conformist. my company has learned the hard way to investigate further when someone comes in for a job interview with a turtleneck and long sleeves. hey, if you wanted to be a hip rebel great, but be one at the video store job where you belong...we can't have our clients meeting with you and your spiderweb neck tattoos, it's bad for business...

n/a

"Girls here, also from my understanding from the posts, see "good guys" as polite sweet guys who treat them nice, even better if they are not asking for nudity"

As far as this site is concerned. I agree 100%. I have hosts in softcore tell me all the time they like cc best because they do not have to do nude show if they do not want to and they have nice members that never ask for a show.

n/a

I don't think you get it and that sounds rude!!

except I get upset when I find out my favorite nice girl host DOES do topless or even nude show!

Julia you raise an interesting point. As far as this site goes I definitely would not fall into the "nice guy" category as I am only here to see sexy shows.

On the other hand I am never rude to a host (unless she agrees to it beforehand :P), have never lied to a host and have never tried to hurt a host.

So is a member who is nice in video but is just playing with a hosts feelings nicer than a member like me. I don't think so.

Having said that I'm sure there is a huge % of members that are a lot nicer than me.

My opinion of a "good guy" regardless of what category he goes to...he treats the host with respect and does not say disrespectful things or try to push her beyond what she is clearly willing to do. It doesn't mean that a good guy doesn't like to see nude (what guy doesn't) but that he is polite, takes the time to read her profile and might suggest certain things but respects her wishes just like in every day life. Never harsh words, rudeness, pushy or a get even attitude if she has clearly defined what she is willing to do. Now a "great guy" and "gentleman" deserve a lot more praise because they actually go out of their way to make the host feel her best and in turn he will see her and enjoy her from that prospective along with other attributes but he can still enjoy nudity if he is in the proper category for it. My experiences!

"but he can still enjoy nudity if he is in the proper category for it. My experiences!"

Unless he is in non adult, all adult categories are the proper category

As long as she is willing in shy and glam!!!!!! It's not what you expect in those situations it is if she is willing to be nude which many do not!! RESPECTFUL of what she is willing to do is the key word it is not a given in those categories so if that is your expectations regardless of what she says than you do not qualify as a good guy:))

n/a

yeah i followed this advice to the letter. I am a handsome guy, with a big hard cock, and I went in to see toxicmoon, then missprecious, followed by cutetiffany and toxicheart. i was polite, funny and charming. after an hour with each in 121 i asked them to strip naked. they wouldnt even show a tease of breast. please can you tell me where i am going wrong, or did i just find the 0.1% who dont show? thanks in advance

Got me, you'll have to ask the poster Dr Seuss.

Funny, but I thought Dr. Seuss sounded more like Dr. Phil. (But I'd rather take advice from Dr. Seuss than from Dr. Phil)

n/a

Sorry but I think that's total nonsense.

I agree I was only posting Dr Suess's opinion form another post

I do agree and think there can be a lot of truth to that. To clarify in the beginning is the best way. To assure you and the host are on the same page of what you expect. If you like to chat and get to know her before but would eventually like much more than say that....then there is also no guessing what you want. :)

Because they are called by both names on this site and all other sites from what I have observed.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Their birthday suit.

Nothing

n/a

n/a

Not me. Love to see naked girls.

Tight jeans or short skirts/dresses :D

I love girls wearing sexy high heels!

n/a

n/a

then I want to be enrolled as a student :P viva la old school!

Are u sure? Did u see Full Metal Jacket? lol

n/a

bad. I don't like the idea of this being a site that promotes prostitution, and too often escort and prostitute are synonymous.

Prostitution is the act or practice of providing sexual services to another person in return for payment. People who execute such activities are called prostitutes ...... what does this site promote world peace ?

well lets just say, i have a very hard time in my own mind seeing webcamming as on a par with prostitution. And though the gray-lines will always be drawn with respect to what people think, I seriously doubt a charge of prostitution would hold up under a legal definition in a court of law regarding webcamming, especially as there is no actual intercourse, no one-on-one exchange of bodily fluids, etc. But who knows? I could be wrong. Just I doubt it.

n/a

well the way "hypocrite" so narrowly inteprets it, anything from buying a porn magazine to going to watch a striptease at the local strip-bar would be defined as prostitution.

prostitution isn't defined as sexual intercourse or exchanging body fluids .. if you were right why would arrests occur based upon transfer of money with the intent for sexual activity ... you are wrong JOHN !

n/a

dude, you got real issues. Why the anger? btw, my name's not John. It's Fred.

Dude you pay for it ..... John! Why is it guys like you can't admit you're ever wrong? Mr know it all's. Instead you want to name call, deflect, cover up you're own insecurities. I was just pointing out a fact by definition its prostitution no anger on my end ..... JOHN !

ROFLMAO! dude, you are the only one here name-calling, and the only one with obvious pent-up insecurities!

Out of the two of you I know which one of I think comes across as the most insecure.

Damn INYF. That is not helpful! do you know how insecure that makes me feel?

regardless of any name calling or getting annoyed in those posts, actually hypocrite's definition of prostitution, as far as the legal system is concerned, is correct as i understand it in the uk and usa and i heard from more than one host that webcamming for money in italy was illegal but if that's true i don't know.

I agree with hypocrite if hes wrong then why is studio webcamming illegal? studios operate only after paying police/officials graft in places like russia, ukraine etc

In different countries different things are illegal for some reason. Anyway get naked for a viewer in webcam not the same as have sex with someone in reality. And involved money here or not it doesn't matter.

Obviously they are not legal acts in those countries or they are collecting Tax but it is not illegal and is not prostitution in U.S. and many other countries. What is the difference of web caming and pictures of models in magazines....you're buying both to see her. Very twisted thinking to consider this prostitution.....if that was the case you could go to jail as well.....lmao!

Goodness gracious. I was not giving a "legal definition" I was giving a "for instance" So let me restate it: "I doubt under a legal definition that a charge of prostitution would hold up in a court of law regarding webcamming, since there is no actual physical contact (or even intent .. to make Hypocrite happy) between two persons." Does that satisfy the literalists here? Now, as for why webcamming studios each country has its own laws, but whether it is considered prostitution or not, who knows except the legislators? But one thing I am of the opinion of, once a site allows its hosts to establish pay-for-sex relationships off site by setting those connections up through the site, it is guilty of promoting prostitution.

Well said and agree with the exception if there is no sex involved in the date :))

My understanding is that, in the UK at least, that act of prostitution in itself is not illegal. If one girl works in a house alone selling sex she is entirely within the law. If two girls work from the house it then becomes a brothel which is illegal.

Having said that, you are probably right that, legally speaking, webcamming could be included under the definition of prostitution although I doubt there will ever be a prosecution.

But surely it is not the UK or USA's legal definition that matters but the definition in the country where the host resides.

group hug fuck me BB I'll pay ya !!

I will have to decline your kind offer as I do not wish to take advantage of the mentally challenged.

and I think it hilarious that you identify yourself as "hypocrite" LOL funny!

I think he sobered up today and doesn't even remember posting here..LOL!

n/a

I'm with you Roman. If that were the case then every Glamour Model and Page 3 girl would be up in court.

n/a

disrespectful ..oh well I copied paste the definition of prostitution from Webster dictionary. Why do I come here... ask JOHN in the topic below he advised a " I am cheap whore" to go wherever it makes her feel good. As a host you justify anything you wish here. Some hosts think "roleplaying" is ok when shes married to make believe shes not for the money others might call that stealing.

n/a

to fuck whores like you .... DUH!!

Calm down everyone! Let's get back to the original question. Who wants to bring back Escort?

bring back the Ford capri, yeaaaaaaa!

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

many host have 2 names. If u r a not so shy host, you could also have an Escort name. I would still pay the same to see u under either name. It would give you more business, not less.

while most girls here would still never consider it, you still have a population of women on this site who engage in what most cultures define as indecent behavior for money. and once you have some of them on that slippery slope, there will be a certain percentage of those who will agree to sex if the money is right. so, unless it's against the law, the site should have no problem with it.

Dean, thx for your answer. It is funny how my original post has gotten lost in a flurry of insults, mostly off topic!

n/a

well, you get a lot of hosts here who are really sensitive and if they don't like a post they start throwing a tantrum. are all girls here willing to have sex for money? no. but some will, and more will here than would from most any other group of women. anyway, Churchill was rumored to have once asked a woman if she would sleep with him for 5 million pounds. She agreed. Then he offered her 5 pounds to sleep with him. The woman replies, "Of course not, what kind of woman do you think I am?" To which Churchill replied, "We established already what kind of woman you are, madam, now we are just haggling over price"

In a way this IS a type of prostitution, in fact sometimes they are referred to as camwhores. Pay them money for a virtual show or sex act

n/a

A fat trucker springs to mind.

n/a

did i say something untrue? are all hosts available for prostitution? - no. is there a greater percentage of girls that are hosts that would consider it? - yes.

they should consider it! Most host here are more beautiful and sexy than most prostitutes. They could be top rate call girls making top dollar. And I would be fool enough to pay!

lol so would I.

I think your minds are drifting into fantasy land thinking that many girls would like to me here for in person sex for payment. Dream on!!

Every girl here can be bought. Just need to figure out that price. Marriage is the most expensive option. I have met a few fucked them all and left.

n/a

I'm always UP to meet more women from here so let me know if you want too.

my goal is too meet and fuck every girl on this site 64 so far. Who's next?

n/a

then why do you host in little shy? Expand! Go where it feels good! OMG, I sound like "viewer" LOL

Really? When i read that message in viwers forum i felt like slapping whoever wrote that:)

n/a

Some girl asked me to call her Slut, Whore, and Bitch. She got off on it.

n/a

Sadly, I think you are mistaken. I was Triksy's first ever 'visitor' and I can see the resemblance but I am sure its wishful thinking on your part! maybe she has a younger Sister! lol! Keep dreaming 'AvidFan' :-)

not her...looks nothing like her...even "slightly"

yes several long time friend-hosts shared the studios' instructions how to do the 'finger curl' to give an illusion of penetration.

Some girls do it better than others. They probably don't like the fact that some girls do it so poorly that the word got around.

My personal viewers point of view on faking.

Faking is bad, it is deception and it is disrespectful to a viewer. And disrespect breeds disrespect. I understand that a host of course is not a machine.

I have said this before on this forum, that we viewers should treat every host with more courtesy and respect. In my mind this is what sets CC apart from some other cam sites, CC seems friendlier to me, for hosts and viewers. Whether a host is in glam or instant, a host should not be expected (forced?) to do something they do not feel like doing at that moment. So if you expect something like that, then that is why faking goes on and I can understand that. I always, on entering private, chat first and then see where it goes. I always say to a host, no pressure, no faking, just do what you feel like doing.

For example, I recently checked out an instant action host. It is was clear to me that the girl did not feel like performing, so we chatted for ages, and it was cool. I would much rather that, than faking and theatricals, though these are my personal values. I've said this before on this forum, and have had responses such as, I should have reported the instant action host for not performing, which is against the CC rules. No, I disagree. If you don't like it, then go to another host.

So, I usually spend at least 30 minutes in private with my few favourites. They know my expectations (or lack of them) , and if they don't feel like playing, that is fine. Though most of the time, they do :)

Well I'm not really that into toys (although if they happen I don't complain :P) but if they are going to be used I would prefer it to be real rather than fake.

Having said that I would agree with you anon that, even if the host is using toys for real, if it is something she does not feel comfortable about I would rather that she not do it at all.

On the IA thing I certainly wouldn't have been as nice as you. I would have still asked for a show but, once I saw she was not in the mood, I would make my excuses and leave.

As for the members who say you should be complaining I'm not really sure what the complaint would be. As far as I'm aware, nudity in IA is only mandatory if the member wants it.

n/a

Very well said and great attitude!!

I rarely get to see fingers and toys in Friends and Family so not sure.

Nudity and fingering are required in IA, toys are not. But sheer competition forces many girls to take things to the next level. I'm not a big fan of toys either, but if a girl likes them, well fine.

To Anon, how you choose to spend your money is your business. But if your favorite host is not happy in IA she can move to Little Shy or even non adult. No one forced her to choose IA. She did that of her own free will.

Show me where it states, on this site (apart from in your post), that fingering in IA is required.

"By signing into this category the Chathost, if asked, commits to:

* EXPLICIT nudity.
To include:
o Close-ups
o Open Legs
* Masturbation by fingers.

If a viewer wants toys, or other specific action they must ask the Chathost first to ensure the Chathost is both willing and able to accommodate the request."

Well to me masturbation and fingering are not necessarily the same thing. Your blurb must be well hidden as I still cannot find it on this site.

I got in CC Mail from a friendly host

n/a

Ummm, I'm confused. This is a cam site, yes? Why would it not matter if I see her on cam? Isn't that the purpose of a cam site, to let me see her? I missed the point of your post.

I think if a host is not doing what she claims to be doing it is fraud. Faking is a lie. I don't want to see it, and I don't want to waste time explaining why I know it's fake.

Some girl try to fake and when I say I don't like fake they admit that they really don't want to do it. I say fine, let's try something else. Others insist that they are not faking when it's obvious that they are. In that case I have to find someone else.

Faking an orgasm is a little bit different, because it might not be possible for her to have a real one. Inserting fingers or a toy is something that she can do, and if she is being paid to do that, she should actually do it, or let me know she won't.

If I ask for fingering, she says ok, spends a few minutes getting into position and getting warmed up, then I call her on faking, she has just stolen money from me. If her price is $3.00 a minute, she might have just stolen $15 to $20 from me. It's not a felony, but it's wrong.

n/a

n/a

n/a

Hollywood fakes all the time - are you offended?

What?!?! All those steamy sex scenes in my R rated movies are not REAL? OMG, I PAY $9 TO $10 TO WATCH THOSE FLICKS! ROBBERY! SUE HOLLYWOOD! BOYCOTT MOVIE THEATERS! WRITE TO OBAMA.... I NEED MY STIMULUS (oh wait, that's a different kind of stimulus, scratch that one)

n/a

gosh... and i always believed that when pornactors in xxx movie are fucking, male actor put his dick in female actors pussy or ass and fuck her.... so u are saying that they really dont do that, they just fake? damn...
well thank god i can watch those movies for free...

looool...yes really they are fakin it...he is bending is part so it looks like it going in ...and some actors have the collapsable parts so it looks like it really happening....loooool

Welcome back :)

try google "saffron hustler" and you might find something intresting... i seen this camgirl riding Sybian with full speed in her ass... its damn hot

Thank you we have one of those machines in my exercise & fitness center and I never knew how to use that machine.

lol

i was wondering what that strange looking thing was in my gym. And why so many women stood in line to use it. And why it felt damn weird when I hopped on to it to try it. And I thought those screams and moans were because their muscles were aching so much. Damn!

Man-up, and use a Jalapeno FleshLight!

Spanish is spoken by many Americans in California and the South-western states, as well as in New York where there is a large Puerto Rican community. If Americans are your target audience, then I think Spanish is your best 2nd language. InEurope, my guess is French may be the most popular 2nd language.

Hey, pick the one YOU like most. German and spanish are easy, french a bit more difficult to study. My next language to learn will be italian-the most beautiful language in the world:)

n/a

Have u studied french? French grammar is much more difficult than in german. Plus the pronouncation that breaks ur tongue. As for german, yes easy, cuz it has almost the same structure as russian, i mean when it comes to the verbs (verbs forms are pain in the ass in every language, the rest stuff is easy), so for us its easy to understand.

french sucks.in english 3 tenses of a word,french i lose count

French, such a beautiful tongue :P

ebonics.....word to ya motha:p

learn sign language! :)))))

Spanish....the US will be more than 50% hispanic by 2050.....

And we will all be around then... 2050...LOL
What a sight...

n/a

Who cares? We live in Europe:)

yaaah yes..europe...the cradle of cry babies

Whereas you appear to be from a nation without an education system; or did you just go straight from birth to jerk?

I thought the US was originally colonized by the so called "cradle of cry babies" in the first place. But you either didn't know that or maybe you're a Tonto descendant instead. If that's the case, my apologies :)

lol, very funny. im speaking of how things are now, as in crying because you have to work longer now or pay more for higher education, but thats what happens to a society that thinks they are entitled.

n/a

German, Dutch, bad French, a few words of Russian and enough Spanish to order my cochinita pibil just the way I like it.

self-promotion???

n/a

n/a

No thanks. I'll pass

i had a great time in her vid. i see other people posting about hosts they like, so i did the same. yes this promotes her, but yes it is a viewer who is giving her a 5 star recommendation!

i have been wondering the same thing.after weeks,nay years of careful perusal,i'm happy to say i've worked it out.my conclusion is that it means 121 is 22c a minute more expensive than open. :--)

hahaha you didn't even get that right. It's actually 24 cent more expensive which is exactly 20% of 1.20 and the minimum increase for 121 :)

Ok, ok, just to make you happy I'll change it to $3.20 open and $4.44 for 121. Deal? Better?
Why members always complain?

Where is the complaint? He merely asked a simple question?

and host never complain? , just read host forum and you will see host r much worse then members.

The lowest (and default) increase for 121 is 20pct. If a host has an open rate of 1.20 and doesn't change anything her 121 price is automatically 1.44.

That works for me. Thanks dude

n/a

Those are your prices???

n/a

Tired of any discussion about prices!! Those are very low prices and I am sure you get what you pay for......not much.

Ok, so instead of snide remarks which are basically insulting to your fellow hosts who charge those sort of prices and whom you are thus denigrating; let us know your price and why you think you offer so much more than the others, such as to justify the difference?

n/a

I beg to differ, the best host I've ever seen on this site charges 1.20 for 121. Of course this is just my opinion.

one of the hottest shows I ever had was by a host charging .56 in open, and many others $1 or less. On contrary the host I visit charging $3 does very little. So I can't agree with your statement

n/a

n/a

it was writtten by a woman from New York. google her, Dorothy Parker, she was very funny

n/a

tks

Maybe what she meant was that they are too polite to ask for more than chat, and so they never go beyond chat, even if the host would like to do more.

"even if the host would like to do more" No host ever wants to do more than she needs to do in pvt.

n/a

Its human nature to only do what is required in a job and no more.

So you know Human Nature? I always do more than required in my job because I enjoy it. Many hosts seem to have the same attitude.

You are lucky you enjoy your job, most people do not. I agree there are hosts that enjoy their job but most that know English would prefer to sit and chat and take it easy. And I have asked many that question over the years

talking to yourself? LOL

Lol, no, but should have put member2

Maybe for lazy people but there is obviously many motivated hosts as there are people in the world. That was a statement without any fact .

Pity you are so jaded, and so full of stereotyped ideas of people.

And you're assuming that all hosts here speak intelligently and also for all hosts?? That's your first mistake!!!

I can sort of understand. Some hosts, while appreciating the polite members, really would just like a simple pervert to come excite them for a while. A nice guy talking about her day versus a guy who wants to help her get off. Sometimes its hard to win that. Nice guys really do get a bad hand a lot of times.. Not saying i'm one of them, but its true.

too polite,is like too nice.it takes a positive word & gives it negative connotations :--)

Just a thought -- maybe the reason some hosts have problems with guests who are TOO polite is because it can makes more work for them. Since this is a sex site, a host assumes a guest came here knowing what he wants. But if he's shy or TOO polite, then she has to drag things out of him. And I would imagine that could possibly become every bit as tiresome or mentally taxing as a guest who is TOO rude or aggressive, on the other end of the scale.

Just a guess on my part, but I think most hosts would prefer too polite to rude.

n/a

Like a robot? Holy shit I've lost of how many times I saw in host profile do not treat me like a dummy. I'm not a robot. I'm human. I hope all those hosts that write that can see this post

I'd agree most hosts don't like to be treated bad or like robots. But she's simply agreeing with Ape's point that guests who are too polite can make things hard for hosts by NOT knowing what they want. It's like working at McDonald's and you've got a customer. He could be a polite, but if it takes him forever to decide what to order, it eventually gets on your nerves. Didn't he know what he wanted when he came in?

just have patience--it works for me

n/a

Just be glad you never knew my 2nd wife...she took 7 years to have an orgasm while I was paying all the expenses... even more unfortunately, she had it with another guy. (((

n/a

n/a

obviously helps to find the hosts that are open to enjoying orgasms online

I never cum or fake an orgasm here but.........

If u think that ure the only member on here, or that there are no guys who will pay 3.00 per min or more to see a girll cumming-ure crazy.

Just go faster yourself :)

..... and allyoop .... good one :)

The host can get off on her own time. I'm only concerned with me getting off. I'm the one paying. And I've payed over $3 and got no more than talk in Glamour and Shy

With your delightful attitude that so surprises me....lol

n/a

I'm out of of ideas when it comes to women also. I'm waving the white flag.....I'll never understand them.

Just tell the host that you want the quickie fake orgasm that takes 5 minutes and see where that gets you :D

n/a

n/a

Thank you ...and Happy Thanksgiving to all the CC family

happy thanksgiving day roman holiday and all, today count your blessings in a special way and don't forget to pass it on.

yessa "Happy Thanksgiving Day" and made all your blessings be plenty and full of life. Enjoy this day the native american indians and pilgrims came together and share the love and to pass along to us at the present time and for us to pass it on to our future generations. Thanks and enjoy your day, come to think of it enjoy your weekend.

n/a

I worked and native Americans are not happy at a day the celebrates the theft out their nation.

What does "I worked" have to do with rest what you said?

And a correction, just to be nitpicky. It was not "their nation" Native Americans made up a multitude of "nations" but not a nation which was a political entity. However your point is clear, and good. Our ancestors did move in and take over the nation. As Israelites took over Canaan, as Huns swept across Europe, as Romans conquered Gaul, as Muslims took over the Middle East, Southern Europe, parts of Africa, as Brits extended their empire across India, Australia, parts of South America, East coast of North America, the Dutch in South Africa; and far too many others to mention. Peoples displacing peoples is history of the world.

I agree 100%

yeah nice and just to be clear: they were thanking God, and not the indians.

That's true they were thanking God while stealing the country from the Indians

They were not stealing. btw the indians gave VD to euro settlers who took it back to Europa

ahhh you rape my land, I rape your health. sounds like a fair trade to me :)

1. Of course the Native Americans stole the land from the earlier inhabitants when they - themselves immigrated to N. America.

2. Your ill informed about early USA History. (dont get your history from Katy Couric et al). You confuse later government actions with the pilgrims. The pilgrims settled on the land of a non-existant dead tribe.

"The Pilgrims later discovered that this area had been the territory of the Patuxets, a large, hostile tribe that had barbarously murdered every white man who had landed on their shores. However, four years before the arrival of the Pilgrims, a mysterious plague had broken out among them, and killed every one of them. The devastation had been so complete that neighboring tribes feared the area. The cleared land which the Pilgrims found therefore literally belonged to no one. Their nearest neighbors were the Wampanoags, fifty miles to the southwest. Their chief, Massasoit, had such wisdom that he ruled over several other small tribes in that area.

It happened that, just when they were needed, two English- speaking Indians, at separate times, came into contact with the Pilgrims. Samoset, a chief of the Algoniquins in Maine, had learned English from various fishing captains who had been exploring the coast of Maine. Squanto, another English-speaking Indian, had actually spent several years in Europe. A Patuxet, he found his way back to his native land only to find that his entire tribe had died of disease."

Happy Thanksgiving Pilgrim!

actually, thanksgiving did not become a holiday until lincoln proclaimed a national day of thanksgiving during the civil war, after which it disappeared until if memory serves me correctly, FDR reinstated it

WarChant is pretty much correct.

Thanksgiving Day had been celebrated irregularly, and sometimes not at all by various states since George Washington had called upon the nation to give Thanks for the happy conclusion of the Revolutionary War. Sarah Josepha Hale, author of the song "Mary Had a Little Lamb", trie for 36 years to get the government to make Thanksgiving Day a national holiday, but to no avail -- until Abraham Lincoln yielded to her request, and issued a Thanksgiving proclamation declaring the last Thursday in November 1863 to be a day for Thanksgiving and urging Americans to commend those widowed and orphaned by the Civil War to God and to pray for healing of the nation. It was celebrated unofficially on that day each year states until 1939, when Franklin Roosevelt moved the day up one week to spur retail Christmas sales and to boost the economy. Two years later, Congress signed into law that Thanksgiving would be a national holiday on the 4th Thursday of every November.

Today, Thanksgiving Day remembers the Pilgrims' harvest thanksgiving which they shared with the Wampanoag Indians, who had been instrumental in helping them to survive. But it also is a day to remember the religious and other freedoms which have been the foundation of our nation here in USA, and to remember the blessings of harvest and other provisions of God.

Actually Thanksgiving was a holiday long before Abe Lincoln was even born. As well, the Continental Congresses and early US Presidents called for days of Thanksgiving at various times when national events warranted it. The first Thanksgiving holiday in North America was in 1619:

Settlers held first Thanksgiving at Berkeley Plantation, Virgina on December 4, 1619, a year before the Pilgrims arrived at Plymouth.
Each first Sunday in November a Thanksgiving Festival is held at the Berkeley Plantation in accordance with documentation from 1619. The event fulfills instructions given to the 38 settlers who arrived on the banks of the James River at Berkeley as documented in the proclamation:

"Wee ordaine that the day of our ships arrival at the place assigned for plantacon in the land of Virginia shall be yearly and perpetually kept holy as a day of thanksgiving to Almighty God."


The "Pilgrims" first Thanksgiving Holiday was in 1620:


"In October 1620, when the 20 acres of corn the Pilgrims had planted under Squanto's tutelage had been harvested, they wanted to hold a celebration festival. They invited Massasoit and the Wampanoag, and of course Samoset and Squanto as well, to come and celebrate with them. Massasoit came a day early, with 90 braves, plus women and children. The Pilgrim women's hearts must have sunk, because they were going to have to use the corn stored up for the winter to feed this crowd of Indians. But Massasoit had thought of that, and had ordered some of his men to hunt for the occasion. They brought with them five deer strung up on poles, and wild turkeys. There were fish from the bay, berries and other fruits, roasted corn, and the Pilgrim women supplied vegetables from their gardens. The festival lasted three days, complete with bow and arrow shooting contests, foot races, and relay races. It was a good and peaceful time for whites and Indians together.

I suspect that many times during those festivities the Pilgrims stopped to thank the Lord for His miraculous provision of Squanto. Had it not been for him, there would have been no cause for celebration and thanksgiving. God had sent this American Indian, who spoke English fluently, ate English foods, understood English customs and ways, and knew about the Christian faith because of his time with the Spanish monks: the right man, in the right place, at the right time. Only God can do something like that. . .

That, my friends, is the true story of the first New England Thanksgiving; the real reason this holiday should be special in Americans' hearts!"

Pass the Cranberries!

I'm confused by the date quoted (October 1620) Surely you meant 1621, as the Pilgrims did not arrive in the "New World" until November 1620 at what is now Cape Cod, and it wasn't until December when they finally landed and settled at what would be called Plymouth Colony. With little rations, only a few buildings, the Pilgrims were ill-prepared to face that first winter. Starvation and disease claimed more than half (55 out of 102 died), with only 6 well enough to care for the rest. The next Spring and Summer a crop was planted, more houses built, and in October of 1621 the harvest was celebrated. After that time, there was no consistent or official "Thanksgiving" until Washington's Proclamation in 1789, and then still, it was not an annual, official, national holiday until Lincoln in 1863. After Lincoln, the date was assumed until an Act of Congress in 1941 made it the 4th Thursday of November

thank you guys. interesting stuff

Happy Thanksgiving to all! I hope everyone had a great holiday and whether you're American or not -- since this is also the official start of the Christmas rush -- here's wishing everyone around the world a joyous season.

And now that Thanksgiving is over, I imagine many people are out shopping and fighting the crowds to take advantage of "Black Friday" sales. Hope you have a black belt in karate because some of these shoppers are crazy!

I had a great thanksgiving day.
But unfortunately, on Black Friday, my finances went red

convert!

Ok, but lets help South Korea :-P

n/a

North Korea bombarded South Korea

n/a

LOL does North Korea need reasons to do anything they do? I don't know if they have specific reasons, or feel S Korea has done anything, but Pyongyang has demonstrated complete disregard for things in the past, and been quite uncooperative in working with world leaders

n/a

wayne,, excuse me, I didn't understand fact number 2, can you tell more, by the way have a great day and if your ever in the state, come over and I will show you something you wouldn' t ever thought could happen.

why blah blah blah?

actually south korea held their annual military exercises. north korea going through a succession used it as an excuse to pump up the next Kim as a 4 star general with no military experience.

n/a

Gabi, come stay with me next August and I take you to S Korean fair in my town :)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Excuse me? I don't want USA involved between South Korea and North Korea because USA already in war with 2 countries by right now.. USA citizen told to government 'ENOUGH ENOUGH ENOUGH" Because We cant afford to pay more tax and lose more soliders for wars! Enough!!

I doubt any good USA man or woman wants that, but the sad reality is, if South Korea and North Korea go to war, it may very well include those who are allies of each side, whether we want it or not. Such is the unfortunate way of the world.

"LOL does North Korea need reasons to do anything they do? I don't know if they have specific reasons, or feel S Korea has done anything, but Pyongyang has demonstrated complete disregard for things in the past, and been quite uncooperative in working with world leaders"

LOL Now replace:
North Korea with USA
South Korea with Iraq
Pyongyang with Bush
and this could be a story we've already been told

When did Bush become a city?

i have a problem with people who whine about saddam hussein being taken out. i've wondered since the late 80's how ur civilized world coupd allow that murderous butcher to exist.
as far as i'm concerned, if they had told me he put his left shoe on before his right shoe, would have been reason enough

sorry war,but i have a problem with saddam(if you write his name backwards its maddas,lol)being taken out.i asked him out years ago & he told me he was virgin....virgin' on takin over the world if he could just get some wmd :--)

tis?
HUH?))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) you need serious help:P

you must be right war,because i replied to this post below....to myself :--)

n/a

From an innocuous little bit of fun to World War 3 ..... quite a thread!

i know 5 facts about you too :--)

war,we're both singing from the same hymn book :--)

n/a

n/a

Thank you my dear. For all my "pissing & moaning", I have much to be thankful for this year.

Prostate???

Oh God, is that what it is?

I could see it coming but I still laughed. LOL

Haha, I like that :)